That is such bullshit!

As switches, both of these electronic components can block voltage or conduct current. The difference is only in the type of charge carriers that they use.
Just because vacuum tubes are generally rated for higher blocking voltage and semiconductors are rated for higher conduction currents does not mean that one "works" with voltage and the other with current.

Stop worshiping high voltage and Tesla!
The whole world switched to semiconductors because the have smaller conduction resistance (among other benefits) needed for most applications - this is not a conspiracy.

 For someone with very little idea whats the difference between a transistor and tube you are the one worshipping something.
 
 There is a very big difference between a vacuum tube and silicon. Yes they both switch but it is the method of swtching that is the key. One involves matter (silicon) and the other involves vacuum in a space enveloped by glass. Although both results are simular they are vastly different in how they get to that result.
 
 In my years in working with the Citizen Band radio this fact was true: Tubes equalled a better radio. It had better sound and fidelity. When silicon started to pervade the CB world it lost it's fidelity. The low end was missing.
 
 Anyways if giving credit to someone who started all of our electronics world is hero worship then so be it. Tesla is the father of AC and a lot more, get used to it. Ignoring someone who won so many accolades in his life is like ignoring the professor in school.
 
 So this is what I'm gonna do Wasabi, Your ignored from now on. Go blow smoke up someone elses thread. There is a clear difference between tubes and silicon in the way they get to the same end. One uses current to control the current flow (silicon) and one uses voltage to control the current (tubes). Lets look at what they are saying now about tubes: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/05/24/nanoscale-vacuum-transistors-way-cool-but-still-not-as-pretty-as-a-glowing-12au6/
 
 In particular read this excerpt:
 "But transistors weren’t better in all respects. Electrons move more slowly in a solid than in a vacuum, which means transistors are generally slower than vacuum tubes; as a result, computing isn’t as quick as it could be. What’s more, semiconductors are susceptible to strong radiation, which can disrupt the atomic structure of the silicon such that the charges no longer move properly. That’s a big problem for the military and NASA, which need their technology to work in radiation-harsh environments such as outer space."
 
 in another resource it says this:

 "The vacuum tube is a voltage-controlled device, which means that the relationship between the input and output circuits is determined by a transconductance function. The solid-state device most closely analogous to the vacuum tube is the JFET, although the vacuum tube typically operates at far higher voltage (and power) levels than the JFET."


 So why don't you stop worshiping your hero the transistor and start learning whats the real truth.

How would you use this in your Kapanadze type setup and what do you find interesting about the two caps on the table?

Because of this:

One involves matter (silicon) and the other involves vacuum in a space enveloped by glass.

That's why I wrote "The difference is only in the type of charge carriers that they use."  Read more carefully next time.
BTW: Vacuum is not the charge carrier in tubes - free electrons are.

P.S.
It is not my purpose to repair your loose mind. My purpose is to protect others from the misleading information that you sow.

  Guys:
   Thank you for the information concerning the diagram and videos available.
I have seen them in the past when they first were shown, but this does save me some time to located the essential ones, again.
   I have mentioned that I do not have a signal generator, or analyzer, that are mentioned as being needed to tune the input resonant frequency.
 I understand the tuning method, but will have to develop my own system to do that. Not easy, I know...
   I have mentioned that in my opinion, it is important to be able to not be dependent on the use or input solely from these instruments in the future, as they will not work in a power outage situation. Although they may just be needed at first to find the sweet spots.
   Although by trial and error, the actual resonance frequency will not be exact, on some replications, or even close, but it may also be possible to reach a useable output, and effect generation, never the less. This will only be known by trial and error.
  I have two of those crt ferrite yokes, or very similar in appearance to experiment on. So after further studying all the info given, I will began to work on this, in the best way that I can, with what I have and can find on hand.
 I have been working in the dark before, and am getting to know my way around.
  Thanks again, to all of you that have come forth with the needed info.
Much appreciated.

        NickZ

I understand the tuning method,...

You do?!
I have been trying to clean up the tuning instructions for years, but none of the inventors ever bothered to respond to this attempt,
...even regarding the red points.  See here.

Any idea why this direct link gives me a 404 error: http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/aidas/

Apparently this whole subject has been deleted after Wesley's trip to Lithuania.  I do not know why.
I noticed that other subjects are still there till today.

That's why I wrote "The difference is only in the type of charge carriers that they use."  Read more carefully next time.
BTW: Vacuum is not the charge carrier in tubes - free electrons are.

P.S.
It is not my purpose to repair your loose mind. My purpose is to protect others from the misleading information that you sow.

 Your purpose is to decieve. You sound like someone I know that posts here under another name. Let me ask the owner to do an ip check. I am guessing you are Verpies. Well see if I am right.
 
 I am not misleading anyone I am experimenting and reporting my findings. I am colaborating with my fellows. So you only purpose is to harass me? That a clear violation of the forum rules.. Wow and you admitted it nice.
 
 The differences between silicon and vacuum are not just the carriers. That is a misleading statement and bending of the truth. Tubes have a great many differences from silicon and to just clue you in they are making a comeback. Sorry.

"Your purpose is to decieve. You sound like someone I know that posts here under another name. Let me ask the owner to do an ip check. I am guessing you are Verpies. Well see if I am right."

Are you willing to apologize publicly if you wrong of this accusation?! I'm pretty sure Verpies is MUCH above this sort of thing..

LITHUANIA EXPERIMENT saved links:
IN =   2 х 10V / 0.25A
OUT = >1 KV  without load
OUT  = + LAMP 150W / 220V

Video:
http://www.modvid.com/uploads/workingouwakeup.wearethepeoplesaveitnowyoutube1.flv

Info on energeticforum:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9673-wesley-stivep1-video-high-voltage-frequency-ou.html

Green Matri-x forum:
http://www.matri-x.ru/forum/index.php?/topic/1084-%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%BC-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C/page__st__460__p__106220&#entry106220

You can do it verpies for yourself and many people here. I know you can do it.

Question is: Do you want ??