Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 14929051 times)

Offline itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1841
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12090 on: June 20, 2012, 09:09:54 PM »
T-1000,

Quote
Ok,one time to see is much better than 100 times to hear:

P.S. It is my b'day today...


Thanks, i agree, 1 picture tells more then.....  well you know.


Happy Birthday,         ;D

Regards Itsu

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12091 on: June 20, 2012, 09:17:03 PM »
@t1000


 Thats some interesting results. But I have to ask why the two frequencies? Has anyone reproduced the Kapandze device as being what you see instead of just supposition? It's very clear what he was doing even though the video is crappy. I am re-examining the video as we speak and should have a better understanding of the process.

 The use of ferrite of iron is counter productive in this instance. However there are many instances why you would want to use it, especially if you wanted to separate the magnetic field from the electric. But in the case of the version of Kapanadze there is no loop for the magnetic field to stay inside of the core. In my honest opinion this is the only way to get rid of the magnetic field since ferrite or iron tends to soak up the magnetic field and compresses the field inside of the core. It has to be a loop to separate the field completely and I thought it was the reason stivep settled on the yoke.

 Very interesting that at the end of the Dollard video he shows how the filed looks around the solenoid coil. Sound familiar?

Offline T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12092 on: June 20, 2012, 09:35:39 PM »
@t1000


 Thats some interesting results. But I have to ask why the two frequencies? Has anyone reproduced the Kapandze device as being what you see instead of just supposition? It's very clear what he was doing even though the video is crappy. I am re-examining the video as we speak and should have a better understanding of the process.

For NMR conditions you need to have 2 oscilating magnetic fields on 90 degrees to each other. Please look carefuly what happens to selenoid transformer when oscilating curent transformer field from spark gap is presented over 90 degrees to windings... :)

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12093 on: June 20, 2012, 10:07:59 PM »
For NMR conditions you need to have 2 oscilating magnetic fields on 90 degrees to each other. Please look carefuly what happens to selenoid transformer when oscilating curent transformer field from spark gap is presented over 90 degrees to windings... :)


 Ok but didn't you find out that NMR is destructive to the core via unequal polarization? It tends to polarize all cores and ruins the results eventually. This is why I suspect that Kapanadze used brass sleeve as the core. It would reflect the electric field back out while maintaining the magnetic field of the "C". Isn't brass used in electrostatics?


 As I could see the center tube was brass like in the Kapanadze device with non conductive epoxy to affix it to the steel frame. The magnetic field in this case was around the device as a "C". This would draw the field around the whole device. As you could see the epoxy failed on one end of the brass tube and that caused a failure of the "OO" field he was trying to make. I doubt this made it stop in fact it probably made it work better. I'm still working on the coils but one coil I'm sure of now. It is what me and Itsu are testing. 1 wire excitation of the coils to enhance the field for magnetic strengthening.

 @Itsu could you try brass in the center of the Katcher coil instead of the copper tube?

Offline yfree

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12094 on: June 20, 2012, 10:44:09 PM »
All the proposed approaches of Tesla, discussed here, are the ones that have been published. These technologies have nothing to do with alternative energy production. They were revolutionary then. They are now considered standard and some of them are even obsolete. The published Tesla technologies are, or were, intended for electrical energy generation (various dynamos), transformation, conversion or transmission and reception. They do not release or provide additional energy as understood here. This was shown over and over on this forum and other forums as well. This does not mean that these technologies cannot be used as helping tools in the construction of devices that do release additional energy. Tesla technologies that were used in these (additional energy releasing) devices, namely the magnifying transmitter and the Pierce Arrow power unit, are not in the public domain. Only a few managed to come across these technologies: Hubbard (who visited Tesla), Michel Meyer, Steven Mark, Floyd Sweet, Tariel Kapanadze, SR193, Magnacoaster and  W. McFreey. These inventors use this unpublished Tesla technology.
Happy birthday, T-1000.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2012, 11:47:55 PM by yfree »

Offline energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12095 on: June 20, 2012, 10:50:51 PM »
today i just did a quick play and i didnt know that we can draw sparks from a plastic tube some 1 cm away from the inner coil.   the spark that i can draw from the plastic tube can strecth out 2mm , plastic tube is 3mm thick
the purple wire is just a wire hanging in my hands
pretty interresting..
can there be relation why kapanadze did not use enameled wire but pvc plastic coated.. hmm

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12096 on: June 20, 2012, 11:38:21 PM »
@Stivep


I like your theorizing. it may help anyone and get inspired, but at the same time many will not understand and just dismiss, Because they need allready tried out practical proof.
Man i would love to see experiments performed by you,  because you are a great experimenter.
a wonderfull mind.

 if you would take videos of your experiments it would be so great.
i think we would be much closer to Teslas secret
Thanks for all your sharings.

Peace


@T1000  HAPPPY BIIIIRTHDAY! LIVE +100 YEARS :)


Soon my friend soon I think.
I got some breakdown 5 days ago.
or should I  call it brake-up
That was positive event ....... the importance of LW rise to top of my priorities.



I spoke with TK many times  for the last 7 days..
Although he is reluctant to cooperate
I got some hints.


I urge you to concentrate on longitudinal waves
Analyze carefully Eric Dollard work.
Recently I was in contact with many Big Names.
Eric is the only person on planet earth who knows how to deal with LW.




Some of statements you will go across ,very controversial:
LW goes  across the earth without the losses
LW does not have wavelength ( well.. it does but somehow differentiated explanation of it)
LW can have  different speeds
LW can go faster than light.
LW does not use electricity till is associated with load.
LW  the energy send = energy returned  if there is no load.




Yes it is enough for traditional scientist to put  that all into denial.


Anyhow this is my input to this forum
I hope I will stimulate all of you  in  any possible way including my experiments


Happy long life  Arunas


Wesley


 

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12097 on: June 21, 2012, 01:20:39 AM »
I spoke with TK many times  for the last 7 days..
Although he is reluctant to cooperate
I got some hints.
Yes, I could use a little hint: Why are there two patents from Tariel Kapanadze on record?

First one is:

INDEPENDENT ENERGY DEVICE

Inventors: KAPANADZE, Tariel (Tzkaltubo Sokak, No:9, Tbilisi, GE)
Application Number: TR2007/000050
Publication Date: August 28, 2008
Filing Date: June 08, 2007

http://www.sumobrain.com/patents/WO2008103129.html

Second one is:

ENERGY TRANSFORMER

Inventors: KAPANADZE, Tariel (Tzkaltubo Sokak, No:9, Tbilisi, GE)
Application Number: TR2007/000062
Publication Date: August 28, 2008
Filing Date: July 03, 2007

http://www.sumobrain.com/patents/WO2008103130.html

What is the significance of this?


Regards

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12098 on: June 21, 2012, 02:51:10 AM »
 I'm not sure about those patents. I call into question the validity of the documents. If you read the first document it clearly spells description right but on the second patent in the pdf it says clearly desacription. Now I don't know about you but it looks like they are forgeries to confuse us.

 I'm sorry but it is clear that Mr. Kapanadze was using two separate grounds per the 2004 video, the water pipes and the buried radiator. And what is in the second patent is not what he shows in the video! Clearly there are 3 coils and not two.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12099 on: June 21, 2012, 03:21:08 AM »
Yes, I could use a little hint: Why are there two patents from Tariel Kapanadze on record?

First one is:

INDEPENDENT ENERGY DEVICE

Inventors: KAPANADZE, Tariel (Tzkaltubo Sokak, No:9, Tbilisi, GE)
Application Number: TR2007/000050
Publication Date: August 28, 2008
Filing Date: June 08, 2007

http://www.sumobrain.com/patents/WO2008103129.html

Second one is:

ENERGY TRANSFORMER

Inventors: KAPANADZE, Tariel (Tzkaltubo Sokak, No:9, Tbilisi, GE)
Application Number: TR2007/000062
Publication Date: August 28, 2008
Filing Date: July 03, 2007

http://www.sumobrain.com/patents/WO2008103130.html

What is the significance of this?


Regards


Look at  date  of filing:
This one is June 08, 2007
Quote
10- An independent energy device of Claim 1 wherein characterized to include the second bobbin (10) to generate electric energy combining the electro magnetic field received from the first bobbin (6) and the independent energy received from the air, after the frequency stabilizer (adjuster) (9) orders the electro magnetic field between the bobbins
This one describes  device receiving energy  from  surrounding field or to be more  specific from unknown  or  undescribed. source of energy


Longitudinal Wave of Tesla :)

If this happened to be true than it is much more than  previously  expected from  TK device even if for some of you it looks opposite . :) 
JOHN HUTCHISON  EXPERIMENTS  OTHER THAN TRANSMUTATION ARE INCLUDED HERE. :)


I'm just afraid to lose credibility by  going to specifics.As it sounds  nonscientific.

You should listen to T-1000 explanation of Hutchison experiment.





Look at  date  of filing:
This one is July 03, 2007


Quote
The economical energy transformer improved with this invention has to receive energy from a power supply constantly. This mentioned energy can be easily generated from a small accumulator or chargeable battery or an inverter or a network or any similar power supply. The economical energy transformer improved with this invention increasingly emits the energy that is received constantly.



What is happening here is that Turk is the guy who is assigned to the patent with 50% of profit from future manufacturing.
and device is in the group of perpetual motion machines.
No chance for patent


The second one  says  that power comes from battery.,
TK showed me flashed in front of my eyes Turkish one that  he says does not require drawings.
He said that this is a patent.


In reality there  is no patents of TK that I know of . All are just patent applications.




It  for me looks like after filing first one  there was attempt to file something that is patent able at least somehow in any possible way.
but:
The economical energy transformer improved with this invention increasingly emits the energy that is received constantly.
 
This was to much.
they  try to snick in  this wording OU. so even if they say it is different device it would be actually the same.
That is why there was no patent.


Eventually TMZ sized its operation, and TK went home.
Push of TK  for  hydroelectric device was nothing more like  electric device that had additional module just to be able to hide details of electric device in  big  body , as public  becomes more educated.
Eventually trying to patent this approach  taking to consideration past mistakes.

 





Wesley


PS:
Although I  officially stay that I'm friend of TK you need to understand something.
I DO NOT GIVE DAMN ABOUT ANYONE OF YOU INCLUDING TK IF AND ONLY IF FOR SOME REASON IT APPEARS THAT  THIS  SOMEONE IS PIECE  OF S...T


I'M NOT FOR SALE AND I WILL NOT LICK ANYBODY SHOES.





« Last Edit: June 21, 2012, 05:57:11 AM by stivep »

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12100 on: June 21, 2012, 03:51:41 AM »
 Well Wesley,


 Try checking the international patent search documents. I can not find one reference to anything put in there. And since when does Scientific American produce patents, yet they are mentioned in there. Also there is mention to Bedini as well from a conference. WTF those are not patents but merely documents of which I can't find a thing about.

 Don't get me wrong This isn't something that TK did I don't think. It just doesn't add up to whats on the videos.

Offline 27Bubba

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12101 on: June 21, 2012, 03:53:53 AM »
Happy B-day T-1000 ;)

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12102 on: June 21, 2012, 04:10:20 AM »
Quote
independent energy received from the air
I see! Hence it is receiving independent energy I want, I will stick with the first patent.

BTW: The drawing of the circuits in these patents is not international standard for electronics. Has anyone ever noticed that? >:(


Regards

Offline sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12103 on: June 21, 2012, 04:52:25 AM »
  Lots of secondaries only one primary. 
http://www.kerryr.net/pioneers/gallery/ns_tesla11.htm

Offline sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12104 on: June 21, 2012, 03:05:40 PM »
   Molecular motion is heat.  Heat is randomized collisions between molecules.   When this randomized motion is lost due to plasma formation a vacuum is created as the air molecules boil into the plasma.  This draws in more molecules whose heat energy is converted to electrical energy in the circuits.  A thunderclap is not produced because of expanding gas due to atmospheric heating.  The plasma current runs cool real cool like superconductive cool.  Why would it heat anything.  It does however act as a speaker rarifying the atmosphere.  When the plasma collapses.  Bang.  Molecules inbound meet molecules being formed from the plasma condensing back into hot gasses.  Get one of those infrared thermometer devices and shield your spark gap so the uv doesn't drive it crazy.  Then aim it at the gas a couple of inches away from gap.