Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 14362793 times)

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12045 on: June 17, 2012, 12:52:50 AM »
There is no mixing of frequencies.
Most important thing is to generate sharp pulses (triggered) the pulse from Tesla coil need to be sharp "This may be good example: electric gas igniter"! This is the only source who generate impulses. this is the only generator there! No mixing and no modulations.
Let's assume for a moment this is the truth. Then that means Kapanadze uses all two (visible) transistors for the creation of high voltage with high frequency. Furthermore the »49 and« reading of the frequency meter must show the frequency created by the inverter itself (the light blue box). But because of that the question arises, what causes the observed switch off delay? Permittivity of space itself perhaps?

Regards

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12046 on: June 17, 2012, 07:39:52 AM »
Let's assume for a moment this is the truth. Then that means Kapanadze uses all two (visible) transistors for the creation of high voltage with high frequency. Furthermore the »49 and« reading of the frequency meter must show the frequency created by the inverter itself (the light blue box). But because of that the question arises, what causes the observed switch off delay? Permittivity of space itself perhaps?

Regards

Good question. It is the same effect as observed with motors. I can't remember now how it is called but the subsequent starts of motor require much less energy input then with "cold one", pressuming that between each running periods did not pass more then a few minutes (or seconds?, sorry can't recall exactly). Surely something is spinning along the big motor. Some scientists try to explain it with remnant magnetic field in armature.
For me it is clear that's the same effect like big bell still producing sound a minute after being hit but hammer.

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12047 on: June 17, 2012, 02:57:10 PM »
 I think you guys are getting there. I made this connection a long time ago. I noticed this event happen more and more and couldn't figure out what was going on. It seemed that there was an inertia built up in a kind of super flow within the device. This super flow could take up to 1 day to loose a good portion of the inertia provided by the powering of the device.
 Now that I have researched ground loops it seems to me to be the mechanism that powers OU like devices. By including different portions of environment and device it allowed for a better interface to the super flow we were creating. Bedini did this with his energizing energy. Once the energy backflowed into the battery it opens up the resistive component and a super flow gets created from this energy. This was why you would see the batteries charging for hours after being exposed to this form energy. It biased the natural values of the metals and made resistance futile or non existent.


 In my real opinion I think it biases the standing voltage of every atom in the device. This expands the distance in between every atom by an amount and in effect lowering the resistance. Also the type of energy this was didn't respond like normal resistances do. Since there was little current there was nothing to impede the flow of this energy and hence the super loops form and spin away for hours. Since this energy has little current it does not have the same effects on resistances. No conversion of energy to heat in fact it might suck in heat to fill in the vacuum that is being made by the nil current voltage loops. So you couldn't detect it flowing in the loop unless you disconnected that loop. The PMH is such a loop. If you look at the PMH you will understand how a charge of the system coils recycle a bidirectional transfer to a unidirectional super flow in the PMH.
 The PMH uses the bifilar polar wind to operate and is partly based on Tesla designs. The transformer that Tesla patented could be made with a bifilar polar wind and thats what Ed used except that he shorted the drive coils and energized them when needed in a half version of Tesla transformer. It was an experiment that told Ed much about super flows and how powerful they can become.


 You could think of it as a fly wheel that stored the energy in the inertia of the super loop. Tapping it at the right time will add more inertia to the loops which could take days to run it's course. And Tesla learned that in the right conditions you could excite the loops into runaway mode and harvest as much of the energy of the excited loop as you wanted. ! tap in this case would last minutes with the right harvesting and seconds if you harvested most of the excitation but left the super loop at it's base level.


 So what we need to do is create a loop, excite the loop into runaway and then collect the additional inertia for our own use without depleting the base loops inertia.


 I am thinking the loops can be created in anything that conducts and most electronics try to defeat that loops power by supplying more energy (waste) to control that loop. Which by all accounts in our literature they want to avoid. They say they are harmless but I have my doubts since they talk about 1000's of amps flowing in these loops. There must be a way to harness these loops. One way is through mid field induction and another is to create the same flow in a pair of coils (bifilar) to the grounds. This will cause a inductive loop and if we then wrap another coil over that inductive loop you get a small current flow. Now energize that inductive loop and it will super flow causing a great amount of current to pass between the coils of the grounds and the overlapped coil around it.


 What the field does is provide complete conduction paths through metals that bypasses resistance and allows the current loop to super flow, even across inductive areas.

 Ok I found the 2004 video and boy you can hear the ground loop at the end.. The 60 hz humm is obvious when he initiates the ground loop. He then lets it ramp up then disconnects the second ground from the table plug outlet to the inverter.

 This video shows the device quite clear and all the components involved: The metal can is just a switch to turn the load on but it has to be shielded or you will get zapped. There is also a step down transformer and diode bridge to turn it into usable dc for looping back to the battery.

 It seems to me that I was partially right but you need to look at all the components. Battery/inverter 2 separate grounds(from outside to table ground), the unit itself, then an additional transformer/bridge for battery looping from the output.

 When I see the device this time after viewing the video I must change my mind yet again about the operatrion. The inverter is connected to the ground and through the device coils to the switch back into the device to the load coil then out to one side of the output. The other side is from the ground to the other output. The inverter hot wire is connected to the spark gap and into a not terminated coil or exciter.

 I am gonna watch this till I get it right.

 http://www.magistrala.cz/freeenergy/2012/02/17/kapanadze-28th-april-2004-full-version-free-energy-device/
« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 05:04:28 PM by jbignes5 »

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12048 on: June 17, 2012, 03:15:49 PM »
Today I'm trying to think profoundly simple:

Could it be that the TMZ setup in the yellow tent is made with coils out of quadfilar wire? If so, then the two coils in the obscure patent specifications (which are looking suspiciously bifilar) are combined to one quadfilar coil.

Question: Why is there obviously no exciter coil drawn on the patent? The exciter coil in the tent setup could be hidden in the base of each of the three coils - or it could be not. Next question: What happens when high voltage pulses are being applied not to an external exciter coil but to one wire of the quadfilar coil itself (if strength of insulation allows)?

Thus obtain a lot of quadfilar cable, wrap it around an old cardboard tube, connect it the right way to high and low voltage, receive free energy en masse.  :D


Regards

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3111
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12049 on: June 17, 2012, 03:59:55 PM »



Wesley's original question:


Quote
How you want to deal with  impedance matching?
1. caduceus with spark?
2. yoke without spark2a. yoke with spark?
3. inductive load of coil circuitry of TK projects?






Verpies response:
The way I do it for VCVS amp is to use predistortion with AWG and low output impedance transistors in Half-bridge push-pull configuration for the output driver operating in the G, H, B or AB class - the predistortion cancels all of the non-linearities of the transistors and the cross-over distortion of the half-bridge.

I keep the source resistance as close to zero according to the Maximum Power Transfer Theorem.

The above allows me to drive large HF currents with good linearity of of the VCVS amplifier so constructed.  The limit of the output voltage is 1200Vp-p, but that's much higher than the voltage in industrial power lines, anyway.  If I need higher voltages, I use a RF step-up transformer and/or LC resonant rise. For higher current I use step-down transformers as well (e.g. for the 1turn winding in the Yoke device) 

Of course any use of the transformer precludes DC components in the output signal. If  DC component is needed above 1200V, the solution is a DC power source in series with the output of such amplifier.

It's difficult for me to answer the rest of your questions because I do not understand the input requirements of the devices descriped in pt.1 and pt.3.  Why is HV needed at their input anyway? 
I haven't studied these devices in detail because I find them unremarkable just like resonant transformers.


Wesley's response:

Please post  practical schematic and/or build practical device and test it.
I will give it to analysis to scientific team.
Task to achieve:
1.  able to produce 10 000V sine wave with linear wavelength at chosen by you frequency range but not lower than 20khz  up to 2 MHz when load is spark gap and 100W light bulb


1a.able to produce 10 000V sine wave with linear wavelength at chosen by you frequency range but not lower than 20khz  up to 2 MHz when load is park gap and capacitor made out of two coils  when 100W light bulb is connected to second one (Air coupling.)

If power of 100W is not achievable than  please  state the max available power of the circuit.I might be able to challenge you with 1KW output and more no only 100W :) :) :)
Ohhhhhh... how m' I going to do that............ hmmmmmmmmmmmm :) :) :) 


problems to solve:
a.changing impedance due to spark properties
b.changing impedance due to spark properties and Capacitive Reactance of capacitive character of coil capacitor(made of 2 flat wire coils diameter  10cm W x 150cm L)
c. in  a and b scenario BEMF or VSWR impact must be taken to consideration
IF YOU CANNOT DO IT than  I CAN DO IT period!!!
So let's see what you can do .

Question :
2. How you build transformer based on ferrite core that will give you  no distortion and close to  100%  linearity in  shape wave   versus out shape wave. in the region of mentioned frequency range 20khz to 2MHz
If it is to hard for you than please just  give the highest upper frequency RANGE OF SUCH TRANSFORMER YOU ARE ABLE TO PRODUCE. I will match it with my design or admit that I'm not able to do so :) :) :)

again

IF YOU CANNOT DO IT than  I CAN DO IT period!!!
So let's see what you can do .
And yet deliver all of mathematical  calculation formulas  for anyone to be able to design transformer of his choice based on it.( in given frequency range)
 
Lets than see what you can do first.


Wesley




PS: yet I might be able to prove you that such one works in practical measurement prove at no doubt
I would love  you to be able to  prove me yours the same way.
for all others not really familiar with subject  I explain.
At primary of transformer made out of ferrite core we are giving say 400kHz square and we have 400kHz square no distortion at output or insignificant minor distortion if any.
Than we go to 20kHz and we repeat  it as well, so is other frequencies of chosen bandwidth.


The same test will be done  with
ramp
Triangle
sine
or any custom  design wave shape including unlimited length of burst  made of different custom made modules of any shape imaginable.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 05:12:06 PM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3111
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12050 on: June 17, 2012, 05:59:55 PM »
Today I'm trying to think profoundly simple:

Could it be that the TMZ setup in the yellow tent is made with coils out of quadfilar wire? If so, then the two coils in the obscure patent specifications (which are looking suspiciously bifilar) are combined to one quadfilar coil.

Question: Why is there obviously no exciter coil drawn on the patent? The exciter coil in the tent setup could be hidden in the base of each of the three coils - or it could be not. Next question: What happens when high voltage pulses are being applied not to an external exciter coil but to one wire of the quadfilar coil itself (if strength of insulation allows)?

Thus obtain a lot of quadfilar cable, wrap it around an old cardboard tube, connect it the right way to high and low voltage, receive free energy en masse.  :D


Regards


Thank you  very interesting


Wesley

Offline FreeEnergyInfo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
    • FreeEnergyLT
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12051 on: June 17, 2012, 06:32:01 PM »

Offline sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12052 on: June 17, 2012, 07:33:18 PM »
 
  If you go back to TK's first video and watch it you see that he is definitely working with Tesla's magnifying transmitter.  What you can do with a Tesla transformer is create storage of energy.  We know that mass is the equivalent of energy.  As you store more and more energy in the oscillations within the Tesla transformer you are transforming energy into mass increase of the oscillator.  Watch out how far you go in increasing the mass of the oscillator.  e=mc2 and the rate is determined by delta v/deltat.  You shorten up that t parameter you got trouble.  Enough said.  So what did tk do with the high voltage monopole produced by a Tesla coil?

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12053 on: June 17, 2012, 11:04:37 PM »
@all

I have tried to make this circuit work for I don't know how long now, without any luck at all. Damn thing just does not want to pulse. So I have had it with circuits, making circuits, and blowing components. I have to concede that I will never be able to pulse things the way I really want to because the circuits are not available and making them myself is just not in the cards.

Now if this is happening to me then it should be happening to at least 1000 other guys just like me around the world. My forté is in the water treatment field but my main forté is business. My business side says if I had the proper skills, and if I wanted to help the OU effort in anyway I could, I would open up a small business called OUCircuits dot com and sell premade circuits of all kinds to OUers around the world, always being paid by Paypal.

I can build coils, buy components, establish and do experiments of all kinds, but the circuit part is definitely not for me.

So, if there is a smart ass out there that has access to components and that can build circuits and would like to make and sell them to me and to 1000s of others, I am more then sure it would be worth the time and effort.

Also, just imagine if such a circuit service was possible, HOW MANY GUYS WOULD BE USING THE SAME CIRCUIT FOR QUICK REPLICATIONS. This would push the OU research further and faster and wider then now possible with everyone always making their own circuits in so many different ways and then wondering  why the hell people cannot replicate this or that effect. Imagine if the Lithuanians were using the same circuit you and I would use.

Anyways, I think I made my point.

Maybe if there is an EEer in the Terrebonne, Quebec area that would like to work in OU as the circuit master, please get in touch with me.

Until I find a solution to my circuit qualms, I am stopping OU research of TK style high voltage systems and going back to low level devices where I have total control over the variable frequency, duty and amplitude. Making fixed HV systems are a dime a dozen and are just looking for a needle in a hay stack with only one look. If you cannot work HV pulsing in variable frequency mode then as far as I am concerned, you are wasting your time. Everything has to do with the right frequency makes the best effects. Yes a single frequency will always work but you could be 1kHz away from fantastic effects and not ever know it. If the dilemma of secure variable frequency pulsing cannot be resolved, then from what I can see, we are just wasting our time just shooting in the dark.

wattsup


Offline DreamThinkBuild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12054 on: June 17, 2012, 11:52:37 PM »
Hi FreeEnergyInfo,

Thanks for the info.

Would it be possible to remove the switch and just cut the signal? Instead of a magnet use a solenoid above the gen coil and feed in a split sine wave.

Not sure if it would have the same effect, something else to try, but here is the Octave/Matlab code to generate the signal. It can be saved as a sound file and looped through a power amp.

Code:
Quote
%%------------------------------------
%Name: CutAtPeak for Octave/Matlab
%Description: Generate a cut sine wave at peaks
%By: DreamThinkBuild
%Date: 6/17/2012
%%------------------------------------

%Clear up variables
clear;
clc;

Freq=200; %Signal frequency in hz
FS=96000; %Frequency sampling rate
t=0:1/FS:1; %Time for 1 second

%Convert frequency to samples in quarters
SampleSplit=(ceil(FS/Freq)/4);

%Construct both halve's of signal into OutSig
OutSig=[sin(t(1:SampleSplit)*2*pi*Freq) cos(t(SampleSplit*2:SampleSplit+(SampleSplit*2))*2*pi*Freq)];

%Output to wave file
wavwrite(OutSig,FS,32,'SplitSine.wav');

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12055 on: June 18, 2012, 12:10:37 AM »
@all

I have tried to make this circuit work for I don't know how long now, without any luck at all. Damn thing just does not want to pulse. So I have had it with circuits, making circuits, and blowing components. I have to concede that I will never be able to pulse things the way I really want to because the circuits are not available and making them myself is just not in the cards.

Now if this is happening to me then it should be happening to at least 1000 other guys just like me around the world. My forté is in the water treatment field but my main forté is business. My business side says if I had the proper skills, and if I wanted to help the OU effort in anyway I could, I would open up a small business called OUCircuits dot com and sell premade circuits of all kinds to OUers around the world, always being paid by Paypal.

I can build coils, buy components, establish and do experiments of all kinds, but the circuit part is definitely not for me.

So, if there is a smart ass out there that has access to components and that can build circuits and would like to make and sell them to me and to 1000s of others, I am more then sure it would be worth the time and effort.

Also, just imagine if such a circuit service was possible, HOW MANY GUYS WOULD BE USING THE SAME CIRCUIT FOR QUICK REPLICATIONS. This would push the OU research further and faster and wider then now possible with everyone always making their own circuits in so many different ways and then wondering  why the hell people cannot replicate this or that effect. Imagine if the Lithuanians were using the same circuit you and I would use.

Anyways, I think I made my point.

Maybe if there is an EEer in the Terrebonne, Quebec area that would like to work in OU as the circuit master, please get in touch with me.

Until I find a solution to my circuit qualms, I am stopping OU research of TK style high voltage systems and going back to low level devices where I have total control over the variable frequency, duty and amplitude. Making fixed HV systems are a dime a dozen and are just looking for a needle in a hay stack with only one look. If you cannot work HV pulsing in variable frequency mode then as far as I am concerned, you are wasting your time. Everything has to do with the right frequency makes the best effects. Yes a single frequency will always work but you could be 1kHz away from fantastic effects and not ever know it. If the dilemma of secure variable frequency pulsing cannot be resolved, then from what I can see, we are just wasting our time just shooting in the dark.

wattsup


 Heh.. tried the mag amp yet? You can even build one yourself. just need two toroids. There are plenty of diagrams for the coiling to get any type of transistor or switch that you need, with feedback or not!
 You know it must be good if the military used it. It was a very robust replacement for tubes in the radar systems they used. Trust me you will have full control over the magamp.


 Don't give up.. Keep trying but use what works. Silicon doesn't work for the voltages we are trying to use here. The best magamps I have seen were rated pretty good. We only need about 20-100k cycles... and the conductors can be rated for very high voltages.

 You also might want to try woopy's katcher pump. It seems to be very nice to energize metals.

 @ itsu I wonder what would happen if you wrapped that coil around a resistor... Would the resistor get energized as well? And finally around a solenoid coil and read the output from the coil. Tesla said to terminate the load with a mass of metal. Thats why you got no results from the other tests. This katcher is actually the Tesla coil. But instead of using a copper pipe in the middle he connected one end of the source to the load then connect to a metal mass. So both the Tesla coil and katcher should be able to use one wire methods directly connected to the blue flame point..

 The bigger the metal mass the better. Tesla also said copper was a good source for amps as a terminator. You guys are still thinking in terms of regular current. This is a pressure hose. A pulsed pressure hose. In that sense any coil would act like a diode or check valve, moving freely in one direction and rather inductively impeding in the other. This might be related to his vacuum pump. He made one that he could get any vacuum out of. I think there is a schematic for it in his patents. I'll have to look to see what it entails and if it indeed is related.

 Not the vacuum system yet but is very related to the system we are looking at...

 http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-454,622-system-of-electric-lighting  This is a one wire system sorta but look at the driver before the big loop!

 And this explains what you need to do when the frequency is very high or the voltage...

 http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-514,167-electrical-conductor

 Hmm read this one and tell me what it is saying... Lots of info in this one...

http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-514,973-electrical-meter
« Last Edit: June 18, 2012, 03:00:11 AM by jbignes5 »

Offline sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12056 on: June 18, 2012, 02:03:55 AM »
@all

I have tried to make this circuit work for I don't know how long now, without any luck at all. Damn thing just does not want to pulse. So I have had it with circuits, making circuits, and blowing components. I have to concede that I will never be able to pulse things the way I really want to because the circuits are not available and making them myself is just not in the cards.

Now if this is happening to me then it should be happening to at least 1000 other guys just like me around the world. My forté is in the water treatment field but my main forté is business. My business side says if I had the proper skills, and if I wanted to help the OU effort in anyway I could, I would open up a small business called OUCircuits dot com and sell premade circuits of all kinds to OUers around the world, always being paid by Paypal.

I can build coils, buy components, establish and do experiments of all kinds, but the circuit part is definitely not for me.

So, if there is a smart ass out there that has access to components and that can build circuits and would like to make and sell them to me and to 1000s of others, I am more then sure it would be worth the time and effort.

Also, just imagine if such a circuit service was possible, HOW MANY GUYS WOULD BE USING THE SAME CIRCUIT FOR QUICK REPLICATIONS. This would push the OU research further and faster and wider then now possible with everyone always making their own circuits in so many different ways and then wondering  why the hell people cannot replicate this or that effect. Imagine if the Lithuanians were using the same circuit you and I would use.

Anyways, I think I made my point.

Maybe if there is an EEer in the Terrebonne, Quebec area that would like to work in OU as the circuit master, please get in touch with me.

Until I find a solution to my circuit qualms, I am stopping OU research of TK style high voltage systems and going back to low level devices where I have total control over the variable frequency, duty and amplitude. Making fixed HV systems are a dime a dozen and are just looking for a needle in a hay stack with only one look. If you cannot work HV pulsing in variable frequency mode then as far as I am concerned, you are wasting your time. Everything has to do with the right frequency makes the best effects. Yes a single frequency will always work but you could be 1kHz away from fantastic effects and not ever know it. If the dilemma of secure variable frequency pulsing cannot be resolved, then from what I can see, we are just wasting our time just shooting in the dark.

wattsup
  Hey wattsup how you doing besides being frustrated. :( :)    Don't get caught up in the details.  Replicators are replicators.  Simple experiments based on hunches.  Like this one.  Take a piece of copper wire and stick it in a piece of cork.  Put it in the microwave and turn her on.   Little spark show as the enamel burns off and then the end of the wire starts to heat up and glow stopping any further fast electron effects.  Now take a new piece of wire preferrably about 1 inch long and this time put a drop of water at the base of the wire on top of the cork.  Turn on the microwave with your finger on the stop button.  Study the effect.  Blue white light fills the microwave cabinet.  Why? What is making the blue white light.  Where did the drop of water go.  Why am I trembling like a leaf when my microwave becomes a water lamp.  Albert Einstein gave us the  statement mass is energy and prooved it.  Mathmatical nut cases went crazy with this formula trying to describe the beautiful process of creation in black and white.  Finally having to admit grey scale does exist.  Why would a process that creates the total diversity of life create boring little constructs all the same just because people can't see them.  Planck is the one that started this madness.  Assigning arbitrary constants to how big something can be.  Why cant an atomic neucleus with it's neutrons just be a fat proton with a degree of surface tension we call charge.  How can charge be negative and positive.  It's like saying hey I have two cars.  One you can see and one that isn't there.  If you buy into that then I own an estate that no one can see it is a negative estate.  You can buy a timeshare at my negative estate for some positive dollars.  It won't cost you anything cause I'll just give you some of my negative dollars in exchange.  Then we'll be even and you get to use my negative estate for a couple of weeks for free.  JEESH

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12057 on: June 18, 2012, 02:24:27 AM »
Come on, fellows, lighten up. It's just VRSWR.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gSXi3BkkNA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dAQ4c13wdw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBUfaYi02WI


ETA: for the microwave experiment Sparks suggests, go to the thrift store and get some glass "hurricane lamp" chimneys. Use a little spacer to space one up a bit from the bottom of the microwave oven (turntable removed) and do the experiment inside the chimney. Sometimes you will get a perfect "ball lightning" plasma ball in there, that can even persist for an instant or two after the MW power is off.

Offline energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12058 on: June 18, 2012, 03:20:30 AM »

  If you go back to TK's first video and watch it you see that he is definitely working with Tesla's magnifying transmitter.  What you can do with a Tesla transformer is create storage of energy.  We know that mass is the equivalent of energy.  As you store more and more energy in the oscillations within the Tesla transformer you are transforming energy into mass increase of the oscillator.  Watch out how far you go in increasing the mass of the oscillator.  e=mc2 and the rate is determined by delta v/deltat.  You shorten up that t parameter you got trouble.  Enough said.  So what did tk do with the high voltage monopole produced by a Tesla coil?
hello Sparks and EVERYBODY

I have made a PDF of my way of approach

I hope to help you with all my simplicity.

pLeAse download the file.

Thank you

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12059 on: June 18, 2012, 08:07:56 AM »
Come on, fellows, lighten up. It's just VRSWR.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gSXi3BkkNA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dAQ4c13wdw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBUfaYi02WI


ETA: for the microwave experiment Sparks suggests, go to the thrift store and get some glass "hurricane lamp" chimneys. Use a little spacer to space one up a bit from the bottom of the microwave oven (turntable removed) and do the experiment inside the chimney. Sometimes you will get a perfect "ball lightning" plasma ball in there, that can even persist for an instant or two after the MW power is off.

Offtopic here but I'd like to ask if vodka can still be lit by TC discharge after a few times you burn a little with flame ? Very insteresting  effect.Does it heat vodka ?