Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 14388431 times)

Offline frantz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12030 on: June 16, 2012, 01:55:17 PM »
a video will not be enough for replication....
for a replication you will need proper understanding of the way it works.
however donald smith lies, he is right about one thing.  several tuned tesla coils will be excited near the tuned sender.
however they will not duplicate energy..
but if you are taking power from them it will not affect input to sender.
which logically is the key to kapanadze,
as a condensed energy which not react upon the source can be added with primary energy because the sender does not notice energy taken from it, the energy is conserved on nearby objects and in earth if no pickup coils are used, energy is not in the dimension anymore which can affect sender, making the output greater .. . .
Thanks to the capacitor this is possible.   a condensed energy will not react on the system but add additional energy to it.

This will only work only with electrostatic energy. 
many describe this very simple operating principle
they all say its dead simple and most guys cant get it right because they think its that hard!
in fact..... DONT THINK..
In one of the videos Donald Smith showed a copper and an aluminium plate,  he showed how can he draw a spark from it and he showed this so to show you there is no disturbance on the input to the sender coil
This is it.
very simple.!
this man also confirms it  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu84y83_AYg



nmr or whatever complex waves you guys are talking about makes no sense
they will not attract special anomaly , nor bifiliar caduceus or whatever ,  just because they have parasitic capacitances they dont mean to have higher energy outputs or whatever.
everybody is a bit naive and never research on facts.
dont fight with me,
you will realise sooner or later that your time is WASTED if you are not thinking simply and logically.

peace


Hi energia9,
I would like to confirm your words by experiment.
@All
Today I did small experiment with two TC coils. I think larger group have some two identical TC (the same resonance frequency).
f.ex. everybody made test with wireless transmiter of energy like in Tesla patent. And whats happened? The same portion of energy with losses is transmit to receiver. When you connect load to receiver coil you have impact to source. Why? Because we have reverse magnetic coupling.


Let's make another test. Put transmiter coil horizontally and connect to receiver load. You will see the load have minimal impact for transmiter. ;-) Because magnetic coupling is equal cos between magnetic vectors.


Let's test, and let me know hows look yours experiments..


Frantz
 

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3137
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12031 on: June 16, 2012, 02:48:59 PM »
Hey, I merely mentioned them - this was not a complete instruction how to use RF amplifiers in this application.
You are correct.
...bit my complete instructions of using these amplifiers would include cutting out the output filter and connecting a load impedance matching RF transformer directly to G or H or A or AB output stage.

With the A or G class amplifiers there is no crossover distortion, hence linearity is good enough at the cost of big heatsinks in the A class.  The operating frequency of the transisors in these amps extends into 100MHz and they are perfectly capable of amplifying signals in the 5Mhz, 50W regime.  I remind you that the Yoke device used much less RF input power than that.
Furthermore, amplifying fast rectangular pulses, often is sufficient, making the sine waveform amplification linearity of the AB and H calsses - relatively unimportant.



Quote from: verpies
Quote
quotes from attached article:

Doing the above is good for something  because these amplifiers, albeit not perfect, are mass produced and cheap - cheaper than e.g.: $300 PA107U_F integrated circuit, alone.


Look at my response:



Quote
quotes from attached article:


REACTIVE LOADS
The PA107DP is stable at a gain of 20 or above when driving either inductive or capacitive loads. However an inductor is essentially a short circuit at DC, therefore there must be enough resistance in series to keep low frequency   
When driving a 1nF capacitive load with a 180 VP-P square wave, the current peak is 1 A. Driving the same capacitor



How you want to deal with  impedance matching?
1. caduceus with spark?
2. yoke without spark
2a. yoke with spark?
3. inductive load of coil circuitry of TK projects?




Statement:
Typical output of generator must match input of amplifier than it must match  load
Question:
1. how you will solve problem with rapid impedance change due to load instability?

Quote
quotes from attached article:


with a 2.3 MHz sine wave, the power bandwidth frequency, results in 2.6 AP-P. The power dissipated in the amplifier 
while driving a purely capacitive load is given by the formula:

P = 2V    V /�X
                           PK  S    C
                   P = 2I   V /�
                          PK  S


Where:
   VPK  = Peak Voltage
     V  = Supply Voltage
       S
     X   = Capacitive Reactance
       C





What  you going to do  if you dealing with signal    with DC offset, ?



Quote
quotes from attached article:

6. FEEDBACK CONSIDERATIONS
The output voltage of an unloaded PA107DP can easily go as high as 95 V. All of this voltage can be applied across 
the feedback resistor, so the minimum value of a ½ W resistor in the feedback is 18050Ω.


Well we are dealing with 10 000 V and more in  most of our  HV application


yoke  is not HV but until you give  spark influence or spark  excitation  to horizontal  U shape strip winding.
 
Than BEMF is certainly  a problem here.
I can drive with capacitive loads high  voltage from the same amplifier  nothing new for me but imagine  how badly you beating  amplifier only with  the  very first second of operation especially  when capacitive character of load is due to  capacitive component of inductive load.
Than you just go fraction off, the desired calculation and inductive component is than leading factor for another  delta T.
SHORT to DC than is what you dealing with.
when you prevent it by DC resistance ( resistor) ..........than you going even to more trouble at the very first moment of applying the power to the structure. Unless you have no square wave at all and you dealing with sine wave only including distorted sine wave.
Modulation than can not be done with square as well, or it could be?
What do you think Verpies?
example yoke device deals with say 50Hz carrier and much much higher modulation signal ( looks like fat snake)
 no DC but......... try to increase modulation factor and/or  frequency  of modulating signal
to the point of presence DC components of AC signal so close...
Aren't you dealing than with DC ( sort of)


Can it be done?
YES. but in ready to use device, end of  product out of shelf FE device.
 
95 V is kind of joke here.




anyhow thank you for your material definitely it is contribution of value to this forum.





Wesley
« Last Edit: June 16, 2012, 05:38:28 PM by stivep »

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12032 on: June 16, 2012, 03:32:20 PM »
Really so the experiment that Itsu did was null and void because you can understand about energizing fields? The field is biases or added to on the whole. The whole field and any object is biased by the energizing field. If I was to take a few blocks of metal like aluminum and attach a meter to each metal and enter one block into that biased field then I would suspect that the current flows in a well organized fashion. Usually twords the higher excitation block. This is exactly How simple this works.


 I never agreed with NMR. It seems they are trying to account for something they can not understand. They think this has to be sooo complicated that they create new buzz words and math to shore up their arguments. But in the end when they see it for themselves they are astonished it is so easy to relate to. My proof is looking at the astronomy field. Astrophysics has had a great many theories as to why everything acts the way it does in space and when they actually look at an area for the first time they are astonished at the results of that finally seeing the event they were theorizing about. Everything gets thrown out of the window. Poof... All the time it took to theorize and ponder over the events in question and actually there is a much simpler solution.


 No one is gonna believe in something they can not see. It has been the crux of the world. God being the hardest to fathom. But yet there have been things that can not be proven by sight alone. We have to create other ways to see or be able to see the processes. We all know there are these lines. We can see them after we provide a channel to see the phenomena(iron filings). But this is not showing the true form. It is a deception. The iron channels are force into an alignment by the flow of the field. A self organizing physical channel based on the field of imaginary lines. Matter has a way to organize and give direction to this field. There are no real lines just equidistant lines that better describe the field and the gradient of potentials in the field. Once you insert a medium that channels the field it changes the field. So in putting the test charge into the static field makes it dynamic.


 But Itsu's experiment that I suggested does work. You can charge the cap externally by the field. This is because the cap separates the polarities and organizing them in such a way that allows us to use the separated field to our advantage.


 Everyone talks about energy from nothing but yet there is no space in the Universe that has nothing in it! All space has a gradient of fields. Anytime we attach to that space it changes the field in some way. It is our observing that does this. There is no way to isolate the fields besides channeling it away from that space and eventually the space will always refill from the surrounding environment around that space. How fast you channel the polarity away from that space is the key and if we understand that if we extract the polarity too fast it can effect that space like a vacuum. Draw too much and walla you have a void. Balance is the key. Creating an imbalance allows work to be done without inputting anything at all well very little if we use the difference in two metals connected by the ground.


 It has been established that the ground of our planet is very very conductive.


 Iron is -.41v
 Aluminum is -1.66v


 The difference is 1.25v


 As this is the bias I am talking about just from the standing voltage of the two metals when in a conducting medium. Well thats part of the bias. The other is the field we create to enhance The values seen as standing voltage. Now what I am seeing is that if we bias the electrodes (Grounds) to different values a very heavy current can and will form in the ground loop. This is simply done by adding a coil in between the grounds as Tesla described. When referenced to each other the electrodes will see one another through different ends of that coil. With one end having a higher value voltage then the other based on the standing value before hooking up the wires to the grounds. When compared you should see a slight value when compared to the other ground. Most likely 1-1.25v. Now hook a coil in between the two grounds and one side will be stepped up and the other side will be stepped down. So the spread should change to a higher value. No add a way to change the values of the setup as is. Connect a source that charges one ground to a higher value and walla current flow loop forms. <-most likely blow the equipment because the loop is not very restricted in this test. In the case of Kapanadze I see that he had to make the water pipe not energized as a true ground and augment the radiator he buried. Someone should try to see if they can replicate this ground loop stuff and see what the process really entails. It could be he didn't want to have a direct current loop because it was to powerful so he used an inductive loop to make it safer to use.


 So for every pulse the ground loop would energize and a flow would induce between the two grounds. This is what Tesla was experimenting on with the light bulbs being so far away from the energizing he gave his first ground(transmitter). Then all he needed to do was hook anything he wanted to use to the ground to access the energizing field in the ground. Now is this adding energy to the systems I highly doubt it. It seems the loops are indeed connected and finite. But they can be used like gears and fluids. So one could net more force by adding additional taps to the source gear. This increases the strength of the flow and attaches a new cog to the gear. Every loop adds to the process because it can strengthen the slip of the source gear and it adds inertia to the flow making it harder to slow down or impede that flow.


 Having diametrically opposite sympathetic flows will only strengthen the torque or inertia of the source cog(field). Try this simple experiment to prove this. Find a circular faucet handle like on a water hose like the one in Kapanadze video. And try to turn it with one finger on the outside. It wont be very easy trust me. Now from opposite sides apply pressure and it turns very easy. This is the same premise. If Kapanadze had another ground spot on the other side of the real ground(water pipe) then he would have seen much more current then without the balance ground. And yet he still shows that he could induce a ground loop and harvest from that flow! This is yet again evident by the self powering he provided to the unit via back flow current. This only took a regular transformer and diode bridge. The bridge makes a very good anti reverse flow check valve. it samples into the transformer then flows through the diode bridge in one direction only. This allows him to tap off of the ground loop after it has started to flow well. Pretty simple if you ask me.

Offline Shokac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12033 on: June 16, 2012, 03:51:27 PM »
look this patent!
TK use coax cable in simple way.



Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12034 on: June 16, 2012, 04:15:31 PM »
Quote
Your amplitude is varying because of the changing capacitance with respect to ground, caused by the mass of metal in the oscilloscope or by your body.
Yes, the ground seems to be the cause of the varying amplitude. But why on one end only (the wrong one!) and not on the other end of the coil? Asking the question the other way round: What is the real amplitude of the wave in the bifilar coil? Is it the high one and the ground damps the wave, or is it the low one and the ground increases the wave?

A classic Tesla coil is connected to ground at the bottom where the exciter coil is located, not on the top. Seems the Kapanadze device works the other way around (like my try).

Quote
I've never had much success using bifilars as secondaries. But as primaries the benefit is obvious, compared to a normal pancake coil.
Strange, Kapanadze's primary coil is neither bifilar nor pancaked, according to my observations.

Quote
In one of the videos Donald Smith showed a copper and an aluminium plate, he showed how can he draw a spark from it and he showed this so to show you there is no disturbance on the input to the sender coil
Is there any credible video showing a self-sustaining Donald Smith device? Or is this all pure theoretical stuff?

Quote
look this patent!
TK use coax cable in simple way.
Or this drawing shows two bifilar coils, both wires connected to one at the top.

Quote
they all say its dead simple and most guys cant get it right because they think its that hard!
in fact..... DONT THINK..
I will try my best ...  8)

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12035 on: June 16, 2012, 05:16:33 PM »
Maybe this will help. Also you are comparing two different systems. The one you are talking about had to be implemented because of the limitation to the ground and the effects on matter. Tesla warned that too much through a conductor explodes the conductor with TNT like force or better then.


 Check this out for the smaller unit.


Now please remember this is un-energized. Just from the standing potentials alone there flows a very heavy current between the two grounds but he cuts down the current by making it an inductive loop and not a direct short. Also the way the current goes through the device is very important to how this works even when un-energized. In it's un-energized state the unit resists flow by the inductive choking through each bifilar coil. But when the field is augmented by the pulses full current flows based on the fields value to each coil. The solenoid coil aroind the bifilar also helps to keep the current from unpolarizing by the use of the flap or fold of the solenoid. This is the minimum it takes to hold the current at bay. This is exactly what the mag-amp uses in it's process of polarization.
 When you understand that the only current that can flow is ground current then you see how this works. Energizing the field of biasing the field forces the coil to overide the restrictions and allows full flow and control over the process simply by inputting a very small current but very high voltage.

 Lets look at this from another direction.

 The mag amp will control as much current even with a small input. It may look like it is free energy but I assure you it is very circular in it's methods. Loops are the main factor and it is very relevant when looking at water bridges and higher voltages. Once the loop is started it will hold very very strongly like a string through pearls.

 Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC8KDYcdiUI

 If you watch closely you can see the water flowing back and forth based on the charge value of both glasses when the water is energized. It's oscillation is very slow but you can see the level changing on both sides back and forth.

 So now you can replace things through substitution. The water is current and the medium is voltage potential through a mass. The water will move based on the values from both sides. As the mass of water shifts so does the value associated with that mass. Since water is very pliable it shifts back and forth all by itself. In solid matter there is no such mechanism so current must flow because each spot has a certain resistance and standing voltage. V*R=current this gives us polarization and now the current flows between two different values of V.

 Shorts have always plagued us and the ground loop is no exception. Until today I never thought you could have gotten anything from such a short but it seems that if we use the distance and conductors that we can do anything one wanted or needed. My only question is what does this do the that area in between the two electrodes or grounds? Is this healthy or should we use a virtual grounding system to help out with effects that we didn't noticed.

 One thing that made me such a great computer Tech was reckoning something outside of the unit afflicted it till malfunction. Ground loops are so common because they chose safety over quality. The only way to get rid of the problem was to cut one of the grounds but then again it was highly illegal in the states here.

 Lets look at the worst of the cases:

 Transformer loops to ground: http://www.bapihvac.com/content/uploads/2010/07/Understanding-Ground-Loops.pdf

 "The second safety issue is to keep equipment within its normal operating voltage range.  Most
modern Direct Digital Controllers (DDC) will operate correctly without a ground connection
anywhere.  The only catch is that the non-grounded equipment may build up large static charges
due to insulation leakage.  The first person that comes along and touches the equipment gets a
very nasty shock.  If the static charge gets high enough, it will discharge to the nearest conductor
at a lower potential.  The instantaneous discharge currents can reach several thousand
amperes and destroy the electronic components of the system.  Grounding the system lets the
charges dissipate without damage."

 Also remember that current and voltage move in opposite directions with voltage usually leading current. So in my picture below the black is voltage and the red is current. For half of the cycle. But what happens when you raise the voltage to like 1 kilovolts on the one side across the gap? If you add a magnet across the gap would it polarize the gap? What effect would that have on the character of the current?

 If one caused 1000 volts @ 1 amp to flow across the gap and the ground loops and returns 1000 amps in the loops isn't that OU? Most likely the 1k volts will nearly induce 800-900v @ 1000 amps to be pulled into the system. This has not been experimentally disproven yet so get to it you nay sayers... Prove it wrong or get on board and help us...

 Obviously my numbers are not proven yet but you get the picture.

 Itsu proved that you can excite a cap into charging with one wire inductively on an unshielded cap. Very easily too. How about moving the cap to the internal of the bifilar coil so that it gets energized by the spark gap every time it fires, recharging the cap by the high voltage flowing in the ground loop.

 Hey Itsu could you write what worked again and didn't work so we can rule out the already done experiments.

 I also noted that I might have the upper solenoid connection on the wrong ground, instead of connecting to ground 2 it might be that it connects to ground 1. That way ground 2 will always be below ground 1 and thats where the charges enter the system from ground 2 to ground 1. Not sure about that one.

 It could also be that he is just feeding off of other ground loops connected to the pipe since most electric companies tie the grounds to water pipes. They never gave a reading from the pipe to the radiator so....
« Last Edit: June 16, 2012, 06:54:08 PM by jbignes5 »

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12036 on: June 16, 2012, 07:39:51 PM »
How you want to deal with  impedance matching?
1. caduceus with spark?
2. yoke without spark
2a. yoke with spark?
3. inductive load of coil circuitry of TK projects?

The way I do it for VCVS amp is to use predistortion with AWG and low output impedance transistors in Half-bridge push-pull configuration for the output driver operating in the G, H, B or AB class - the predistortion cancels all of the non-linearities of the transistors and the cross-over distortion of the half-bridge.

I keep the source resistance as close to zero according to the Maximum Power Transfer Theorem.

The above allows me to drive large HF currents with good linearity of of the VCVS amplifier so constructed.  The limit of the output voltage is 1200Vp-p, but that's much higher than the voltage in industrial power lines, anyway.  If I need higher voltages, I use a RF step-up transformer and/or LC resonant rise. For higher current I use step-down transformers as well (e.g. for the 1turn winding in the Yoke device) 

Of course any use of the transformer precludes DC components in the output signal. If  DC component is needed above 1200V, the solution is a DC power source in series with the output of such amplifier.

It's difficult for me to answer the rest of your questions because I do not understand the input requirements of the devices descriped in pt.1 and pt.3.  Why is HV needed at their input anyway? 
I haven't studied these devices in detail because I find them unremarkable just like resonant transformers.



Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12037 on: June 16, 2012, 09:19:02 PM »
When you connect load to receiver coil you have impact to source. Why? Because we have reverse magnetic coupling.
If the receiver coil receives energy through resonant inductive coupling - a reactive near field wireless transmission (Frantz calls it "reverse magnetic coupling"), then the receiver will influence the transmitter.

However, if the electromagnetic wave is allowed to separate from the transmitter (as it naturally happens in the radiative far field), then the receiver will not influence the transmitter anymore.

This lack of influence does not mean OU though.
According to conventional theory it would take infinite amount of receivers to collect all of the EM energy radiated by the transmitter. 

The burden of proof is on those claiming otherwise.


Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12038 on: June 16, 2012, 09:33:38 PM »
NMR or whatever complex waves you guys are talking about makes no sense
Why not?
NMR and MRI has been observed many times in copper and most other matter, so it definitely is a real phenomenon that can happen.
I have seen no evidence that NMR plays a big role in the devices described by McFreey but I'd be far from calling it nonsense.
As far as I am concerned the jury is still out...

Offline frantz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12039 on: June 16, 2012, 10:07:11 PM »
If the receiver coil receives energy through resonant inductive coupling - a near field wireless transmission (Frantz calls it "reverse magnetic coupling"), then the receiver will influence the transmitter.

However, if the electromagnetic wave is allowed to separate from the transmitter (as it naturally happens in the radiative far field), then the receiver will not influence the transmitter anymore.

This lack of influence does not mean OU though.
According to conventional theory it would take infinite amount of receivers to collect all of the EM energy radiated by the transmitter. 

The burden of proof is on those claiming otherwise.


@verpies,
just check!


Don't create theory, just check by experiment!!!!
Check two setups:
1. Two TC transformers vertically
2. One horizontally second vertically.


(first is transmiter, second receiver)




Regards
Frantz

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12040 on: June 16, 2012, 10:52:56 PM »
Don't create theory, just check by experiment!!!!
Check two setups:
1. Two TC transformers vertically
2. One horizontally second vertically.
I don't create theories - I confirm and cite them.  See Near and Far Fields
I played with Tesla Coils when I was 11 years old, but I still remeber how they behaved.

This article correctly predicts the near-field interaction between the perpendicular as well as parallel configurations of the receiver and transmitter coil / antenna.

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12041 on: June 16, 2012, 11:16:53 PM »
I don't create theories - I confirm and cite them.  See Near and Far Fields
I played with Tesla Coils when I was 11 years old, but I still remeber how they behaved.

This article correctly predicts the near-field interaction between the perpendicular as well as parallel configurations of the receiver and transmitter coil / antenna.

would it be the same if connection is via single wire transmission line ?

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12042 on: June 16, 2012, 11:46:06 PM »
would it be the same if connection is via single wire transmission line ?
I have not analyzed this case.
The wire would extend the near-field range - especially the unbalanced electric charges

Offline sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12043 on: June 16, 2012, 11:57:37 PM »
   A tesla coil is an ends to a means.  Believe you me there is no coupling of anything to it.  Tesla was not producing em waves or standing waves or any of that unless he wanted to.  He was playing around with the permittivity of space itself.
You change the permittivity parameters of space and electrical charge residing in that space reacts as well as the rest of the fielf.

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12044 on: June 17, 2012, 12:41:07 AM »
 A Tesla coil is only part of the equation. It's the first part. Once you have the blue flame coming out of the tip I would think you could energize anything including unshielded caps. Listen guys the reason you want to raise the voltage as high as possible is to change the character of the current. It becomes less of a loss the higher it goes, at least from resistance and resistance is a big stumbling block. Once you have cleared the current waste then it is now time to time the pulses and create a one way valve. In steps the spark gap. once the spark gap is done then comes the low resistance winding that will get excited from all the pulses. This gets radiated inwards through the copper of the load coil and energizes anything it touches. By going inwards the field gets more intense or compressed and the charges that are getting sucked from the ground loop is attracted to the high voltage area. All the while this field is spinning and churning swirling the heavy charges through the load coil and generates a very good current flow as well as the exciter voltage to a lesser degree......

 Once the ground loop is there it can take a very long time to dissipate as stated from the earlier ground loop reference I posted.

"Real grounds are conductors, so there is a certain
amount of resistance to electrical current between all
grounding points. This resistance can change with
humidity, temperature, connected equipment and many
other variables.  The resistance can always allow an
electrical voltage to exist across it.  Large currents
running through grounds will cause voltage drops in the
ground conductors and will take time to dissipate."

 These loops are not limited to the real ground as well. They can form from any virtual ground even.

 There is no magic just something they thought was a nuisance. They even say these current don't really do anything bad.. Well I beg to differ.. Many transformer fire are fed from ground loops and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see whats happening. Ground loops take a while to fade and thats usually why they leave them alone till they run their course.

 The one thing Tesla did figure out was that energized fields enhance current flow of all items in that field including us, when the voltage and frequency are right the current flows very easily. Maybe because the pathways have been enhanced by the energizing voltage field. Maybe bridging the resistance and effectively allowing the current to pass unimpeded.

"Ground loops allow electrical and magnetic interference to create noise voltage sources.  These
voltage sources add to the signal being measured and are indistinguishable from the proper
signal.  The controller, not knowing that it is reading an improper value, performs an improper
control action. This can result in uncomfortable conditions for the occupants. It can also drive the
mechanical equipment into an oscillation, causing the equipment to wear out prematurely.
The primary sources of these noise problems are Magnetic Induction and Ground Imbalance."
« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 02:56:56 AM by jbignes5 »