Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84248
  • *Latest: khniki

  • *Total Posts: 897991
  • *Total Topics: 15836
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 10

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 13848882 times)

Offline Alena

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10515 on: February 05, 2012, 02:07:54 PM »

You need to really understand about why there is capacitor in flyback making LC resonant circuit connected in series with high voltage coil.. :)

I'll be very grateful if you draw a schematic diagram of the inclusion

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10516 on: February 05, 2012, 02:17:12 PM »
I'll be very grateful if you draw a schematic diagram of the inclusion


He is referring to C1 on the diagram he just gave you.
This is what wattsup thought was critical.


Seems you are right wattsup!

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2964
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10517 on: February 05, 2012, 02:27:28 PM »

Thank You  Aidas from NYW group  for  pointing subject

I have start to dig into ion and ion properties in regards to TK secret.This is my typical weekly  portion of  material I study.



preamble:

Note:
In TK devices it is believed :
  there is first delivery of impulse and than action is by itself.
-using looping of energy from output to input
-coupling to - possibly some of external form of energy


This material is brought to weekly session of scientifically oriented group representing traditional  science but they are tolerating my very much nontraditional  acting in this area.
By their response I'm getting much closer in much faster time...

Subjects to discuss
what is an ion?
http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/propulsion/1-what-is-an-ion.html


http://tubedata.tubes.se/sheets/022/suppinfo/ETL-ElectronicTubeHandbook-i3.pdf
page 161a
Why spark gap need light?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_thruster  Ion Thruster
-what is correlation between electrostatic ion trusting force and electromagnetic ion trusting force in coaxial cable?

types of ion thrusters
- Electrostatic ion thrusters use the Coulomb force and accelerate the ions in the direction of the electric field
-Electromagnetic ion thrusters use the Lorentz force[/font] to accelerate the ions.

                                                          Ion in coaxial cable?
                                                          O boy ...what Wesley got it from
                                                         there is no ions in coax or is it?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/40806243/Coaxial-Cable-With-Screening-Electrode-For-Use-As-An-Ionization-Chamber---Patent-5003177
                                                      Abstract
The invention relates to a coaxial cable for use as an ionization chamber
 with an inner signal electrode (1) and an outer high-voltage electrode
 (2), surrounding the latter, which are held at a distance from each other
 by an insulator (3). The insulator (3) contains as an integral part a secreening
electrode (4) which prevents leakage currents from flowing from the
high-voltage electrode (2) to the signal electrode (1).

how electromagnetic wave  travels in coaxial wire?
(https://madisoncable.te.com/gif/AMPFIGUR.GIF)
https://madisoncable.te.com/RFCoaxialCables.asp
An electromagnetic wave traveling in a coaxial cable produces an
electric and a magnetic field between the inner conductor and the outer conductor
(Figure 1). The electric (E field) is radial and varies in time. An alternating
current flows along the inner conductor and the outer conductor.
An oscillating magnetic field (H field) circles the inner conductor.
Question: Please closer explain radial  nature of electric field in coaxial cable


                              some controversy about Ions and Ions movement.
what are the properties of ion?
when more than 10 000V is delivered to coaxial cable how ionization works in it.
what is the relation between electrostatics and ion?
what is a vector of ions in coaxial cable?
what is a speed of ions in coaxial cable?
How ions impact electromagnetic wave?
How electrostatics works in coaxial cable?
supporting literature:
http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/l98/PAPERS/MO4061.PDF


Radiant Energy Diatribe
http://www.nuenergy.org/alt/radiant_energy_diatribe.htm


supporting material for that subject
What is electret?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electret
or:
Electret ]A solid dielectric with a quasi-permanent electric moment.
Electrets may be classified as real-charge electrets and dipolar-charge electrets.
 Real-charge electrets are dielectrics with charges of one polarity at or near one side of
the dielectric and charges of opposite polarity at or near the other side,
while dipolar-charge electrets are dielectrics with aligned dipolar charges.
Some dielectrics are capable of storing both real and dipolar charges.
An example of a charge arrangement of an electret metallized on one
surface is shown in the illustration.
(http://img.tfd.com/mgh/cee/Schematic-cross-section-of-an-electret-disk-metallized-on-one.jpg)


quote:
Static Electricity that  is generated on a properly treated insulated wire will produce more than
 a kilowatt in a light wind, according to Paul Clint This becomes possible because of a phenomenon in physics known as the electret effect.
This effect occurs when the surface between a conductor and a dielectric obtains a
permanent electric field. This field has the same effect on static electricity that a magnetic
field has on iron filings
How can a small cable extract so much energy from little or no air currents?
The energy collected from the cable is not derived from charge collection as one might first think. It is derived from induction, as the positive ions in the air rush towards the cable.
Still, the wire hardly intersects any of the wind. How can a little wire collect so much?
The cross section of the wind from which power is collected is much larger than you might think. Remember that the electret effect creates an electric field, which attracts charged air molecules as a magnet attracts iron. The cross section of this field can be as great as 2 feet, so a 100-foot cable can intersect as much wind as a 16-foot diameter airfoil.

How does humidity affect cable operation?
Ham radio operators have reported that static charge builds up on their antennas more often
 and more intensely in times of high humidity, rain, or snow. The technical literature reports that most atmospheric charge is carried by aerosol particles of dust or water that collect hundreds, thousands, and sometimes tens of thousands of units of charge. As they collect more and more charge, these particles migrate toward the earth's surface and constitute a major component of the fair weather current.
  Has anyone measured the ion density of the atmosphere?
Yes, the average is 3000 ions per cubic meter.
The figure is subject to stupendous variations of many orders of magnitude as shown by this quote from "Atmospheric Electricity in the Planetary Boundary Layer" by William A. Hoppel, R.V. Anderson and John C. Willet.

The ion density does not appear to provide enough charge to account for the current generated by the cable. Are there other sources of energy contributing to the current?
Both the electric field of the earth (typically 100-200 volts) and that of the cable produce an effect called the induction charging mechanism. This is a physical process for particle charging involving the collision of pairs of particles in an ambient electric field. Electric charge induced on particles surface by the ambient electric field is made available for transfer when the two particles come into contact. A subsequent differential particle motion that is influenced by gravity is postulated to result in large scale charge separation. The specific role of induction charging in the electrification of thunderclouds has not been resolved.


                                Capacitance of High-VoltageCoaxial Cable
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CEUQFjAC&url=
http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jmst.org%2FEN%2Farticle%2FdownloadArticleFile.do%3
FattachType%3DPDF%26id%3D7384&ei=_44tT7fIJqjL0QH85JDyCg&usg=
AFQjCNGshNfYLbPVhQEwyFu3zMkRbj4IMQ&sig2=mQe0372Py2AmKKsAd0RBsQ


                      Ion Valve Technology   Explained
http://www.nuenergy.org/alt/valve.htm
The ion valve converter (ion valve) shown here has an axial negatively charged tungsten cathode wire that extends the length its cylinder and is capable of emitting secondary negatively charged ions. The anode cylinder is positively charged and is made from a semiconductive material that will readily capture electrons.

http://www.nuenergy.org/images/gif/valve.gif

http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/miscon/eleca.html
 


All electric currents are flows of electrons. Wrong.
"Electricity" is made of electrons, not protons. Nope.
Electrons are a kind of energy particle. Wrong.
"Electricity" carries zero mass because electrons have little mass. No.
Positive charge is really just a loss of electrons. Wrong.
Positive charge cannot flow. Totally wrong.
To create "static" charge, we move the electrons. Not always.






1. All electric currents are flows of electrons? Wrong
Electric currents are not just flows of electrons, they are flows of any type of electric charge. Both protons and electrons possess exactly the same amount of 'electricity.' If either the protons or the electrons flow, that flow is an electric current. In salt water, in fluorescent bulbs, and in battery acid, atoms with extra protons can flow along, and this flow is a genuine electric current. And in fuel cell membranes and in solid ice, electric current is actually a flow of single protons (go and look up "proton conductor.") http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_conductor


explanation:
Proton conductor   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_conductorFor practical applications, proton conductors are usually solid materials. Typical materials are polymers or ceramic. Typically the pores in practical materials are small such thatprotons dominate direct current and transport of bulk solvent is prevented. Ice is a proton conductor, albeit a relatively poor one.[2]Proton conduction was first suggested by Alfred Rene Jean Paul Ubbelohde (14 December 1907 - 7 January 1988) and S. E. Rogers.[3]When in the form of thin membranes, proton conductors are an essential part of small, inexpensive fuel cells. The polymer nafion is a typical proton conductor in fuel cells.High proton conductivity has been reported among alkaline-earth cerates and zirconate based perovskite materials such as acceptor doped SrCeO3, BaCeO3 and BaZrO3.[citation needed] Relatively high proton conductivity has also been found in rare-earth ortho-niobates and ortho-tantalates as well as rare-earth tungstates



2. "Electricity" is made of electrons, not protons? Nope.
Charges of "electricity" are carried both by electrons and protons. These two types of particles have very different weights (mass), but both have exactly the same amount of electric charge. Electrons are easily removed from atoms, while protons usually are stuck to other protons, but that doesn't affect the amount of charge they carry. If we remove an electron from an atom, that atom is left with too many protons, and that's the only reason why the atom has an excess of positive electric charge. Positive charge isn't a lack of electrons. *All* positive charges in objects and in circuits are created by protons


3. Electrons are a kind of energy particle?
Wrong.
Electrons and protons are matter, not energy. A flow of electrons is NOT a flow of energy, it is a flow of matter and a flow of electric charge. Same goes for protons: moving protons are electric current, but they're also matter flow. And most important: if you have a certain amount of charge in one place, you'll have no clue about the amount of energy present. Charge is not energy. Coulombs are not Joules, and knowing the amount charge does not tell you the amount of energy you have. A moving electron does not carry energy along with it, any more than a moving air molecule carries a sound wave with it.


4. "Electricity" carries zero mass because electrons have little mass? No.[
Quantities of "Electricity" (meaning charge) have weight because charge is part of matter particles. A flow of charge always requires a flow of carrier particles, so electric current must always carry mass with it. Electric current in a wire is not a flow of energy, it is a flow of electrically charged matter. Ion currents in an electroplating bath are a flow of considerable amounts of matter: electric currents can transport material and deposit matter onto electrodes. However, in normal circuits we rarely notice the moving mass. There are two reasons for this: the flow is circular, so an electric current doesn't need to build up extra mass anywhere. Secondly, the flow is very very slow, so even if the current were moving an enormous amount of mass, we'd never notice this.

5. Positive charge is really just a loss of electrons? Wrong.
Positive charge is not made of "missing electrons." Positive charge is a genuine type of charge in its own right. Yes, when protons and electrons are near each other, their charges cancel. Removing the electronsexposes  the charge on the protons, and that's probably where this particular misconception originates. Since neutral atoms receive a positive imbalance of charge when their electrons are removed, is seemsn']like positive charge is nothing but missing electrons. But this is wrong. If you have a handful of protons, you have a handful of positive charge. A proton is not a missing electron. And if you have a vacuum (a total lack of electrons,) that doesn't mean that any positive charges are present.

6. Positive charge cannot flow? Totally wrong.
Electric currents in a metal wire are flows of electrons, but in many other materials both the positive and negative charges can flow. For example, when you get an electric shock, no electrons flow through your body. The electric current inside your tissues is made of positively charged atoms flowing one way and negatively charged atoms flowing the other. The same is true of electrical currents in salt water, in the ground, and in battery electrolyte. When your car battery is supplying 300 amps to the starter motor, 300A worth of ions is flowing through the battery acid, and approximately half of these are carrying positive charge. Also, plasmas can have positive ion currents as well as negative electron flows: examples are neon signs, fluorescent lights, camera flashes, and sparks of all kinds. There are even some conductors where the current is a flow of positive hydrogen ions, +H ions, otherwise known as protons. One common " proton conductor" is ice. Other proton-conductors are used as solid electrolytes in exotic batteries and, more recently, are found as proton-conductor solid electrolyte membranes in tiny fuel cells.


7. To create "static" charge, we transfer the electrons? Not always.
"Static" or imbalanced charges can be created by removing electrons from a neutral atom. They can also be created by adding or removing charged atoms from an object, and the ions being removed can be negative or positive ions. It is even possible to add or remove bare protons from some materials (after all, protons are the same as H+ positively charged hydrogen atoms.) If you have some positively-charged water, or ice, or acid, then you probably have too many bare protons (too many H+ ions.)


Entertainment for the crowd  of scientifically oriented group

When you turn on the lights in your home, the charges inside the wires wiggle back and forth and don't flow forwards, while the energy races along the wires at almost the speed of light. So ...does the "electricity" sit in one spot and vibrate? Or does "electricity" flow forwards rapidly? Do electric companies sell electricity, or do they merely pump it back and forth? Scientists of old would insist that the electricity stays with the electrons, and therefore the electricity vibrates within the wires without moving forward. Most modern textbooks disagree.



Final conclusion:
TK in all of his devices used plastic pipe (former) with thick wire inside
That is coaxial cable with dielectric ( air)

Please analyze ion formation and influence



Generator made of  coaxial cables only

http://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=blumlein%20generator&source=web&cd
=5&ved=0CFEQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fusor.net%2Fboard%2Fgetfile.
php%3Fbn%3Dfusor_files%26att_id%3D3230&ei=
d5kuT5XSK_CL4gSE19y6Dg&usg=AFQjCNH0gjDPM25a3bqhkj35GGugP25P4g&cad=rja




Wesley
« Last Edit: February 05, 2012, 04:17:08 PM by stivep »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10517 on: February 05, 2012, 02:27:28 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10518 on: February 05, 2012, 02:52:41 PM »
at some point when capacitor connected to form lr tank in old flyback, i hear a loud noise at around 20 khz coming from the ferrite, but no sparking occurs,  the sparking occurs with one wire with capacitor is at around 10khz, and without capacitor it is 31.65khz

it detunes from the sound quickly and trying to find it again is difficult, it seems that the noise is at a very precise frequency,  is this ferro resonant freq?

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10519 on: February 05, 2012, 04:47:20 PM »
I got this message:

Stefan,
 
What they say in this video is of no consequence. There, they do not reveal how the device works.
Kapanadze generator is a modification of CZ 284 333, the three coil version. The modification consists of using pulsed HF generation (spark)  rather than the continuous wave as described in the patent. The spark is phase synchronized with the magnetic field modulation sine-wave (~50 Hz). The principle of operation is best seen in the pictures from Georgia, published by Wesley. Bare in mind that the fuel in this generator may be either Fe or Cu in the form of foil. I think, Kapanadze will reveal it sooner rather than later. Michel Meyer revealed it first in the Science et Vie article in March 1976.
You can assume the same, or very similar, for  Steven Mark devices.
If you wish, you can publish this information, omitting my name.

==============

Now I found the Patent file:

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19980812&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=CZ&NR=9603387A3&KC=A3&ND=5


Nuclear magnetic resonance is stimulated in a generator by the action of a magnetic field and electric current on an Fe 56 ferrous core, whereupon part of the current gained through conversion to Fe 54, is returned to the core, while the remaining part of the current is drained out of the equipment, allowing disconnection of the source and a self-sustaining process until exhaustion of the Fe 56. The apparatus for performing this method is a generator with a core in the form of an Fe 56 bar (2), support construction (1), inductors (6, 7, 8, 9), input from the source (11), necessary circuits and output. The device is equipped with a circuit for transfer of part of the gained current back to the bar (2).;  The device can be advantageously arranged with current output from the bar (2) split into two parts, one conducted to a regulator (14) for turning off the source (11) and the other conducted to the apparatus output.

===========

Here is the attachment of the PDF file unfortunately in Cz language, but there are some pics at the end.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10519 on: February 05, 2012, 04:47:20 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10520 on: February 05, 2012, 06:00:44 PM »

preamble:

Note:
In TK devices it is believed :
  there is first delivery of impulse and than action is by itself.
-using looping of energy from output to input
-coupling to - possibly some of external form of energy

you are right (exactly in that way are organised process in device) keep it up :)
* -coupling to - possibly some of external form of energy – (answer: "ionisation")

Offline cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10521 on: February 05, 2012, 06:12:00 PM »


P.S.

Example of natural process:
 (we can compare it with light – when you for example want to make a infinite light source – what you need to do?
 First of all, it is not enough to amplify a light source – lets say from light bulb through magnifying lens and loop it back by several mirrors etc... what you need to do is, to make a bridge to external source (you need to cause this effect by some action with medium – for example, the natural light in medium as light and energy source are lightning ball or plasma)

This is example, what i want to say that – it is not enough to loop electricity through coils – you need interact with medium (make a bridge) But remember – always and always this is manipulation with time (free energy are not impossible with that! This is always like that – and there are not only free energy, Gravity and other effects (you can see this for example in John Hutchinson experiments)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10521 on: February 05, 2012, 06:12:00 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2230
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10522 on: February 05, 2012, 06:21:25 PM »

P.S.

Example of natural process:
 (we can compare it with light – when you for example want to make a infinite light source – what you need to do?
 First of all, it is not enough to amplify a light source – lets say from light bulb through magnifying lens and loop it back by several mirrors etc... what you need to do is, to make a bridge to external source (you need to cause this effect by some action with medium – for example, the natural light in medium as light and energy source are lightning ball or plasma)

This is example, what i want to say that – it is not enough to loop electricity through coils – you need interact with medium (make a bridge) But remember – always and always this is manipulation with time (free energy are not impossible with that! This is always like that – and there are not only free energy, Gravity and other effects (you can see this for example in John Hutchinson experiments)

Stop posting your bullshit please.

Offline frankidel

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10523 on: February 05, 2012, 06:25:30 PM »
you are right (exactly in that way are organised process in device) keep it up :)
* -coupling to - possibly some of external form of energy – (answer: "ionisation")

 
It's not the electrons, it's the ions   ( T.H. Moray )

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10523 on: February 05, 2012, 06:25:30 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline John M

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10524 on: February 05, 2012, 06:39:35 PM »
Not always, you can do modifications as you wish – this thing is "big experiment" :)
Device is simple and there are no too complicated to modify something.

The most important thing is to organise HV impulses – the most simple way is to use Blocking generator in right arrangement
Example is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Sm-xKiStXBQ#!

"This is first step" you can make a simple Mini Tesla coil – If you remember awhile ago i say importance of "Andrey Melnichenko" works
"The essence of the physical effect of generation of the free energy of the secondary field of the ferromagnetic"

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fferromagnetic-energy.ru%2Farticles%2Fsut_fizicheskogo_e_ffekta1%2F

http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/delamorto/kacer_delamorto.jpg
http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/delamorto/DELAMORTO_2.jpg

P.S. Don't listen others here, they want not let you know about this – they are not interested in Free Energy, mostly is interest of self importance.






There is so many variations it is hard for some of us to decide out which one to pursue. To use ferrite or not to use ferrite. Use caudeus or not use caudeus.
Below is my favorite video. I don't know if anyone else has replicated it but it seems simple. Cosmos mentioned that it is simple. Know one seems to know how it works where they can explain the theory and how it relates to how such a device works.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Sm-xKiStXBQ#
John




Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3955
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10525 on: February 05, 2012, 07:28:23 PM »





There is so many variations it is hard for some of us to decide out which one to pursue. To use ferrite or not to use ferrite. Use caudeus or not use caudeus.
Below is my favorite video. I don't know if anyone else has replicated it but it seems simple. Cosmos mentioned that it is simple. Know one seems to know how it works where they can explain the theory and how it relates to how such a device works.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Sm-xKiStXBQ#
John


Here is my favourite : http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a7X5fHhmeEY

(however due to ACTA they removed sound :-( )

cosmoLV thank you very much ! I believe delamorto circuit is not a hoax !

Note: gap between two banks of ferrite rings...

Now , I wonder why this setup is limited to only 500-700W of output power ? Something is still wrong , but don't think about it right now. We need a replication first ! Even small 10W would be nice and allow to research various problems in circuit.

The only problem I have with ferrite and iron core is possible radiation which is not easy to measure (costly apparatus)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10525 on: February 05, 2012, 07:28:23 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline abc

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10526 on: February 05, 2012, 08:34:13 PM »
Stop posting your bullshit please.
He will while there're listeners;
those who know're silent :D.

Offline FreeEnergyInfo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
    • FreeEnergyLT
« Last Edit: February 05, 2012, 10:50:17 PM by FreeEnergyInfo »

Offline cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10528 on: February 05, 2012, 09:39:13 PM »
you are right (exactly in that way are organised process in device) keep it up :)
* -coupling to - possibly some of external form of energy – (answer: "ionisation")

It's not the electrons, it's the ions   ( T.H. Moray )

I already say this, where you see in text "electrons"  !


P.S.

Example of natural process:
 (we can compare it with light – when you for example want to make a infinite light source – what you need to do?
 First of all, it is not enough to amplify a light source – lets say from light bulb through magnifying lens and loop it back by several mirrors etc... what you need to do is, to make a bridge to external source (you need to cause this effect by some action with medium – for example, the natural light in medium as light and energy source are lightning ball or plasma)

This is example, what i want to say that – it is not enough to loop electricity through coils – you need interact with medium (make a bridge) But remember – always and always this is manipulation with time (free energy are not impossible with that! This is always like that – and there are not only free energy, Gravity and other effects (you can see this for example in John Hutchinson experiments)

Stop posting your bullshit please.

This is not a bullshit, this is true – like you this or not!

Offline John M

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10529 on: February 05, 2012, 09:58:34 PM »

Here is my favourite : http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a7X5fHhmeEY

(however due to ACTA they removed sound :-( )

cosmoLV thank you very much ! I believe delamorto circuit is not a hoax !

Note: gap between two banks of ferrite rings...

Now , I wonder why this setup is limited to only 500-700W of output power ? Something is still wrong , but don't think about it right now. We need a replication first ! Even small 10W would be nice and allow to research various problems in circuit.



The only problem I have with ferrite and iron core is possible radiation which is not easy to measure (costly apparatus)





I believe Cosmos himself said ferrite is limited to about 500 to 700 watts maximum.

John

 

OneLink