Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: MPI Patent  (Read 17394 times)

Overtone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #15 on: June 27, 2009, 07:57:35 AM »
Tinsel,

If you read my earlier reply it states clearly that a further filing is in the works for the device to exceed unity. The first prototype exceeded unity by a very large margin at extremely low power. 

However, developing this particular technology into a commercial product is complex and expensive and other solid-state generators are likely to be in production more rapidly.

Another patent is pending on a different family of generators and several more patent applications are in line.

Logged

turbo

  • Guest
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2009, 11:14:35 AM »
Quote from: Overtone on June 27, 2009, 07:50:01 AM
Marco,

The statement about your physical condition is almost a direct quote from one of your own posts on this website. Your memory is obviously also failing.   :D

Yes  :D it is, you are correct.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2009, 12:28:41 PM by -[marco]- »
Logged

Nali2001

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2009, 11:41:15 AM »
Well if one wants yo maintain the good squareloop properties of a nanocrystalline core you better not machine it at all. And if you do, to the very least it has to be re-annealed.

Don't know what properties you are depending on, Hi freq low loss or high freq square loop (both?). But it is tricky to keep these properties intact when you machine cores like 2605 metglas or Finemet Ft3. So I can imagine that such stuff needs to be reprocessed. But even then not all is 'best'. Its a trade off, but you either do that or noting at all.

Can you tell me what core type you use and what specific properties you expect from it?

Thanks!
Kind regards,
Steven




Logged

Overtone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2009, 03:33:20 PM »
Steven,

Sorry. That is propritary information.

Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #19 on: June 27, 2009, 06:29:19 PM »
Quote from: Overtone on June 27, 2009, 07:57:35 AM
Tinsel,

If you read my earlier reply it states clearly that a further filing is in the works for the device to exceed unity. The first prototype exceeded unity by a very large margin at extremely low power. 

However, developing this particular technology into a commercial product is complex and expensive and other solid-state generators are likely to be in production more rapidly.

Another patent is pending on a different family of generators and several more patent applications are in line.

Mark, I've read just about everything you've written publicly since 1999, and for some reason it always says pretty much exactly the same thing. 
Jam yesterday, jam tomorrow, but no jam today.
And your claim of any excess power from your "first prototype" is just that: a claim, which no one has been able either to verify or replicate.
Logged

Overtone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #20 on: June 27, 2009, 07:17:28 PM »
Tinsel,

Keep an eye on our Chava website...

Those with a need to visit our labs and have signed a NDA are fully aware of our progress.  This is new science and new technology. None of it is simple or easy.

An analog is hot fusion, which after hundreds of billions of $ has had trivial over unity.

This work, and I am not just referring to our firm, has been funded at an absurdly low level world-wide, even though it is far more promising. The surprising fact is that some continue, including yourself, to pursue it.

Fortunately, change is in the wind and practical products are on the horizon. Chances are you will get to enjoy some jam in the not too distant future.
Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #21 on: June 27, 2009, 08:10:45 PM »
Mark
Don't worry, your shenanigans are being watched, at higher levels and with more amusement than you might realize. And you are right, I am continually surprised that I myself am involved, at whatever level.
I really do hope you or somebody has something, or will have something, other than the same old rap. But my reality is evidence-based, not theoretical, even though I'm not from Missouri. And if there's any evidence for your claims, I certainly haven't seen it. What I have seen, on the other hand, could be taken as evidence that you don't in fact have what you claim and will never actually have it.
But I do admire your tenacity and I envy the fact that you are able to structure your own destiny, or at least this portion of your path through it.
Too bad Sebastopol has gotten so gentrified. I lived there in the 70's and it was pretty nice then.
--TK
Logged

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #22 on: June 28, 2009, 03:55:46 AM »
Quote from: Overtone on June 27, 2009, 07:17:28 PM
Tinsel,

Keep an eye on our Chava website...

Those with a need to visit our labs and have signed a NDA are fully aware of our progress.  This is new science and new technology. None of it is simple or easy.

An analog is hot fusion, which after hundreds of billions of $ has had trivial over unity.

This work, and I am not just referring to our firm, has been funded at an absurdly low level world-wide, even though it is far more promising. The surprising fact is that some continue, including yourself, to pursue it.

Fortunately, change is in the wind and practical products are on the horizon. Chances are you will get to enjoy some jam in the not too distant future.

The ring device with the drilled mag glass uses a piss-poor core material, which lacks specific properties to succeed in the endeavor.  Furthermore, that devices origins are rooted in an anonymous document about "duplication of magnetic fields".  So, patent schmatent.

Ride the gilded stallion while you can, Mark, when D-Day comes, your investor will pull in the reins.

Logged

Overtone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #23 on: June 28, 2009, 04:04:09 PM »
As the website reveals, Chava is developing a variety of magnetic generators as well as other promising technologies.
Logged

ckreol1

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: MPI Patent
« Reply #24 on: August 02, 2009, 08:25:06 AM »
Mark, I remember a patent was applied for last year.  Has that patent become public?  Please share.
Logged

Overtone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: MPI 2nd Patent Pending
« Reply #25 on: August 02, 2009, 04:36:40 PM »
Applications are not public until 18 months after filing. That one went to the PTO last December.

The work is now part of Chava.  The website is: www.chavaenergy.com
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »