Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 173 174 175 176 177 [178] 179 180 181 182 183 ... 189   Go Down

Author Topic: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie  (Read 652067 times)

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2655 on: November 16, 2009, 06:42:42 PM »
number 4
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2656 on: November 16, 2009, 06:46:38 PM »
THANK YOU VERY MUCH GRUMPY.  I think we need you take over as monitor here.  Just teach Poynty your
trick of bringing the post size down a bit. 

 :-*
Logged

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2657 on: November 16, 2009, 06:46:49 PM »
Thanks Grumpy.

There is a scroll bar at the bottom of the screen  ::)

It should be noted that the Current Probe can be located at almost any point in the circuit. Close to the battery + terminal would be ideal.

.99
Logged

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2658 on: November 16, 2009, 07:04:57 PM »
poynt come on man...
look, there is NO reason for your line drawing to be 1600 pixels wide. did any of the critical detail get lost when grump resized them? NO!
no one wants to scroll back and forth because you are too ignorant to post a properly sized image...
you can use a scope but you cant use paint. ::)

rose, just delete his posts containing the idiotically huge line drawings. maybe then he will figure out how to properly size his images...
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2659 on: November 16, 2009, 07:11:21 PM »
Quote from: WilbyInebriated on November 16, 2009, 07:04:57 PM
poynt come on man...
look there is NO reason for your line drawing to be 1600 pixels wide.
no one wants to scroll back and forth because you are too ignorant to post a properly sized image.
you can use a scope but you cant use paint. ::)

rose, just delete his posts containing the idiotically huge line drawings. maybe then he will figure out how to properly size his images...

Actually Wilby - it's a good idea - but it's also rather amusing.  If Poynty would prefer me to - I'll do it -
especially as Grumpy's done a repost.  Just advise.  Your choice Poynty?  I'm definitely trigger happy if that's a preference.
Logged

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2660 on: November 16, 2009, 07:11:31 PM »
Hi everyone,


Here is Test #9 with the new shunt installed a 0.25 Ohm resistor from "Caddock" High Performance Film Resistor, "non-inductive" 30 Watt, type MP930-0.25-1%, this is a re-test of TEST #8 ( http://www.energeticforum.com/73814-post3108.html )

http://www.energeticforum.com/74402-post3126.html



Here is TEST #10 .... it's a one (1) hour test with 40us and 2us readings taken every six (6) minutes for a total of eleven (11) readings or twenty two (22) Image and Data files for one (1) hour.

http://www.energeticforum.com/74594-post3133.html

Fuzzy
 :)
 
Logged

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2661 on: November 16, 2009, 07:13:23 PM »
Quote from: witsend on November 16, 2009, 07:11:21 PM
Actually Wilby - it's a good idea - but it's also rather amusing.  If Poynty would prefer me to - I'll do it - especially as Grumpy's done a repost.  Just advise.  Your choice Poynty?  I'm definitely trigger happy if that's a preference.
if he has any brains at all, he would just grab grumps resized versions, and replace his with those...
but he is probably tired or something... ::)

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how%20to%20resize%20images
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2662 on: November 16, 2009, 07:22:46 PM »
Wilby - truth is that those posts are really quite amusing.  In fact I've been rolling with laughter.  Truth is I prefer them to the resized numbers.  Not that I don't appreciate Grumpy's efforts.  Just sorry to find out that Poynty's still going on going on.  For a while there I rather hoped we'd get something interesting.

 
Logged

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2663 on: November 16, 2009, 07:32:07 PM »
Quote from: witsend on November 16, 2009, 07:22:46 PM
Wilby - truth is that those posts are really quite amusing.  In fact I've been rolling with laughter.  Truth is I prefer them to the resized numbers.  Not that I don't appreciate Grumpy's efforts.  Just sorry to find out that Poynty's still going on going on.  For a while there I rather hoped we'd get something interesting.

If the Ainslie team continues this pursuit to the end, it is inevitable they will have no choice but to implement at least one of the 4 proposed improvements I've just outlined.

At that time I would hope at least for a "thank you", since no one on that team had the insight to realize these deficiencies and improvements themselves. But alas I won't be holding my breath 8) as that's usually how it goes when pride and ego rein over gratitude.

.99
Logged

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2664 on: November 16, 2009, 07:35:32 PM »
Quote from: poynt99 on November 16, 2009, 07:32:07 PM
If the Ainslie team continues this pursuit to the end, it is inevitable they will have no choice but to implement at least one of the 4 proposed improvements I've just outlined.

At that time I would hope at least for a "thank you", since no one on that team had the insight to realize these deficiencies and improvements themselves. But alas I won't be holding my breath 8) as that's usually how it goes when pride and ego rein over gratitude.

.99

i'll say thanks if you resize your ridiculously sized images to something more appropriately sized...
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how%20to%20resize%20images
and it's reign not rein... and you don't have to thank me. ::)

speaking of insight... how come you didn't say all of this 200 pages ago? why has "the real deal" test as proposed by the 'anti ainslie team' been changed so many times? how many times is it now that your team has moved the goalposts poynt? i've lost track. perhaps i should go back over the thread and make a post that shows all those...

edit: and fuzzy keeps showing his work while poynt keeps talking and showing none of his...
Logged

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2665 on: November 16, 2009, 08:03:02 PM »
Quote from: poynt99 on November 16, 2009, 07:32:07 PM
If the Ainslie team continues this pursuit to the end, it is inevitable they will have no choice but to implement at least one of the 4 proposed improvements I've just outlined.

At that time I would hope at least for a "thank you", since no one on that team had the insight to realize these deficiencies and improvements themselves. But alas I won't be holding my breath 8) as that's usually how it goes when pride and ego rein over gratitude.

.99

walk away
Logged

utilitarian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 816
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2666 on: November 16, 2009, 08:18:57 PM »
Quote from: poynt99 on November 16, 2009, 07:32:07 PM
If the Ainslie team continues this pursuit to the end, it is inevitable they will have no choice but to implement at least one of the 4 proposed improvements I've just outlined.

At that time I would hope at least for a "thank you", since no one on that team had the insight to realize these deficiencies and improvements themselves. But alas I won't be holding my breath 8) as that's usually how it goes when pride and ego rein over gratitude.

.99

Those people do not care about trying to falsify their claims, which every good scientist should try to do prior to asserting something as world-shaking as "hey there is extra energy here coming from NOTHING!!!!". 

You will never demonstrate anything to their satisfaction, as they can always point to something or other and claim your tests are deficient.  If their device is green, and your replication is off-green, they are going to claim the colors are all wrong and you should do an EXACT replication before you should be so bold as to say anything negative.

I agree, just walk away.  The burden is on the inventor to demonstrate overunity, so let her and her team do that.
Logged

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2667 on: November 16, 2009, 08:21:49 PM »
Quote from: Grumpy on November 16, 2009, 08:03:02 PM
walk away
it's a little difficult for poynt to do that and save any face in the light of his earlier 'prophecies' regarding how this would all pan out...
Logged

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2668 on: November 16, 2009, 08:24:33 PM »
Indeed, it's time to heed the advice from all my close associates here and go for that walk. I've done about all I can do here (and more) to bring the crucial aspects to this whole exercise to light.

Perhaps I'll see you all again some time down the road.

.99
Logged

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #2669 on: November 16, 2009, 08:27:32 PM »
transients produce harmonics - many many harmonics.

Ever see the harmonics of a delta fuinction (a very narrow spike)?  Man, they just go on forever.

Has anyone looked at the ol' signal at the infamous inductive resistor with a spectrum analyzer?

Quote
Since harmonic voltages produce harmonic currents with frequencies considerably higher than the power system fundamental frequency, these currents encounter much higher impedances as they propagate through the power system than does the fundamental frequency current. This is due to “skin effect,” which is the tendency for higher frequency currents to flow near the surface of the conductor. Since little of the high-frequency current penetrates far beneath the surface of the conductor, less cross-sectional area is used by the current. As the effective cross section of the conductor is reduced, the effective resistance of the conductor is increased.

The higher resistance encountered by the harmonic currents will produce a significant heating of the conductor, since heat produced — or power lost — in a conductor is I2R, where I is the current flowing through the conductor.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 173 174 175 176 177 [178] 179 180 181 182 183 ... 189   Go Up
« previous next »