Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie  (Read 643687 times)

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #315 on: July 12, 2009, 07:57:34 AM »
If you fkn agree, mostly, and if I have long ago conceded your point, then why in the world do you keep on harping on it?
It's getting to be quite ridiculous. You seem fairly intelligent for a troll, and it might be nice to actually discuss something substantive with you, if only you would change your meds or something.

Oh, I get it--you are a paid lackey of the Free Energy Gurus In White, and you are keeping me uselessly distracted on this thread, answering your inanities, while everybody else is happily developing their gravitymagnoSECgenerator, without skeptical interference.
because you still haven't shown any data with a correct replication, obviously...
just do it, put it to rest.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #316 on: July 12, 2009, 07:57:57 AM »
you didn't know that at the time. nice misdirection though. the point remains, you used a circuit diagram which specified a irfpg50 among other components and you substituted whatever you felt like. and then proceeded to use words like identical and exact and then compared your hack to good scientific method. that's what i have always had an issue with, 30 pages running now.

Wrong yet again. The very first thing when I started this fiasco was to read everything I could find, and it's in her early material. I knew she said the mosfet wasn't critical before I did the first thing with this project.
And I did not use whatever I felt like, I used the closest match I could find at the time, after pouring over data sheets for hours.

And you will be happy to know that I have just burned up my dinner, ruined a pan, and I have nothing else to eat in the house.

So troll along off, little troll, I'm not playing with you any more. You can't even come up with a proper criticism.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #317 on: July 12, 2009, 07:58:40 AM »
because you still haven't shown any data with a correct replication, obviously...
just do it, put it to rest.

I don't have to show you no stinkin badges.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #318 on: July 12, 2009, 08:00:27 AM »
Wrong yet again. The very first thing when I started this fiasco was to read everything I could find, and it's in her early material. I knew she said the mosfet wasn't critical before I did the first thing with this project.
And I did not use whatever I felt like, I used the closest match I could find at the time, after pouring over data sheets for hours.

And you will be happy to know that I have just burned up my dinner, ruined a pan, and I have nothing else to eat in the house.

So troll along off, little troll, I'm not playing with you any more. You can't even come up with a proper criticism.
no you didn't or you would have pulled out the 'zipons' ad hom right away. and, if that was the case, which it's not, why wouldn't you have said that in this reply to my first critique of your 'replication'?
OK, several points to address.
First, yes, when I can find them I will use identical components to Ainslie's circuit. Her MOSFET is kind of pricey and will have to be ordered; the one I'm using is...well, you can look up the data. It's pretty close, good enough for prelim testing. I will replace the shunt with .25 ohm today.
wow, what an amazing confabulation you have there tk...

nobody cares... mint?

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #319 on: July 12, 2009, 08:09:56 AM »
You will please stop making things up about which you have no idea.
I first mentioned the "zipons", I believe, in my very first post on this issue. Which is not in this thread. It's in the post where I replied to ramset when he asked me to look into this matter. I'm sure you could find it, if you could just get your head out of that dark smelly place you live in.

IceStorm

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #320 on: July 12, 2009, 08:10:26 AM »
have you read my posts re: the fet where i said i agree with him? (mostly) ::)

No, ive not seen it

Best Regards,
IceStorm

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #321 on: July 12, 2009, 08:11:08 AM »
no you didn't or you would have pulled out the 'zipons' ad hom right away. and, if that was the case, which it's not, why wouldn't you have said that in this reply to my first critique of your 'replication'?wow, what an amazing confabulation you have there tk...

nobody cares... mint?

Lying troll, you cannot even get your own facts straight. Now go away and bother someone else.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #322 on: July 12, 2009, 08:16:38 AM »
Wilby, just what will it take to get you off my back? I have long ago conceded your only point.
I really do not want to continue this ridiculous exchange. Why don't you seriously go pick on Rosemary, who has clearly made manymany more of the kinds of statements you seem to object to, and where it might do some good?
You are not doing good here.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #323 on: July 12, 2009, 08:17:29 AM »
Lying troll, you cannot even get your own facts straight. Now go away and bother someone else.
that's your justification for not saying right then and there that the fet didn't matter? LOL this is rich, hold on, i gotta grab a chair this is sure to be classic...

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #324 on: July 12, 2009, 08:18:10 AM »
Wilby, just what will it take to get you off my back? I have long ago conceded your only point.
I really do not want to continue this ridiculous exchange. Why don't you seriously go pick on Rosemary, who has clearly made manymany more of the kinds of statements you seem to object to, and where it might do some good?
You are not doing good here.
i've told you several times now. do it right, for the love of zeus.
you and i are not talking about RA, we are talking about your bad scientific method. i've seen your definition of 'good' in regards to your scientific method. i think i'll stay, i got heathens aplenty right here...

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #325 on: July 12, 2009, 08:20:04 AM »
i've told you several times now. do it right, for the love of zeus.
you and i are not talking about RA, we are talking about your bad scientific method. i got heathens aplenty right here...

That is it. Goodbye. You get the last word. Enjoy playing with yourself.

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #326 on: July 12, 2009, 03:20:12 PM »
If you look at energeticforum.com , Rosemary said that the Fet is not a critical part
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-8.html#post59195
Also, Tinselkoala appears to have been slung off that thread. Nice use
of red ink:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-16.html

henieck

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Claim no OU of Rosemary's circuit
« Reply #327 on: July 12, 2009, 03:46:13 PM »
Hello TinselKoala (and others as well),

You seem to be very reasonable guy. I know you from the other forum and I am happy I have found you here because I would like to ask you a question. You are well seasoned member of wide interest of this community while I am just a fresh one, and my little request to you is if you could express what is your perspective on “free energy” field in terms of what seems to be bull s. or what has been successfully replicated by some people. So far I have proved just to myself that Rosemary’s circuit is a joke. I hope others will be able to make it working – but I really doubt it.

The worst is that years later there will be people who will be trying out this stupid circuit and be puzzled by the surface effect of the flyback loop – what a waste of time. So after my first encounter in this field it seems to me that designer is uneducated- but made a virtue from this fact and reframed it into open-mind-ness, emotional about the outcome, childish about criticism, not capable of objective, down to the point thinking, not being able to detect her own errors in judgments and trace her own mind deceit. I was shocked to discover that the “inventor” did not know basic operational facts about electric current, energy or even her very simple circuit.

This woman was not even aware of the fact that it takes energy to make magnetic field exist, and that a coil can store some energy in the form of magnetic field, until it is disconnected form the current! This is just most shocking of all. The woman who was gong to energetically save the world had no most basic understanding about energy. It wasn’t somebody who knew it, saw a flaw in it and proposed different, better theory– it was somebody who had an amazing informational “hole” in this region and in few others (the battery example). There was no model about this piece of reality in her mind at all– so instead of getting educated she was forced to make a new zipon theory.

Even when I pointed out how energy is stored in a coil - nothing helped, like there was total blockage for any new input. Just her littlie world of sick hallucinations and zero capability to processing any new information – just deletion. She had no other choice - she had to delete all the contradictory information because otherwise she would be forced to rebuild her entire pitiful world and all the past experiences about this circuit. Infinitely pitiful. I didn’t want to put new convictions through throat – I just wanted her to process new information somehow. She must have had sensed, that asking questions expose to herself her inconsistencies – so she insisted on deletion of those who asked inconvenient questions.

Some other users of forum disappointed equally – evidently they want to live in entirely other semi scientific, semi religious world and don’t want to be disturbed by any sober, they call “debunkers”. I think that first of all she was trying to debunk widely accepted point of view – and the fact that they call me debunker confirms that they had readily swallowed her infantile, yet complicated zipon theory like Lindemann swallowed gravity wheel idea. Seeing this great “nothingness” compared to her great claims I have to admit I have got carried away a bit – so they blocked me entirely that I can’t even read what is next there. Does it happen very often here as well?

Scientifically, playing with this idiotic circuit for few days was a pure waste of time, although one learns all the time something new. Conversely, from psychological point of view – it was fascinating to have first hand experience in this field how psychology of one such “inventor” really operates. Priceless experience – and I am wondering – do you think that other pseudo-scientific “inventors” in this field are equally contaminated by this sort of psychological problems as well? But most of all, like I wrote above – I would love to hear your opinion about other things potentially worth of at least looking at. Are there any preliminarily promising things in this “free energy” field? I consider this Rosemary’s idiotic thing finished for me and need new inspiration. What is yours now?

Best regards, henieck.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #328 on: July 12, 2009, 04:07:32 PM »
Quote from All Canadian

I would like to make a point about skeptics, skepticism to a point can be a healthy thing but you should understand where this path leads.Take a look at this website and read the posts for a while and you will get the picture.---http://forums.randi.org/
These guys must be the most self rightious, egostical bafoons I have ever had the displeasure of talking with. They are hard core skeptics who believe reason and logic must dictate everything as such they cannot imagine how "there" logic could be flawed in any way,so they continually degrade and humiliate each other. In essence there logic concludes that 99.99% of the people on this planet are misguided, delusional or stupid relative to them. But there logic has a flaw, the individual, there logic cannot explain the wright brothers airplane, goddards rockets or Teslas alternating current. Because at that time all these technologies were "unproven" to the skeptics the key word being "unproven", the skeptic needs concrete proof before he will believe anything as such he believes almost nothing which is why I have yet to hear of any true skeptic accomplish anything that could be regarded as beneficial to society in any way.
I usually simply ignore the skeptics as they have absolutely nothing to offer me in the way of understanding, they come to degrade and humiliate to make themselves feel superior----that is there nature.

BTW  TK is NOT a skeptic  ,
He is a scientist/experimenter with a very good bullshit meter

Chet 

Asymatrix

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #329 on: July 12, 2009, 04:59:42 PM »
Perhaps Rosemary is Mylow's cousin...