I wonder if you know any more about this Physics than you do about Lawrence Tseung's
Physics.

What is pathetic is that you do not care to learn.

Teach me then, PaulR.

Show me what you've got.

Build a device using Tseung's "theory" and show it doing something, anything at all, that is not fully in line with conventional high-school physics.

Build the circuit under discussion here, test it however the flmp you like, and report your results.

In other words, put YOUR WORK where your mouth is.


(Oh, and by the way, there is only one "Physics", and it does not belong to anyone. It's testable and its results are public and may be repeated any time by anybody who has the right tools and the knowledge to use them. Mathematics being the primary tool.)

At this point everyone at energetic is quite aware THERE IS A PROBLEM.

So now its playtime [fun for some]
Hopefully they will utilize some of Aarons parallel coil stuff or the tensor flat coil stuff In Stiffler's Thread [VERY interesting things being discussed the last few days][especially from the penguin fellow]

Here http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3934-high-voltage-thin-air-26.html

Perhaps now the stops can be pulled out on a lot of these Ideas/facts?

Chet

I have not been approved over at energetiforum, otherwise I would likely respond to some posts in the Ainslie thread and Gotoluc's bemf recirculating thread.

.99

They say you are approved now.

You will have to carry the banner of truth and accuracy of information; I have been banned and my posts removed (the recent ones anyway). And I used no profanity, no insults, I just asked questions, pointed out discrepancies, and provided true information.

In my opinion, the fact that that forum's moderators will actively censor posts and remove them, even though they are not abusive or obscene, even though they are reporting on experiments that Ainslie requested, is a travesty of the entire concepts of truth, freedom of information, open-sourcing, and so forth. The site, which seems to be at root a religious one, is clearly fascistic and totalitarian in what it will allow to be discussed.

Not like this one at all.

Thanks, Stefan, for allowing contrary opinions and facts to flourish, and to be subject to the same tests as other extraordinary claims.

Skeptics perform a very necessary role in the quest. Some are more credible than others, just like the researchers they criticize. But a real discovery is skeptic-proof, and the harder skeptics try to knock it down, and fail, the "realer" the discovery. And the real researcher welcomes the challenge to attempt to disprove her ideas; indeed, cooperates with it. Most scientific papers reporting experiments include substantial error analyses, references to published support for ideas in the paper, and so forth, and on review, if the reviewers ask for the raw data, it almost always is provided. Certainly, references to calibration and other vetting must be real and traceable, if it is to be taken seriously.

They say you are approved now.

You will have to carry the banner of truth and accuracy of information; I have been banned and my posts removed (the recent ones anyway). And I used no profanity, no insults, I just asked questions, pointed out discrepancies, and provided true information.

In my opinion, the fact that that forum's moderators will actively censor posts and remove them, even though they are not abusive or obscene, even though they are reporting on experiments that Ainslie requested, is a travesty of the entire concepts of truth, freedom of information, open-sourcing, and so forth. The site, which seems to be at root a religious one, is clearly fascistic and totalitarian in what it will allow to be discussed.

Not like this one at all.

Thanks, Stefan, for allowing contrary opinions and facts to flourish, and to be subject to the same tests as other extraordinary claims.

Skeptics perform a very necessary role in the quest. Some are more credible than others, just like the researchers they criticize. But a real discovery is skeptic-proof, and the harder skeptics try to knock it down, and fail, the "realer" the discovery. And the real researcher welcomes the challenge to attempt to disprove her ideas; indeed, cooperates with it. Most scientific papers reporting experiments include substantial error analyses, references to published support for ideas in the paper, and so forth, and on review, if the reviewers ask for the raw data, it almost always is provided. Certainly, references to calibration and other vetting must be real and traceable, if it is to be taken seriously.

ohhh you got banned. poor poor pitiful you. i was gonna make a wager with you on how long that was going to take...

you were told in no uncertain terms that your posts were no longer welcome in that thread and to refrain from posting in that thread or your posts would be deleted... and yet here you are, acting all surprised and shocked that that's what happened after you continued to post.  again i have to ask, are you mental?

i saw you claim to have the correct fet now, no data yet? well, let us know when your 'i got myself banned' pity party is over and you get back to serious work. 

can i cry too?  since you banned me from your youtube channel for asking questions and pointing out discrepancies. hypocrite.

Hi Folks,

Do you know what happened to the energeticforum.com ?  it has been down for some hours now. Last time I visited their pages was about 6 hours ago and now my web browser says it cannot be found.

Gyula

Still works for me. I can even still post there, although I won't anymore. As you can see, the odor is clinging.

I did that - in Lawrence's thread. I shall not bother to
do it again.

Thank goodness for small favors.

LMFAO, will you be using the correct fet this time? like you should have done from the start if you were at all concerned with good science.

i promised you nothing. there you go making stuff up again. using words that don't apply like 'identical', 'exactly', 'fascist' and 'totalitarian'... show 'exactly' where i said "i promise".
whoops, there i go pointing out your discrepancies again...

Remember when you posted this?

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

The phrase "I will" would be interpreted in any court of contract law as a promise to perform.
If, that is, it was uttered by an entity competent to enter into a contract.
Which you, being a troll of the first magnitude, clearly are not.

DBL Post