Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie  (Read 643630 times)

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #195 on: July 08, 2009, 01:01:00 AM »
why are you looking for testable hypothesis "over there" when you won't even test your own here?

You wouldn't know a testable hypothesis if you woke up next to one.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #196 on: July 08, 2009, 01:02:13 AM »
You wouldn't know a testable hypothesis if you woke up next to one.

nice ad hom, you're quite good at that.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #197 on: July 08, 2009, 01:04:09 AM »
nice ad hom, you're quite good at that.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

Not as good as the "pro".

 :D

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #198 on: July 08, 2009, 01:05:11 AM »
But Wilby, if you'd bother to get someone to read my posts out loud to you in whatever language you stutter in, you'd see that I have reproduced the heating of the load. So how could it get any better, or even be different, if I used a different mosfet? Are you saying that DC produces overunity too? Or maybe that, since I got the same heating as she did, I'm getting COP>17 already, and using the mosfet you promised to send me will improve on that? Wow, I sure hope it gets here soon then. Maybe you should airmail it, so we can hurry up and save the world from the tyranny of big oil. Since you've been so helpful, I'll even cut you in for a percent. Not a percentage, a percent.

but TK, if you'd bother to comprehend my posts, you'd see that i have said i agree with you, SEVERAL TIMES NOW... i just don't like your half-assed approach of using the wrong fet and coming up with some hypothesis by using some ass backward approach instead of just using the right damn fet. but you refuse, justifying it with all sorts of obscure and pathological reasons.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #199 on: July 08, 2009, 01:05:43 AM »
Some very funny stuff here ;D ;D ;D ;D

Thanks guys

Chet

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #200 on: July 08, 2009, 01:07:18 AM »
"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

if the shoe fits, wear it...

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #201 on: July 08, 2009, 01:09:28 AM »
but TK, if you'd bother to comprehend my posts, you'd see that i have said i agree with you, SEVERAL TIMES NOW... i just don't like your half-assed approach of using the wrong fet and coming up with some hypothesis by using some ass backward approach instead of just using the right damn fet. but you refuse, for all sorts of obscure and pathological reasons.

At this point it's mostly because it's fun to rattle your cage.

Because you see, the mosfet has nothing to do with the problems in Ainslie's claim, and the 67 percent of scientists who understand statistics will agree that I have shown that her claims are not supported by reality.

Nevertheless, should an IRFPG50 mosfet miraculously arrive from somewhere beyond, I will assiduously test it, just for the satisfaction of saying "I told you so" to you.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

I love doing that! Ctrl-v and it makes you twitch, at the speed of thought! Zipons, eat your little bitty hearts out!

Justalabrat

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 93
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #202 on: July 08, 2009, 01:10:16 AM »
Tk, I've gone through at least 20 pages of WilbyInebriated posts, this is the only constructive thing that I found.

just connect the scope to one of your coil windings.

EVERYTHING ELSE WAS JUST ARGUING!  ::)
 Do yourself a favor and just put him on the IGNOR list!

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #203 on: July 08, 2009, 01:12:14 AM »
At this point it's mostly because it's fun to rattle your cage.

Because you see, the mosfet has nothing to do with the problems in Ainslie's claim, and the 67 percent of scientists who understand statistics will agree that I have shown that her claims are not supported by reality.

Nevertheless, should an IRFPG50 mosfet miraculously arrive from somewhere beyond, I will assiduously test it, just for the satisfaction of saying "I told you so" to you.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

I love doing that! Ctrl-v and it makes you twitch, at the speed of thought! Zipons, eat your little bitty hearts ou!

no, it's mostly because you need to save face. its been how many days now? surely you can afford a $4 part. get your friend whose address you PM'd me to use ebay for you. do they live in the same "sufist" cult building as you? or make up another pathetic excuse...

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #204 on: July 08, 2009, 01:13:42 AM »
Tk, I've gone through at least 20 pages of WilbyInebriated posts, this is the only constructive thing that I found.

EVERYTHING ELSE WAS JUST ARGUING!  ::)
 Do yourself a favor and just put him on the IGNOR list!

Well, that post was even wrong, because I've always connected the scope just as in the Ainslie papers, and yes, it is connected to the positive rail, along with one end of the coil-resistor load.

But don't let Wilby get you down, I understand his motivation perfectly. He's a truth seeker, and wants to keep me honest, and he's right to do that.

Too bad he's not a "truth-speaker" as well.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

Besides, if I just ignore him, he'll eventually go away, and what fun would that be?

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #205 on: July 08, 2009, 01:14:31 AM »
no, it's mostly because you need to save face. its been how many days now? surely you can afford a $4 part. get your friend whose address you PM'd me to use ebay for you. do they live in the same "sufist" cult building as you? or make up another pathetic excuse...

Why should I? I have it on the best authority that I will be getting one in the mail soon.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #206 on: July 08, 2009, 01:16:39 AM »
Why should I? I have it on the best authority that I will be getting one in the mail soon.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"
you're a betting man, i bet you $1000 US that you can't keep your mouth shut until it arrives...  ;)

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #207 on: July 08, 2009, 01:17:39 AM »
Well, that post was even wrong, because I've always connected the scope just as in the Ainslie papers, and yes, it is connected to the positive rail, along with one end of the coil-resistor load.

But don't let Wilby get you down, I understand his motivation perfectly. He's a truth seeker, and wants to keep me honest, and he's right to do that.

Too bad he's not a "truth-speaker" as well.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

Besides, if I just ignore him, he'll eventually go away, and what fun would that be?
actually it was a different circuit, but your pompous knee jerk jump to assumption is typical.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #208 on: July 08, 2009, 01:19:11 AM »
"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

You know, the more I think about this, the more pissed off I'm getting. You made a challenge and a promise, and I took you up on it by sending you a good address to use. Now you are reneging, and I have no idea what you will try to do with that address. I feel betrayed, because I trusted you, to a certain extent. But now I am thinking that I was right about you that other time: You are a troll, a stalker, and you do not care about truth, you care about getting a rise out of someone. Well, you've gotten a rise from me now.

Either send me the part or STFU and get off this thread. We are trying to do some serious work here and your posts are not constructive and in fact are disruptive.

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #209 on: July 08, 2009, 01:19:19 AM »
Foot happily in mouth, the monologue continues, with 2c zipons and delinquent antitruants leading the way.

Must be those delinquent little buggers that keep getting me in trouble. I wonder if wives can sense them. After all, wives can hear a squeaking hinge before the husband.

YES! That IS the answer! I must drop all research now so I can develop a hearing aid for delinquent antitruants. I'll have the boss off my back in no time!