Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie  (Read 643665 times)

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #165 on: July 07, 2009, 11:19:05 PM »
so that's a no then?

No, that's a yes. Assuming, of course, someone can tell me just what the correct circuit is, and someone else is able to get a stamp properly stuck to an envelope.

This is a no:

NO.


WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #166 on: July 07, 2009, 11:27:51 PM »
No, that's a yes. Assuming, of course, someone can tell me just what the correct circuit is, and someone else is able to get a stamp properly stuck to an envelope.

This is a no:

NO.

you still think i'm sending you a fet?  LMFAO you are funny. look tk, the other "replicators" weren't being pompous asses about their circuit being "exact", which i can't even believe you would dare to utter when i asked you straight up on page one if you had plans to do it right. then you do the same things you cry foul about R.M.A. doing, ad hom, misdirection (ie:talking about my circuit when it's yours that is up for criticism. i didn't post my incorrect "replication", you posted yours remember?)

edit: i did like how you did it wrong 4 times and then came up with that brilliant hypothesis you last posited. that one about using the fet you should have used first...  ::)
that was classic, thanks.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #167 on: July 07, 2009, 11:30:04 PM »
OMG!!! I"VE MADE A SERIOUS ERROR!!

An error that has profound implications for my "replication" of Ainslie's "work".

In fact it is so serious that I've got to go out immediately and get supplies and components to correct it.




What have I done? How could I have been so stupid and foolish?
Oh, well, I guess there's nothing for it but to admit:

 :'(









I've RUN OUT OF BOOZE!!!

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #168 on: July 07, 2009, 11:33:48 PM »
"you still think i'm sending you a fet?  LMFAO you are funny."

So this post from you was a baldfaced lie, then.
Well, color me especially stupid and naiive, because I tend to believe what people tell me they will do.
No more.
Either you come through and send me the transistor like you said you would, or you can go play in somebody else's yard, because my Mom won't let me play with liars.

well, you clearly have the ability to make BS up on the spot and then misdirect and obfuscate when called on it... i am assuming $4! is still "expensive" for you then? or is it that ebay is as difficult for you to use as google? or do you just like posting outright falsehoods as justification for doing it wrong?

send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum.

building "something" may or may not require opposable thumbs. from your elevated pulpit do let us know when you get around to building it "right"...

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #169 on: July 07, 2009, 11:36:53 PM »
"exactly"

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #170 on: July 07, 2009, 11:37:37 PM »
you still think i'm sending you a fet?  LMFAO you are funny. look tk, the other "replicators" weren't being pompous asses about their circuit being "exact", which i can't even believe you would dare to utter when i asked you straight up on page one if you had plans to do it right. then you do the same things you cry foul about R.M.A. doing, ad hom, misdirection (ie:talking about my circuit when it's yours that is up for criticism. i didn't post my incorrect "replication", you posted yours remember?)

edit: i did like how you did it wrong 4 times and then cam up with that brilliant hypothesis you last posited. that one about using the fet you should have used first...  ::)
that was classic, thanks.

Yes, I used a fet that was rated, on that critical parameter, higher than the one Rosemary allegedly used. Alleged--there is at this point nothing more than her bogus claims that says she actually used anything at all. And my "hypothesis" if you can interpret it correctly, is that she may have been using a BLOWN mosfet--in which case even you would probably admit that it would make no difference what mosfet it is.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #171 on: July 07, 2009, 11:39:01 PM »
"exactly"
"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #172 on: July 07, 2009, 11:40:26 PM »
Wilby

A....A.... LLLLIIIIIIIAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR!!!!!?? :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #173 on: July 07, 2009, 11:40:48 PM »
Yes, I used a fet that was rated, on that critical parameter, higher than the one Rosemary allegedly used. Alleged--there is at this point nothing more than her bogus claims that says she actually used anything at all. And my "hypothesis" if you can interpret it correctly, is that she may have been using a BLOWN mosfet--in which case even you would probably admit that it would make no difference what mosfet it is.

great, grand, wonderful. let us know when you get around the proper and correct experiment part that comes next.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #174 on: July 07, 2009, 11:42:39 PM »
great, grand, wonderful. let us know when you get around the proper and correct experiment part that comes next.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"


I'll be checking my mail every day, looking for a little package from you.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #175 on: July 07, 2009, 11:44:42 PM »
Wilby

A....A.... LLLLIIIIIIIAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR!!!!!??????

it's a $4 part. i've made it abundantly clear in prior posts that tk can easily afford it. why he chooses not to is beyond me. why you all are naive enough to think i was serious after i made explicit points of tk's demonstration of his deep pockets and his willingness to bet, why anyone would think i was serious is also beyond me.  ::)

nice try on the misdirection though...

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #176 on: July 07, 2009, 11:46:01 PM »
It will probably make as big a difference as the kind of scotch you drink

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #177 on: July 07, 2009, 11:48:40 PM »
It will probably make as big a difference as the kind of scotch you drink

i don't drink, but nice ad hom...

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #178 on: July 07, 2009, 11:55:59 PM »
If Aaron wasn't so busy with Jerry in his tube thread ,
this never would have gone on this long.
Look at Rosies cavalier response to the fact that the article is corrupt
Not even important enough for her to give a  clear answer [we should search all her posts]
How many days??

Chet

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #179 on: July 07, 2009, 11:58:56 PM »
If Aaron wasn't so busy with Jerry in his tube thread ,
this never would have gone on this long.
Look at Rosies cavalier response to the fact that the article is corrupt
Not even important enough for her to give a  clear answer [we should search all her posts]
How many days??

Chet
how is this relevant to tk using the wrong fet?
nice try on the misdirection though.