The simulation does not show BEMF. If you have it then you have no kick. If any part of the pulse goes below ground then the kick is nulled. It is delicate. Nature abhors a vacuum. Class AB amplifier would be a good example of this negating this process. You'll notice the height of the kick in the previous simulation because there is no negative part.
Podkletnov: CEMF effect allows the recoil to null the kick effect. The kick is to propel the standing wave incrementally forward from the source to the destination of farther out, increasing the radius. The Searl device holds the standing wave at bay because of the mechanical distance rotors fron the stators. Podkletnov and Brown sent the standing wave away at incredible distances and speed.
Look at the kick like the return reading of a metal detector. 

The first rotovertor has the generator side by side or dual parallel axis and this configuration works beautifully. The reconfiguration on the same axis has a preponderance of tuning issues. Any takers?

If this info is not in line or spec with this thread then many apologies.

--Ji'an K'ylar.

Seems like someone is finally catching on. TPU = Motionless induction motor/generator.

Single oscillator, phase shifted to drive a 3 phase stator (control Coils) with a rotor/pickup (collector).

Using multiple control coils/stator coils, one on top of the other (sound familar Farraday?) to increase output field, use more collectors to collect more of the field. simple induction and generator theory.

very simple to do really.

Have fun, be careful.

BEP

Did that, but Wiki would seem to be the only reference to the two being different things. Like I said, at college in England (ok, it was a few years ago now) I never even encountered the term CEMF - our inductor theory talked only about BEMF.

The fact that you hadn't heard the term BEMF until you started to use the web does rather tend to indicate it is a language issue rather than a distinctly different phenomenon.

However, I do feel we need to clarify this point. Can you provide another reference other than Wiki?  A single reference could be wrong and is not really acceptable. The majority of websites talk about the two terms as if they are a different way of saying the same thing. Wiki would seem to be in the minority.

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00351.htm

http://ayyarao.blog.co.in/files/2008/07/notes-8.pdf

http://campus.murraystate.edu/tsm/tsm118/Ch7/Ch7_4/Ch7_4.htm

I personally think we are simply using different terms to describe the same thing.

Agreed Dave

Inductive spikes may well be something different altogether, but as far as what is implied by BEMF and CEMF, I truly believe that the confusion here has been created by people who have had no formal training thinking that the two terms are different phenomenons... and Wikipedia!

American = CEMF
UK = BEMF

Therefore BEMF = CEMF

@FD,
I was referring to the kick simulation picture.

HELOO ALL
 
tesla whas discoveret longtime ago how isposible to spin in one direction to spin his rotor 

WHIT AC VOLTAGE
IF AC IS more then 60 or 50 hz   did  the rotor whill spin fats <yes>
and now  the same elktromagnet force fild of that motor  be all the time the same  and if you increasing only the hz  rotor whill be spin more fast
NOW WORDS  FROM <S.M>

........ IF YOU HAVE VERY SMALL MAGNET  AND MOVE FAST IN TO THE COIL  WHIT SPEED  OF GUN BULYT ...
AND NOW .. THE ELLTROMAGNET IS THE SAME FORCE WHIT NO CHANGE THE FORCE  AND ONLY INCREASIN THE  SPEED 

IS HERE SOMETHING LIKE  S.M SAYS

IM VONDERING WHAT IS THE SPEED  OF S.M SMALL ELKTROMAGNET FILD IN TO THE  T.P.U
IS IT  5000 TURNING IN ONE SECOND  OF THAT VERY SMALL  ELKTROMAGNET FILD

P.S  . MANNIX I   ASK MY SELF  WHAT I WHILL DO  WHIT  MY METER IN MY HOUSE IS STILL  RUNING FAST ,,HOW TO SLOW DOWN>
idont have money to pay bilds

Oppps.   BEP, Have I shoved my foot in my mouth?

Loner, you're too sensitive my friend.

BEP wanted clarity on the issue... he got it. Job done.

If he should feel anyway aggrieved that the outcome didn't go his way then that is an issue for himself to deal with, it was never anything personal.

So Loner, are you yet in a position to collaborate on a project?

My thinking is this. If we could decide on a design that offers the most promise, then both carefully build the same thing, we could always rely on the other person to confirm results... or not.  Also, given that we would no doubt be using different test equipment, any anomalies that show up when we both have identical designs might be extremely imformative.

What do you say?

Yes that rings a bell now about old Boycie. Didn't he get struck by lightning twice... and lived to tell the tale.

I guess he either was really creating some sort of energy vortex... or someone upstairs doesn't like him very much 

Does cause a little concern though doesn't it. A least there seems to be no affinity to lightning from the SM TPU.

OK, I'll leave you to finish your projects and I'll start with a Boyce look-a-like coil configuration and take it from there. I'll get some photos up as I go for the record.

Not sure what to do about the core at present though. If SM had a core it would appear to simply be coils of wire. Boyce details his ferrite-like former.

Important question. The core. Did you use a toroidal transformer core?