Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29   Go Down

Author Topic: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?  (Read 160530 times)

peper10

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #390 on: May 14, 2009, 01:34:50 PM »
Quote from: Ergo on May 14, 2009, 08:17:46 AM
Hey, look who's talking.
A hopeful newbie with no experience or insight whatsoever.

You say I don't do my own eperiments.....are you crazy.
Haven't you read what I have been telling you.
This is MY DAY JOBB. I do it FOR A LIVING.
Don't you tell me I don't know what I'm talking in this case.

Dear Mr Ergo!!

No nead to tell that you ansewr me with words don`t disprouve anything that Tommey
did...
And if you are so educated put up an experiment to disprouve TOMMEY....
So if you are a good KNOWER..hi.hi.hi Do you really know if i`m really a newbie???????
I`m not gonna go this way......
By the way if you read interesting WORDS in your CLASSROOM dont mean you are an
graduate astrophisitian......
Please,let the EXPERIMENTER do the experiment and just listen......
There you gonna prouve to everyone that you have EDUCATION (by your parents)..
Thank you..
Logged

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #391 on: May 14, 2009, 02:08:04 PM »
Quote from: peper10 on May 14, 2009, 01:34:50 PM
Dear Mr Ergo!!

No nead to tell that you ansewr me with words don`t disprouve anything that Tommey
did...
And if you are so educated put up an experiment to disprouve TOMMEY....
So if you are a good KNOWER..hi.hi.hi Do you really know if i`m really a newbie???????
I`m not gonna go this way......
By the way if you read interesting WORDS in your CLASSROOM dont mean you are an
graduate astrophisitian......
Please,let the EXPERIMENTER do the experiment and just listen......
There you gonna prouve to everyone that you have EDUCATION (by your parents)..
Thank you..

I can only answer you the same as exnihiloest....and he was totaly right.
Quote from: exnihiloest on May 14, 2009, 08:54:03 AM
"What is asserted without proof can be denied without proof / Euclid"
There is no need for me to disprove Tommey by any build.
In this matter I know I'm right. There is no question about it.
I have all the knowledge and experience I need to make judgement in this matter.

By the way, who did you choose in the brain surgery matter???
The trained brain surgeon or the grade 12 student?
Logged

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #392 on: May 14, 2009, 02:15:43 PM »
Quote from: Ergo on May 14, 2009, 02:08:04 PM
I can only answer you the same as exnihiloest....and he was totaly right.

Why don't you try to reproduce TR's last demonstration to prove/disprove it.
Logged

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #393 on: May 14, 2009, 02:26:19 PM »
Quote from: nyctuber on May 14, 2009, 02:15:43 PM
Why don't you try to reproduce TR's last demonstration to prove/disprove it.

There is no need for me to reproduce any of his demonstrations.
I do this type of development in daily basis and I know by 100% certainty he's wrong.
There is just his own words and no other "proof". His electromagnetic skills lack all basic knowledge.
He's also suffers from self-delusion in questioning his so called results.

Do you all want to know the truth or do you just want hear the things you like to hear?
I love the idea of overunity myself, but I don't like when people are fooled in the wrong direction
and expensive replications by a ignorant person that's pushing his own findings without validation.
I know how you all feel. We all want OU. But it's wrong to push crap knowledge and teach people
the wrong things. In this case particular, as there is no OU coming from BEMF.
Logged

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #394 on: May 14, 2009, 02:36:24 PM »
Quote from: Ergo on May 14, 2009, 02:26:19 PM
There is no need for me to reproduce any of his demonstrations.
I do this type of development in daily basis and I know by 100% certainty he's wrong.
There is just his own words and no other "proof". His electromagnetic skills lack all basic knowledge.
He's also suffers from self-delusion in questioning his so called results.

Since you are the aggressor, and Tom has asked for nothing by posting his videos, I'd say you owe the forum an explanation of why his last experiment does not show what he thinks it shows.
Logged

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #395 on: May 14, 2009, 02:40:44 PM »
I'm just asking for him to get some other than himself to perform the measurements.
A skilled and educated person that is.
Logged

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #396 on: May 14, 2009, 02:43:14 PM »
Quote from: Ergo on May 14, 2009, 02:40:44 PM
I'm just asking for him to get some other than himself to perform the measurements.
A skilled and educated person that is.

A reasonable request.
Logged

bearicey

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #397 on: May 14, 2009, 03:11:37 PM »
Quote from: Ergo on May 14, 2009, 02:26:19 PM
I do this type of development in daily basis and I know by 100% certainty he's wrong.

In this case particular, as there is no OU coming from BEMF.

Hi, Ergo

If you had found a way of achieving OU, please enlight us, or just keep quiet! 

Tesla , Bedini and Torres all use coils and BEMF, if you think there is no OU, you should just leave this forum and go somewhere else.

Andy
Logged

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #398 on: May 14, 2009, 03:29:11 PM »
Quote from: bearicey on May 14, 2009, 03:11:37 PM
Hi, Ergo

If you had found a way of achieving OU, please enlight us, or just keep quiet! 

Tesla , Bedini and Torres all use coils and BEMF, if you think there is no OU, you should just leave this forum and go somewhere else.

Andy

Now look who's being ignorant here. It's certainty not me.
If you can direct me to one single device being overunity without doubt then I will shut up.
The inventers own words does not count. There must independent verification from a thrustworthy source.

For as long as I have been around there have never been any overunity devices. Not a single one.
And all those bedinis and other motors are not overunity. This is just a hope among inventers that wont die.

Don't get me wrong here. I'd like to find overunity but as long as there is nothing else but false statements
from ignorant inventers I can't shut up. It's really good that we all struggle to find the holy grail but we
must be honest and avoid self-delusion in this process. Or we will continue to be ridiculed by everybody.
Logged

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #399 on: May 14, 2009, 03:43:49 PM »
First of all I disprove gotoluc cap test, by charging on cap with a battery voltage of 12.32 volt.
I allow the precharge cap to charge up the second cap to get a balance voltage of 6.02 volts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsYFuyOmqrw&feature=channel_page

Tom:)
Logged

bearicey

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #400 on: May 14, 2009, 03:55:19 PM »
Quote from: Tommey Reed on May 14, 2009, 01:12:31 PM

The first test has 12v 50w and the second has 6v 150ma, and yet the second test show greater output.


Hi, Tom

6v 150ma = 0.9W , the 12V 50W is just taking too much Voltage.

If the coil has a resistance of 0.6 Ohms, connected in series with this 50W light buble, the buble will take 10V, and leave only 2V for the coil.   

According to Torres of ARK Research,  COP = 1.618  X Q , and he said Resonance is OU.

Finding a high Q coil and Resonance is the key.

Andy

pic. from

www.panaceauniversity.org/Norman%20Wootan%20MRA2.pdf
Logged

bearicey

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #401 on: May 14, 2009, 04:29:16 PM »
Quote from: Ergo on May 14, 2009, 03:29:11 PM

The inventers own words does not count. There must independent verification from a thrustworthy source.

but we must be honest and avoid self-delusion in this process. Or we will continue to be ridiculed by everybody.

Ergo,

Thrustworthy source is the problem of OU.   Do you trust your government?

Guess who will be ridiculed by everybody ~ Tesla, Bedini, Torres, Tommey Reed, or Ergo ?

Tesla, Bedini and Torres all got their own inventions and theories.  And Tommey is working on his Coil Pulse motor experiment here, as the title says.

If you have a theory ,or experiment, go post your own title.

Andy
Logged

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #402 on: May 14, 2009, 05:36:45 PM »
Logged

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #403 on: May 14, 2009, 07:29:06 PM »
Hi Tom
Great videos  :)
 I have sent Gotoluc a PM and hopefully you will have a response from him when he   next logs on

cat
Logged

allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #404 on: May 14, 2009, 07:32:35 PM »
LOL, this thread reminds me of that song-----
"Oh lord it's hard to be humble, when Im perfect in every way-- I can't wait to look in the mirror, I get better looking each day"

I once read a statement that seems to make a great deal of sense. It was called the "Law of right" , The right action will produce the right result. Not to insinuate anything or point fingers at anyone but it seems logical that if you cannot succeed at something you may be doing something wrong. If you keep doing the same things over and over this is not expertise nor the gaining of knowledge, this is repetition and nothing more. I think it is those people willing to learn new things and fully consider the other persons perspective as well as understanding their own, who will find success. As always I reserve the right to be completely wrong.:)
Regards
AC
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29   Go Up
« previous next »