Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?  (Read 159738 times)

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #375 on: May 14, 2009, 02:51:05 AM »
I have added another test that could answer some question of OU, this is using greater load for input/output using 12v 50w bulbs
It does not show OU with a lightbulb test at higher loads, but I still need more data when it is running at 30% or less.
30% of the pwm show greater output, but these meters might be off.


Tom



Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #376 on: May 14, 2009, 02:52:29 AM »

allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #377 on: May 14, 2009, 04:33:33 AM »
@Tom
That lightbulb test is a pretty good comparative test I have done many times, however it has severe limitations. If the input currents are restricted in any way so is the effect itself which in turn lowers the transfer efficiency drastically. Large capacitors or a capacitor bank on input and output is a much better indicator. This is something few consider, that the act of measurement must always have effects and these effects may render the measurement itself worthless. I have high potential oscillators that will stop dead if your hand comes within two feet of the  operating device---that is the boundary of the electric field produced and in this case it is a dynamic boundary in an open system which cannot be accurately measured because any device changes the oscillator field conditions.
Regards
AC
« Last Edit: May 14, 2009, 05:06:34 AM by allcanadian »

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #378 on: May 14, 2009, 08:17:46 AM »
You seam pretty cocky men..
As far as i can  read you don`t put up any experiment..
I really like the guys like you who speak VERRY LOUD and never make ANYTHING..

Hey, look who's talking.
A hopeful newbie with no experience or insight whatsoever.

You say I don't do my own eperiments.....are you crazy.
Haven't you read what I have been telling you.
This is MY DAY JOBB. I do it FOR A LIVING.
Don't you tell me I don't know what I'm talking in this case.

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #379 on: May 14, 2009, 08:26:22 AM »
If you really want Mr.Reed to listen to others then maybe he will listen to an engineer

I am an engineer...and skilled in this field of technology.

exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #380 on: May 14, 2009, 08:54:03 AM »
...
Make up something and disprouve what TOMMEY did and THEN YOU CAN BE CREDIBLE....

Wrong way.

"What is asserted without proof can be denied without proof."
Euclid




poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #381 on: May 14, 2009, 08:58:59 AM »
What gets me is that everyone with a so called education, unlike my self are telling others that BEMF has less energy out then in. Its like our Government being highly educated and doing the same, and yet making big mistakes in this country.
Alway know this, I do my research and spend my money to find answers even getting patents to give it out for free.
God has given us free energy like the sun to use, even to make electricity. But Governments won't let this technology be cheap, because they could not make money on it.
OverUnity is there, we have to search for it, and some times its in front of us and yet we did not see it.
BEMF is wasted energy in today world, I know that I am using BEMF.
When the coil is disconnected from the circut, no power goes to the output because of the blocking doides.
If we are looking for Over Unity, research thing that some my have missed, or block out of text books!
As for my meters and what they show, its OU!
Tom.

Tom, this is the same thing every other "Tommy Reed" before you has said. I suggest you do a little homework in researching what others have "discovered" about this technology, and the conclusions reached. You might save yourself a lot of time and money. No doubt you are probably learning which is great, but please learn enough to speak with some certainty before you speak with ignorance.

If you do not believe myself or Ergo, listen to what your predecessors have said about this technology being ou or not. They have gone down exactly the same path you are on right now and have come to the final conclusion that there is no ou in inductive kickback, or as most call it, "BEMF".

You get out exactly what Ergo said, "what you put in, minus the losses", nothing more.

Your meters are most likely lying to you as well. Do some research on this. Here is a start: http://enginova.com/true_rms_volts.htm

A question for all the "education bashers" out there: If you required brain surgery to save your life, who would you rather have perform the operation, a trained brain surgeon, or a grade 12 student that has only passed Biology 30 but thinks he knows as much as a trained surgeon?

.99

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #382 on: May 14, 2009, 09:37:36 AM »
@poynt99

Very well spoken. Right on....

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #383 on: May 14, 2009, 11:11:06 AM »
I did my other test, and yet now other jump on my comments like I told you so, that's fine.
What gets me is people thinking they know so much, sit on there ass like so called " I'm a engineer, I do this every day. Its my jod to bash others."
Mr. Engineer, make cheaper solar panels for the world if your so good at what you do.
I would rather you ask me if I learn something , then bash my experiments like you did.
I learn one thing I made mistake trusting meters and also the educated people, will make mistakes too.
Nobody is perfect, but its people like me that keep looking for answer, unlike engineers acting like a total ASS.



Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #384 on: May 14, 2009, 11:59:28 AM »
I'm glad you have learned/discovered that BEMF is not overunity in any way.
And I'm sorry for bashing you yet another time but it was written before wathing your new video.
Perhaps you should have spoken directly of your findings instead of mentioning the new video.
Your words of not finding OU when measuring more accurately is 100 times faster to comprehend
than having to watch a several minutes long video of your struggles.

Keep up your learning. Once you know how things hang together you might find a way free from errors.


nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #385 on: May 14, 2009, 12:07:53 PM »
Tom, can you repost the video from May 1, originally titled ' Pulse Generator, Building the controller for overunity' What you illustrated on the board seemed interesting. Thanks.

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #386 on: May 14, 2009, 12:07:59 PM »
My next test is using lower power lightbulbs rated at 6v 150ma (radioshack 272-1115)
The first lightbulb is connected to the battery positive and the mosfet drain going in to the first diode to the coil.
The second lightbulb is connected to the output BEMF capacitor collector positive and nagitive of the cap.
Test shows at the beginning the first bulb at the mosfet drain lights up, after turning up the pwm the second bulb starts to get brighter and given greater light power output.

I'm loading this experiment up on youtube now.
Tom

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #387 on: May 14, 2009, 12:10:56 PM »
I will see if I still have that video, too many videos slow down my computer.
Tom

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #388 on: May 14, 2009, 12:36:08 PM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoLQFeU4rV4&feature=channel_page

This is the second test that shows greater output then input.
With lower power lightbulbs, 6v 150ma.
Tom

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #389 on: May 14, 2009, 01:12:31 PM »
My first test show input was greater then the output, but why did the second test at a lower pwm rate and with lower power bulbs show greater output then what was going in?
Light bulb don't lie, one was brighter then the other, and even burning out that bulb.

I don't understand why this one showed different results, then the first test. They are both the same rated bulbs for each test.
The first test has 12v 50w and the second has 6v 150ma, and yet the second test show greater output.


Tom