Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?  (Read 159764 times)

gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #255 on: May 01, 2009, 02:27:08 AM »
I made a statement last year in another forum which has stuck with me, "The day I quit following others and started coming to my own conclusions based on the work of others, is the day I started to succeed"

Yes AC, I do remember reading that statement and a very good one it is ;)

Luc

nitinnun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #256 on: May 01, 2009, 03:13:10 AM »
Yes AC, I do remember reading that statement and a very good one it is ;)

Luc


i have been forming my own conclusions,
regarding everything,
for most of my life.

i cannot agree more,
that it is the road to success.


most of the population generates:
failure,
paranoia,
doubt,
fear,
denialism,
die-hard ignorance,
blatant intolerance of other peoples meaning,
and worse.


if you want to succeed,
than you must often AVOID doing what the mainstream does.

because if the mainstream methods worked,
the mainstream would not have so many screwed up problems.


forget the mainstream.
value your own thoughts !

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #257 on: May 01, 2009, 03:33:32 AM »
No more vids, Tommey? Keep going!

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557


powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #260 on: May 01, 2009, 09:58:23 PM »
I'd suggest dropping '600% efficient' from the topic title. After the Mylow thing, it would probably be wise to wonder why Tommy did not show a closed loop OU (recharging the batteries with back EMF) system from day one. I think the answer is fairly obvious.

Hi nyctuber
I feel this is Tommey's thread and if he wants to change the title hopefully he'll let us know
Tommey does discuss closing the loop in his last video number 66

Thank you for notifying people of new videos  I am not always available to do this

cat

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #261 on: May 01, 2009, 10:18:03 PM »
Hi nyctuber
I feel this is Tommey's thread and if he wants to change the title hopefully he'll let us know
Tommey does discuss closing the loop in his last video number 66

Thank you for notifying people of new videos  I am not always available to do this

cat

I think Tommey is covering all the bases regarding back EMF. If he closes the loop it would be spectacular but it's still good stuff.

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #262 on: May 01, 2009, 10:56:05 PM »
...
I feel this is Tommey's thread and if he wants to change the title hopefully he'll let us know
Tommey does discuss closing the loop in his last video number 66
...

@powercat

The 600% efficiency came out for Tommey as a calculation mistake, I commented this here in Reply #6, first page of this thread, and I also wrote to him on his old video channel and he agreed he had made a miscalculation,  it was 387% in that partical measurement.   So this is where he took the 600% but did not correct it.  Maybe you can edit the title of your thread?

Of course the 387% would still be a wonderful result, and I am afraid the most convincing proof for any extra output over an input would be using a DC-DC converter to loop back the output to the input.  (Off the shelf  DC-DC converters are available with many input -output voltage/current ranges, with at least a decent 70-80% efficiency or higher.)

rgds,  Gyula

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #263 on: May 01, 2009, 11:41:06 PM »
Hi Gyula
 it seems I can only change the subject of each post now
 not the title of the whole  thread this is a job for Stefan

 I have noticed that Tommey has been recently logging onto the forum
 But he has not posted for a while.
 so there's a good chance that he's seeing all the suggestions being posted.

 we are all keen to see Tommy achieved OU and loop back to source
 his work rate is amazing

 Thanks
 cat

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #264 on: May 02, 2009, 12:00:48 AM »
New vid up

And a website: http://energytechnologynow.org/ (maybe a repost, dunno)

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091

Tommey Reed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #267 on: May 02, 2009, 01:40:03 AM »
Hi Cat,
I am working on the second stage to loop the pulse generator.
This will prove OverUnity.
The BEMF cant be loop, because of the caps need to have 12v constant charge, when the cap drops below 12v the pwm have problems sending the right amount of voltage to the coil.
Almost have to be regulated to work overunity, As for input of 12v power having a constant output, It does show overunity.

Tom


powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #268 on: May 02, 2009, 02:09:23 AM »
Hi Tom
did you see the suggestion made by gyulasun
Quote
the most convincing proof for any extra output over an input would be using a DC-DC converter to loop back the output to the input.  (Off the shelf  DC-DC converters are available with many input -output voltage/current ranges, with at least a decent 70-80% efficiency or higher.)
End Quote
I'm sure other suggestions will come in time

looping is big problem, and one of the best I have seen is the two battery system[Bedini]
sorry but with my limited experience I can only suggest things I've seen here before

cat

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #269 on: May 02, 2009, 02:28:08 AM »
Tom
Do you have any measurements that you could post on your current setup showing OU

Thanks if you can
cat