Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?  (Read 159670 times)

bearicey

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #240 on: April 29, 2009, 01:27:16 PM »
"Transverter systems may be the Volskwagen of OU systems for the money-"handicapped" research guy!"


http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Transverter

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #241 on: April 29, 2009, 03:33:02 PM »
Hi everyone,

here is a video I made of a replication of Tommey Reed's circuit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4fYvSRxHd0

No Over Unity for me.

I challenge Tommey to do the capacitor test as I have done.


Luc



Hi Luc
 great video and great timing, hopefully Tommey will take up your challenge
 looks like he was questioning the type of coil your using

Quote from Tommey
Is your coil, is it .61 ohm 16gage wire?
This is a basic coil out of a microwave oven at 120v ac

cat

allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #242 on: April 29, 2009, 05:33:40 PM »
I think Mr.Reed is exactly right, a replication is just that---- a replication of the experiment. To use completely different components,voltages or values of components is "NOT" a replication in any sense of the word. As well Mr.Reed utilizes an air core coil, which I noticed is the primary from a microwave transformer, the qualities of this coil are far removed from the iron core others have used. This is the biggest problem I see here in the forum, people throw some random components together and call it a replication, which it is most certainly not, then state their replication has failed. I would submit "they" have failed due to a lack of understanding, like the old saying goes---- "don't blame the messenger". In any case Mr.Reed's circuit is based on technology Nicola Tesla perfected over 100 years ago, this is nothing new in any way, it has just been ignored by the masses for a very long time.
Regards
AC

gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #243 on: April 30, 2009, 04:47:31 AM »
Hi everyone,

For those who did not read Stefan's questions he posted on my YouTube video they are in bold below with my replies.

Hi Luc,
did you try to get the driver frequency tuned to the resonance frequency of the coil ?
Is it really this low at 1.23 Khz ?

Is this the resonance frequency ?
Maybe you can tune to a better harmonic frequency of the resonance frequency ?
Maybe you can retry your tests without the iron core and tune to the frequency of your driver to the resonance frequency of the coil ?
Maybe the iron core is too lossy.


My reply:
Hi Stefan,
thanks for looking and posting your positive comment.

I did do many sweeps of up to 200Khz (555 frequency limit) on all kinds of coils, air core coils and with cores. Out of the 10 or so coils tested this is the one that gave most voltage output at this low frequency with minimum amp input.

I would need AC to achieve Resonance. Never been able to do it with just chopped DC. I was also trying to keep it to what Tommey Reed has been doing.

Stefan:
Hmm,
you should be able to get resonance also with chopped DC.
The coil does not care about a DC level being superimposed, at least if you use a coil WITHOUT an iron core..

What best frequency do you get, if you unplug the iron core from this coil you have shown ?


My reply:
I've never been able to do it, so pleas show me a video of someone that shows resonance using chopped DC. When my coils go into resonance using just 10 volt AC the coils output is well over 150 volts rms

I pulled out the core from the coil and it now performs best around 12Khz.


gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #244 on: April 30, 2009, 04:59:47 AM »
Hi Luc
 great video and great timing, hopefully Tommey will take up your challenge
 looks like he was questioning the type of coil your using

Quote from Tommey
Is your coil, is it .61 ohm 16gage wire?
This is a basic coil out of a microwave oven at 120v ac

cat

Hi cat,

I did see that post but did not realize it was a question for me.

The coil I used in the video is not from a Microwave Oven Transformer. As I replied to Stefan on YouTube I did many tests using many coils including an AIR CORE MOT primary and also a steel core MOT primary. Out of all the more then 10 coils I tested I chose the one in the video as it performed the best results.

I hope that can answer some questions.

Luc

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #245 on: April 30, 2009, 05:16:03 AM »
@gotoluc

As usual a good video and well explained, but we must convened that @allcanadian is right on two counts. First, replications should adhere to strict reproduction but what are the chances of making exactly the same coil, but don't worry, it never hurts to try other things as we all do it. Second, this is Tesla all the way, but I think even @allcanadian would agree that @TR is using some pretty cool variations.

I have been able to get good resonance with DC pulsing but rarely in the 200k range. Usually always in the 1-2mhz range.

But I have one question. Given stuff I have tried out on The Tesla Project thread, it would seem that the current reversal effect that @TR has shown would still happen without those four diodes and maybe not consume .6 volts each.

I will try @TR's circuit this weekend.

gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #246 on: April 30, 2009, 05:27:15 AM »
I think Mr.Reed is exactly right, a replication is just that---- a replication of the experiment. To use completely different components,voltages or values of components is "NOT" a replication in any sense of the word. As well Mr.Reed utilizes an air core coil, which I noticed is the primary from a microwave transformer, the qualities of this coil are far removed from the iron core others have used. This is the biggest problem I see here in the forum, people throw some random components together and call it a replication, which it is most certainly not, then state their replication has failed. I would submit "they" have failed due to a lack of understanding, like the old saying goes---- "don't blame the messenger". In any case Mr.Reed's circuit is based on technology Nicola Tesla perfected over 100 years ago, this is nothing new in any way, it has just been ignored by the masses for a very long time.
Regards
AC

Hi allcanadian,

I did test Tommey Reed's circuit with an air core MOT primary!... you should know better than that by now :-\  I used one a year ago to test your Tesla circuits you share: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0etbntkxbs

I spent several hours testing many coil configurations, frequencies, voltages, pulse widths and so one and in the end chose the coil, frequency, voltage and pulse width that gave the best result to do the video.

I have been testing and studying back EMF collection for over a year now and have never found it to contain more energy then the energy put in. However, when a coil is in resonance there seem to be more energy than back EMF but I have not yet found the best way to extract the energy.

Luc

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #247 on: April 30, 2009, 05:32:22 AM »
@gotoluc

As usual a good video and well explained, but we must convened that @allcanadian is right on two counts. First, replications should adhere to strict reproduction but what are the chances of making exactly the same coil, but don't worry, it never hurts to try other things as we all do it. Second, this is Tesla all the way, but I think even @allcanadian would agree that @TR is using some pretty cool variations.

I have been able to get good resonance with DC pulsing but rarely in the 200k range. Usually always in the 1-2mhz range.

But I have one question. Given stuff I have tried out on The Tesla Project thread, it would seem that the current reversal effect that @TR has shown would still happen without those four diodes and maybe not consume .6 volts each.

I will try @TR's circuit this weekend.

@wattsup
btw, TR mentioned to me on the phone the other day that his flat coil came off a old microwave and it's copper. The new one s found on modern (made in China) microwaves are aluminum and not so good. Maybe you should find the right ones if you want to be as close as possible. Just a thought.

cheers
chrisC

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #248 on: April 30, 2009, 05:41:45 AM »
I'd suggest dropping '600% efficient' from the topic title. After the Mylow thing, it would probably be wise to wonder why Tommy did not show a closed loop OU (recharging the batteries with back EMF) system from day one. I think the answer is fairly obvious.

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #249 on: April 30, 2009, 05:43:24 AM »
I'd suggest dropping '600% efficient' from the topic title. After the Mylow thing, it would probably be wise to wonder why Tommy did not show a closed loop OU (recharging the batteries with back EMF) system from day one. I think the answer is fairly obvious.

See his last but one video. He's starting to close the loop!

cheers
chrisC

allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #250 on: April 30, 2009, 06:53:56 AM »
Hello Gotoluc
---"I did test Tommey Reed's circuit with an air core MOT primary!... you should know better than that by now"

I should know better by now,LOL, your work and research has been flawless from what I have seen. Personally, I have never had much success in replicating others work, I think it is easier to understand the fundamental principals involved and follow my own intuition on how to progress. I made a statement last year in another forum which has stuck with me, "The day I quit following others and started coming to my own conclusions based on the work of others, is the day I started to succeed". I am sure everyone here will find their own success in their own time.
Regards
AC

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #251 on: April 30, 2009, 10:34:40 AM »
Hi all
 
56

Pulse Generator, How to use back emf in DC motors
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLbjHA7YHy4
 
57
DC Generator, Load test 001
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3LktMlCAjo&feature=channel_page

58
Basic pulse motor design
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br5ltO8XsQU&feature=channel_page

59
Update on the pulse motor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0e47cyIblg&feature=channel_page

60
Tom's project 213  [off topic]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cTs5XXAI4A&feature=channel_page
 
 
looks like Stefan's decorators have been in 8)
cat

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #252 on: April 30, 2009, 10:36:49 AM »
Hi all
 
56

Pulse Generator, How to use back emf in DC motors
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLbjHA7YHy4
 
57
DC Generator, Load test 001
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3LktMlCAjo&feature=channel_page

58
Basic pulse motor design
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br5ltO8XsQU&feature=channel_page

59
Update on the pulse motor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0e47cyIblg&feature=channel_page

60
Tom's project 213  [off topic]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cTs5XXAI4A&feature=channel_page
 
 
looks like Stefan's decorators have been in 8)
cat

Thanks Cat. Do look at MyLow's latest rotor disk. Awesome....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4uVuK2Ec6Y&feature=channel_page

chrisC

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #253 on: April 30, 2009, 05:45:18 PM »
Hi chrisC
I thought this announcement was much more promising
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4047.msg174197#msg174197

Quote
Based on the results of our last video - I would like to present a public OVER-UNITY DEMONSTRATION at the lab at Ottawa University on May 3rd, 2009 (May Day) at 11 am.

New Multi Coil Stator Ring
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPMbWzNuMOg&feature=channel_page

sorry for being off topic
cat
Tommey you might like this setup
« Last Edit: April 30, 2009, 08:18:56 PM by powercat »

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?
« Reply #254 on: April 30, 2009, 09:17:42 PM »
Hi chrisC
I thought this announcement was much more promising
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4047.msg174197#msg174197

Quote
Based on the results of our last video - I would like to present a public OVER-UNITY DEMONSTRATION at the lab at Ottawa University on May 3rd, 2009 (May Day) at 11 am.

New Multi Coil Stator Ring
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPMbWzNuMOg&feature=channel_page

sorry for being off topic
cat
Tommey you might like this setup

Not saying it's legit, can't tell much from the video, but..

According to sterling's account of thngs, Mylow was told by the 'MIB's that there would be a 'major announcement out of a University' regarding Mylow's technology (or somethign similar) in the near future, supposedly as a way for the 'bad guys' to retain control of it.