I'm pretty sure even if they indeed said they were the one who caused 9/11 it wouldn't change a thing and people would keep going on with their lives .... I was listening to cenk ugyur thursday and he said something about the nra ... how many school shooting does it take per day until thing changes ... 5 death ? 15 death ? 150 young american death per day  ? Don't think for a second anything will ever change in the system...

Spinning wheel is ...spinning

Here is an example of the level of mental depravity and perversion reached by the very people who employ internet disinfo slugs.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6078529.ece

A clear picture of what we as a society are up against.

Regards...

Paranoia can be treated with drugs to be brought under control but can never be totally eliminated.  But there is no known treatment for shear stupidity.  I suspect you will just be stuck with that and your conspiracy theories.  GOOD DAY.

wow john, ad hominem and non sequiturs... oh my!
nice how you resorted to that instead of addressing the questions i posed you, or making the clarifications as to what you where actually suggesting.
why am i not surprised?

and for the record it's 'sheer stupidity'... gotta love it when some guy is calling you stupid and can't spell or know what words mean, that's 'shear genius' man... i suspect you were stuck with hooked on phonics

A complete engineering data report can be obtained here for the interested in why building 7 collapsed.  Some people are more suited for removing rats from ductwork and laughing at intelligent people and some for insulting, critiquing, and correcting intelligent peoples grammar mistakes.  Truly intelligent people are responsible for investigating and reporting facts.       

http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf

Factors contributing to the building failure were: thermal expansion occurring at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings; significant magnification of thermal expansion effects due to the long-span floors, which are common in office buildings in widespread use; connections that were designed to resist gravity loads, but not thermally induced lateral loads; and a structural system that was not designed to prevent fire-induced progressive collapse.

Wine drinker check my spelling on this please

Captain your handle is certainly appropriate for your intellect. 

Here's a truth thats obvious

The problem with the NIST report is that it expects us to believe that the Bldg. 7 building was so weak that it fell from the minor fires and superficial damage to the exterior... Yet didn't topple over from wind storms or normal compression 20 years before.

And it must be really embarrassing to you guys that these 3 steel buildings are the only ones in history to ever collapse from fire... or that the collapses all looked exactly like controlled demolitions (but Bldg 7 looked the most suspicious, and is certainly the hardest to explain to people who's eyes don't stare blankly into space).

This one is interesting:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tGOt9f3gKk

It shows the famous BBC news report where they claimed the "Saloman Bros. Building" (Bldg 7)  had fallen... 21 minutes before it actually did. We can literally see the building still standing in the background near the woman's left shoulder (to the right of her head) while she is reporting about it "having fallen".

Oops.

BBC later said they got that report from the U.S. government.

... Evidence of Time Travel perhaps? .. Considering all the other wacky conspiracy theories these people expect us to believe for what happened that day, i wouldn't be surprised if they claimed that next.

Willy Nelson once said concerning Bldg. 7 : "How stupid do they think we are?"

Truly intelligent people are responsible for investigating and reporting facts.       

please, do let us know when you drag yourself up from your elementary school comprehension of words and manage to join that group...

i'll be your huckleberry...
spineless bastards, like yourself utilitarian, have evolved this society into a bunch of spineless sheeple. if one of you wanders off for some unknown reason even when the grass is great right where we are, the rest of the herd will rumble and bumble after the one wanderer. spineless bastards like yourself have evolved this sheeple herd to the point that the shepherds don't even need sheep dogs anymore. why would they? the majority of the sheeple keep the rest inside the fences by lambasting them with things like you are saying. ie: what would my friends think? what would my family say? what would my boss say?
 
got some evidence of other steel structures 'melting'? no, they fucking burn for days and are still standing...
i noticed no one tries to refute the silverstein interview other than idiots who never watched the whole thing and try and construct some context other than the demolition context of the entire interview.

lambasting... haha get it? probably not...

I am not going to get into the "melting metal" and similar bullshit, because that has already been debunked ad nauseam.

I take it you have no explanation why there have been no attempts to suppress 9/11 truth websites though, right?