Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion  (Read 168667 times)

dixiepnum

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #315 on: May 16, 2009, 02:59:51 AM »
@clanzer
@mylow
@queue
@replicators
@alfparts

please read justalabrat/empireofmotion before you proceed any further....

otherwise you will never get this machine to work

component weights*spin quality*degree of magnetism across magnets will dictate success

you're going to go through years of trial and error unless you can figure this issue out first

i'd add that all components need to be made of the same aluminium as mylow's as well

i'm predicting the death of these trials from replicator fatigue unless this baby is figured out...

thks...dixie

 >:(

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #316 on: May 16, 2009, 03:22:01 AM »
This is getting close
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAhe1nX0HLM

And CLaNZeRS on entering and exiting the gates in his latest vid seems to show a large piece of the puzzle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHAK8aQ6tSg

 :)

Hah. I sneer at your "getting close." This is what "getting close" looks like. Can anybody beat it? The rundown time is nearly the same as with no stator.
Remember, until you can show a rundown time that's LONGER than with no stator, your device has produced NO extra energy beyond what you put into it.
You can do comparisons by running up to known rpm, or by the string and weight method. But you have to do comparisons!!!


Justalabrat

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 93

AquariuZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 645
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #318 on: May 16, 2009, 10:28:23 AM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6x5hWpuqte0

"To the M.I.B. I GOT GATORS IN MY BACK YARD!!!! "

LOL

Highest marks for his enthousiasm but not a self runner yet.

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #319 on: May 16, 2009, 10:45:37 AM »
I admire the man's efforts.  He is persistent, you have to give him that.  That actually looks more promising than some I have seen.  I am glad you posted that.

Bill

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #320 on: May 16, 2009, 12:54:26 PM »

At this time it may be worth reviewing the 'Model T' discussion on the 'coral castle' thread.

The bell housing had an unbalanced flywheel which reportedly would run on its own, on cow magnets placed in prepared slots on the housing. 

Ed L. also used the same parts in his work.

Regards...


AquariuZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 645
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #321 on: May 16, 2009, 01:01:50 PM »
At this time it may be worth reviewing the 'Model T' discussion on the 'coral castle' thread.

The bell housing had an unbalanced flywheel which reportedly would run on its own, on cow magnets placed in prepared slots on the housing. 

Ed L. also used the same parts in his work.

Regards...

That discussion deserves its own thread.....

Homopolar = key

Yucca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #322 on: May 16, 2009, 01:34:53 PM »
I'd have to say overly mischievous when he has people traveling some distance to see his motor, using money for fuel, time taken out of their daily lives, I have no love for Sterling, but what Mylow did to him and PMMTester is unforgivable, no it's not any loss to me so I really should not care, but it could have been one of us.

RB, Of course  I see your point, I can see how anyone who took the leap of faith may feel a little sore, but anybody undertaking these replications should always bear in mind the posibility of fakery. If not then there expenses, in the case of fakery, are the cost of learning that lesson.

Plus they will have undoubtebly learned more about the finer points of magnetic interactions and rotating rigs, other valuable things to learn.

Also I doubt it could have been you, I don´t think the sell was quite convincing enough to fool you RB, you´ve never seemed the type to engage in too many leaps of faith.

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #323 on: May 16, 2009, 02:06:06 PM »
Heh, you can thank Steorn for that, I took a leap of faith on them 6 years ago, it will not happen again, my rule now, if an inventor/replicator is confident in their claim, then they have nothing to hide, excuses are not acceptable when claiming FIRE2.0
Also I doubt it could have been you, I don´t think the sell was quite convincing enough to fool you RB, you´ve never seemed the type to engage in too many leaps of faith.

Bobbotov

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #324 on: May 16, 2009, 02:45:40 PM »
Heh, you can thank Steorn for that, I took a leap of faith on them 6 years ago, it will not happen again, my rule now, if an inventor/replicator is confident in their claim, then they have nothing to hide, excuses are not acceptable when claiming FIRE2.0

RB, you mean three years ago don't you? I mean they only went public in August 2006. Did you know about them before that?

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #325 on: May 16, 2009, 03:19:50 PM »
RB, you mean three years ago don't you? I mean they only went public in August 2006. Did you know about them before that?
I stand corrected, man it seems so much longer!

Bobbotov

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #326 on: May 16, 2009, 04:00:19 PM »
I stand corrected, man it seems so much longer!

According to Steorn they started six years ago and went public with the Economist ad after three years. But I know what you mean about it seeming like six years. It just goes on and on and on...with no meaningful resolution. I doubt seriously if it will ever get resolved to anyone's satisfaction particularly the ardent fans.

robbie47

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
Re: MylowHJ Replication - Discussion
« Reply #327 on: May 16, 2009, 06:09:54 PM »
A little tip for the replicators I found out this afternoon:
I have glued two series of small neo magnets on a CD-R disc and fidle with an adjustable stator magnet that I made from an iron bar and sets of block magnets.
This allows me to easy adjust the distance of the poles of the stator setup. Very usefull to find the optimum setting with minimum drag.
Attached a drawing what I mean.
By stacking extra magnets you can also adjust the strength of the poles. Attached a drawing of such a stator setup.

Justalabrat

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 93
« Last Edit: May 16, 2009, 10:02:22 PM by Justalabrat »