That qoute hits home when it comes from an engineer working on a 20 billion dollar piece.

How many people have bought his plans, and attempted a replication?



I think this is strange too...  In reality, people have absolutely no scientific reason to believe this guy's claims UNLESS they have seen it working in person, or replicated his experiment themselves...        People are going by this logic...   "He seems like an honest guy, therefore he must be telling the truth"      and even...  "The MIBs tried to interfere with his experiments, therefore he must be telling the truth!"  ...  This is just weird!   

There is a  (small) chance his magnetic motor works, and might not be in any violation any known physics laws... Or it could work and be utilizing new physics..   But until I see a few independent working replications I will have serious doubts.      I'm always extra skeptical about people trying to profit from their designs designs (who talk about MIBs, etc)..  Especially when nobody has produced a working replication!

 Hello Guys and Gals. The 'Scientists' in the community are a needed element of safety and should take care to maintain a strict and professional focus on the accuracy of their observations. As well, the category within the Forum where these observations are noted should be appropriate and not such that is an over the shoulder menace. While the element of scrutiny serves a useful purpose it is the responsibility of those who assume this responsibility not misdirect and misapply their opinions. This sort of practice often produces damaging effects to the overall effort which has been launched in the direction of finding a solution.

   Aside from the views about authenticity..... being skeptical about the MIB stories might certainly be understandable since it is likely foreign to the reality of most individuals. However, persons of skepticism in regard to this matter should be preparing themselves to live that reality more than they ever thought possible. Also I would like to clarify the stance that Mylow himself has on the issue of 'profit' There has been and will be no attempt to by by him to profit from this venture. So far this endeavor has only been an expense and he is fine with this. He doesn't even hold any aspirations for so much as recovering his previous or future investments in the venture. There are some however who have, as well as others that might try to exploit the situation. Such intentions are well beyond his wishes and tolerance. Please be aware that he does not approve of this and will not condone it in any way. I certainly do not approve of it either. There are perhaps different forms or greed. 'Monetry' is just one. Intellectual control is another. 

It is not necessarily the responsibilty of the inventor or developer to justify a device by explaintion of theory or fact, except perhaps to the effect of simply producing a working unit. I saw a reference to the word 'amature' or 'amatuer' within this forum area as is pertains to Mylow. Well, Mylow may not even see himself as being to that level yet and has indicated such on more than one occasion. However, please do not let yourselves exercise the belief that the level of what some may refer to as education, intellect or professionalism or what have you, carries any weight with regard to an individual's right to attempt or accomplish results. That is a totalitarian point of view which is of direct and intolerable conflict with this effort to simply help humanity. No, of course I am not pointing the finger at YOU, and you know this:)

There 'may' presently successful replications of this type of design as well as others. Some are presently in use and others have been in use for a VERY long time. Those who possess these replications of the Mylow and other versions of PMM's also fortunately have sense enough to know that it is not presently prudent to divulge details within this type of venue as well as most others. However, such a time is painfully near and these functional devices will be revealed.

Please also keep in mind that this technology specifically IS and WILL be continued to be suppressed from the public. Showing the adversary that you possess the 'means' is usually a workable tactic but waving it around single handed and unloaded is an invitation to massacre.

There is more to this idea of making a PMM that most people realize. It is one of the gateway components to something far more fantastic.

Meanwhile, keep working and consider the secrets of the snowflake.

I hope that you can read between the lines.

@Alf:
Maybe those who have working designs know it isn't prudent to disclose them on the internet. But surely some of the people that do post, would be able to post real results that hinted that success might be near...like some magnet configuration that gave increased rundown times, or greater steady max speed when driven with known power, or some such. Sure, many people post subjective impressions that something might seem better than something else, but nobody has been able to show measurements that support even an approach to success.  Is it a situation of "all or none"? Is the correct configuration so sensitive that it works, but even the slightest change causes it to fail completely--?? So replication attempts aren't like shooting an arrow at a target, where even if you don't hit the bullseye you still get some points, but rather like shooting the arrow thru a knothole. No graceful degradation, no gradual approximations??
Then explain how Mylow got 8 different configs, with all kinds of magnets to run, when the rest of the open researchers haven't been able to produce, well, broccoli.

Then again, maybe there aren't really any magnet motors that run, prudent or not, and that knothole is really just an illusion.

Except, of course, that the motor magnets are made from a ferrite material of extremely high resistance to being demagnetized (or remagnetized.) That alnico remagnetizer would not be able to do much to a motor arc magnet.
Consider for a moment the engineering requirements for a DC motor arc magnet. Subject to strong rapidly changing fields from the armature coils. Subject to high temperatures. And so forth.

There are some Alnicos that are less sensitive to demagnetization, check the specs for "Alnico 8". Some can approach the demagnetization resistance of ferrite. As far as heat is concerned, Almost all Alnicos are more resistant than ferrite.

nothing is more dangerous!!!!!

TK and corona,

You made a good point. And I also think that its not possible to re-magnetize that Arc magnet using the Remagnetizer shown in that link.

http://www.allmagnetics.com/education/magnetizer.htm
The text says:
Alnico magnets can lose their magnetism if dropped, stored without keepers, or while demonstrating repelling magnetic poles. Instead of throwing these valuable magnets away, remagnetize them! The Remagnetizer restores the magnetism to Alnico horseshoe and bar magnets in just a few seconds. No electricity required.

Only bar and HS supported. You can clearly see there is a divider in the slot, so an arc magnet won't fit into it. May be Mylow got them remannetized from somewhere else, if at all he did that. These stators look too much like ferrite.

Anyway, this does not imply that the motor is non-working, only that Mylow could not tell what and how he did it exactly.....
Until an expert gets there, we will not know. Fortunately there are only two possibilities, so we can try both, one by one.

I continue my replication attempt. Sourcing stuff right now.

Video 17 1.38 to 1.57 says it all for me. Listen carefully to all his words during this sequence.

Hoppy

Can you please provide a linked reference to video 17? Thanks.

cheers
chrisC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAs4-rQXQjU&feature=channel

Thanks Hoppy. So, what is your conclusion? I take it you meant he's adjusting some kind of aided mechanism? I thought he was aligning the spindle. We can speculate for all we can but the ultimate proof is whether someone else with a good pair of hands and the same set up can get it going or that MyLow will let some learned person/s investigate further. Anything else is conjecture and if you even think otherwise, you might be subjected to censorship!

cheers
chrisC