I now understand how Professor Laithwaite was able to lift those heavy gyros.
He was generating EG energy and utilising the rotary reaction of the earth.
Funnily enough I had appreciated the linear reaction of the earth way, way
back (and met violent opposition for that suggestion) - but I found it again
with the half wave rectification experiments of the combined Vimmy wheel
and pendulum.
I then realised (when thinking about how half wave rectification of
horizontal energy) that the carriage could also give rise to
unbalanced radial earth reaction as the carriage was driven up hill.
I had thought of rotary reaction before but hadn't connected it up
with the other two.
One other thing which needs mentioning is the leverage reaction which Eric
was providing. His two hands gave the moment which was balanced
by an opposite moment of the earth. Had he stood on a friction-less turntable
he wouldn't have been able to provide that moment.
You can see that the horizontal moment he applied is analogous to the
vertical moment which holds the offset gyro up so mysteriously -
mysteriously that is until Laithwaite's KEMS microscope is brought into play.
So where does the energy come from?
It has to come from the Ersatz Gravity (
EG) field. The moment that the Prof
applies to the heavy gyro unbalances the opposing centrifugal forces and
generates
EG energy. One centre of curvature moves in towards the gyro, the
other moves out. The energy generated is the difference between the two.
Remember,
EG obeys a square lay whereas
NG is linear.
The beauty is the evidence is unarguable. The experiment has been done.
Anyone can easily repeat it for themselves. He raises 50 pounds in the air
expending very little energy. Energy is obviously being supplied from
somewhere other than the gyro because the speed of the gyro doesn't
change. If he had been tall enough he could have gone on lifting the gyro
until he reached stationary orbit providing he kept his feet firmly on the
ground so as to maintain ground reaction.
Frankly, I would have more sympathy with someone who claimed the
demonstration was fraudulent than some who tried to explain away
the obvious gain in energy. It's a bit like Desertphile's attitude to
Al Setalokin's WhipMag. He recognised it was obviously generating
free energy so he claimed it must be a trick of some kind.
Clearly, developing this phenomena to obtain energy on a continuous
basis will not be difficult once the psychological block of cognitive
difference is removed.
I feel a bit sorry for poor old Sjack Abeling. He has been overtaken by events,
SuperMac's biggest problem. Still, I expect it will take quite a time to sink
in so Sjack may have a small window of opportunity to wow the world and
make some money.
If I had oil shares (which I don't) I would sell them now.