Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: New design working  (Read 46003 times)

DIDIT

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
New design working
« on: March 31, 2009, 01:39:18 PM »
Hey,
I'm new to this site and found out that this is the place to spread the news.  I have designed and tested a magnetic motor using standard neo's and will be producing a video shortly.  There are a lot of sceptics on this site and I will try to make everyone hapy with the demands they requested on other topics.  For example, glass table, full view with camera showing entire machine.  This will not be a problem.  Hopefully this will end the question if it's possible to create a motor with magnets alone.  For the record it's not a traditional wheel design.  This is going to blow your mind
Till later.

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: New design working
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2009, 04:05:42 PM »

Quote
For example, glass table, full view with camera showing entire machine.

In which case, I'm already leaning toward a magnetic beam amplifier hidden off premises....

LOL


DIDIT, I hope it has enough power to pry that heavy, cast iron lid from off the melting pot, cause iff'n not,
TPTB might cannabalize the magnets off it to help keep the lid on even tighter.

0c

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Re: New design working
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2009, 04:10:16 PM »
Most important things:

1) Credible witnesses
2) Replication
3) Independent analysis

(Videos can be faked)

All 3 of those things are still missing for the design I proposed and it has gone nowhere for over a year. Mylow has not been able to do any of those things either. In fact, there are no overunity devices listed in this forum that have been confirmed by all three. I think you will have better luck if you can meet these requirements.

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: New design working
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2009, 04:17:57 PM »
Any drawings or something to explain the concept behind it?

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: New design working
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2009, 04:27:01 PM »
DIDIT

Personally, I  think your approach will be just fine to start

We could do with a little mind blowing these days [something positive amongst all the negative]

Thanks 

Chet


DIDIT

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: New design working
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2009, 04:28:29 PM »
Most important things:

1) Credible witnesses
2) Replication
3) Independent analysis

(Videos can be faked)

All 3 of those things are still missing for the design I proposed and it has gone nowhere for over a year. Mylow has not been able to do any of those things either. In fact, there are no overunity devices listed in this forum that have been confirmed by all three. I think you will have better luck if you can meet these requirements.

NO problem

dixiepnum

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: New design working
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2009, 04:48:32 PM »
great news didit...when is the video coming up?

hydrocontrol

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 281
Re: New design working
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2009, 05:01:36 PM »
How about a totally solid Plexiglas enclosed display case that sits on a pedestal outside with a wireless web cam attached for close ups then another wireless web cam 20 feet back showing the whole setup with the first web cam.  ;)

Actually Oc's statement of
1) Credible witnesses
2) Replication
3) Independent analysis

is really the best.

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: New design working
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2009, 05:05:50 PM »
How about a totally solid Plexiglas enclosed display case that sits on a pedestal outside with a wireless web cam attached for close ups then another wireless web cam 20 feet back showing the whole setup with the first web cam.  ;)

Actually Oc's statement of
1) Credible witnesses
2) Replication
3) Independent analysis

is really the best.

I'm still thinking whether he should leave his clothes on or not for the demo. Because god forbid that he has hidden something in them to make it spin. People should understand the REASON why it works not what the setup looks like. This is why I hope he can show us the reason as well as the setup. Once you understand the reason you can build your own designs out of it.

carbonc_cc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 91
Re: New design working
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2009, 05:32:19 PM »
He better bring dental records.

And real time 3D images of the magnetic flux line interaction.

And a cherry on top...

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: New design working
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2009, 05:37:02 PM »
April fools?

I hope 'not a traditional wheel design'' doesn't = Uses banana skins  :)

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: New design working
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2009, 05:41:08 PM »
Quote
1) Credible witnesses
One source that is "Credible" to me is an academic professor at a University. Anyone who's in the "free energy" movement would not be a "credible" source to *verify* such a machine *for other people*, including myself. If your machine is obvious, such as mylow's or the whipmag, then most University professors would gladly take a look.


Quote
2) Replication
This should *not* be a requirement if the machine was analyzed and *confirmed* by a notable academic scientist. An academic scientist would take the proper measurements to see if the output is greater than the input.


Quote
3) Independent analysis
This falls under that same requirement as #1, "Credible witnesses."


All you need to do to prove your machine is to have a notable academic scientist analyze it that shows the machine is producing more out than in. That's it!  Please drive to your nearest University.  :)


PL

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: New design working
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2009, 05:58:38 PM »
Hey,
I'm new to this site and found out that this is the place to spread the news.  I have designed and tested a magnetic motor using standard neo's and will be producing a video shortly.  There are a lot of sceptics on this site and I will try to make everyone hapy with the demands they requested on other topics.  For example, glass table, full view with camera showing entire machine.  This will not be a problem.  Hopefully this will end the question if it's possible to create a motor with magnets alone.  For the record it's not a traditional wheel design.  This is going to blow your mind
Till later.


How long is shortly ?
This is going to blow the world if you have free energy

cat

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: New design working
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2009, 06:14:08 PM »
Seems like Didit has left the forum momentarily

Hopefully Hes busy posting his vid

Chet

0c

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Re: New design working
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2009, 06:24:54 PM »
One source that is "Credible" to me is an academic professor at a University. Anyone who's in the "free energy" movement would not be a "credible" source to *verify* such a machine *for other people*, including myself. If your machine is obvious, such as mylow's or the whipmag, then most University professors would gladly take a look.

This should *not* be a requirement if the machine was analyzed and *confirmed* by a notable academic scientist. An academic scientist would take the proper measurements to see if the output is greater than the input.

This falls under that same requirement as #1, "Credible witnesses."


All you need to do to prove your machine is to have a notable academic scientist analyze it that shows the machine is producing more out than in. That's it!  Please drive to your nearest University.  :)


PL

1) A credible witness does not need to have scientific qualifications, but they should be someone who is trusted. All they need to do is report on what they have seen, that the device works as claimed without any obvious external source of energy being supplied. Anyone trusted by the comminity and with a reputation for honesty could fill this position.

2) A working replication will provide additional evidence that the device is practical and reproducible. It can also be independently witnessed, studied, and analyzed.

3) Independent analysis is where the experts are required. This would be a thorough examination and analysis of the device in a dedicated effort to rule out any possibility of trickery. It should be carried out by a university or professional lab experienced in dealing with the technology.