Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1236062 times)

Thedane · « **Reply #2625 on:** August 15, 2007, 03:40:38 PM »

Nice box Jason,

Where did you put the fuses?
- I can't seem to be able to spot them. (A transformer THAT big

can do pretty nasty things when shorted)

On a different note, Bedini seems to think the key to radiant energy lies in PWM - I'm still making up my mind $:-\$

innovation_station · « **Reply #2626 on:** August 15, 2007, 03:58:58 PM »

@jason it makes me happy to see you have switched to tubes to find the answers may you have the best of luck i dont think it will take you verry long to compleat this project using tubes

ist

edit: just a thought after reading the below

what hapins beond the speed of light hummmmmm

time travel of course

i think the tpu is just the verry bengining to the end!!!!

dutchy1966 · « **Reply #2627 on:** August 15, 2007, 04:15:26 PM »

Hi Jason

What about this for a start?

If an EM field is somehow rotated extremely fast, shouldn't all matter be repelled from its center? -kgo.

How fast do you want it rotated? It's fairly simple to construct a system to produce rotating EM waves at whatever rotational velocity you wish by feeding a pair of broadside dipole arrays with quatrature phased waves. It is quite simple to construct a system that would have a rotational velocity of C within the uniform field area. It might also be fairly easy to do this with a Hemholtz coil arangement as well, but the broadside array will be much easier to do at easily engineerable frequencies. Some really interesting paradoxes come about when the rotational frequency is high enough so that the rotational velocity exceeds C within the uniform field area of the arrays or within the hemholtz coils.
Robert Shannon

What effect would there be at the boundry where the rotational velocity reached, and then exceeded the speed of light? How could the magnetic field even propogate to the center of the antenna structure if it would have to move faster than light to reach that space? If hemholtz coils were used instead of loops, the magnetic field strength would be uniform inside the structure, how could the field strenght be uniform if there is not sufficient time for the field to propogate through the space inside the structure itself? Could such an effect actually generate a wormhole like phenomena, at energy levels far below that of neutron stars and such? As the causal mechanism, the magnetic field, is in roation, would this describe a traversable worm hole as has been postulated in relationship to rotating black holes?

Grumpy · « **Reply #2628 on:** August 15, 2007, 04:34:54 PM »

Quote from: Jdo300 on August 15, 2007, 02:59:15 PM

I have focused my attention on experiments involving high-speed rotating magnetic fields at resonance.

Might try rotating the "potential" rather than the field. It is the potential that creates the field in the first place.

innovation_station · « **Reply #2629 on:** August 15, 2007, 05:00:18 PM »

is the rotation not set up by the way it is wound and wired that is what i thought give it a pluse and it spins give it 2 pluses oppsite and it cancles the flux give it 2 freqs that smash togather in the wire and it makes the 3rd no?

is

Jdo300 · « **Reply #2630 on:** August 15, 2007, 07:07:08 PM »

Quote from: Thedane on August 15, 2007, 03:40:38 PM

Nice box Jason,

Where did you put the fuses?
- I can't seem to be able to spot them. (A transformer THAT big can do pretty nasty things when shorted)

On a different note, Bedini seems to think the key to radiant energy lies in PWM - I'm still making up my mind $:-\$

Definitely got that covered, If you look at the photo of the back of the power supply, there is a fuse holder on the left next to where the power cord goes in. I have a 0.5A fuse in it at the moment but I may upgrade to a 1A later if needed.

As for PWM. I'm not sure about that. I never really bothered to look into it but if you think about it, PWM is actually the square wave form of a beat frequency, which when spaced 7.8 Hz apart *may* produce some interesting effects. Not sure though, I haven't really played with that much.

God Bless,
Jason O

Jdo300 · « **Reply #2631 on:** August 15, 2007, 07:09:53 PM »

Quote from: innovation_station on August 15, 2007, 03:58:58 PM

@jason it makes me happy to see you have switched to tubes to find the answers may you have the best of luck i dont think it will take you verry long to compleat this project using tubes

ist

edit: just a thought after reading the below

what hapins beond the speed of light hummmmmm

time travel of course

i think the tpu is just the verry bengining to the end!!!!

Hey IS,

Thanks. I know I'll have fun with this as I have never played with a tube before. I still have yet to fire one up (still have to make the tube circuit yet).

God Bless,
Jason O

Jdo300 · « **Reply #2632 on:** August 15, 2007, 07:12:59 PM »

Quote from: dutchy1966 on August 15, 2007, 04:15:26 PM

Hi Jason

What about this for a start?

If an EM field is somehow rotated extremely fast, shouldn't all matter be repelled from its center? -kgo.

How fast do you want it rotated? It's fairly simple to construct a system to produce rotating EM waves at whatever rotational velocity you wish by feeding a pair of broadside dipole arrays with quatrature phased waves. It is quite simple to construct a system that would have a rotational velocity of C within the uniform field area. It might also be fairly easy to do this with a Hemholtz coil arangement as well, but the broadside array will be much easier to do at easily engineerable frequencies. Some really interesting paradoxes come about when the rotational frequency is high enough so that the rotational velocity exceeds C within the uniform field area of the arrays or within the hemholtz coils.
Robert Shannon

What effect would there be at the boundry where the rotational velocity reached, and then exceeded the speed of light? How could the magnetic field even propogate to the center of the antenna structure if it would have to move faster than light to reach that space? If hemholtz coils were used instead of loops, the magnetic field strength would be uniform inside the structure, how could the field strenght be uniform if there is not sufficient time for the field to propogate through the space inside the structure itself? Could such an effect actually generate a wormhole like phenomena, at energy levels far below that of neutron stars and such? As the causal mechanism, the magnetic field, is in rotation, would this describe a traversable worm hole as has been postulated in relationship to rotating black holes?

Hey Dutchy,

That guy is right about the field. One of the many things that I have heard about over and over again are time dilation effects! And there is NOTHING ODD about this at all! It's all simple relativity. Whenever something moves that darn fast, it is going to bend space. The beauty of this is that we can take advantage of this and use it to make a potential difference in the space around the coil that we can tap energy from (like a black hole really on the basic level).

God Bless,
Jason O

Jdo300 · « **Reply #2633 on:** August 15, 2007, 07:14:35 PM »

Quote from: Grumpy on August 15, 2007, 04:34:54 PM

Quote from: Jdo300 on August 15, 2007, 02:59:15 PM

I have focused my attention on experiments involving high-speed rotating magnetic fields at resonance.

Might try rotating the "potential" rather than the field. It is the potential that creates the field in the first place.

Hi Grumpy,

Thanks for the tip. I always had a gut feeling that was the way to go. This would work out quite nicely if I can come up with a one-wire tube circuit for driving the coils. Then I can create a rotating electric field and see what happens. (also adding an electric orthogonal bias).

God Bless,
Jason O

Thedane · « **Reply #2634 on:** August 15, 2007, 07:19:19 PM »

Quote from: Jdo300 on August 15, 2007, 07:07:08 PM

Quote from: Thedane on August 15, 2007, 03:40:38 PM
Nice box Jason,

Where did you put the fuses?

Definitely got that covered, If you look at the photo of the back of the power supply, there is a fuse holder on the left next to where the power cord goes in. I have a 0.5A fuse in it at the moment but I may upgrade to a 1A later if needed.

I notised the fuse on the primary side, but not on the secondary side.
When you turn on the transformer the inductive load might blow the fuse if it's too small (or fast blow), but I'm sure you know that

But even with a primary 0.5A fuse you can still draw amps (a lot!) on the secondary side before the primary side fuse blows. (Even with a 110V supply it's over 50W - something I wouldn't want to mess with)

I won't tell you how to wire it, just let you know my practical experiences

Good luck on the tube project!

turbo · « **Reply #2635 on:** August 15, 2007, 07:41:45 PM »

Quote from: Grumpy on August 15, 2007, 02:08:14 AM

By the way, isn't -[marco]- in that group?

Stefan gave me access to this group, i never asked for it..
i think it's a stupid idea alswell as i think Bruce is stupid too but i guess you all figured that out already

Marco.

innovation_station · « **Reply #2636 on:** August 15, 2007, 07:55:59 PM »

marco do we need to beat each other with rude remarks ?? are you a man or still a boy??

this thing can not be that dificult to make happin

this was suspoto be a team effort now all i see is people getting rude

perhaps the rude will never finish this project this was a gift from sm he did not have to let this out but we need it and he knows it we as in the world so maybe i add confusioin maybe i help to achive our goal maybe i dont but i DO NOT GET RUDE TO OTHERS ON THIS FOURM!!!! WELL USUALY NEWAYS

PS MARCO /TURBO IF YOU DONT LIKE MY CLUTTER THAN DONT WASTE YOUR TIME READING IT

Grumpy · « **Reply #2637 on:** August 15, 2007, 08:23:23 PM »

Quote from: -[marco]- on August 15, 2007, 07:41:45 PM

Quote from: Grumpy on August 15, 2007, 02:08:14 AM

By the way, isn't -[marco]- in that group?

Stefan gave me access to this group, i never asked for it..
i think it's a stupid idea alswell as i think Bruce is stupid too but i guess you all figured that out already

Marco.

No more stupid than saying that someone used batteries in their TPU, or using batteries to fake a TPU, or leaving a forum because you are accused of faking results, or starting another forum because you don't like this one, or any damn thing else anyone does.

Bruce started the separate effort after Bob expressed the desire to be more private about his work - what is stupid about this? Would you rather Bob send cryptic messages through a single person? Would that be more suiting?

After over a year of cryptic crap and squabbling no one has "openly" re-created a working TPU, yet Bob comes along and offers to help and the group following his lead is stupid and secretive. Well, I don't see anyone else offering to show how their device works. I know of a few working replications and not a single one is being shared here. No, I do not know why - I assume they have their reasons.

What is "stupid" is ignoring what is right in front of you.

z_p_e · « **Reply #2638 on:** August 15, 2007, 08:42:16 PM »

Gosh I'm sorry I brought the whole thing up. I don't really care about it, just commented about it because I noticed many people stopped posting.

It's not a big deal guys!!!

If some folks want to work on things privately, that's ok, let them.

If you have been made a member of this private group withour your consent, ask to be removed, or don't bother with that thread.

It's business as usual for the rest of us here. Relax and just keep doing what you are doing.

So let's keep going...shall we?

Regards,
Darren

Grumpy · « **Reply #2639 on:** August 15, 2007, 09:01:35 PM »

Quote from: z_p_e on August 15, 2007, 08:42:16 PM

It's not a big deal guys!!!

That's all it boils down to - no big deal.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1236062 times)

Thedane

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

innovation_station

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

dutchy1966

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Grumpy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

innovation_station

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Jdo300

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Jdo300

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Jdo300

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Jdo300

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Thedane

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

turbo

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

innovation_station

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Grumpy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

z_p_e

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Grumpy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"