Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84255
  • *Latest: romeos69

  • *Total Posts: 898155
  • *Total Topics: 15837
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 10
  • *Total: 11

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"  (Read 1070493 times)

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #615 on: September 19, 2006, 05:26:07 PM »
I would have to agree that SM3, SM6, & SM17 are good names. The wattage can easily change, but the diameter of a particular machine is fixed.


Quote from: tao
Those posts are spread across EVERY post that Mannix ever did. I have compiled all of SM's words into a text file that makes reading his words easy.
Tao,

Thanks. I can see Mannix's quotes of SM are valuable. Everyone should save these posts to their computer. I saved them, but it's not reliable as someone or group has been repeatedly hacking my machine ever since I started continuing my Magnetocaloric energy research. As a software engineer it's been close to 10 years that I've worked with computer & Internet security and after taking precautions I'm amazed as to how they are able to hack into my machine. I can watch their actions. It was just roughly a month ago that my entire HD was lost.

Anyhow, I wish Mannix would come back and post some more of SM.  I believe "other forums" was mentioned. If possible could you please (re)post the links where SM or Mannix has posted on other forums?



Quote from: ctglabs
Also, if the difference frequency or interefernce or beat frequency of the two is 7.8Hz, is this able to somehow extract excess energy by connecting with the schumman resonance.
Dave,

I see you have also made the connection. I just don't see how any radiant energy from the Sun holds up. Here's what SM says, "YES NORBERT, WE DID TRY THEM SOUTH OF THE EQUATER,   THEY WORK IN REVERSE. CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHY?"

According to SM's experiments, it is clear that his device needs to be pointing toward Earth. Also the 7.3 Hz mentioned by SM should be another huge giveaway.


Quote from: ctglabs
Normally I wouldn't even bother mentioning that due to the weakness of the earths field, etc, but perhaps something else can go on when standing waves are involved?
Yes I agree. Anyone who has seen the power of resonance cannot dismiss it. Even the Mythbusters were astonished with the power of resonance. Just a precise miniscule tapping on a bridge can manifest into noticeable forces. In the hands of a genius such as Tesla then such miniscule forces become powerful. If we sent the right type of field around the Earth at the exact frequency and continually repeat then it is possible for such a weak field to become very powerful.

I have a theory that sounds good so far. If it's true I have no idea. In a nutshell, there could be a resonance between the device and the D-layer ionosphere and/or the top layer Mantel. This matches the 5 KHz resonance. This field would also spread horizontally around the globe and matches the 7.3 Hz. If this field is in resonance (builds up over time) then the field could become very strong. Since the device is in resonance with this field, it could very well experience a gyroscopic and inertia effect. When you move such a machine you are moving it out of alignment with the resonance field, which would cause resistance. To understand why this would occur we need to understand standing waves. Consider sand on a vibrating disc. There is a force on the sand to stay in nodes and away from the antinodes. Similarly, as SM moves his device he is essentially moving the entire resonance that has been building up over time. He is moving the away from the node and into the antinode. This would cause resistance. That could explain the inertia effect. The gyroscope effect could be explained by once again the magnetic material reacting to the antinode. Anyone who's placed a PM somewhat near another PM and then moved it sideways knows there's a force that wants to rotate the magnetic. That could explain the gyroscope effect.

It's just a theory. I think we need to find out if it is true and not be irresponsible. If the "free energy" is coming from some radiant energy source then it sounds safe. If the energy is being instantly moved from the mantel or D-layer then we seriously need to consider the consequences and be responsible. Personally I cannot take the position that others here might be hating or angry that anyone would even suggest such a thought. We need to also be responsible, find out what is really happening, and just be nice and work with everyone. :)

Kind regards,
Paul Lowrance

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #615 on: September 19, 2006, 05:26:07 PM »

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #616 on: September 19, 2006, 09:10:53 PM »
I would have to agree that SM3, SM6, & SM17 are good names. The wattage can easily change, but the diameter of a particular machine is fixed.

Okay, let us keep these names, sounds good with the diameter
description.
Are these in inches = 2,54 cm ?

@Otto,
sounds good, what you are doing.
Yes, please try to wind another control coil around
the core and drive it with a different frequency and
see, if the current output from your rectifier will
go up !
Also you could connect a 10 or 100 Ohm resistor at your output
and measure the DC voltage at it, if you put a capacitor
across it, so you will see the output wattage !
Watts= DC-Voltage^2 / Resistorvalue

Then please compare it versus the input wattage from your 12 Volts DC source.
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

Offline giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2783
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #617 on: September 20, 2006, 04:14:13 AM »
The SM3, SM6, SM17 are in inches. Gotten from the stevennew.mp4

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #617 on: September 20, 2006, 04:14:13 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2783
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #618 on: September 20, 2006, 05:15:42 AM »

I too am wondering why 'three collector coils/wires is important' according to SM also hartiberlin AND how that all relates to this...

This is where my Radiant Theory covers more ground and is able to combine ALL that Steven described and is shown in the videos....

I merely posted my rotating magnetic field theory just to spark the minds of all the people who feel SM's devices work exclusively on rotating magnetic fields.......


Tao, what post/page# did you mention the rotating coils. I need to go back and read that.

I came up another theory about the SM3 & SM6

I had mentioned before that I felt the SMs were Tesla coils. You had mention that there are 3 coils. Well with those could one possibly build an air core Tesla coil by embedding the feedback coil (lets say 10 turns) inside a control coil (lets say 50 turns) inside the largest output coil (lets say 1000 turns)?
I say this because in the video that an SM6 has a slice cut out, there is just styrofoam/cork type filling. I did not see any thing that would match up with the diagram in the compiled posts of Steven Mark. That diagram show internal windings.
As always, I am open to be incorrect.

If we look for the sunlight, we shall see no shadows. Helen Keller. ;)

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #619 on: September 20, 2006, 06:40:35 AM »
Quote
About the collector:
It is three separate coils of multi strand copper wire laid one on top of the other, not interleaved. Three is important. You can do many things with three coils. You can run them in parallel, you can run two in series and one in parallel, or etc.
You can run a separate frequency into each coil for better control on large power units if need be.
The control wiring is vertically wound in several segments around each of the horizontal collector coils. Other control wires are wound around all of the horizontal collector coils together.
Through the different control wire and coil wire arrangements you can keep complete control of the unit most of the time. However, you must have an emergency KILL switch. A way of cutting off all the control frequencies simultaneity. This kill switch must be, manual and also connected through a heat sensor buried within the collector coil. it should automatically stop the function of the unit before it self destructs on it's own. This is important for obvious reasons. Also the kill switch should also be connected to cut off whenever it measures over voltage. If that should ever happen, you would never have enough time to hit the kill switch before the inevitable explosion occurred.
You know, it is very similar to the idea of a long garden hose. Picture a hose with water in it. If you pick up one end and move along the length of the hose you will move the water constantly along in the direction you are moving. You could also squeeze the hose in the direction to move the water along as well. And you could do both to control the movement of the water more precisely. You can think of the movement of water as the movement of electrons through the collector coils.
I hope the things I share with you give you ideas about how my unit works. As you know, I am a great believer in understanding, not copying.
Sincerely,
SM.

Hi Tao,
I tried to search the whole forum here, but did not find this posted earlier ?
So this seems to be information that you have found somewhere else ?
I also could not remember having read it already before.
So where did you get it from ?
P.S. I think the search function over here might also have some
problems as it can not find some other sentences...
I will try to fix it soon with a fresh install of the forum software...
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #619 on: September 20, 2006, 06:40:35 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Jdo300

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 682
    • The Magnetic 90 degree rule Theory
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #620 on: September 20, 2006, 08:23:00 AM »
@Tao,

Awesome work with your theory about the Steve Mark device, as well as for compiling that information. I love the references you made to Bill Beaty?s website. I remember reading over it a long time ago but I just about forgot about it until now. I too have some information that I believe will be very valuable to our research here. As you have been so diligently explaining and re-explaining the concepts here, I have been working in the background doing some bench tests which I believe have confirmed what you have been saying all along. This is a long post and I have only been able to scratch the surface of some of the experiments I have done. But all I have to say is We Got It  8). But first off, I?ll reply to a couple of other recent posts here.

@Otto,

You may not realize it but the results that you are getting area great step in the right direction!! I read the description of your setup and tried to visualize it to the best of my ability. But to make things easier, could you possibly draw some diagrams of the circuits you described? Also, if possible, could you take a picture of your setup? I have a set of ideas on how I believe the device works, like Tao, and from a series of promising experiments I have tried, I believe that we are not too far off from getting this thing to work. I have some more comments to make on your setup but I would first like to see the diagrams of it to make sure that I am interpreting your explanations correctly.

Quote from: hartiberlin
Hi Tao,
great thinking !

If the Mark units are really working on interfence pattern
moving along and inducing output inside the core copper coils,
then why does he need 3 coils inside the core?

Why not just one coil and just a few control coils wrapped around it
to create the 2 opposite rotating magnetic flux fields?

So if it has nothing to do with the Barkhausen resonance in
iron wires, I still wonder, if this rotating interference pattern
will need additional input power, if power is drawn from the output
coils ?

I don?t yet see the dragless operation of this !
Also if you use antennas to draw power from a transmitter,
the transmitter needs to generate this power first,
so the antenna is able to draw it all from it.

So if the transmitter and antenna are coupled, then the power is
just transmitted from the transmitter to the antenna and that?s it.
You need to put more power into the transmitter, if you draw more load
wattage from the antenna...

I *think* I can explain how the fields in the control coils can rotate without experiencing a drag from the collectors. I actually posted a question on PhysicsForums.com about coils at right angles to each other and how that affects the magnetic coupling of the coils. You can check my post out here: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=121122.

Essentially, what I learned is that two magnetic fields at right angles will not couple to each other in the case of coils. But the mere explanation of this was not enough so I set out to test the idea. I had a round coil with an OD of 3?, and ID of 2?, and a height of 0.5?. It was made of insulated 16 gauge wire and was varnished together (no metal core). So I took this coil and toroidally wrapped some 20 gauge magnet wire around 1/4th of the diameter and ran sine wave signals of different frequencies through the 20 gauge coil. As I did so, I had my two-channel scope hooked onto both coils so I could monitor the input signal and the signal that was produced in the big coil. For the most part, my test results agreed with what the people on PhysicsForums said. Magnetic fields at right angles don?t really interact. Now, granted, there was a small signal induced but it was only a small, small fraction of the input. But? It gets better?. So, I switch my function generator over to the square wave signal (0 DC offset) and try varying frequencies. I notice immediately that at certain frequencies, there are numerous amounts of spikes that appear on the toroidal input coil. BUT, these spikes are almost losslessly conveyed to the larger coil! I later learned that after finding what I call the ?sweet spot? of the coil, that the spikes can easily be twice as tall as the input voltage (which was always less then 20 volts for my function generator).

Now there is one more thing I need to throw in here that will blow this thing out of the water!!! I disconnected the ground lead of my function generator from the toroidal coil and I was still getting spikes! After a bit of retuning, I found out that it actually worked better (meaning bigger spikes) using only one wire from the function generator rather than two. I rediscovered Tesla?s one-wire electricity!

Now, before I got all excited about this feat, I decided to see if I was getting any usable current, so using some small germanium diodes, and a smoothing cap, I made a rectifier circuit and started changing a 3000uF capacitor from the output of my circuit! It took about 15-20 seconds to fully tank up but once It did, I could run some LEDs or even a tiny DC motor off of it for a couple of seconds. But I noticed that creating higher voltage spikes allowed the capacitor to charge even faster. The effects I am mentioning here I found using a number of different coils so I don?t have any exact numbers to tell. But I can say that in my case, the frequencies that worked best for me were anywhere from the 200-400 kHz, 400-600 kHz and 6-7MHz range depending on the size of the coil. Not to say that lower frequencies did not have any effects. My input voltage was limited to the 20 volts that my function generator could output (I haven?t done any tests with transistors just yet) but the secret is all in the square wave and the frequency that you pulse it at?.

As some people have already mentioned, the sweet spot for each coil must have something to do with the frequency that they can resonate at (like an antenna).

I have a lot more thoughts to share but my mind is all over the place at the moment. But as a suggestion, everyone should focus on pulsing the coils with an ungrounded signal source. Or if you do choose the ground the circuit (like in my right angle coil setup) put the ground wire on the other coil that is not attached to the input. I also got bigger spikes that way also.

More to come?

God Bless,
Jason O

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #621 on: September 20, 2006, 09:29:05 AM »
Hi Jason,
nice experiment.

Can you try to measure, if the output wattage is higher than the input wattage
in your circuit ?

Maybe put in series with the function-pulse-generator a 10 Ohm resistor, so you can measure
the current from the function-pulse-generator into the circuit.
Maybe you will find a frequency, where you have more output than input power ?

Many thanks for this interesting experiment.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #621 on: September 20, 2006, 09:29:05 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #622 on: September 20, 2006, 04:45:33 PM »
@Jason,
maybe only capacitive coupling ?
how big was output versus input power ?

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #623 on: September 20, 2006, 04:48:30 PM »
@Dave
what DC source did you use with the ignition coil ? 12 Volts ?
How big were the forward kicks and how long did they last ? thanks .

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #623 on: September 20, 2006, 04:48:30 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #624 on: September 20, 2006, 04:52:29 PM »
Hi Dave, how do you measure the large forward kicks on your coill? Did you put a scope directly across the coil ? or across the battery? was the battery frshly charged or old ?

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #625 on: September 20, 2006, 04:54:56 PM »
Hi Dave,

Your device and setup look professional. Great work!

Quote from: dave aka ctglabs
Telsa's radiant pulses require very high voltage and abrupt switching with long wires or high resistance

That sounds very interesting. Do you have any in depth research references that focus on this Tesla radiant effect on high abrubt voltage on long wires so that I and others here can study it?

Paul Lowrance

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #625 on: September 20, 2006, 04:54:56 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #626 on: September 20, 2006, 05:00:44 PM »
Does anyone remember this guy Anderson or how he was called, who used 2 toroidal donut coils inside each other to try to deflect gravity ?

He also has written 4 small DOS PC programs that did show the superimposing of some scalar waves... but my old PC was just too fast already to display it rightly... I guess we should look again into it, as the magnetic  interference patter could be generated this way ?

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #627 on: September 20, 2006, 05:10:37 PM »
If Steven Mark did really say, that 3 output coils are important, then I guess 2 of them are somehow put in series, so that they act bifilar and compensate any backdrag onto the control coils and the third one might get the output..hmmm....

The question is, if it really works only by using copper coils and no iron coils are required, then it is not based on the Barkhausen effect and just seems to be just a Lentz law violation effect...
But if iron coils are required, then it is probably needed a 180 khz resonance LC circuit to tap the Barkhausen resonance...

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7977
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #628 on: September 20, 2006, 05:55:56 PM »
Sorry Dave, could not yet see your posted pics, as I am on my PDA only in this moment. Will check it out later and comment then. Many thanks.

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #629 on: September 20, 2006, 06:37:24 PM »
Quote from: ctglabs
A good book about this is "Secrets of Cold War Technolgy - Project HAARP and Beyond" by Gary Vassilatos.  I also recommend the Tesla Longitudinal waves work from Borderlands research.  There is not really any online research about it.
Thanks, I'll have to get that book.  As for Borderlands research, their work is valuable, but some of their experiments are flawed such as the on suggesting fast than light speed. Don't get me wrong, I know fast than c is possible, but not as simple as they suggest and not in their experiments.

All theories are great and we should test them. Eventually someone will create the smoking gun and publish the detailed build instructions so that anyone can build it; i.e., a machine that is self-running (closing the loop).  That will be some day!  Perhaps the machine will be created by accident or perhaps a theory will lead someone into designing a self-running "free energy" machine on paper that will work when built.  If a theory is detailed enough and correct then it will lead to the smoking gun.  If not, then oh well, back to the drawing board, lol.

Looking forward to seeing everyone's experimental and research results.

Paul Lowrance

 

OneLink