Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"  (Read 1224124 times)

Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 564
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2006, 05:46:47 AM »
That the stuff!

Now here is some more of what Steven has explained to me.
I have taken some personl stuff out so that we can keep relevant here

Excuse the typos  Mine as well !




Dear Lindsay,
I hope this letter finds you well and in good spirits. I have a moment to write you and thought I would do so.
Something that has always bothered me is a statement that was made to me by a gentleman who is the head of a security firm here in the US.
He used to keep track of all the postings on the Internet concerning alternative energy developments.
He mentioned that in almost every other circumstance where a technology has been displayed or discussed, it is usually the demonstration that is discredited. An example would be -- look at all the wires going over the table. They must go to some hidden power source, etc.
However, he mentioned to me that in the case of my technology no one has ever managed to create a credible argument that my technology demonstration was faked.  That is why he believes there has been a concerted effort to attack me personally. Some statements trying to discredit the technology were made by what appears to be nit wits and are easily recognized. The following for example:
The inventor claims that the output of the unit is high voltage DC with a frequency component of around 5k Hz.
Then the person trying to discredit me goes on to say that I am trying to fool people because you can't have DC and AC together, etc.
My dear Lindsay, there is something more sinister about some of the simple statements that have been made about my comments on the video tape.
That one statement and others like it were all over the place for while. It appeared as though the person writing it felt it was very important to get his viewpoint across to as many interested people as he could.
Why would that person keep harping about the frequencies not being possible within a DC output power?
I have made a great study of Vacuum tube power supplies as I have told you. It is all very interesting. Please remind me to tell you why Nicola Tesla used Vacuum tubes in his most powerful demonstrations of his power conversion technologies.
Anyway, I have taken a high voltage power supply as follows:
500 v-0-500 v  300 mV plate transformer run it through a full wave silicon circuit then run it through a 5U4 electron tube rectifier. Now you know that the 5U4 requires 5 volts AC at 3 amps for its heater to gather the electrons and complete the circuit. Well, I measured the output from the tube and the result is 500 volts DC at 250 mV. The loss is due to the high impedance of the tube and its limited ability to dissipate more than 250 mA.. The point I wish to make here is that also along with the 500 volt DC is, yes, you guessed it, the 5 volts three amp AC current! They are both completely independent of each other except for some very interesting things I will mention to you some other time..
First of all, obviously you can have several different output components in the power output signal. You can have DC and AC together without any problem. Why did that mystery person claim that it was a foolish to say DC output with a 5k Hz component? Because he was deliberately trying to mislead anyone who might want to figure out what I was doing.
My security man tried to contact the person at his email addresses but with no response. In his opinion it does not seem logical that someone so energetically trying to disprove the validity of my technology would simply never answer any of his e-mail inquires.
What I am trying to say here is that believe I am not the only person who knows about the reality of the technology. There are others who know it can be done and have a desire to see to it that it's application is delayed for as long as possible.
Now about the DC output with AC signal.
There is a book about Nicola Tesla "The Man who Had lightning in his hand". I suggest that you find a copy of that book and read it. In that book it is related that Tesla states that you can have all kinds of electrons flowing through a wire traveling in different directions relating only to their potential power source. He even said that you could have different electron flows through a single wire completely separate from each other. I tried it and he is right!
On to another point.
HE said that one day in his laboratory he was noticing that there were some reactions on his magnetometer for no reason he could understand. The next day he had many magnetometers brought into his laboratory and he began additional research. He found that the measurement of the earth's magnetic field was fairly straightforward. You have a device, which measures a very small magnetic force which comes from the generation of magnetic waves as the big iron ball we call the earth rotates. If you look at a scientific display of the earth you see that it resembles a big power generator. It has poles, a magnetic field, rotation, everything.
Now I am you know that anytime you have a magnetic field moving past a wire you have electron flow in that wire or more precisely on the surface.
So the earth is generating the most unbelievably huge amount of power all the time and we can't tap into it?! I don't believe it!  Neither did Nicola Tesla.
He found a way to tap into the earth's power potential and he demonstrated it often.
 Did you know that every single one of his patents was purchased by Edison and Westinghouse? He had a very large amount of patents and they purchased all of them but only utilized one for transmitting electric power via 60 cycle AC and step down transformers, which became the standard of power transmission throughout the earth to this day.
Anyway, back to his research in the laboratory. He noticed that most of the time the magnetometers stayed relatively sedate and around the same level. They would fluctuate just slightly. however one day he noticed that the meters jumped quite unpredictably.  It attracted his attention and he began to find that the meters were reacting to a thunderstorm many hundreds of miles away. Interesting isn't it?
Then he continued his experiments and found that as a thunderstorm moved closer the magnetometers would register larger and larger fluctuations until they were off the scale and useless. 
He was fascinated and consumed by this. He acquired better magnetometers and his research found that you could tune the magnetometers to certain specific frequencies and tap directly into large magnetic waves. When I say large, I am referring to huge. That was useable power.
However, you had to find a circuit potential in order for the electrons to flow. That was the difficulty which he overcame to produce his famous demonstrations of power from nowhere.
Please let me make another point.
Let us say that you have a magnetic field perhaps it is only a small permanent magnet. Now, you have a single copper wire twelve inches long. If you move the magnet across the surface of the wire from left to right at a certain speed you create an electron flow which is DC and it has a power potential based on how strong the field is and how fast the magnet if moved. So, if you increase the size of the magnet or the speed it moves you create a larger flow of electrons, larger as in higher voltage or more currant.
Everyone tells us that the earth's magnetic field is measured as being too insignificant to generate any useable power, that is not so.
Let me give you something to think about...  If you had a short wire and you moved a magnet across it you would always have limited potential because the length of wire was so short. OK now what if we increase the length of the wire to many miles in length even with a very weak magnetic field moving across the wire you still have a much greater potential flow of power available.  If we put it into a perspective of power per inch it may be easier to understand.
If you have a small magnetic field moving across a wire twelve inches long it can generate an electron flow equal to lets say one millivolt per inch. If you move the magnet twelve inches at the same speed you get 12 millivolts as you transgress the twelve inches of wire. Understand that I am trying to convey a principal that you can understand for use in the future.
So, you have a wire twelve inches long and you can make 12 millivolts moving a magnet across it. If you have a wire 1000 feet long and you move the same small magnetic field across the length of it you can create much more voltage potential perhaps 12,000 millivolts lets say.
 So, you have managed to generate a significant amount of electric power with a weak magnetic force.
OK, how does this help us? where am I going with this?
Suppose you have 1,000 pieces of wire twelve inches long and you run the same weak magnetic field over them all at the same time..... you get the same flow of electrons.
If the wires are run in series then you will get the 12,000 millivolts etc. If you connect the wires in parallel you will get higher current but lower voltage.  However, the power potential is the same whether you run the wires in series or parallel.
If you know how to find the circuit potential, you tune into the frequency and you have enough short pieces of wire you can convert as much power as you wish in a given space.
    Things are more complex then what I have told you but I am just trying to give you an idea of how the technology works.
How it IS POSSIBLE to use what appears to be a weak magnetic force to generate large useable amounts of power.
By the way, when I met with Dr. Schinzinger many years ago we discussed a point you may find invaluable in your thought processes.
Did you know Lindsay, that it is a scientific impossibility to play a vinyl record with a diamond needle?  Well it is. Science tells us that if you were to use a diamond, the hardest natural substance to play the soft groves of a vinyl record you would destroy the record with just one playing, but, as you know that is not the case. They have made millions and millions of vinyl records and people used millions of turntables equipped with diamond needles to play them repeatedly over and over again. How could something that could not possible survive one playing continually be played over and over again?
Science can not explain this. I say that if you run a diamond across a plate of glass you will invariably make a serious scratch in it with very little force, but if you play a vinyl record there is no damage or at least very little discernable wear. Something to think about, isn't it?
The reason the diamond needle phenomenon exists today is because of ignorance. You see when they started making grooved records back in the beginning of this last century they were using cactus needles to play the records. The cactus needles would wear down and need to be sharpened. So enterprising young men came up with steel needles. Unfortunately, they too would wear down and need to be sharpened. Eventually these enterprising men continued to use harder and harder materials eventually arriving at diamond to make their playing needles -- about the hardest thing they could come up with. They didn't know that according to science only one playing of the shellac disk would destroy it. They didn't know so they just kept on making and selling diamond needles for not only shellac disks but the new soft vinyl ones as well..
Trial and error is the best way to make new discoveries. If we rely completely on what we are told by scientists and engineers we will never make any relevant discoveries because we are told not to try, that they are impossible.
Lindsay, I hope that you got something out of all this. I am very tired now and I have to go. I will talk to you again.
Next time I will try not to be all over the page. It is just that I have so much information to convey. It is more important that I get you to understand the concept more then anything else I could convey to you. I am sorry.
Sincerely,
SM


Please Digest this carefully Guys I took me 3 days..and nights to see the significance of all this
Have fun!

Lindsay Mannix

IcyBlue

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2006, 11:15:41 AM »
Quote
[...]Then he continued his experiments and found that as a thunderstorm moved closer the magnetometers would register larger and larger fluctuations until they were off the scale and useless. [...] He acquired better magnetometers and his research found that you could tune the magnetometers to certain specific frequencies and tap directly into large magnetic waves.[...]
we do not need to go into wild guesses about natural occuring electric and magnetic currents anymore because, compared with tesla, we have the advance that we can simply meassure and display them. All you need to do is buildung a VLF receiver and feed the signal to a spectrum analyzer. We don't need to speculate about large magnetic waves, because if there are any, we would see them in the frequency plot. See www.vlf.it for more details.

Attached is an example, showing the earth schumann resonances (the strong line is the power distribution system frequency of 50Hz). Natural activity is undenieable present, but very weak, compared with the manmade noises.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2006, 03:46:28 PM »
I agree, the thunderstorm magnetic waves output is very low, if you are miles away... so this is probably not the power source for Steven?s devices. Also it is  very uncommon, that his output ceases, when he turns the device by 180 degrees and not by 90 degrees, thus I also don?t believe, that it is really powered by the weak magnetic field of the earth ...hmm, maybe he is just tapping the permanent magnet and cools down the core and magnet..but then, why does the output decrease when turned by 180 degrees and not by 90 degrees, which could be more normal...?

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2006, 05:23:18 PM »
Maybe Steven can just post an experiment we could try to see his effect ? This would take all the guessing out of this thread and we could move on to verify the effect. It must not be the actual device circuit, but just an experiment, which proves the concept and where one could clearly measure some positive results....
Many thanks.
Stefan.

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #34 on: February 04, 2006, 07:12:47 PM »
\"If you know how to find the circuit potential, you tune into the frequency and you have enough short pieces of wire you can convert as much power as you wish in a given space.\"


What is the meaning of \"find the circuit potential\"?


maybe all posible free  electrons in a wire of x inch?

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #35 on: February 04, 2006, 08:43:46 PM »
Maybe Steven can just post an experiment we could try to see his effect ? This would take all the guessing out of this thread and we could move on to verify the effect. It must not be the actual device circuit, but just an experiment, which proves the concept and where one could clearly measure some positive results....
Many thanks.
Stefan.


Hallo hartiberlin,

schon mal das hier gelesen?

http://www.b-kainka.de/bastel87.htm

MfG
rensseak

Tink

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #36 on: February 04, 2006, 10:44:03 PM »
Hello all,

Have a look at this site with Cook coil generator.
Okay okay, it did not seem to work for Mr. Randall and to be honest I never got it to work either.
But all the same,....have a look:
http://my.voyager.net/~jrrandall/CookCoil.htm

Just my two pennies.

Tink

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #37 on: February 04, 2006, 11:06:22 PM »
Hello again,

An other thing to ponder about,...the Emery coil !
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/emery.htm

The thing is; dc from coils, and things happening that should not happen (the diamond needle)

Just another two cents.

oouthere

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2006, 05:12:37 PM »
Just a short note of appreciation to "SM" and Lindsay.  There are probably many more such as myself soaking in this great information.   I'm an outdated wanna-be electronics tech that does not remember much so the simplistic teaching style is great  Please keep-up the good work!

Rich

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #39 on: February 05, 2006, 08:03:10 PM »
Hello,

looking at this I miss the exact description of how the coil is wound. Does anyone have a diagramm of this
coil ?

Kator

oouthere

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #40 on: February 05, 2006, 08:49:31 PM »
No circuits or diagrams, he seems to be teaching something much better.....the concept.

Rich

mpav

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #41 on: February 06, 2006, 04:07:13 AM »

oouthere

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #42 on: February 06, 2006, 05:50:59 PM »
This may be presumptious, but I'm fairly certain SM's Power Ring and Perrigo's Accumulator have much in common.

http://rexresearch.com/perrigo/perrig~1.htm

Rich

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #43 on: February 06, 2006, 08:26:52 PM »
Hello again,

An other thing to ponder about,...the Emery coil !
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/emery.htm

The thing is; dc from coils, and things happening that should not happen (the diamond needle)

Just another two cents.

This is probably just a measurement error.
If you see, that the small meter is just reflected to6 amps
as he puts it up onto the core, the core magnetism is probably
just deflecting the needle of this small ampmeter.
The lighting of the bulb comes from mechanically removing the magnetized
iron core from the rest of the core and thereby inducing current into the coils
via induction.
It is like opening the core with  a permanent magnet.
I am sure the rest is measurement errorsas he also
never tried it with a digital ampmeter to prove it ?!

I think this does not resemble the Marks devices !
Regards, stefan.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #44 on: February 06, 2006, 08:32:49 PM »
Hello all,

Have a look at this site with Cook coil generator.
Okay okay, it did not seem to work for Mr. Randall and to be honest I never got it to work either.
But all the same,....have a look:
http://my.voyager.net/~jrrandall/CookCoil.htm

Just my two pennies.


Yes, maybe the Marks device is something simular to this,
who knows..
Maybe Steven got something towork, which Randall did not get to work ?

As Steven posted, it must be very special components and the circuits
are dangerous to experiment with cause High Voltage is involved it will
be much better, if he would send us an example, how to see the basic effect
in an experiment, so that if the effect is seen by independent researchers we can
build up onto this and design our own scaled up version to extract useful output.

But we first have to see the real effect in an experiment. All posted until now
is too vague to begin experimenting. So Steven, if you read this, maybe you
can point us into the right direction, so some can start experimenting.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2006, 10:19:15 PM by hartiberlin »