@ronette

superb .. yes this is the document i read recently and thankyou for re introducing it to the forum . it is extrememely valuable for the novices in this field to help gain an understanding of the basic principals of what is to be considered.

I personally believe it is required reading.

Though others might disagree.

Regards,

Dean

Hmn...Very good point Mazda! 

Not abandoned.

Everyone is hard at work.

Try pulsing outer coils and collect with inner.  Let it run for a while with just pulses to build the field up on the collector.

Run pulses through a diode (or bridge) and use as trigger for switching device to make shorter.

You might even strigger several switches with one trigger pulse to pulse several coils at once.

Hello there, I am an independent television producer and I am very interested in the TPG.  My uncle and I have been watching the  videos and I do not know too much about the technical side of your process however, I noticed the poor quality of the video taken and I would like to speak with Mr. Mark regarding the production of a more professional video which may help to provide a more clear demonstration of his unit.  There would be no cost to Mr. Mark and I would like to do a complete documentary around his adventure and help in providing more solid proof of SM's invention.  Or which conditions he may require without question it is of monumental interest and scientific achievment that could benefit all of humanity and this should be correctly documented for future generations at the very least.  Can you pass along my invite to Steven you or he can reach me either through the forum or on my email.

Ernst
Exactly what are we looking at? What more information do you have? I am sure we know all the Hendershot information available on the internet but do you have something new?

Regards


AM

I think it operates exactly like the Magnetic Power Patent. You have to read this, I had been working on this exact process before I saw the patent and must admit they have it nailed.
So here it is, what if you had a split magnetic path? The primary field moves from top to bottom with two paths through a magnetic material, the output coils are oriented so this primary field can move through either or both of them.The input or control field moves through the magnetic material horizontally, to the left-to the right, but since the control field is at right angles to the output coils and the primary field it cannot be affected by them. It is absolutely a one way process and this is literally the magic of this technology.
The harnessing of any primary conservative field with no reversal of power, isolating the input from the output.
So what if SM used a toroid with a magnetic field moving through it and he could turn this field with no field reversal. As the input is additive and is part of the output it is conservative, but any external field is added to the output and cannot affect the input.
Im sure this is it, the MPI patent explains this effect very well and is worth reading.

@CTG Labs
If you look at the patent there is a picture showing a cross section of the generator, when the control input is ON the primary field is pushed to the left we will say. You will notice that where the output coils go through the core (the hole) the field turns or wraps 3/4 way round the wire. As current is induced in the output coil this field turns 360 Deg round the hole, turning the primary field even more. Think of a tornado,you need two flows to create a turning force, Vector two fields incoming at 90 Deg, add a turning component in the hole and you have induction. To see what is really happening run this cross section on vizimag, you will like what you see.
As for OU, it should be obvious, a magnetic transistor effect. A small input turning a larger one. If the output is driven by the primary field, a PM then any work given to the output must come from the PM, which is free. The control does not drive the output, it produces a steering force on the primary. You gain when the control in on, and gain when the fields return to equlibrium.

You never want to say in a patent that your device is OU or make free energy, then they either won't grant the patent or the Fed's grab it.