Lissajous:
Magnet display of a infolding energy creating a vortex.
It is better to point towards knowledge than someone else, Dankie.
Tesla stated about the present national electrical power situation is
"one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history"This one time I am going to disagree with Sir Nikola. "We, Earthlings, have been doing in all our existance". You may kiss the ring.
We ground harmonic resonance from our consumptive energy generating systems. They would not be consumptive if we diminished thermionic waste and applied the 'UNWANTED' harmonics. This is what Tesla achieved! Ed Leedskalnin used bottles and coils. Hello?
If the aliens gave us flying saucers that worked we would put them in amusement parks. There is even a patent describing the folly.
On the thermal approach...
http://www.virginia.edu/ep/SurfaceScience/thermion.htmlCurrent electrical designs approach the use of electricty like is fire. Oooo! Another great step for mankind.
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/NegativeResistorAndMore.htm--giantkiller.
Correction: It was Sweet who mentions microwatt biasing.
Adjunct: Men of old, in concert, built a huge tower named after Babel. God said (Paraphrase) "No way, and don't waste your time with such folly for it goes nowhere!". Today we build bigger and better and don't need any help to destroy ourselves. HaHaHa!
Google: "The source charge problem".
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=The+source+charge+problem&aq=f&oq=http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Fact_Sheets/Fact%20Sheet%20-%20Source%20Charge%20Problem10.doc . Numbers of scientists have objected to the old “heat death†prediction of the second law anyway. E.g., Steinmetz had this to say: "The second law of thermodynamics is well founded on our experience. The reasoning from this law as to the death of the universe is logical. At the same time, the conclusion that the universe must run down is not reasonable. If the universe is eternal, has existed since infinite time, then it should have run down an infinite time ago. But if it is not eternal, but had a beginning, what was before? How could energy begin without offending the first law, that of the conservation of energy? Thus, in the final reasoning, we arrive at a contradiction." Quoted from Charles P. Steinmetz, "The Second Law of Thermodynamics and the 'Death' of Energy, with Notes on the Thermodynamics of the 'atmosphere'," General Electric Review, Vol. 15, July 1912.]
. E.g., Price states it this way: "…the major task of an account of thermodynamic asymmetry is to explain why the universe as we find it is so far from thermodynamic equilibrium, and was even more so in the past." (p. 36). And again: "A century or so ago, Ludwig Boltzmann and other physicists… attempted to explain the temporal asymmetry of the second law of thermodynamics. …the hard-won lesson of that endeavor—a lesson still commonly misunderstood—was that the real puzzle of thermodynamics is not why entropy increases with time, but why it was ever so low in the first place." (p. 78). Quoted from Huw Price, Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point, Oxford University Press, 1996, paperback 1997. Our comment is that Leyton’s extension of Klein geometry to produce Leyton’s hierarchies of symmetry is the formal solution to the long-vexing time asymmetry problem of thermodynamics. The second law has simply been incomplete, and has erroneously not included negative entropy systems and interactions such as the source charge and its continuous production of negative entropy.
This is clear as a bell. Be sure to ring it twice. Ding, dong!
@ Thaelin,
Well, well, well... Doesn't the 'Harmonic Resonance pdf' prove out Tesla's Earthquake machine, Ed L.'s construction techniques, the exploding T.V., and Keely's atomic Disassocation.
@all,
I sincerely hope all this is clear?
--giantkiller(squared).
