Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Energy Receiver  (Read 27410 times)

Offline FredWalter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2006, 07:22:06 PM »
US4004210,page7,line 8-10;

I've attached a copy of this patent, as a .pdf file.

Offline FredWalter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2006, 07:24:43 PM »
US562311,page8,line60-67/page11,line 47-54/page15,line 3-6

I believe you meant US5623119.

I've attached a copy of this patent as a .pdf file.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #17 on: March 13, 2006, 02:28:44 AM »
Hello "Big",
in your post the comment about hydrogen,from "The use ..." to "enough said."
is under a "negative sphere" !

We shall see all energy-mediums as future-needs solution,so actual risks shall be
researched and the right "medium-handling" be developped !

It is not the question about weeks,months,years:
the real global -common-challenge will not begin soon 2025 !!!

Sincerely
            de Lanca

Offline Big

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #18 on: March 13, 2006, 03:38:01 PM »
lancaIV,
You will need to help us all understand what you are trying to say by what you write.  I am having trouble making heads or tails of it.

What is a "negative sphere"?  Is that a scientific term?

What are "energy mediums"?  Surely this is not some sort of spiritualistic funny business.

What does the phrase "as future-needs solution" mean?  Is that as opposed to current needs?

What is a "real global-common-challenge"?  I can't imagine where to start with that one.


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #19 on: March 14, 2006, 02:54:16 AM »
Hey "Big",

a"medium" is to understand as deposit/storage,not self-(re-)activity inside !

Fossil fuels are not energy !
This can be used for the energy-related process,like other -non fossil- material !
So we can recognize,that all gas/liquid/solid material on earth and later outside shall be used as "medium",
"Cement to fuel","Garbage to fuel","Biomass to fuel","Metals to fuel",
"Granite/earth-rock to fuel".

The difference between current/future-needs will be,energy-related:
-90% KWH per capita in the developped countries,through rational using
of all resourches,Fuzzy-logic included !
 
In reality "ENERGY" consumption is in the industrial/commercial sector something
cheap (consumer price-related) but it is very interestant for speculative actions !

"war for oil"and "dying for oil",why not,if not for oil,the politicians would find an other reason for "games",there is a great reservoir of full-risk-gambler like payed soldier !

Sincerely
            de Lanca

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #20 on: March 14, 2006, 03:37:37 AM »
But let us come back to the basic theme "energy receiver":
Visit for example the webpage of Mr.Thomas Cosby,
http://www.geocities.com/cosbytech/stock.html
Cosby Technologies Inc.,
a person,involved with thermodynamics since over 40 years !
My first contact with him,telephonical,2001 !

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8055
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #21 on: March 14, 2006, 04:12:25 AM »
Aha, ja rechtsdrehende Kreisprozesse !
diue Konvertieren Umgebungsw?rme in mechanische Energie !
Gut !

Yes, right turning energy cycles which convert  latent suroundings heat
into mechanical work, ! Genuine !

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #22 on: March 14, 2006, 04:49:10 AM »
This system only needs a thermal difference/voltage of 80 degrees Fahrenheit !
So the combination with a conventional heatpump more heatchanger would
give a thermodynamic-cycle Transformer !

Or,as second possibility,to grave in the absorber in desert sand
-sand is a good heat accumulator- !
Sincerely
            de Lanca

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8055
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #23 on: March 14, 2006, 05:14:19 AM »
First we have to find a circuit, where we can see an amplification
of these kicks.
Let us just calculate:
If we have a power supply with 10 Volts and we pulse
this 10 Volts for 1 microseconds ( 0.000001 seconds)
onto a 100 Ohm resistor, we have spend 0.000001 Wattseconds
of energy from the powersupply.

So if we have a toroidal circuit with 100 Ohm
impedance instead of the resistor and we
can get the output pulse, which is magnified by the kick
rectified and stored in a capacitor, it needs to have a voltage on a e.g.
1 uF cap of at least :
V= (2x Wcap / C)^-1 = 1.41 Volts
to have the same energy as the input pulse !
Now all higher voltages on the 1 uF cap as 1.41 Volts
from a single 10 Volts input pulse 1 usec long will
show then an amplification of this pulse.

So how can we generate such a circuit, that will
have a higher voltage than 1.41 Volts ?
Thanks.
Regards, Stefan.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #24 on: March 14, 2006, 05:40:03 AM »
When I see such a question I think,at first,:
who was for the AC-industry(primarly Westinghouse) more important:
Karl Steinmetz or Nikola Tesla ?


Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca

p.s.: When the Torribio Bellocq Analogon is real(hydro current~ electro current)
       then there will be also the right-experimental repeatable-answer !
       
       Aber nicht mehr heute frueh,keine geistige Konzentration mehr !
« Last Edit: March 14, 2006, 05:50:16 AM by lancaIV »

Offline FredWalter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #25 on: March 14, 2006, 03:03:50 PM »
But let us come back to the basic theme "energy receiver":
Visit for example the webpage of Mr.Thomas Cosby,
http://www.geocities.com/cosbytech/stock.html

Mr. Cosby's website has nothing to do with the 'basic theme "energy receiver"'.

His website has to do with steam engines:

"The present proposal relates to a method and apparatus for reducing the amount of fuel required to perform work in a steam cycle to generate electricity."

I've attached one of his patents to this message.

Offline Big

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #26 on: March 14, 2006, 05:12:54 PM »
Fred is correct.  That site has nothing to do with the subject.  In fact, it is just another scam site, selling shares and not making a product.

It is amazing how some people can be so gullible.  But strange as that may be, they are also the ones who use a lot of mumbo-jumbo, double-talk and just plain ignorance, willing to believe in anything, desiring to be viewed as an expert and knowing little if anything.

First things first; learn to read and write.  Next, try some things out for yourself.  Gain some experience in life and then start asking questions.  Even if you reach that point, you are still not ready to offer knowledge.

Please go back to the original question.  If you don?t have an answer or a reasonable comment, please don?t contribute.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #27 on: March 14, 2006, 10:03:09 PM »
Pardon,but also a solar collector is an energy receiver !
A steam-engine is also an energy-receiver and time-parallel? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?an energy-transformer !
Wo beginnt/endet der kleinste "gemeinsame Nenner" bei den Begriffen:

Perpetuum mobile
Overunity
Energy

The Internet is like an OPEN SKY,we have not to buy or sell something,
we can get information through webpages like freeenergynews(A-Z) and
many others,and normally we are souverign enough to decide about
acceptance or recusing !

"Erst sprechen,dann denken !" oder "Erst denken,dann sprechen !"

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca
p.s.:
"Big",where can you find a "scam" potential ?
There is a study of +/-500 companies and their R&D :
from 1911 ideas
         376 became board-projects
         176 became market-introduction
  and    11 became financial success,24 invest pay back and the rest:EEE       

Imagination:"Just an illusion,..."
« Last Edit: March 14, 2006, 10:39:11 PM by lancaIV »

Offline Big

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #28 on: March 14, 2006, 10:46:39 PM »
No, that simply is not true.  A steam engine is not an energy receiver.  It is a device that takes out, or utilizes, the energy that has been put into the steam by someone who used another energy source to boil the water.  However, the steam engine may be a part of an energy receiver system.  This is simple physics, and it is an extremely simple concept.

An energy receiver is an energy tap.  It connects with the vast pool of energy that is all around us and allows it to flow freely.  I am obviously looking for useful examples of devices that can tap into that pool and allow us to freely use that source without any other step, except perhaps current conversion of some sort.  We need free electricity, and plenty of it!  I currently use at least 2000 watts continuously, maybe more.  I want more electricity and I want it for free.  I believe that to be a big issue of our century as we are forced to wean ourselves off of oil and coal.

The solar panel qualifies, but it is not very efficient and it is very expensive.  The wind turbine also qualifies, as perhaps do other solar collectors that create steam to run a generator.  (The best design I have found is at http://www.stirlingenergy.com//default.asp  since it is available now, but I suspect that it would be quite expensive.)  But if the system is too complex, it will likely be too expensive to purchase and/or maintain.  I do not call that practical.

While the Internet is a place where there is a free exchange of information, that is not the purpose here, nor the reason for this topic.  I am looking for very specific information in the practical realm.  There must be someone out there that has a device for sale, or knowledge of the subject that can be used now.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: Energy Receiver
« Reply #29 on: March 14, 2006, 11:53:25 PM »
In the 19.century many great steam-machines/-engines had been
solar heat driven !Parabolic-mirror f.e. as receiver !

It is easy for me to write with orthographical faults,
many posts are written when my Bio-Rhytm "sleeps",
but sometimes it is harder for anybody to argument with facts when
he/she describes "his/her true" !
Please,visit an "Estate library",Wikipedia and other archives,
receive up-to-date knowledge and probably begin with your own
physical experiments-there are also enough e-groups-
and then,but only then let us both discussing about "Earth 2050"
under best or under worst case scene

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca
p.s.: 2KW X 8766h(permanent)=? or only because e-heater during cold season? ?
? ? ? ?The average electricity use (not consume)for a 4-Persons-household in FRG:
? ? ? ?4000KWH/year (without room heating)
« Last Edit: March 15, 2006, 01:00:27 AM by lancaIV »