Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim  (Read 1168690 times)

sterlinga

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
    • Pure Energy Systems
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #30 on: March 18, 2009, 08:09:05 PM »
I've posted a feature page over at PESWiki on this:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:_MYLOW%27s_Mangetic_Motor_based_on_Howard_Johnson%27s_Design

Shortcut:
http://peswiki.com/energy/MYLOW

Discussion list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mylow_magmo

I did a few screen grabs to show the different components.  Working on an animated gif.

Pretty neat stuff.  I look forward to you guy replicating this.

Feel free to post your results over on our site at PESWiki (publicly editable).

Here's the opening text for the page:

YouTube user "MYLOW121363" (hereafter "Mylow") of Chicago has apparently successfully replicated the late Howard Johnson's all-magnet motor, Stonehenge model, that Johnson worked on in the early 1980s to demonstrate to the U.S. Patent Office. Mylow purposely kept his replication as close as possible to Johnson's design.

Mylow claims it has run 26 hours continuous in one setting. His replica begins to turn once the single stator horseshoe (U-shaped) magnet comes close to the rotor magnets on the perimeter of the rotor. The rotor spins up to a certain speed and does not go any faster. The speed limit could be due to an eddy current interaction between the stator magnet and the rotating aluminum rotor. If the rotor was changed out for plastic or brass, then it might continue to accelerate.

Mylow says he has seen some deceleration over time. Perhaps the energy supporting continued rotation is a function of the magnet gradually giving up its magnetism, like a battery. He had the stator magnet remagnetized, and the motor worked again.

The rotor consists of sets of 7 Alnico magnets attached to an aluminum disc with crazy glue. There is a gap between each set. He plans to fill the larger gap (that appears as of at least March 17, 2009) with another two sets of seven magnets. The aluminum disc rides on a high precision ball bearing that was forged at his brother's workshop. The single stator magnet (also U-shaped) is glued to the bottom of an aluminum bar that is mounted on top of two wooden stands.

On March 17, 2009, Mylow said he will be presenting documentation, schematics, drawings and instructions to allow others to replicate this motor. [1]

"I've been working on this idea of his for a very long time. All the credit goes out to him [the late Howard Johnson] and whoever owns that patent." -- Mylow
« Last Edit: March 18, 2009, 10:44:09 PM by sterlinga »

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #31 on: March 18, 2009, 08:35:00 PM »
Again, no accent whatsoever should be put on whether or not there is degaussing of the magnets. That cannot be the energy source driving the motor even if there's such degaussing.What really needs to be understood is whether or not this is a self-starter sustaining its run for a sufficient time (11, even 27 hours claimed).

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #32 on: March 18, 2009, 08:39:29 PM »
Why on Earth would he wanna do this, make multiple videos of an externally powered device pretending it's a self-runner? Besides, 11, let alone 27 hours of self-sustained run is far too long for a decelerating motor.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #33 on: March 18, 2009, 08:47:43 PM »
No, it doesn't. Why would he want to cheat in view of the fact that nowadays "liar, liar pants on fire" is easier than ever to be deservedly hanged on any overunity fraudster (recall @alsetalokin).

Also, what do you mean by this: "See the mathematical proof based on well-established conventional physics." What mathematical proof?

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #34 on: March 18, 2009, 09:00:43 PM »
I disagree, the answer isn't at all obvious. What does he stand to gain by such allegedly blatant lying?

As for the "mathematical proof" it will take me some time to see what you have in mind by that in your text on magnetism. Diode array text is to be discussed elsewhere.

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #35 on: March 18, 2009, 09:09:47 PM »
I disagree, the answer isn't at all obvious. What does he stand to gain by such allegedly blatant lying?
Are you truly telling me the following thought did not come to mind? -->

* Person replicates the device.
* They have high hopes.
* It costs them $ and time.
* It does not work.
* Person become frustrated and angry.
* After repeating the above, numerous times, the person becomes burnt out, wants nothing to do with this "free energy" community.

PL

lostcauses10x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #36 on: March 18, 2009, 09:35:59 PM »
Sounds about right, LOL Though in reality such is usualy some sort of out side input that is not know to the individual at the time.
The other one is that they believe and by faking it hope some one will correct the lock points by replication that they can not. Just a couple of things that come to mind.

Are you truly telling me the following thought did not come to mind? -->

* Person replicates the device.
* They have high hopes.
* It costs them $ and time.
* It does not work.
* Person become frustrated and angry.
* After repeating the above, numerous times, the person becomes burnt out, wants nothing to do with this "free energy" community.

PL

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #37 on: March 18, 2009, 10:21:07 PM »
Yes, but why the fraud?

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #38 on: March 18, 2009, 10:32:56 PM »
I have many times asked myself why every inventor of a free energy device claims that all the parts MUST look EXACTLY like that. You MUST have 2,00617720333012844 inch radius in the magnet to make this work, or else it is impossible to replicate. And the best of all; The pictures of the device looks like a kinder garden project, someone unluckily used the chainsaw on a piece of particle board and drilled 100 holes in it. Glued the magnets with strawberry gum, and decorated the rotor with metal pieces. In the same sentence, the inventor also claims that he has disassambled the machine, and have lost the drawings. Who the f¤&/%uck want to destroy a free energy device he's built? It smells fish through the computer screen, and all the way to Maura in Norway. God bless the kids ;D

I understand that many inventors whished his device should work, and do something stupid like using an external motor to run the thing - even batteries are used.

Anyway, I'll make my motor - just for educational purposes :)

Br.

Vidar

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #39 on: March 18, 2009, 10:46:15 PM »
Wow even belittling people that show videos as proof are we? He showed every part and explained everything, still not good enough?

But your inventions are holy and other people's work is dirt,right?

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #40 on: March 18, 2009, 10:56:08 PM »
Pl I didn't suspect this high skepticism from you. Actually a bit like low-q. You guys have produced nothing with your ideas but are very quick to belittle someone who has. This is the behavior that keeps mankind in the stone ages.

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #41 on: March 18, 2009, 11:00:41 PM »
Call me when it can power my house. That's all that matters on this forum and you know it. And you seem to have forgotten who I am, I was an avid follower of your work.

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #42 on: March 18, 2009, 11:08:35 PM »
Wow even belittling people that show videos as proof are we? He showed every part and explained everything, still not good enough?

But your inventions are holy and other people's work is dirt,right?
My point wasn't exactly that. Also I have never claimed anything of my "work" as OU or free energy devices. So I have never put a video on youtube with a claimed running motor. I have one animation, poor one, with an explanation on how this MIGHT work. And it took only 5 hours before some youtuber called me an idiot ;D. So here I am - an idiot, and no better than anyone in this forum, or on you tube for that matter.

But nevertheless, I am a hunter for free energy, and will be unstoppable till my death in search of free energy. But it is also allowed to discuss others work or intentions without being attacked for no objective reasons. Well, I wasn't very objective in my previous post - sorry. It will probably never happen again.

I enjoy most of both yours and others approach to free energy, but sometimes one bumps into persons who take their selves too cermonious and are often offended by allmost nothing - and I respect that.

God bless you and all other members here in the search for free energy. Do not give up, but stop believing that magnets are the solution to the energy crises on this brittle planet.

br.

Vidar

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #43 on: March 18, 2009, 11:15:35 PM »
My point wasn't exactly that. Also I have never claimed anything of my "work" as OU or free energy devices. So I have never put a video on youtube with a claimed running motor. I have one animation, poor one, with an explanation on how this MIGHT work. And it took only 5 hours before some youtuber called me an idiot ;D. So here I am - an idiot, and no better than anyone in this forum, or on you tube for that matter.

But nevertheless, I am a hunter for free energy, and will be unstoppable till my death in search of free energy. But it is also allowed to discuss others work or intentions without being attacked for no objective reasons. Well, I wasn't very objective in my previous post - sorry. It will probably never happen again.

I enjoy most of both yours and others approach to free energy, but sometimes one bumps into persons who take their selves too cermonious and are often offended by allmost nothing - and I respect that.

God bless you and all other members here in the search for free energy. Do not give up, but stop believing that magnets are the solution to the energy crises on this brittle planet.

br.

Vidar

Your post was beautiful until you ruined it all at the end. I wanted to compliment you on your patience with me but I changed my mind after that last sentence.

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #44 on: March 18, 2009, 11:27:55 PM »
Your post was beautiful until you ruined it all at the end. I wanted to compliment you on your patience with me but I changed my mind after that last sentence.
Looking forward to your proof, and result of your unapproachable skills of mathematics. God bless you anyway, but please stay objective!!!

Vidar