Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer Explained  (Read 352486 times)

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #750 on: February 26, 2022, 09:51:04 PM »
Hello Everyone,


When a mistake is made it's vital that you own up to that mistake and then keep it moving and not to wallow or stew in that mistake. I picked a new core that should allow me to build the transformer the way I like and went and designed the bobbins for it already as seen in the photo. Now having learned my lesson I won't move to print this bobbin set until I have the core in my hands and have taken actual hands on measurements of it's dimensions. I also went and ordered the expensive transformer sealing resin so that I can vacuum all the air out of the transformer after it's all wound up. Then and only then will I be able to use this transformer to power up my WFC as those are the rules we all must follow with these types of transformer designs.


The AnyCubic 3D resin printer allows me to do things my way and in such a way that it would be impossible to do by a CNC mill. I put a lot of time, thought, and effort into my designs asking and answering many questions. I'd like to see the designs of others but it would seem everyone has stopped trying to build this technology now. I can say I blame them as the prices on everything has truly went up a lot.


I know that if I had to buy a differential probe and make the WFC now I wouldn't be able to afford it. It shocks me that the resin to seal all the air out cost this much now but it's a must have item so it has to be purchased or the technology will not work.


Well Everyone, this is how it's done mess up, pick up the pieces, and keep it moving.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #751 on: March 04, 2022, 12:45:10 AM »
In this post I am going to go over how this technology goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules scientifically so that there is no doubt if this technology works or not as in no way does it violate the laws of physics as those "paid to say" scientist are running around telling people about this technology.


I will do each paragraph per photo as this will be a graphical representation of this technology breaking the bonds of the water molecules.


In order to understand this technology fully you need to know how to solve work problems in Calculus and Physics. This first photo shows how the waveform should look on the oscilloscope. This waveform has both positive and negative areas under the curve. Since this is a "Work" problem the area under the curve is doing the work of electrolysis and the amplitude of the wave form is doing the work of Ionization.


The second photo shows the area under the curve in colors so that it's easier to visualize what's taking place. When you take the sum of all the energy that which is left over in the red will be all that remains to do the work of electrolysis. This is why what Professor Paul CZYSZ says about the device running for over a half hour and the water temperature hasn't changed is so important as these graphs show why the water isn't heating up and that's because the energy to perform the work of electrolysis got mostly canceled out. You can watch this video to see the Professor describe what he witnessed here: [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkjpVcsRQLc&ab_channel=EdwardMitchell[/size]


In this third photo it shows what energy is left over to perform the work of electrolysis after you take the sum. As you can see there really isn't all that much energy left over and it seems to lacks the necessary energy to perform normal electrolysis all that well. When I took actual measurements of the current flowing through the water bath I got a reading of just 0.6mA. So, you can clearly see that after taking the sum there is almost zero work being done in the form of electrolysis.


In the fourth photo it shows voltage performing the work of ionization on the atoms that make up the water molecules in green so that you can easily visualize what's going on. Here the voltage amplitude of the waveform is now over the ionization threshold of the hydrogen and oxygen atoms. As a result the hydrogen and oxygen atoms start to release their electrons and with water if the electrons aren't there to hold the molecules together those molecules simple fall apart and you get hydrogen and oxygen gases plus electricity as those electrons go into the water bath.


The last two photos just show that this technology is mimicking the earth's Global Electric Circuit. And this my friends is how this technology goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules by way of ionization as it complicatedly mimics the earth's Global Electric Circuit. With this we can switch where we get are hydrogen from away from fossil fuels to just using plain ordinary water.
In trying to get support for this technology I shared this information with folks on twitter as a way to refute the claims that this technology violates the laws of physics by mainstream scientist.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #752 on: March 11, 2022, 12:34:05 AM »
Hello Everyone,


Well, thankfully I waited to print out any new bobbins until I actually took some hands on measurements of the cores as these guys are a tad larger than what was promised, but they will work. I'm almost done drafting up new bobbins for them and will then print some out on the Photon Mono X when finished. Just goes to show I too am learning, lol, for if I had printed some out I'd have had to toss those out too.


Well, that's it everyone. Just a quick update on my progress.


Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Offline nightlife

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1089
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #753 on: March 16, 2022, 07:35:52 AM »
This in no way violates the law of physics. If anything, it helps confirm the law of physics beyond what is commonly known. Finding and mimicking the most suitable natural frequencies to split H2O into hydrogen and oxygen is just the top of the iceberg. I played with it for awhile years back and it led me to a better alternative. I won't go there but research John Hutchinson's work with frequencies if you haven't already. Nothing is solid and everything is vibrant which can be altered and or even eliminated  using certain frequencies. Keep up the good work it inspires me to get back to work. Thank you 😁

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #754 on: March 16, 2022, 03:43:27 PM »
This in no way violates the law of physics. If anything, it helps confirm the law of physics beyond what is commonly known. Finding and mimicking the most suitable natural frequencies to split H2O into hydrogen and oxygen is just the top of the iceberg. I played with it for awhile years back and it led me to a better alternative. I won't go there but research John Hutchinson's work with frequencies if you haven't already. Nothing is solid and everything is vibrant which can be altered and or even eliminated  using certain frequencies. Keep up the good work it inspires me to get back to work. Thank you 😁


Yes, I've heard of Mr. Hutchinson and sometimes even talk to him on FaceBook. One thing to understand about this technology is there is no special frequency as we are dealing with a variable capacitor in that the more gases that are produced the less dialectic material there is between the plates of the capacitor(s) thus the less capacitance it will have which requires a higher frequency to maintain resonance. So, as one raises/lowers the voltage going to the water fuel capacitor changing the amount of gases that it generates it's capacitance changes and the circuit used must be able to keep up with those changes in real time.
With the above graphs I attempted to explain the technology in as simplest of terms that I could to allow people to see just how the technology goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules differently that normal electrolysis does. Electrolysis is a simple technology and this technology is in every way the opposite of electrolysis as it's a very complex technology.


As for me I had to go back to a very early design to ease the manufacturing process a bit on my end. Now I'm back to using my Tri-Bobbin design from which I started off with many years ago. At this point I am really not expecting anyone to be able to follow my work as I am doing things somewhat differently than Stanley Meyer did as I am just following where the science had lead me. Most people don't seem to understand that Meyer didn't have a finished product as if he did then why was he plaining on building a research facility instead of a manufacturing facility for this technology? Because his life was cut short he wasn't able to fully understand the technology but my life wasn't cut short so I was able to get at the core science behind this technology as a result only because I lived longer. Anyway the Tri-Bobbin design allows me to get around a few problems I ran into when winding these transformers up and now that I can make the bobbins myself actually cut cost a little bit.


I have hope for this year as things are looking good for me concerning this technology, but only time will tell.
Take care everyone Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/77uvw4-energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #755 on: March 23, 2022, 06:18:27 AM »
Hello Everyone,


This post is just for more clarification as I think Max Miller, and a few others are running around telling everyone this is an A/C waveform but that's not the case as look at the blocking diode in the secondary side of the circuit. That diode is either "on" or it's "off" as unless it's broken it doesn't allow two way current flow. This is why you can take the sum of all the energies under the curve as it's all going in the same direction.


Basically what I have shown everyone that can read and interpret those graphs is irrefutable evidence of another way to break the bonds of the water molecules that is outside of Dr. Faraday's electrolysis method. This process uses voltage potentials to break the bonds of the water molecules and not current as the electrolysis process does.


For me it's kinda frustrating as most people I run into from the general public just don't have a good enough grasp of scientific principles to be able to understand what they are being shown and told by me. Most I have run into don't even know how to interpret the readings on a oscilloscope. Sure they went out and purchased one but they don't know how to actually use or read it. When I got mines I too didn't know how to read or operate it correctly but I use the internet to find teaching videos to learn how to use this tool as to me what good is a tool if you don't know how to use it?


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #756 on: March 24, 2022, 03:23:46 PM »
Right now I am unsure of just what to do in order to get this community of nearly 84,000 people to act as the crowd they are and come together in one accord to ensure this technology sees the light of day.


I have broken the technology down to just simple arithmetic, IE, addition and subtraction and still folks aren't able to see or understand this technology. I think this is due to education level as those that are well versed in math and science can see this technology and those that are not well versed in science and math can not see this technology in how I have explained it. Those graphs show this technology is yet another way to go about breaking the bonds of the water molecules outside of Dr. Faraday's electrolysis method scientifically. But since folks don't even know how to read and/or interpret the readings they see on a oscilloscope they fail to understand the explanations I have shown them. Furthermore those graphs show irrefutable proof of just how this technology goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules with voltage instead of current as done by the electrolysis process.


In this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkjpVcsRQLc&ab_channel=EdwardMitchell Professor Paul CZYSZ states that it practically boils the water and I will add do you think he knows what boiling water looks like? Boiling water does not look like typical electrolysis and here I have shown water being broken down and you all tell me what it looks like to you: [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW78gKn1ZZ0[/size]. As you can see I have already shown everyone this technology working correctly and my reward for doing so is to get 0.002% support from the Overunity community. I can assure you that's not going to allow this technology to move forwards and make a difference in our lives. I'd like to think this is because folks don't understand how crowdfunding works so let me give an example of how it works. Say if 50% chose to donate just $2 a month that would be 40,000 x $2.00 = $80,000 a month in funds for this technology to move forwards. This is how crowdfunding allows the many to come together in one accord to make something happen.


Now I don't know the many reasons why folks choose not to support this technology but I suspect it's due to my heritage of being a Negro. Why you might ask? Well, before my heritage was known I was getting a good bit of donations and once that video interview of me at the 2013 Global BEM went viral practically all of my donations came to an abrupt stop. So, from my perspective it's reasonable to assume that happened due to the color of my skin as I went on to actually get the technology working and the support for this technology still remains close to being flatlined. But one thing is for sure is none of you get to complain about high gas prices or higher electric bills as that would make you hypocrites due to the lack of support for a technology that would take those cost away from you.


I have done what I can to get this technology up and running so that it can make a difference in our world but without support none of us will live to see the day this technology actually makes a difference. There are more that 1.3 billion cars on the road that need converting over to this technology and that's only talking about cars and not the many other things we now power by fossil fuels.  I will keep moving forwards as best I can but the pace will be slow as I work to build the company from the ground up practically alone. The ball is truly in your court if you want to see this technology make a difference in your lifetimes.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me
« Last Edit: March 24, 2022, 08:36:52 PM by h20power »

Offline massive

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #757 on: April 22, 2022, 03:36:36 AM »
bump. hope image link works

https://overunity.com/7030/stanley-meyer-explained/dlattach/attach/186020/image//

people have got to observe this first hand. so much to learn and its a free lesson in HV and electrons

Offline Johnsmith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #758 on: April 22, 2022, 04:09:55 AM »
Right now I am unsure of just what to do in order to get this community of nearly 84,000 people to act as the crowd they are and come together in one accord to ensure this technology sees the light of day.


I have broken the technology down to just simple arithmetic, IE, addition and subtraction and still folks aren't able to see or understand this technology. I think this is due to education level as those that are well versed in math and science can see this technology and those that are not well versed in science and math can not see this technology in how I have explained it. Those graphs show this technology is yet another way to go about breaking the bonds of the water molecules outside of Dr. Faraday's electrolysis method scientifically. But since folks don't even know how to read and/or interpret the readings they see on a oscilloscope they fail to understand the explanations I have shown them. Furthermore those graphs show irrefutable proof of just how this technology goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules with voltage instead of current as done by the electrolysis process.


In this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkjpVcsRQLc&ab_channel=EdwardMitchell Professor Paul CZYSZ states that it practically boils the water and I will add do you think he knows what boiling water looks like? Boiling water does not look like typical electrolysis and here I have shown water being broken down and you all tell me what it looks like to you: [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW78gKn1ZZ0[/size]. As you can see I have already shown everyone this technology working correctly and my reward for doing so is to get 0.002% support from the Overunity community. I can assure you that's not going to allow this technology to move forwards and make a difference in our lives. I'd like to think this is because folks don't understand how crowdfunding works so let me give an example of how it works. Say if 50% chose to donate just $2 a month that would be 40,000 x $2.00 = $80,000 a month in funds for this technology to move forwards. This is how crowdfunding allows the many to come together in one accord to make something happen.


Now I don't know the many reasons why folks choose not to support this technology but I suspect it's due to my heritage of being a Negro. Why you might ask? Well, before my heritage was known I was getting a good bit of donations and once that video interview of me at the 2013 Global BEM went viral practically all of my donations came to an abrupt stop. So, from my perspective it's reasonable to assume that happened due to the color of my skin as I went on to actually get the technology working and the support for this technology still remains close to being flatlined. But one thing is for sure is none of you get to complain about high gas prices or higher electric bills as that would make you hypocrites due to the lack of support for a technology that would take those cost away from you.


I have done what I can to get this technology up and running so that it can make a difference in our world but without support none of us will live to see the day this technology actually makes a difference. There are more that 1.3 billion cars on the road that need converting over to this technology and that's only talking about cars and not the many other things we now power by fossil fuels.  I will keep moving forwards as best I can but the pace will be slow as I work to build the company from the ground up practically alone. The ball is truly in your court if you want to see this technology make a difference in your lifetimes.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me


  What's preventing him from using the hydrogen as a source of energy so it's self sustaining? An example is for him to buy a membrane to use the hydrogen
and oxygen recombination into 2 electrons and water again? And that might be why they say something is happening. It requires 2 electrons to convert water
into hydrogen and oxygen.
 The challenge with hydrogen generation has been where to get the electrons from and how to convert H and O efficiently back into H2O? Right now the most
advanced systems are about 60% efficient. I posted something along this thinking but then I also thought of where the electrons could come from. It's just that
people do need to learn some of the science involved with electrical current, chemistry, etc.

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #759 on: April 23, 2022, 05:53:57 AM »

  What's preventing him from using the hydrogen as a source of energy so it's self sustaining? An example is for him to buy a membrane to use the hydrogen
and oxygen recombination into 2 electrons and water again? And that might be why they say something is happening. It requires 2 electrons to convert water
into hydrogen and oxygen.
 The challenge with hydrogen generation has been where to get the electrons from and how to convert H and O efficiently back into H2O? Right now the most
advanced systems are about 60% efficient. I posted something along this thinking but then I also thought of where the electrons could come from. It's just that
people do need to learn some of the science involved with electrical current, chemistry, etc.


I really don't understand this comment as are you asking me to recombine the hydrogen and oxygen gases after it comes out of the Water Fuel Capacitor back into water? What purpose would that serve?

I am talking about phasing out the use of fossil fuels with this technology and wondering why this community of, supposedly, like minded people on this forum aren't on board to get this process started as it's going to take many years to convert all the world's vehicles to be ran on this technology. Why aren't folks in this forum moving to support my efforts to get this technology on to the marketplace so the process of phasing out the use of fossil fuels can get started? What are folks waiting for what's shown in this photo to happen before they act?


Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #760 on: April 23, 2022, 06:43:06 AM »

 I really don't understand this comment as are you asking me to recombine the hydrogen and
 oxygen gases after it comes out of the Water Fuel Capacitor back into water? What purpose
 would that serve?

Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me

@H20Power

Really ? You are seriously asking " What purpose would that  serve ? "?  :)

What is the efficiency in these terms ?

       0.29307107 watts is equal to 1 BTU/hour

What is the ratio of the Watts (electrical) input to the BTU/hour output, of the
method you describe ?








Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #761 on: April 23, 2022, 08:44:18 AM »
@H20Power

Really ? You are seriously asking " What purpose would that  serve ? "?  :)

What is the efficiency in these terms ?

       0.29307107 watts is equal to 1 BTU/hour

What is the ratio of the Watts (electrical) input to the BTU/hour output, of the
method you describe ?


I ran energy content calculations for this technology a long time ago comparing it directly to gasoline: https://overunity.com/7030/stanley-meyer-explained/165/


Reading is still free on this forum and there is a lot of information in this thread for one to read and learn from.


Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/77uvw4-energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #762 on: April 23, 2022, 09:25:30 AM »
@H20Power

A quote from: h20power
     I really don't understand this comment as are you asking me to recombine the hydrogen and
     oxygen gases after it comes out of the Water Fuel Capacitor back into water? What purpose
     would that serve?
End of that quote


@H20Power

Really ? You are seriously asking " What purpose would that  serve ? "?  :)

What is the efficiency in these terms ?

       0.29307107 watts is equal to 1 BTU/hour

What is the ratio of the Watts (electrical) input to the BTU/hour output, of the
method you describe ?


Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #763 on: April 23, 2022, 05:29:21 PM »
@H20Power

A quote from: h20power
     I really don't understand this comment as are you asking me to recombine the hydrogen and
     oxygen gases after it comes out of the Water Fuel Capacitor back into water? What purpose
     would that serve?
End of that quote


@H20Power

Really ? You are seriously asking " What purpose would that  serve ? "?  :)

What is the efficiency in these terms ?

       0.29307107 watts is equal to 1 BTU/hour

What is the ratio of the Watts (electrical) input to the BTU/hour output, of the
method you describe ?


Since I have made improvements to the technology improving it's efficiency I consider that type of information company business and will not be talking about it with anyone.


The difference between then and now when it comes to the output of this technology however hasn't changed as I haven't found a way to improve upon those numbers which are as good as they are now as they were back then.


This technology uses voltage to break the bonds of the water molecules and it also uses voltage and laser energy to strip the oxygen atoms of it's electrons from the incoming air supply to the engine. Voltage is performing the work of IONIZATION as this technology is governed by this theory:

"All  Molecules  can  be  separated  into  their  component atoms  by  taking  away  the  electrons  from  the  atoms that  make  up  the  molecules."

I have went over and shown already how voltage is performing work with this technology and if you don't get it then perhaps you never will but as to function as your instructor now just isn't going to happen as I am done with playing that role. I thought I made myself clear on this when I moved this thread to "Capital and Funding," in that I would no longer be teaching this technology to anyone anymore as it's time to move forwards with this technology now. Was I unclear on this or did you never bother to read it?


I took a long look at the age of this thread and where the technology was moving and found that it simply wasn't moving anywhere so I stopped what I was doing to change that as the world needs this technology now more than ever. Basically I saw that I have to be the change I wish to see in this world as I would die first waiting on you guys to come around so I moved on towards actually attempting to bring this technology into our world. This way the phasing out of the use of fossil fuels can get underway or do you like paying for gasoline so much that you are willing to stand in the way of this technology vowing to never give it your support and actively move to do things to prevent it from coming out? As of right now you don't seem to be a friend of this technology but a foe.


Shalom Everyone and enjoy the Sabbath,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #764 on: April 24, 2022, 04:35:37 PM »
@H20Power

Quote from H2Opower 04/23/22

"Since I have made improvements to the technology improving it's efficiency I consider
that type of information company business and will not be talking about it with anyone."

END of that quote

                  Energy density and water vapor as the only byproduct.
These are two of the qualities which make hydrogen desirable as a fuel. 
                                              Stating the obvious...
Given that the production method requires an energy source, it follows that
stating / demonstrating the efficiency of the ratio of the input energy to the usable
output energy is the bottom line.

The method does not have to be O.U., just an improvement over conventional
electrolysis, in order that it has merit.

A quote from: h20power
     I really don't understand this comment as are you asking me to recombine the hydrogen and
     oxygen gases after it comes out of the Water Fuel Capacitor back into water? What purpose
     would that serve?
End of that quote


@H20Power

Really ? You are seriously asking " What purpose would that  serve ? "?   

What is the efficiency in these terms ?

       0.29307107 watts is equal to 1 BTU/hour

What is the ratio of the Watts (electrical) input to the BTU/hour output, of the
method you describe ?