Alternating is not the way.

This is not AC, look again.

But once in a while, the polarity flips. I have yet to figure this out yet why.

I have not done in depth electrochemistry like Stephen Meyers did. He says very little in the interview but asks a question.

Why is snow white?

He also talks about the steel itself, and how transistors were born

That is all, not much.

Meyers might be, certainly not me.

I am no good @ calculus.

But if you are good, I might need ya.

In fact, I like to cheat with CAS like maxima.

Yeah, I'm a big fat cheater and I like it like that.

I had in mind these frequency fluctuations. The thought came whether this frequency could not be the resonant frequency in the bifilar choke? And not related to the water cell?



I understand that for many years this may have been discussed.

And why do many topics go into oblivion many years ago.
For example, there was such a Tin man.
What did he achieve? Did he get his own OU ?

Using the keyword search, you can find a lot of topics on the decomposition of water. Only on this site. People worked, argued, lived it. And all is forgotten.

there is the sites, for  what its worth 

open-source-energy.org

overunityresearch.com

RWGRESEARCH.com

Yeah pretty much right, many people mistakes HV bubbles with frequency for regular banal electrolysis.

How do distinguish?  BIG PRODUCTION. On the electrodes or near the electrodes, if the production is BIG, then its special electrolysis.

Lets say big production = 2x Faraday efficiency.

Its become coocoo town with all the gibberish.

Well, take radiolysis or photolysis.
There, decomposition products are formed in the entire cell volume, and not on the electrodes.
And this is understandable. If Meyer's technology breaks the covalent bonds of non-ionized water molecules by his resonance,HHO should be generated in its whole volume. and not on the electrode.
I wonder if anyone thought about this?

Many have. A well built electrolyzer will have plate distances just greater than
the break down gap for their particular electrolyte mixture.
And in this arrangement, electrolysis takes place in the entire volume between the plates,
not just on the electrode surface.
If they are close enough, separation of the 2 gas streams becomes impossible.

look up the stephen meyers paper, gas is generated across the whole bath.

read it!

Smoky2, I have seen such banal things before from the people at ionizationx

Its boring.

Vicktor Schauberger wrote the math on this.
Just put a magnetron in an appropriate sized vessel l x w x h = (1/xf)^3


Or it a simpler form, make the dimensions of your vessel a multiple of the wavelength.


Have you considered what frequency Meyers was operating at?
What does your microwave do? ?


When a volume of water is set to resonate it heats up.
essentially increasing its’ internal energy.


Inside a resonant cavity, the entire volume of water will resonate
not just the individual molecules.


Steam can be produced at a much lower energy cost in this manner
and with the addition of an electric field, electrolysis follows the same energy curve.
(assuming the water is still in liquid form, governed by temperature and pressure)


The fact that the Meyers devices stayed cold, means that for the power level he was using
the volume of water was large enough to diffuse the heat faster than it was being created.
However, the “temperature” in terms of molecular energy, is a function of motion.
and in that sense, the water is “hot” while the cell is being used.