Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer Explained  (Read 451032 times)

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #420 on: November 27, 2019, 07:30:36 AM »
.

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #421 on: November 27, 2019, 10:19:51 AM »
Unfortunately, I just can’t experiment with a cell and a circuit. I have to spend time repairing equipment to make a living .not enough time. :'(

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #422 on: November 27, 2019, 07:55:20 PM »
Its Ok Kolbacit, this is too much for you.

Despite your clear ignorance and lack of education, you proved to be an exeptionnal user, hard worker. You work alot and you talk little.

I'm sure that if you were given 2700$ and this circuit, that you could do much more Hydrogen than anybody before.  ;D


h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #423 on: November 28, 2019, 12:04:29 AM »
Unfortunately, I just can’t experiment with a cell and a circuit. I have to spend time repairing equipment to make a living .not enough time. :'(




I understand as this technology takes a lot of time and money to get the things needed built properly and testing underway. Just trying to take temperature change readings over time properly can eat up an entire day or two.


People look at the cell I am using and have no idea just how hard it was to get it made for me by a local machinist where I live. They don't understand that a machine shop will not make just one of something, well not at a cost that anyone could afford anyways. Most have a minimum make amount that must be paid in full before they even get started most of the time. I had to make eight of these cells minimum with a total cost of around $13,000 bucks. It's not a cheap technology to have built let alone the time one must sink into making and revising the VIC transformer that will have enough energy to be able to charge up the cell. Which by the way cost even more than making the WFC cells as again you will run into minimum buy amounts as the core cost $358.40 with a minimum buy of eight and you don't even get a price break unless you buy 50 or more units. Same for the wire as you can't buy just what you need as you have to buy what ever minimum buy amount they offer for the right type of coatings, sizes, and types of wire you need. Most people have no idea of these cost as they never get to point of building anything.


I'll keep at it as I have come this far and now can see the light at the end of the tunnel,
Edward

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #424 on: November 28, 2019, 12:32:30 AM »
Maybe in those years.

But nowadays, developping machine shops in china offer extremely competitive pricing, and anything out of delin can be turned with a 500$ lathe on craigslist.

3D printers are more affordable.

Its up to the CTO, chief technology officer to make every dollar count and plan everything from design to manufacturing.

Its not hard to manufacture high tolerance jobs, anybody can do this.

Of course, if you listen to these bullshitters, open your mouth, and say "fill me up honey", you are gonna pay a bit more.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #425 on: November 28, 2019, 01:20:07 AM »
Here let me give you an example of bringing a manufacturing process in house.

Instead of paying somebody to assemble my boards, I decided to buy this retrofit kit, to turn a regular oven into a high precision reflow oven.

Total price: 250$ USD.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Its this divide and conquer strategy that will make or break you as a business man.

Lets simulate if I was making this Stephen cell.

Now, I have my pcb software:free

Digikey Parts: ~100$

China PCB shops: 200-300$ I might make a few impedance boards.

I need: A plastic circular tube, and a plastic disk, plastic seperator/holder for the tube: 500$. Glue this. It will all be surrounded by water as suggested so leaks are of no concern.

For the SS tubes: Off the shelf pair, machined third if problems, will look for all off the shelf standards.

I think I would come under 2700$. Ok yeah I'm good at this but still, it was free money, you cant expect alot out of gofundme.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #426 on: November 28, 2019, 05:47:32 AM »
https://www.ebay.com/itm/24V-Positive-Negative-Voltage-Regulator-Module-Board-Based-on-7824-7924-x1-/132716246379

Since this is a MOSFET amp, this is all you need.

The cell should be driven by powerful batteries 12-13.8 volts

I think some F4 microcontroller with 3x ADC can do this, but there might till be need for lowpass, I am not sure.

This circuit is for zero programming/turn the knob.

But close to the cutoff, since this is a multiphase type scenario, the imperfections of the filter components play a role in phase shift/amplitude drop.

I would be surprised if you needed more than 10khz, considering that the sine component measure ~500hz in the patent application.

Now if any anomalous effects were detected, perhaps we could figure out other more efficient design topologies.

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #427 on: November 28, 2019, 08:52:17 AM »
Yes, not enough time, but unfortunately I have to deal with routine affairs. But I hate these things.
But I will do it anyway. Here is what is already there. Bottom to measure gas volume.

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #428 on: November 28, 2019, 12:17:38 PM »
Another tormented thought. Why do I see all cells are two-dimensional? Be it a cylinder in a cylinder or flat plates.If we have a water molecule is a three-dimensional tetrahedron, then can arrange three electrodes in the form of a three-dimensional grid?
And make full use of your three phases.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #429 on: November 28, 2019, 05:12:51 PM »
Dont do it.

You will only do it poorly and feel discoueraged.

The cells are as they are because greater men said so and we will copy them.

massive

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #430 on: November 28, 2019, 07:14:40 PM »

It seems to be the hardest part , is to start your own thread ?

take that first step ………

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #431 on: November 28, 2019, 07:19:36 PM »
I am doing snow angels in the backyard of this thread, its mine, always have been.

Suck it!

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #432 on: November 28, 2019, 07:42:47 PM »
This thread was garbage untill I started posting on it.

The pictures posted here dont even belong to H2Opower,

But to this guy

https://www.youtube.com/user/valyonpz/videos

He has been taking you for a ride.

H2Opower, its wrong to just post pictures as if it was yours.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #433 on: November 29, 2019, 02:40:10 AM »
Another tormented thought. Why do I see all cells are two-dimensional? Be it a cylinder in a cylinder or flat plates.If we have a water molecule is a three-dimensional tetrahedron, then can arrange three electrodes in the form of a three-dimensional grid?
And make full use of your three phases.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTV85J2QHj0

Peter davey, find all you can from him.

There was a man from France who studied this in depth.

For electrolyzers, maybe it could happen, to create some sort of resonant cavity, but I would be surprised if we were the first to think of this.


kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #434 on: November 29, 2019, 05:23:49 PM »
thank you all. We will try differently.

Quote
You will only do it poorly and feel discoueraged.
I'm  used to being disappointed.The same cell experimented with such a circuit. It didn’t work.
only according to the law of Faraday from the DC component of the current.On the alternating and pulsating not a single bubble stood out.