Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer Explained  (Read 447617 times)

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #345 on: October 07, 2019, 10:44:41 PM »
H2Opower
Quote
Here is how I see things. No one is talking about what I shared on this forum on my thread. I already know this is very new information concerning Meyer's technology to everyone as not a soul has ever talked about Meyer's technology in such a way that I am aware of. Most have brought to me different technologies that really aren't viable solutions instead of talking about what I just shared in an Open Source setting. This is what I see and can go back a few pages to easily prove what I am saying is true. When I say Meyer took this technology with him in death I meant it as I haven't shared how to actually go about mimicking a thunderstorm as I only shared the raw science behind the technology in an attempt to gainer some support for this technology as I move forwards with it.

I looked at your gofundme page and it looks like you have done some pretty good work. However I would point out that you are not the first to rediscover this process and disclose it. To my knowledge Victor Schauberger disclosed the bulk of this technology over 50 years ago in his decades of work. I get it, you have done a great deal of solid work however by no means are you the first nor will you be the last.

Quote
Meyer was very good at hiding the technology in plain sight as he purposefully left out the primary equation that governs this technology as well as a few other things. He was so good at hiding things that even those that actually held his technology in their hands missed things and thus copied it wrong which is why they were unable to duplicate his work. The main thing that separates me from them is I actually took the time to make use of the scientific method and where it lead me I followed.

I would agree and the first thing that caught my eye on your gofundme page was the segmented coil formers. I got a 3D printer a few years ago specifically to print my own segmented formers of any geometry or size I choose. If you do the research you will find these formers were invented in the late 1800's specifically to overcome the many issues associated with very high voltage coils. You know, there are many FE patents that state a coil or coils are used however they seldom show the coils or there exact relation to one another. Sure we could assume it is simple solenoid coils arranged in know ways however we also know this does not tend to produce the desired effects were looking for.

Concerning the VIC circuit, if you replace the water cell with a spark gap and add a few additional components you basically have the circuit diagram for the majority of know FE circuits. Which begs the question, is the circuit a FE generator hidden in plain sight with a glorified electrolizer cell/plasma emitter?. It could also be a multiplier process stacking one FE process (the circuit) on top of another (the plasma water cell) to exponentially increase the output.

You should also consider the evolution of Free Energy technology that every inventor including myself follow.
1)The first kind...First there are experiments and builds relating to mechanical based observable FE processes. Including water cells, engines, motor-generators, hydroelectric/wind power/solar enhancements as well as atmospheric and ground current devices.

2)The second kind...This evolves into non-mechanical devices including arranged or bundled coils, spark gaps or other switching devices also including emitters, antenna's and ground connections

3)The third kind... requires no observable switching devices and few if any components resembling coils. It relies almost solely on the attributes of the energy in question, the geometry and quality/structure of the materials often engineered and impulsive energy flows.

4)The fourth kind... Once FE is mastered it becomes obvious that matter, space and energy are integrated within each other and are fluid. The next logical step is the transmutation of matter for practical purposes and what many mistakenly call anti-gravity. It is not anti-gravity per se it is the removal of the reaction force within matter which is the cause of gravity. As it were 99% of the universe has little or no gravity and no concept of weight thus gravity is abnormal in comparison to the universal plasma-electric field of force.

You have chosen your path and I can respect that however there are many paths. I jumped right into FE devices of the 2nd and 3rd kind simply because they integrate into an electric energy economy much easier which I believe we are in the process of transitioning to. The only fossil fuel powered IC engines your going to see in 50-60 years will be in museums right next to the steam engines.

Regards

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #346 on: October 07, 2019, 11:29:37 PM »
onepower : 

is an anerob bio-reactor  his output : not fossil. ? sewage = fosso-content
Can the bio-reactor fuel not be the base for this :
https://patents.google.com/patent/CA2859958A1/sv

Are we thinking in 15% average efficiently ic-engines or 90%  ic- engines. ?
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=10760

Is the Reinhardt-Turbine ( 30 KW/ 300 US$) + waste heat recuperator not cheaper than " fuel-cells/Brennstoff-Zelle". ?

The price from the " gun-engine"   ? Conventional ic-engine to gun-engine conversion kit. ?
https://peswiki.com/directory:gun-engine. = f.e. Suzuki engine converted



ic-engine optimizer :
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=13001

ic-engine with emission recuperator/ filter ~ pseudo- closed cycle. ?


Is this real, demonstrativ?   :  https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCjiLpxnCll-VmnaRS-Z93dA


h2O power : adaptive or concurrence. ?


1990- 2050 Kyoto conference agreement : - 80% GHG  With the above devices : easy/ difficult approach.  ?

EUGENIC = aristocratic competition.  = the best solution shall/will win

Not to forget : 1990 world human habitants/ consume per capita

                          2050 world human habitants/ consume per capita

                                                     1990 - 2050

                                     -  80% anthropogenic  GHG                                 

                                    +       % natural GHG increase
                                       GLOBAL ELECTRIC CIRCUIT : IONOSPHERE             
                         
                          WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING WITH THE MAGNETOSPHERE. ?
                                  Without "cosmic particle / solar radiation"- influence.  ?

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&q=magnetfeld+erde+aktuell&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiuipfvlYvlAhXn4IUKHVpZBLQQ1QJ6BAgAEAE
              GALAXIS "MilkyWay"  IN MOVEMENT/ SOLARSYSTEM IN MOVEMENT/EARTH IN MOVEMENT

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #347 on: October 08, 2019, 12:13:01 AM »
Onepower,


What I am talking about is seeing the global electric circuit being mimicked is something totally new to practically all of you as I have read Victor Schauberger's work and that doesn't come up. But Meyer wasn't the first to mimic that for automotive use as Dr. Dingle came before he did and his coil setup looks exactly the same but he really wouldn't show people I just happen to know what to look for. This process goes along with mother nature and not against it. I also spoke of ease of implementation into our current technology with the automotive industries did I not? This technology will fit the way they already do things with very little change thus not causing them to have any stranded assets. They are not going to go for solutions that have them stranding a lot of their assets as truth be told a lot of them are going to fail due to just trying to switch to making EV cars. Furthermore since engines converted to use this technology will actually clean the air as they are operated doesn't that do better than something that is neutral?


Sure I can come out with other parts of Meyer's technology that will give an EV unlimited range but that isn't actively cleaning up the mess we have all contributed to our environment is it? I am looking at the big picture as the damage we have done needs to be reversed meaning it needs to be carbon negative not neutral. I know when I say this technology doesn't have any friends that statement would really bother some people as they have put their time into other technologies which they perceive to be totally viable, but they haven't asked these hard questions I just answered. If I go to convert a Maersk ship all I need is the proper injectors and a water management computer to drive the technology along with a Gas Processor installed on the intake system. And since it will now be using water as it's source of fuel can't it just get it from the ocean it's sitting in? That is what I am talking about when I talk about ease of use for our current technology we are already using as this technology doesn't have any equal in that department. This technology is the most suitable for wide scale adoption based on our current level of technology is what I am getting at. Sure there are other technologies out there but for quick and widespread use given our time limit of just eight years we needs solutions that can be easily implemented on a large scale. All of those other solutions you are talking about are not so easily implemented into our current ways of doing things and thus will have a high cost factor when trying to switch our systems over to making use of them.


As for being the first to actually solve Meyer's technology yes I am the first that I am aware of and disclosed the core science that this technology is mimicking in nature. If you know someone else please post there names and the actions they have taken so I can look them up too. Now as a test to this since I didn't disclose how to actually go about mimicking nature I'd be willing to bet until I choose to disclose everything not a soul will be able to get this technology up and running as it is not as simple as I made it all out to sound. The reasons I know this is no one has even gotten the voltage up to best my efforts back in 2013 and I fell short around 4 kv to get that WFC I was using to work. I am very much aware of what I have done and will say "thanks" if you are congratulating me in your own way as it took me many years to actually get at the science behind this technology.


As for the far future who knows what is going to happen? But I am sure this technology will be apart of that future in one way or another for it is a whole new era of scientific discovery just waiting to be discovered.


Shalom,
Edward

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #348 on: October 08, 2019, 12:27:57 AM »
H2O power :

Kyoto conference agreement : carbon neutral, carbon negative economy  +  other GHG-emission

Paris conference agreement : temperature neutral, temperature negative economy


                        temperature in Calorie/Joule/Watt per capita limiting/reduction  !
                     
                                       Included : temperature-dirty electricity.  !
       

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #349 on: October 08, 2019, 12:36:36 AM »
IankaIV
Quote
Are we thinking in 15% average efficiently ic-engines or 90%  ic- engines. ?
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=10760

Efficiency is one part of it however a large number of highly machined moving parts requiring oil lubrication dictates that the IC engine can never compete with electric power. We could have a FE generator with no moving parts and electric wheel motors with only one moving part as such the entire system would only have a few moving parts. Now if we could integrate the FE generator into a generator-motor wheel with wireless control then we could simply slap it on any vehicle and go. There is no future where an IC engine could possibly even begin to compete with electric vehicles in my opinion.

Hell my next vehicle is going to be electric for no other reason than low maintenance, no toxic explosive fuels and no damn dirty oil changes... ever.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #350 on: October 08, 2019, 01:03:57 AM »
FE- devices with no moving parts - static converter like "conventional" transformer will be/are  part from the energetical future concept ,yes  !
But there is to differ the situation :having an old " technology" car and the wish/ the need to change only the technology or to change totally this " old car" by a new one :

affordable for the car-owner. ?

The industry up to today did not want that anybody can introduce improvements without their willness,this is the known " lobbyism= protection -effect". !

Commercial beside patent/ utility model there is also the( often unknown and hidden ) "design protection" as protective and expensive barrier. to overcome legal !

In German ,theme " design protection" related :
https://www.google.com/search?q=autoindustrie+design+schutz&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m


Especially car parts related ( translated) :

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fm.spiegel.de%2Fauto%2Faktuell%2Fersatzteile-fuer-autos-neues-gesetz-soll-reparaturkosten-senken-a-1267588.html

IC-engines are not only used as car / ship/plane drive : stationary co-generation plant.( also as range extender ) !

"FE- generator into a motor-generator wheel with wireless controle"  ::) ;)


NEXT STEP :
"FE- generator into a by human flying drone with wireless controle"  8)
X2e-coating. ?

 "flying carpet"- style :   https://www.google.com/search?q=flair-boat&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m
              "FLAIR CARPET" + "chu200"( -style : I prefer jovoto essential core ) Huckepack :
   https://www.google.com/search?q=chu200&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ms https://www.google.com/search?q=chu200&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m


onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #351 on: October 08, 2019, 01:39:15 AM »
IancaIV
Quote
IC-engines are not only used as car / ship/plane drive : stationary co-generation plant.( also as range extender ) !
"FE- generator into a motor-genrator wheel with wireless controle"
"FE- generator into a by human flying drone with wireless controle"

You know it's strange that we are even wasting our breath debating whether our next car will have an ICE or be electric. The car as we know it is already a relic and as we speak they already have autonomous electric flying vehicles capable of carrying 2 passengers 100 Km at 100 Km/hr. They have already proven the technology and everyone is gearing up for the game changer of this century in transportation. They want to sell me an ICE car?, in the near future I will be able to buy a flying electric vehicle charged from the solar panels on my roof and able to travel 300 Km at 300 Km/hr... they can keep there ICE car, lol.

It's kind of like listening to people debating the virtues of the best donkey/saddle combination while an F-16 flies over there heads.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #352 on: October 08, 2019, 02:25:04 AM »
About Nature mimikry and use :
4.  - 9.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Max+Mueller+friedrich&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search

Fly- drives

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Erich+mehnert&IN=&CPC=&IC=

Especially : N. A. S. A.   R&D magnetic highway

 ~ The 5.the element- movie "cars"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fQ9RqgcR24g
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=30&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20010322&CC=DE&NR=19944785A1&KC=A1#

Pelikan - flair-effect and hovercraft :  https://rqriley.com/product/pegasus-hovercraft-plans/

http://www.williamwilsonmusic.com/inventor.html

TARGET : FLAIRING /FLYING HOMEMOBIL ( AUTONOM LIVING INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDED)

https://www.google.com/search?q=container-hubschrauber&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m
1 collapsed/folded 30 sqm/40 foot container = open : 90 sqm living area x morphing factor ~ 225 sqm convent.

                                   15 sqm/20 foot.                                 45.                                                                 112,5 sqm

Flying/flairing platform :
https://www.google.com/search?q=inflatable+bubble&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m
+ all-weather-overall  http://rexresearch.com/cuinanoagwire/cuinanoag.html
~  desert habitants overall  https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune

NOT ENERGY AND WATER IS THE SOCIETY PROBLEM : SESSHAFTIGKEIT/ LOCAL FIXATION

                           URBAN NOMAD MOVEMENT


Canada, one invention : relocateable towns  = relocateable population/habitants
Fixed constructions, Cities, becoming worth-poor. ! Also because the morbid demography. !

Future : rural living + internet-cities-world  ! Physical Cities : culture zoo/museum

« Last Edit: October 08, 2019, 04:26:46 AM by lancaIV »

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #353 on: October 09, 2019, 03:11:02 PM »
#340: ;) Chet  !
About " playing" :  EL ELOHIM EST ~ ALL(U)A(H) AKBAR ~ GOTT IST GROSS


  Kingdom JUDA : GODFATHER EL.  I  MORAL VERSION. VERSUS GODFATHER EL II KANAAN-UGARIT VERSION
                                         RELIGION SYNTAX SUCCESS OR SYNTAX ERROR  !?





Going to the IT IS - stage = today = presence and a VISION/PROJECT/PROTOTYPE

          The 2000 W society ( 2000 Wh per hour per capita ! )

www.oeko-energie.de.       3000 Wh electricity per day ( without air conditioning )   ? capita per household

www.mtbest.net.                   800 Wh electricity per day  ( without air conditioning ). ? capita per household

                   
                 Each one + non electric solar-thermic or wind-brake KWh energy to heat conversion per day



              kitchen/ electric devices list " mtbest"- household  : " spartanic " or international average comfort  ?

                800 Wh per day electricity - 100 Wh freezer/fridge. =  700 Wh for motoric motion/ light/ heat  ?

                 700 Wh / improvement factor 4 ( motor efficiency,LED light controler/ resonant circuit )

                 = 175 Wh + 100 Wh freezer/fridge = 275 Wh super-intelligent kitchen/ electric appliances consume
   
                  275 Wh / 24 h( = day + night) ~ 11,5 Wh electricity permanent generation
                 
                   Wasser,water,agua,aqua : chemical H2O  or HHO  to electricity :

                  Meredieu " caps(u)l-e/-a" :

                  12 V x 1,5 A = 18 VAh ~ 18 Wh. X 30 hour per HHO filling volume/ capsel
                 
                 18 Wh x 24 h = 432 Wh. generation max. per 24 h- "day"  :
                                            275 Wh kitchen/ electric devices consume need break- even reached. !


                 Second choice :

                 800 Wh without improvement

                 864 Wh from 2 x Meredieu capsels output per 24 h-"day"





                   Meredieu " H2O power" capsel : portable
                   Alternatively : Don Adsitts ( R.I.P.) "Earth battery "
                       
                   This output cleary collect in a Wh-storage like
                   capacitor or battery or hybrid ( DIY or commercial product)

                    High energy storage/cycles ( expensive?) : adgex.ru energybrick                 
                                                                                                   CSIRO Ultra-battery
                                                                                                   KILOWATTLABS
                                                                                                  Water-Grafit battery



               
                  "Satisfied ?" , Chet  ?

   
                   So gehe ER hin in Frieden

                   DANK  sei EL ELOHIM  :)


                  REFERENCE LIST
                   Meredieu
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19280203&CC=FR&NR=633752A&KC=A#



                  Don Adsitt
             
               https://web.archive.org/web/20070225160446/http://www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/
               GOTO :   MAIN MENUE      THERE:       E-BAY and other PLANS  :         1. " NO HYDROGEN NEEDED... "
               




                  IF NOT DC ELECTRIC , RECOMMENDATION : AC- ELECTRIC BATTERY/ GEN-SET
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=73&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20090326&CC=US&NR=2009079393A1&KC=A1#

                   DESCRIPTION : [0008] output ( "...several times.." ) > input

                  TARGET : 100% input and   100% output  as" first success"  trial

 
« Last Edit: October 09, 2019, 10:10:04 PM by lancaIV »

massive

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #354 on: October 12, 2019, 02:14:21 AM »
IancaIV
It's kind of like listening to people debating the virtues of the best donkey/saddle combination while an F-16 flies over there heads.

the best saddle for a donkey is the one that is most comfortable for the animal not the rider.
an F16 is reduced to scrap metal if the fuel tanks are empty or if a financial group halt supplies.
in our modern advanced society horses are used for nothing more than racing , entertainment or pet food yet for 1000s of years horses were used for transport and work, a much prized possession.

the donkey and F16 is just an example of how 2 worlds are made obsolete by external force. and that peoples choices are not really their own

H2 is still the biggest threat to the same old players. notice all the wind farms around the world ? the same power, has the power and don't want to give the people freedom to break loose of the grip

great to see Ed back on board.  ….might be good idea to walk away from the forums tho, doesn't seem to change does it


 

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #355 on: October 12, 2019, 04:06:07 PM »
Anybody care to share results?

Before we talk about more money...

H2O, maybe you have to admit that you were had by a conman and been parotting all those years?

Must be hard on you.

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #356 on: October 27, 2019, 01:12:20 AM »
the best saddle for a donkey is the one that is most comfortable for the animal not the rider.
an F16 is reduced to scrap metal if the fuel tanks are empty or if a financial group halt supplies.
in our modern advanced society horses are used for nothing more than racing , entertainment or pet food yet for 1000s of years horses were used for transport and work, a much prized possession.

the donkey and F16 is just an example of how 2 worlds are made obsolete by external force. and that peoples choices are not really their own

H2 is still the biggest threat to the same old players. notice all the wind farms around the world ? the same power, has the power and don't want to give the people freedom to break loose of the grip

great to see Ed back on board.  ….might be good idea to walk away from the forums tho, doesn't seem to change does it


Yeah, as they say you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink. I have lead these people to the core science behind Meyer's work and clearly they refuse to drink. The way I see it I have done what I promised I would do a long time ago and that was to post the core science if I managed to figure it out. My promise to these people is fulfilled in my eyes as they can now do with this technology what they wish with it. For as you can clearly see in these forums things really haven't changed all that much as truth is always rejected when it is handed to them freely as I did in this forum for in their minds, "Who does that?"


Anyway a promise is a promise and I kept my promise on this one as I posted the core science behind this technology for all to have back on pages 21 & 23. I have to now post where the information I posted is to be found as there is just post after post of non topic related garbage designed to bury what I posted so that no one will be able to easily read it and/or find it. If you go over the whole thread you should notice things are coming out backwards and that is due to I was back engineering this technology, but now that I got at the core science I can start from there and talk about this technology in the proper sequence. Perhaps in the future I will do so but for now I will just leave this up as some of these horses I lead will drink the water.


But now the cat is out of the bag and I am sure those whom understand science will make use of the information I provided here.
Take care,
Shalom

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #357 on: October 27, 2019, 05:12:38 AM »
I find the Stephen Meyer patent application much more interresting. Stehen seems to have provided a screen grab from his tek..Great, seems serious.

Perhaps this man tried to cleanse the mistakes of his late brother, who travalled the states for 20 years and did not even tell his wife the secret.

He speaks in much more scientifically sound terms, and proposes a circuit, an actual circuit, there is a mix of high and low frequency, wich is also of interest to me.

Accordnign to some experimenters, this can act deep in the nanoscale.

I see Stephen as a very privileged man, with privileged information and research and a very solid background.

So of course... Anything you say goes directly in the trash, and everything he wrote and said, is held in high regard by me.

https://open-source-energy.org/?topic=3309.0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz8Zm-PG6hA&t=712s

https://www.youtube.com/user/valyonpz/videos


SEE THIS MAN  !!! See this! KEEP YOURSELF HUMBLE, THERE YOU GO AGAIN LOOKING LIKE A FOOL, LIKE YOU ALWAYS MANAGE TO DO.

ALL YOU EVER DO IS ARGUE! THATS WHY YOU GET BANNED! bla bla bla wrong wrong wrong argue argue !!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bw4ADWjDt60&t=706s

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #358 on: October 27, 2019, 11:46:42 AM »
Anybody care to share results?

Before we talk about more money...

H2O, maybe you have to admit that you were had by a conman and been parotting all those years?

Must be hard on you.


After all that I shared in the past few post I thought you would have crawled under that rock you crawled out of and stayed there. If you are unable to follow the science I took the time to hand walk everyone through you only show your incompetence with understanding scientific principles. I clearly showed Meyer did in fact mimic "The Global Electric Circuit" and went on to give many examples of how thunderstorms go about breaking down many different molecules as any molecule that makes it's way inside of an active thunderstorm will be separated into it's component atoms in that manor in which I talked about. This is how "Mother Nature" goes about breaking the bonds of molecules and Meyer mimicked this process. No longer is this technology forever lost with Meyer's death as it has been since he passed away as I kept at it asking and answering questions until I finally got at the core science behind the technology.


You laughed and made fun of me in the past and I know in time you will wish that you could take down those post but to come here again and doubt me shows you are really not all that bright or are a very sore loser and/or both but it really does to show your lack of understanding of science when it comes to trying to understand something new. It's sad to see you post this type of doubt in what I have shared with everyone after all the many examples I have given of the science actually working each time a thunderstorm kicks off around the world plus I also gave other examples outside of how thunderstorms work that do the same thing in that they take the electrons away from the atoms that make up the molecules, IE, radiation, heat, photosynthesis, and I could have went on as there are many more examples to talk about but felt that was enough to show everyone that the theory I came up with is sound.


That rock you climbed under for the past month or so was a good place for you for if you can't see that I have figured all of this out by now you do in fact have issues that require help from other types of scientist in the Psychiatric field. Anyone reading this can see this by now in you as I gave far too many examples and you still show your ignorance towards the actual science behind this water for fuel technology in what appears to now be out of spite. Are you mad at me for sharing the science behind this water for fuel technology in an open source forum? If so the only thing that sucks right now is to be you 🤯.

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #359 on: October 27, 2019, 08:37:05 PM »
h2opower,  As much as I can't stand AOC (the Cortez Congress woman who makes so many news headlines) she does seem highly interested in climate change and getting the world off fossil fuels.   Maybe if you contacted her about your gofundme page and told her a summary of what you have going on maybe the gofundme for you would really take off as she has such a huge twitter following.