Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83855
  • *Latest: Sandy13

  • *Total Posts: 522017
  • *Total Topics: 15552
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 6
  • *Total: 8

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer Explained  (Read 234492 times)

Offline Farrah Day

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #120 on: April 10, 2009, 02:03:25 AM »
See what you're up against Phantasm?

Everytime someone tries to bring things into the real world they accuse that person of being a rebel: You are me, I am Buzz,  Buzz is someone else.... what!

Trying to bring sanity to the thread is like trying to teach Einstein to be stupid - it's just not going to happen.

Trying to initiate intelligent conversation is pointless as there are no intelligent people to converse with - you must surely realise this by now, it's just not going to happen!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #120 on: April 10, 2009, 02:03:25 AM »

Offline johnbostick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #121 on: April 10, 2009, 08:20:12 AM »
H2OPower,
I am also new to this subject but have duplicated the VIC Voltage Enhancement Circuit. I was able to do that because of such a specific description of it in the tech brief.  I find this ionazation to be fascinating yet extremely confusing as I am not formally educated but am very willing to learn.  If you were a new student to this theory what would be the basics that you would want to familiarize yourself with? I do need a starting point.

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #122 on: April 10, 2009, 08:22:45 AM »
Hi! H20power, I am new to this forum. I've been reading several forums for the last year or so on Stan Meyers and about anything i could research about him and his work. I never realy wanted to join a forum until i started reading this thread for i find it very interesting. I have been working on this for over a year now. And like most people im getting no where with it. I Think you show a new outlook on the way it should be built and work. I intend on putting your ideas and math to good use (for it all adds up). I hope you and everyone welcomes me here for i may need help from time to time......I am a Machinest by trade and i am willing to help out in any way i can in that feild of work..

Thanks,
Gpssonar

Welcome Gpssonar,
Hope everyone treats you well on this form and welcome to the war.

h2opower.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #122 on: April 10, 2009, 08:22:45 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline kinesisfilms

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #123 on: April 10, 2009, 08:30:30 AM »
yes! and now that john has duplicated the vic all that is left to do would be the creation of the gas processor since the gas processor uses the vic to create it's votlage field in between it's anode and cathode.

we should becoming together soon.

another person of skill and help is our friend donald.......he might be able to produce your gas processor for a much much cheaper price than 750 dollars.

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #124 on: April 10, 2009, 08:55:58 AM »
Hi kinesisfilms,
That is the total cost for all the LEDs plus needed resistors, gaskets and sealing rings, nuts and bolts, EEC, and all of the electrical connections plus shipping cost that go with the Gas Processor. Like I said I am fine with it for now, meaning when I get a lathe big enough I will make the thing myself, lol. But I do like the machinist I am currently working with for his is a good man.

I wanted to explain how the injectors work here but I think I will just keep that on the other forum. For the dogs are out filling this thread with page after page of BS now. But I did what I set out to do and that was to let people see some math and science to go along with Stanley Meyers work for a change. I just hope that as many as possible start breaking the chains of energy enslavement.

Best Regards,
h2opower.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #124 on: April 10, 2009, 08:55:58 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Farrah Day

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #125 on: April 10, 2009, 05:48:23 PM »
People always see me as a negative and disruptive influence, and that may be so, but it's only down to the fact that no one seems to be capable of actually thinking for themselves.  I'm actually as intrigued by this subject as anyone else, it's just that I'm well grounded and don't live in a fantasy world like many here seem to. I also find it hard to continually tolerate nonsense posted by idiots.

The biggest thing here that makes no sense to me, is why anyone would at this stage be interested in building the gas processor in the first place. It's akin to fitting a supercharger on a car that as yet has no engine!

Surely the gas processor is of absolutely no use until someone firstly recreates Meyers method of high voltage, low current electrolysis - the super-efficient dissociation of water!

Perhaps it's just me, but wouldn't it seem far more logical to start from the beginning and overcome the initial and basic problem with Meyer's gas production, before worrying about how to energise the resulting gas.

Come on, is anyone actually making a substantial amount of hydroxy from a WFC at very low power??

I started a thread about the 'dissociation of the water molecule', because that's where it all starts from, that's the key to everything, but it seems people are just not interested in sorting out the basics. Everyone is trying to run before they have learned to walk, they want the cake but can't be bothered to bake it - it's just crazy!


Offline dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #126 on: April 10, 2009, 05:53:12 PM »
H20power

I agree with John , we need a better starting point that your little circle thing . That 1000$ thing can be replaced by an inexpensive tiny piece of metal .

,what leds? , how was it made ? How was it pulsed ? Whats the voltage ?

All one big ?

distribution method after that ???

Seriously ... 



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #126 on: April 10, 2009, 05:53:12 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #127 on: April 10, 2009, 06:50:13 PM »
As you can see everyone his thinking(Farrah day) is flawed due to the fact he is unable to answer the primary question:

How did Stanley Meyer run a 1.6L aluminium series engine with an hho production rate of only 7L/min.?

For in answering this question you will see if you have an hho producing device capable of producing 7L/min. and you add on the Gas Processor would you not get the same results? Sure yours wont be as effiecent as Stanley Meyers but it will work none the less, am I right? I know people that have systems producing over 14L/min. with a 4-5 amp draw from the system. They can't run an engine with twice the amount of hho production as Stanley Meyer had, and I ask why is that? Answer is they don't have the Gas Processor doing the job it is supposed to be doing hooked up to the system.

And to add insult to injury, why would you not build it? For as Stanley Meyer made the change from gaseous injection to water injection the Gas Processor still remained apart of the system. Everyone put your thinking caps on and ask, "why is this person telling you not to build the Gas Processor?" If you reason it out you can only come to a few conclussions, but the primary conclussion is, he is trying to get you to not build a nesasary device found in the patents of Stanley Meyer's for the reason of keeping you all trapped in the energy enslavement game they have us all playing right now. Think about it. :o

Energy independence is now ours for the taking,
h2opower.

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #128 on: April 10, 2009, 07:44:07 PM »
Dankie I can understand your confussion, but the resonant cavity unit is the WFC, not the Gas Processor the Gas Processor is part of the hydrogen fracturing process. You can see the resonant cavity unit here: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3217-stanley-meyer-explained-8.html#post51124

I have had it with this site for I can't explain anything due to not being able to load up imagies that I have.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #128 on: April 10, 2009, 07:44:07 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Farrah Day

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #129 on: April 10, 2009, 08:46:37 PM »
Firstly, 'he' is a 'she' as the more quick-minded around here might just have realised by now... ok, so... perhaps not too many then.

Quote
If you reason it out you can only come to a few conclussions, but the primary conclussion is, he is trying to get you to not build a nesasary device found in the patents of Stanley Meyer's for the reason of keeping you all trapped in the energy enslavement game they have us all playing right now

H2O you muppet, why would I want to do that? If you have ever read any of my threads you would realise that I want to get to the bottom of this as much as anyone else. It's simply illogical to start from the later end and work toward the beginning - surely even you can see this.

As for asking me to answer a stupid question again and again, get over it, because it all depends on whether or not you believe Meyer ran his 1.6l VW, and I for one - as already mentioned - have never considered the man remotely credible.

Do you have a balanced chemical equation for what happens when you ignite hydrogen ions in the presence of heavily ionised oxygen ions?  How can these ions react to form molecules or water??? Or are you, like others before you, not going to let real science get in the way?

And for Christ's sake, there is a 'c' in necessary, and only one 's' in conclusion. I guess education is all relative, eh!

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #130 on: April 10, 2009, 09:06:53 PM »
Now I am going to set this up as an engineering project as a result I will not tell you how to build, construct, and/or design your projects if you so choose to make them. The idea is simple, to get as many different models as possible that all work. You will be shown where the power truly comes from and how everything works for the water fuel injector system, not the WFC in use with the gasous type injectors. Read them as a set of rules to follow, anyway you see fit on how to apply what you have read is up to you.

Again I stress that this is to be a engineering type project, the full build of the design shall come from the individual and/or teams that want to work together on it. And most important of all is to have fun ;D.

Enjoy: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3217-stanley-meyer-explained-7.html#post47874

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3217-stanley-meyer-explained.html

This will be my last post on this site due to not being able to up-load pic's, from my photo bucket or my PC to this site and that hampers me from explaining anything fully. If you have questions regarding Stanley Meyer's technology and/or patents go and join the above site or just read the thread from start to end. Also this site is not run the way a site should be in my opinion, and like I said I have set out to do what I intended on doing and that was to let people see some science and math added to the Stanley Meyer patents.

Good bye Hartiberlin.

h2opower.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #130 on: April 10, 2009, 09:06:53 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline triffid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4254
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #131 on: April 11, 2009, 03:03:01 AM »
Since its public domain anyway,I will reveal here what I use.A salt, potassium chloride, will draw water out of the air.Then you use heat to drive the water off thus freeing up the salt to do it all over again.I would like to use solar heat.In my experiments KCl will pull equal amounts( by volume) of water out of the air.Usually takes about 3 days for maximum results.Triffid

Offline triffid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4254
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #132 on: April 13, 2009, 04:44:03 AM »
What?No response?A 100 mls of KCl beads produces about 100 mls of liquid in 3-7 days.The waste heat that developes in a car that has its windows rolled up on a hot day could be used to drive off the water from the salt(KCl).Triffid

Offline triffid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4254
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #133 on: April 13, 2009, 04:47:49 AM »
So a 55gal drum off this stuff would hold about 55 gal of liquid that one could pull the water out of using heat.And repeat the cycle over and over again.Triffid

Offline newbie123

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 459
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #134 on: April 22, 2009, 10:51:44 PM »
It is bizzare how many people will "explain what Stan Meyer did to run his car on water".     Yet nobody has a working water car.   We need more science and less nonsense!

Does this site doesn't even have a thread for the recent cold fusion (LENR) replication done by the Navy?    Why not talk about something more real than all this heresay (aka, everything you've read and seen Re: S. Meyer)




 

OneLink