Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer Explained  (Read 447630 times)

Digits

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #90 on: April 08, 2009, 08:23:43 PM »
Hey Mr Fara day

If you dont like the thread leave it What H2O have shown us is exactly the truth I have run the maths with a few chemical engenners and it is viable indeed.
Yes in theory it is easy so we are in the processe of developing a working prototype but this, like all good things take time.
I wil be happy to prove you and all critisizing clowns wrong,but at the moment I dont have a prototype working and you my dear friend can not prove that the maths is wrong, now can you?
So we are in the same boat

So either contribute to the thread or go away, but just please check weekly to view our first fuits,and then appologize.

Thanks Digits
javascript:void(0);



Outlawstc

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #91 on: April 08, 2009, 08:36:44 PM »
i will answer for you h20

In electricity, a corona discharge is an electrical discharge brought on by the ionization of a fluid surrounding a conductor, which occurs when the potential gradient (the strength of the electric field) exceeds a certain value, but conditions are insufficient to cause complete electrical breakdown or arcing

references
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_discharge

outlawstc

Outlawstc

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #92 on: April 08, 2009, 08:57:02 PM »
i wrote this on the 1st..
tell me what you think.. it explains where overunity is in humanity. and in a complex sense where it comes from in free power.

For every question there’s an answer, for every answer there’s a question there the same in relation but there are two differences involved to get action, distortion and clarity. When you are born, distortion of our reality is at its highest. Its simple times of life, the beginning... the mind is not full of mixed signals created from experience that happens in time... its blind. As we go through life we find clarity in many things and it gives us a sense of enlightenment and or a sense of troubles... distortions and clarity can create gain working in opposition to each other. The gain is wisdom and the truth. One step forward towards the question will in return, bring you one step closer to the truth. Hey it may be a bumpy road but its builds character. What shows the truth? Reflection. They make us walk in circles now days, surrounded by nothing but distortion. Some of us have intuition gods people... some have ignorance the devils infantry. There is so much truth in this .if you don’t understand it read it again and again. Since each time you read it, it shall bring you one step closer to clarity and one step away from distortion, at the same relative time it will bring you one step closer to intuitive instincts and one step away from ignorance at the same time hey its duality vice versa!! Life has too many variables and complexities to predict and prepare ahead of the time in most cases... so the only thing you can do is BE prepare for the ride 24/7... And in the present time of relativity it seems like it might get ruff. So hold on tight and don’t shit yourself. The truth is I’m as real as they come these days haha... what does your intuition say? I say bitch don’t judge!!! see it’s vice versa hahaha

this is where free unlimited power comes from.. and it is also how us people of difference can also be overunity..
the age of Aquarius is rolling in (that water barrer) and the exit of the age of the Pisces (the fish (give a man a fish he eats for a day, teach a man to fish he eats for a lifetime) is this coinincidence.. or destiny? "god don't play dice with the universe" albert einstein..


outlawstc

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #93 on: April 08, 2009, 09:34:51 PM »
i will answer for you h20

In electricity, a corona discharge is an electrical discharge brought on by the ionization of a fluid surrounding a conductor, which occurs when the potential gradient (the strength of the electric field) exceeds a certain value, but conditions are insufficient to cause complete electrical breakdown or arcing

references
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_discharge

outlawstc

That is correct but there is more to it. When put into a capcitive field every atom on the suface of the the two plates is working independently and together at the same time. For we all know that the capacitive field always hits perpendicular to the surface of the capacitors plates. You can see these atoms working together in this MIT video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQvXrxrqshk. Now to add up the energies one would have to add up all the atoms on the surface using Avogadro's number and a lot of high level math to solve all of the energy being expended. But we all have seen lighining storms in action and that is proof of the high energy yeilds by such a device. I didn't really expect that guy that stole a great mans name to even come close to answering the question, for that takes 18 months of physics to figure out completely and fully a graduate class tacking on yet another year. I wanted him to see just how out matched he was in trying to pick a fight with me.

I'd bet he wont even thank you for answering his own question that he had.

Energy independence is now ours for the taking,
h2opower.

Outlawstc

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #94 on: April 08, 2009, 10:11:42 PM »
nope there will be no thank you because that person is in the devils infantry(ignorant) i like the video.. theres one thing differing there h20. theres only one excitor.. i think with a positve and neg right next to each other they create 4 times the strength off oppostion for defecting electrons off h2o.. only if you know how to keep the charges happy in there bifilar wind on a inductor.. and that has to do with resonance and balance involving opposite charges sitting next to each other on a core.. they attract so much i think they would like to remain on the choke rather then crossing a gap.. after thats accompished i think they do trade of pos and negative charge.. but its happening on a 1/1 ratio so it appears neutral.. but really isnt in a sence of trade.. when we read amps in todays electric it is how many electrons pass a given point.. but the electrons that they are acounting for are the exsess turbulent ones.. the only ones that are readable with todays meters. the thing i posted that  i said i wrote on the 1st, i sent it to john hutchinson and got a reply.. he said loved it thank you great words.. so in my mind to have someone of that credibility write back to somethin i wrote pertaining to free energy.. farrahday your just a pimple on the butt. and your words could never amount to 6 words said by the guy who antigravity is being named after.. you know, the hutchinson effect.


outlawstc

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #95 on: April 08, 2009, 10:13:11 PM »
But I would like to add to that, for I am a homble man. If anyone finds mistakes in anything I have done show me and I will correct myself for I am not error proof. At first I made a mistake with the energy level of gasoline for I forgot to write the last digit and had 495k J/mol for the energy level of gasoline, someone was nice enough to point out that mistake and I corrected it. And then my numbers made since with what Stanley Meyer was saying when he spoke of stripping 4 or more electrons off of the oxygen atom for it was at the fourth energy level that water for fuel surpassed the energy content of gasoline. That should give everyone an example of what a simple mistake can do, I said I was sorry to the group and corrected my mistake and move on. For it is not our thoughts that define us but our actions that we chose to act on with our thoughts. For if I made any mistakes it won't prevent the Gas Processor from working.

h2opower.

Farrah Day

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #96 on: April 09, 2009, 12:46:52 AM »
H2O, I see now that you are at heart just another illiterate wannabe.

Quote
You are not smart enough to take on the likes of me so go call on some of your butt bodies to help you out, or take the easy way out and quit

You can't be serious - you're conversing with a first class muppet like Outlaw and you think I'm not smart enough to see right through your nonsense. Outlaw copies and pastes from Wikipedia and you're impressed!! It's laughable, you might be able to fool 99% of the idiots around here, but I see you as just a self important smartass, minus the 'smart'. If you had any education in science you would see the flaws in your theories without me having to point them out. You reaaly don't have a clue about what you're talking about do you?

No H2O, you're just another wannabe enjoying the limelight. You rank right in there with Outlaw, Dankie, Kineses, Spewing and the other illiterate retards that make a mockery of these forums by bringing the level of intelligence down to the gutter.

There is no one around here capable of intelligent conversation because the general level of ignorance and foul language is so great it has driven them away. This and most of the other similar forums have been killed off by stupid people with single figure IQ's, impossibly low mental ages and with no background in science that continually spout absolute garbage.

This forum will be dead in weeks without the input of intelligent people, and even the ignorant morons will get tired of bullshitting each other very quickly.

I could look in on here in 5 years time and you'll still be talking about how you know it all works, but you'll still be doing a few sums and still won't have proof of concept. But don't worry, the uneducated and niave such as Digits and Ramset will still have their misplaced faith in you because they can't think for themselves and tend to mindlessly follow like sheep, hoping they're on to a good thing. You might have them fooled into thinking you know what you're talking about, but not me matey!

This is no longer a science forum, it's a fantasy forum for brainless tosspots, losers and now, as it seems in the case of Outlaw, religious nutcases!

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #97 on: April 09, 2009, 01:08:48 AM »
Don't anyone answer him for all he is trying to do is fill this thread up full of his BS so anyone looking into it will not get to the good stuff due to filtering through his endless ranting. And most importantly he didn't answer even one question. So we must ignor him to the max, okay everyone treat him as you would these free energy advertisings ;D

Thanks for all of your cooperation in these matters

h2opower.

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #98 on: April 09, 2009, 01:18:07 AM »
Great to see you around Farrah ... I dont agree with all you said , but do agree with some of it .

Yeah this forum sucks now , its just a shithole , I feel like cursing @ everybody  .... O yeah I remember , thats just what I did for the last few weeks , curse and insult people ., I guess this site does has its appeal after all... best part is you cant ever get banned :)






I

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #99 on: April 09, 2009, 01:22:31 AM »
dankie
its just like the real world ,the only way you get banned is in a pine box

Chet

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #100 on: April 09, 2009, 01:43:26 AM »
Great to see you around Farrah ... I dont agree with all you said , but do agree with some of it .

Yeah this forum sucks now , its just a shithole , I feel like cursing @ everybody  .... O yeah I remember , thats just what I did for the last few weeks , curse and insult people ., I guess this site does has its appeal after all... best part is you cant ever get banned

And to you Dankie I owe you an apology for the 430F(FR) wire is needed if you are going to build the water fuel capacitor with spacings between 0.060 - 0.010 inches. That part you couldn't answer for me, but in the end the answer to the question of what is it's purpose was answered.
So for what it's worth I'm sorry.

First type of VIC transformer

Voltage Intensifier Circuit (60) of Figure (3-22) (Memo WFC 422 DA) as to Figure (1-1)
(Memo WFC 420) and Voltage Intensifier Circuit (620) of Figure (7-1) are specifically designed to
restrict amp flow during Programmable Pulsing Operations (49a xxx 49n) but in different
operational modes: VIC voltage circuit (60) utilizes copper wire-wrap to form Resonant Charging
Chokes (56/62) of Figure (3-22) in conjunction with Switching Diode (55) to encourage and make
use of "Electron Bounce" phenomena (700) of Figure (7-9) to help promote Step Charging Effect
(628) of Figure (7-7) by preventing electrical discharge of Resonant Cavity (140 - 170) since
Blocking Diode functions as an "Open" switch during Pulse Off-time; whereas,

Secound type of VIC transformer


VIC Voltage
Enhancement Circuit
(VIC - VB) (620) of Figure (7-1) incorporates the use of stainless steel wirewrap
coils (614/615) to accomplish the formation of unipolar gated pulse-wave (64a xxx T3 xxx
64n) without experiencing "signal distortion" or "signal degradation" (preventing transformer
ringing during signal propagation) as elevated voltage levels ( - xx Vc- xx Vd - xx Vn) while
allowing the reduction of Capacitor-Gap (Cp) (616) of Figure (7-11) width spacing (57 of Figure 3-
25 ~35 of Figure 6-2) (typically .060 - .010) respectively. as illustrated in Tubular Resonant Cavity
(170) as to Taper Resonant Cavity (620) of Figure (7-1). 


Be honest, did you know there where two types of VIC transformers being used by Stanley Meyer?

I went over this on the other site for anyone else wanting to know more about them.

Best Wishes,
h2opower.

Farrah Day

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #101 on: April 09, 2009, 01:55:59 AM »
Well I'm just gonna leave you boys to it - this girl's got better things to be doing than reading through this never ending clap-trap.

H2O in his wisdom - just like Meyer - has it all figured out and has told you all what to do (even though he hasn't yet done it himself) so I assume you'll all have a car running on water in the next few weeks. Just one thing tho', don't hold your breath waiting for him to prove his theories - it might take a while! 

Remember, it's up to you to prove his claims wrong, not for him to prove them right!

Can you imagine taking something to the patent office and when they ask you to show them how it works, you answer by telling them to prove it won't work!!  ???

Oh yes, and check out Corona Discharge as everything will become crystal clear after that  ;D  Yawn...yeh right!

You all have fun now! ;)

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #102 on: April 09, 2009, 02:43:25 AM »
Its Ok H2opower ... I dont care anymore , Dynodon is stealing all the customers anyways .

Yeah The s/s wire works well ... Transformer part  works like a charm , unlike what people said , and the power consumed is also in the few hunded mA .

So far so good ... I'd like to say a nice Fuck you to all these idiots you see here , expept those I have already forgiven ... Seamonkey was quite annoying

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1027

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1033

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=953

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1082

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=802&start=15

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=3119&highlight=#3119


What I will critisized you for H2Opower is how you see the gas processor as the ultimate solution . I never payed much attention to that part as I was simply facinated by the injector concept , you talk about a 125 psi rate , well I say that if you can close that valve and split that water while its in the cavity there you have your psi rate , expanson rate ...

I also believe the "pressure" here plays an imprortant part , I believe is has to do with some sort of energy from the ether  this "dipole exitation" thing  , I will see how far Meyers takes us with this but I really do believe there is a missing link somewhere , something that was covered by all this other stuff , it is a cover for an otherwise NSA banned patent...

Obviously there was some heavy social engineering done with Meyers  , just looking @ the amount of failure rates , but there have been a few diamonds in the rough @ (wfc.org) who have inspired me ,  this technology is still the best and last hope for humanity , this magnetic shit wont get the real stuff done , we need a real answer , we need to power our trucks and tractors 4 cheap , yep , only water will save us ...

Lets get for some energy independance , finally ...




Outlawstc

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #103 on: April 09, 2009, 03:17:26 AM »
Quote
Be honest, did you know there where two types of VIC transformers being used by Stanley Meyer?

I went over this on the other site for anyone else wanting to know more about them.

the bobbin and the alternator version dankie informed me of long ago.. thier begining designs were a tad off in demension at first but we gain better idea after a visual of the real deal.

kinesisfilms

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #104 on: April 09, 2009, 03:54:40 AM »
Kineses

spell it right.

the least your illiterate bashing mindset can do is copy and paste my username correctly.....buzz.

you should learn from your mistakes before you get banned again.

your pathetic.


and dankie......as you have stated the gas processor is not the ultimate solution seeing that it will not run without the vic coil......the vic coil is the ultimate solution.....but without the gas processor you will never get it to run an actual car....nor will you get the 100mpg claim....the gas processor is the second most important thing.......third would be the quenching tubes.

as for farrah day and his complete assurance that we are idiots is quite amusing......if only we could show him the photos of everyones work.......i can't wait for that thread labeled....."the idiots who replicated meyers".....and hopefully this will happen real real real soon.