Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 895770
  • *Total Topics: 15759
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 11
  • *Total: 12

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer Explained  (Read 267538 times)

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4610
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #525 on: April 23, 2021, 09:11:36 PM »
Mr. Mitchell,with your development stage I would give You the advice for regional "business angel/s" organisation search !


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Business_Angels_Association


https://www.angelcapitalassociation.org/   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_Capital_Association


With/out NDA cooperation !




Sincere


OCWL


p.s.: https://www.xprize.org/prizes/elonmusk

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #525 on: April 23, 2021, 09:11:36 PM »

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #526 on: April 24, 2021, 08:19:36 AM »
Thanks for the links :D


Now a lot of times I think they are just fishing to see if there is any tech out there that can threaten their positions of power. But as this point in time I really don't think there is much they can do about it as my plans have already started, so basically it's too late, LOL.
I had a long time to create these plans and gone over so many different scenarios as to always be four to five steps ahead of them. Trust me when I tell you this these folks aren't going to be pushed off of their thrones without a fight and in many ways they are going to lose in much the same way the Reddit Crowd bested them with the Game Stop stocks with the power of the masses. In time the future will once again look bright and beautiful with clean air, clean water ways, and much much more.


Again thanks for the links,
Edward




Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #527 on: April 24, 2021, 09:35:30 AM »


What I'd like to know is just where all the power to continually ionise oxygen is coming from in the first place?


And what energy from sourse electricity does the dissociation of an oxygen molecule into atoms (free radicals) require in a glowing electric discharge?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #527 on: April 24, 2021, 09:35:30 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4610
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #528 on: April 24, 2021, 11:34:18 AM »
rights,obligations : interests !


Stanley Meyer Technology ,another commercial trial  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEGe7GasoADRNz6wfHM91sQ


                                                                            https://web.archive.org/web/20130208154222/http://www.stanleymeyerwebshop.com/




Edward Mitchell  CEO and Owner      True Green Solutions    https://twitter.com/h2opower_


@h2opower_


US Army & US Marines Veteran


Water for fuel expert


Husband and Family man

Stockton, California. USAtruegreensolutions.net


Seit Juli 2009 bei Twitter



as real company/social entity :             True Green Solutions Inc.


                                                         CEO minimum qualification by law !? The other administration partners !?


                                                         social capital (minimum !)


                                                         branch : production department employees minimum qualification by law (!?)




Mr.Edward Mitchell,you worked during Your development with companies which produced for You the specific prototype parts !


Go to them,ask them for their "company organigram",the demanded licences/permissions to work commercial  !


Your future will be to constitute Your organisation by same rules ,independent to deliver the market under "no profit" or "high profit" condition !


The company organigram is the same, ever -by law- with demanded minimum qualifications and qualities   ! INDUSTRIAL STANDART !


Technical responsibility :  operator with official   engineering degree

Financial responsibility ,CEO/Chair-man/woman :  operator with  business administration degree




https://www.quora.com/Did-Stanley-Meyer-really-invent-a-water-powered-car




Edward Mitchell

Former Diesel Mechanic at U.S. Army1999–2003

Studied Science & Architecture at San Joaquin Delta College, Stockton, CA

                                                                                     https://www.deltacollege.edu/

Joined September 2017

For real world company technological CEO position such a profile : unqualified !


SCHEISSEGAL,ob Weisser,Gelber,Schwarzer,Roter,Gruener,.....

Mr.Mitchell,You are in the same position actually like member George1 and some other overunity.com-members whose means that .......




                                        This is our (hidden) operative society system-bondage !


                                                      Over all majorities/minorities !




FIRMA,UNTERNEHMEN,                            COM PAN Y CIRCENSES (Brot&Spiele/Bread&Games)


                                          =   Inc. shortly  Incorporation : Koerperschaft ( oeffentl./privatem Rechtes)


                                                         = juristische Person/Individuum           


                                                                    corpus= the body




                     Com-pan-y(circenses) organ-i-gram and their operators " (naked) Profile " : Forensik/Anatomie tools




                       When today people come together for projects,each one becomes observed ( internal/external curriculum) !




                      approved/certificated  qualification/quality is for "financial credibility" and project/object financing A MUST !




                      Even the minority share-holder Elon Musk did it learned and accepted it !




                      He depends from others,so he has also to howl with the wolves
« Last Edit: April 24, 2021, 01:57:48 PM by lancaIV »

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #529 on: April 24, 2021, 03:36:04 PM »
It's kinda sad as I use to work with Max Miller on this. We had our setups exactly the same and were conducting test at the same time sharing information. I remember talking to him about my cell heating up over time and he told me that his cell wasn't heating up. Since our setups were exactly the same something must be wrong as whatever my set up was doing so too should his set up be doing. We shared videos showing what was going on so we could learn more effectively. In the video he sent me I could clearly see heat waves coming from his resonant cavities and I told him about it. He insisted that his cell wasn't heating up but would no longer provide temperature measurements over time to me. So, I concluded he was lying to me and to himself and stopped working with him as I was all about the science and the scientific method forces one to be honest with themselves if followed correctly. And since my cell was heating up and his, according to him, wasn't one of us had to be lying and this was the end of my working with Max Miller.

I ended up solving the heating problem of the cell several weeks later as to me it was just a problem that needed a solution. I can't speak for his true state of mind but it seems he was in competition with me and wanted to prove that what he was doing was better than what I was doing. In any event that lie stalled his work and he made no real progress with the technology from that point forwards. I on the other hand kept moving my understanding of the technology forwards and am where I am today and I contribute that to being honest with myself as I made use of the scientific method to get at this technologies secrets.


Let this be a lesson to all whom are reading this. A lie has the power to steer one's path away from the truth and in this example it steered Max away from the truth of this technology. You see since I had a problem I kept asking and answering questions and that ended up leading me to a solution and Max had no problem thus never asked any more questions. The solution to the problem was a balanced waveform having nearly the same negative and positive voltage potentials being applied to the plates of the WFC. I think why no one else working on the technology saw this was due to them just looking at the pictures in Meyer's patents and technical brief and not actually reading the information Meyer provided. For in writing Meyer stated very clearly that there must be equal positive and negative voltages being applied to the plates of the water fuel cell.
Since I recognized these waveforms where work problems I had seen in physics I applied what I had learned in physics towards understanding what was going on. The area under the curve shown on the oscilloscope represents current flow. And since I was sending a square wave pulse to the transformer it had a period. I noticed that in this period for every one pulse I'd send to the VIC circuit I'd get two pulses back. The leading pulse would be negative and the other would be positive and it was then when I saw what Meyer was talking about when he stated that this technology doubles the pulse frequency as I was now able to see this with my own eyes. So, with each and every pulse I was sending to the VIC circuit I was getting two pulses back and I now knew to look for this while I was adjusting the pulsing frequency. You see if the waveform shows a equal negative and positive voltage the current flow cancels out and no water heating electrolysis takes place.
Being a nice guy I attempted to point this out to Max but he just went off on me still clinging to the lie he'd told himself and went on trying to tell everyone that would hear him that I was doing things wrong and he wasn't alone as many chimed in at that time to tell everyone that I wasn't telling the truth and was lying to everyone and that I was lying about the water bath not heating up. When I went to the 2013 Global BEM I proved what I was saying as I took temperature measurements for all to see whom came to my station. I ran the unit all day and the temps of the cell would just follow the temps of the day. You'd think all that rose up against me would be accepting of data being given to them in real time but you'd be wrong as they doubled down one what they were saying about me and in the end all of their work stalled out just as Max's did while I kept making improvements.


I had to learn from scratch how to build the VIC transformers correctly towards the application I was subjecting them too as I was using a transformer that was designed for the injectors on a WFC. The load being placed on the transformer from the WFC was much greater than the load being placed on the transformer by the injectors thus the solution was to beef up the transformer so that it could handle the increased load. At this point Meyer and I took a different path on transformer design and my transformers didn't much look like Meyer's transformers anymore just similar to his. Again those whom were determined to hate on me pointed this out but at this point I just ignored them as what progress were they making? None. This really amped up their attacks against me as I guess no one likes being ignored. The sad part of all of this is while I was showing everyone an ever increasing voltage being applied to the WFC as I improved upon my transformer designs they were showing nothing, no improvement whatsoever or just nothing at all. When I was re-reading through this thread I'd see these folks all trying to do the same thing that other guy was trying to get me to do recently in that they all wanted me to stop what I was doing and throw in the towel.


I too had stalled out but not because of what I was doing with this technology but because I had simply ran out of money as these people did one thing very effectively and that was to kill my crowdfunding efforts with all of their combined negativity and outright lies aimed squarely at me. Between that and some greedy machinist it took all the money I had too the point where I did have to stop and save up before I could start again which is where I am at today. I have to save up to get the equipment and materials I need to move forwards again with this technology as I now must do as much as I can inhouse to cut cost.


It's interesting to see so much information about me, though it's incomplete, LOL, but still very interesting to see. I've done a lot in this life and hope to be able to do more as time marches on as sooner or later I will save up enough to get the things I need without any help, but any help I can get is welcome as it cuts the time down for me to be able to launch this technology to the world.


I love this quote from Meyer:
Quote
Success is measured by the determination to make it work, and successful we shall be!


What makes me different from Meyer is I am a mechanic first and a scientist second thus know how engines work. What's missing from your search is I first learned to be a mechanic way back in 1986 so I know my way around cars and thus will not be wasting time trying to re-invent any wheels like Meyer did. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_lnd8Xw3TY&ab_channel=KurtAnnaheim


Shalom everyone,
Edward
« Last Edit: April 24, 2021, 11:17:28 PM by h20power »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #529 on: April 24, 2021, 03:36:04 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #530 on: April 25, 2021, 08:52:03 AM »
And then there is such a device. It can be powered by 12 volts from battery.
If you put it on an insulating table. Is it possible to make measurements instead of a differential probe?  Only the handles cannot be touched. :D

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #531 on: April 25, 2021, 05:18:53 PM »
Hi Kolbacict,


I'm not sure but it would seem that would work. Then the problem might be the voltage ratings of the probes you have as if you place the probes across the entire exciter array the voltages will exceed 10 kv with a 10 resonant cavity cell like mines or Meyer's after he disconnected one of his eleven resonant cavities. Now you can place the probe directly across just one of the cells in the series array as it will be ten times less in it's voltage than the entire series array.


For a resonant cavity built to Meyer's specifications to get it going the potential voltages need to be 500 volts negative and 500 volts positive which gives a total of 1 kv of potential difference. This is the minimum requirements to get the tech working and note it might take just a bit more than this for as seen in the other notes that I posted on Meyer's stuff he was placing a total of 10.2 kv of potential difference on the injectors. Failure to reach these high voltages will result in the setup doing not to much of anything as the threshold for ionization hasn't been reached. Think of it like trying to boil water. If you take it up to 98° C nothing is going to happen to the water as you haven't reached it's boiling point so it's not going to boil. This is no different as both of these atoms have a voltage threshold that must be reached before the atoms go into a state of ionization and start releasing their electrons. Trust me nothing will happen as I held the voltage at 9.6 kv for something like three days straight on my cell and it would try to start but no dice. So I have to redo the transformer in order to reach the proper voltage levels when I get the funds to do so. I think even Don Gable got close but again it will do nothing if the ionization threshold isn't reached. I think his transformer shorted out on him as his transformer coils were exposed to the open air which will ionize the air making it conductive and they were allowed to vibrate which will rub off the wire's protective coating. There is a reason why I vacuum resin seal these transformers now and these two problems are it.


One thing everyone needs to understand is the electricity doesn't wish to go through this resistive wire or an inductor at resonance which acts like a very large resistor. If given the chance it will take a short cut to it's isolated ground or to any grounding source you place too near to the device. Do not stick your finger in the water bath when it is up near these voltages as it will discharge the capacitor through you to get to the earth's ground. Thus it's very important to make sure the isolated side of this technology can't find a way to ground as it must remain isolated at all times for this technology to work correctly. This is why Meyer's injectors didn't work all that well as they would work fine in the test setup he had as it was made of plastic and thus kept things isolated but as soon as he would put the injectors in the engine it would ground out to the car's electrical system. I am sure given enough time he would have solved that problem but he wasn't given any more time.


Meyer and I have different solutions to the same problems we face as that's only normal as we are two different people. His solution to prevent the current from taking a short cut in his WFC was to disconnect one of the resonant cavities and mines was to rewire the resonant cavity splitting the cell in half where the input voltage connections were now 180° apart from one another. Same problem different solution from two very different men. This is what understanding this technology has allowed me to do as I no longer need to follow everything Meyer did as I understand what must be done and why which is precisely why I went out of my way to get at the real science behind this technology. You see if there were mistakes made I'd be able to see them but only if I understood the science behind it all. And, I could come up with totally new solutions to any problems he faced.


People love to get mad at me for saying things like this but I think I just showed the proof to them that I am now qualified to see and correct problems Meyer faced with this technology when he was still alive and come up with different solutions to problems he faced.


Let me know if you want me to post photos my my WFC solution that was different than Meyer's solution, okay?


Edward
« Last Edit: April 25, 2021, 09:02:51 PM by h20power »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #531 on: April 25, 2021, 05:18:53 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #532 on: April 25, 2021, 08:54:28 PM »
Hi Edward.
I else came up with something better !   8)
If you don't have a good differential probe and you don't have the money to buy it.
You can apply a high-voltage signal directly to the CRT plates. An old oscilloscope with a CRT.
Am I smart?  ;)
p.s.
Quote
Let me in if you want me to post photos my my WFC solution that was different than Meyer's solution, okay?
What does this mean?

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #533 on: April 25, 2021, 09:44:24 PM »
Oops, that's a type-o, sorry. I corrected it.


I assume the answer would be yes if not by you but by my many fans and haters alike.


In these photos I show how I went about breaking the cell in half as I wired 5 cells one way and the remaining 5 cells the other way and joined them by a longer wire. You see the problem Meyer ran into was current will always follow the path of least resistance. The current that would charge up the plates of the exciter array simply jumped over the top of the positive and negative resonant cavities as the combined space gaps between each to the cells in the series array was greater than the distance between the two adjacent resonant cavities where the positive and negative connections were made. So the current would only move to charge two of the resonant cavities in the series array as a result as that was the shortest/least restrictive path to ground.
This is the reason why Meyer disconnected one of the resonant cavities of his eleven series array as by doing so now the least restrictive path to ground was going through the remaining cells in the series array. Since I understood what was going on I knew that if I ran a wire around the cell to complete the series array that wire's resistance was much less than the resistance for the current to try and jump over the top of the cells as now the positive and negative connections are 180° apart from one another in their circular arrangement. There is a third solution and that is to make the exciter array in a inline array setup and not in a circular array pattern. But this all has to do with realizing that water is a physical part of the circuit and as such it's resistance is measures in physical distance. You have the distance between the plates and the distance between each of the resonant cavities. In a circular array if the combined distance of the gaps between each of the resonant cavities of the series array is greater than the physical distance between the negative and positive connections the current would take the shortest path to ground.

So, we have the same problem that can be solved by multiple solutions and my solution was just different than Meyer's solution, but in my solution I got to use all of the resonant cavities in my series array while he had to disconnect one of his resonant cavities. Note I used wire that is rated to handle 15 kv between each cell and 30 kv for the negative and positive connections.


With understanding of the technology I can solve problems in a different way than Meyer did and see problems he didn't get a chance to see due to his untimely death.


Take care,
Edward


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #533 on: April 25, 2021, 09:44:24 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #534 on: April 26, 2021, 03:19:29 PM »
I understood. Thank you.   :)
Be that as it may, I have not yet managed to have more gas output than by  Michael Faraday.
In WFC was always a analog ammeter in the circuit. For control of the constant current component.
How many coulombs of electricity were passed through the cell, so much gas was obtained.
And it was never possible to get more than a few tens of volts per cell. :(
Although I know, in radio engineering, even copper can be the perfect insulator.
This is when, for example, in long lines there are quarter-wave short-circuiting bridges ...
I don’t know how to say it exactly in English, but I hope you will understand me.
But with these cell sizes, frequncy it should be many gigahertz ...

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #535 on: April 26, 2021, 11:03:01 PM »
I understood. Thank you.   :)
Be that as it may, I have not yet managed to have more gas output than by  Michael Faraday.
In WFC was always a analog ammeter in the circuit. For control of the constant current component.
How many coulombs of electricity were passed through the cell, so much gas was obtained.
And it was never possible to get more than a few tens of volts per cell. :(
Although I know, in radio engineering, even copper can be the perfect insulator.
This is when, for example, in long lines there are quarter-wave short-circuiting bridges ...
I don’t know how to say it exactly in English, but I hope you will understand me.
But with these cell sizes, frequncy it should be many gigahertz ...


Again with this technology reaching the threshold for ionization of the hydrogen and oxygen atoms is no different than reaching the boiling point for water. Meyer states that each resonant cavity will require 1 kv. Now for comparison lets treat that 1 kv like 100° C for the boiling point of water. If you only bring the temps up to 96° C will the water ever boil at 1STP? The answer is no. So, if like me you managed to put 960 volts to the resonant cavity will it work? Again the answer is no, why? Because the threshold for the ionization of the oxygen and hydrogen atoms hasn't been reached.


One thing you also need to understand is Dr. Faraday's work doesn't apply here as this method of water decomposition is following how mother nature breaks the bonds of the water molecules and not man's way to do it. A new measuring method needs to be made for the efficiency of the reaction as mankind has truly never done this before. Remember this is new to the scientific community and it hasn't been taken seriously yet.


As for the frequencies this technology operates at it's around 5-12 kHz depending on the size of the resonant cavities and the inductance of the inductors used. This is still a RLC circuit but one made to mimic mother natures way of breaking the bonds of the water molecules. There are two different resonances taking place as the gating frequency is aimed at the outer tube's vibrational resonant frequency, and the RLC circuit, well you should already know that one. This is why at first when you don't understand things you must build it as close as you can to what Meyer had done. Now if you don't wish to be honest with yourself and run around faking as if you understand this technology and you really don't you will end up blowing through a lot of money and come out the other side empty handed. It took me a very long time to gain the understanding I now have about this technology. Lots of experiments performed making use of the scientific method both asking and answering questions as I learned how this technology works the old fashion way by trial and error.


All in all I'd say you have a long ways to go to get to my level of understanding about this technology but keep your nose to the grindstone of science and everything will work out as long as you make use of the scientific method.


Take care,
Edward

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #535 on: April 26, 2021, 11:03:01 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Jerry Volland

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #536 on: April 27, 2021, 04:07:27 AM »
Hi Edward,


Good to see you're still at it, and the progress you've made since I last read one of your reports. SOMEONE has to do the work you're doing, and I'm confident you'll be the one who solves it.


Interestingly, a couple of days ago I was wondering if resonance has anything to do with the size of the outter containment tube. Now, out of the blue, you point out that the container's resonance is the gating frequency. So that's some important information, and I appreciate it.


And have you seen recent reports that some researchers are using photosynthesis for electrolysis? It's been a long time, but I remember that YOU pointed that out first.


As for my work, I've got 1200V connected to a single cell, and ALL of the bubbles are coming off just the center electrode. No Meyer pulses, just Mains frequency. I'm wondering what would happen if someone used the technique with a Meyer's type power supply. Or perhaps the effect may be interesting, but unimportant.


Best Regards

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #537 on: April 27, 2021, 07:02:53 AM »
Hi Jerry,


Yeah, it has been a while since we last wrote to one another. In my latest research I figured out something very interesting about the WFC's, but also unsettling. It turns out I, along with Meyer and anyone who copied him, made the things wrong. If you take a close look at the one where Meyer used the Alternator you will see Meyer doing it correctly in that he is physically holding the outer tubes at their "Nodes." For reasons unknown when he made the WFC for the car he no longer went to hold the tubes at their nodes.


The fundamental frequency is what the gating frequency is tuned for with the outer tubes. This is why they all must be as close to perfect as possible in their size for they all must have the same resonant frequency for this to work on them all at the same time. Luckily for me I held the resonant cavities to a really high tolerance of just ±0.0005 inches, but I didn't make the cell to correctly hold them at their nodes. When I get in some new equipment in I will make a new one that does address this problem as I am cutting out the expensive middle men that have taken so much of my money as to leave me broke most of the time. Yep, going to be doing a lot more things "In-House" from now on.


Now I did share this information on Chris's site before he banned me for pointing out racism and then the site just suddenly went down for reasons unknown, so I guess I can post that information here for all of you.


The waveform is very important as the negative and positive voltages must be nearly the same to get the amp restriction Meyer talks about. Most people on the forums dogged me out for saying that but I showed my cell wasn't heating up over time in use just as the eye witnesses talked about in the Arthur C. Clarke video. But it's like boiling water as if all one can reach is 96° C the water will never boil. With respects to Meyer one must build the resonant cavities to his dimensions for his words to work for them. If the gap between the cells is larger it will require a lot more voltage to reach the ionization threshold for the atoms that make up the water molecules to get them to eject their electrons. With water dissociated in this manor it produces, hydrogen and oxygen gases and electricity as those ejected electrons go into the water bath. Now the voltage intensifier circuit does take care of this so that it doesn't arc inside of the cell creating an explosion as when the switch is "On" creating a short circuit the electrons are free to move through the coils of the transformer on their way to the other side of the plates of the capacitor as when the switch is "On" it short circuits the capacitor.


This technology is very complex as I haven't even shared the really difficult stuff as I feel no one would truly understand it and I don't want to feed those that aim to put my company out of business.


In my testing with other cells that were unbalanced I'd be able to get some of the resonant cavities working at random and it looks like the water is boil as I would get a very large burst of gases being produced in one or two resonant cavities but never all of them at the same time as I didn't make the cell correctly. I have a video of it but I don't think it's the right time to share such things on the net as of yet. With Meyer's technology the voltage intensifier circuit is a must or it will not be duplicating how mother natures goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules. Now there are more ways to do this but most of those ways are very dangerous as it can be done with radiation, strong magnetic fields, and any other way that we know of to get the atoms to eject or have their electrons removed. I see the thread started with someone trying to go over making use of magnetic fields to do this and wonder if they now that this was a problem for those folks that build these atoms smashers. They use water as a dielectric liquid in their systems and from the things I read this was a really big problem for them that they had to design out for as I stated when water is broken down this way it not only produces these gases but also electricity. In time it will produce enough electric charge as to create a spark which would blow up their high dollar equipment. It is also how those three reactors in Japan blew their tops as by way of radiation bombardment those high radiation levels knocked the electrons off of the atoms and over time the electrons built up a charge that was strong enough to over come the air's resistance and that's when they blew their tops putting radiation all over the planet.


I learned all of this by first moving away from studding the WFC when I went to figure out how the Gas Processor worked. The Gas Processor targets one atom and the WFC targets two atoms simultaneously is the primary difference between the two devices. In order to understand all of this I had to leave Meyer's work for awhile just moving wherever the science took me in my experiments and come back to it once I understood what was going on. I think this is why when I speak of this technology most people think I am coming out of left field as Meyer never spoke about many of the things I figured out about this technology. https://adobefreeuserschannel.na3.documents.adobe.com/public/fs?aid=CBFCIBAA3AAABLblqZhBHwnu0ZoIma-oV4QM4v1jOGi46qx-tIaYtZpYhOzFPQSVahcL3H7Rv0oPteGmUhck%2A


As for those that solved making hydrogen and oxygen with just sunlight with their artificial leaf I am not sure what happened to them as they had all the funding they needed to have been in mass production by now but they just seemed to have disappeared. The earth is going into "Hell Mode" as we keep on using fossil fuels and they are nowhere to be found with their solution, strange?


Best Regards to you too,
Edward
« Last Edit: April 27, 2021, 09:47:15 AM by h20power »

Offline h20power

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #538 on: April 27, 2021, 04:23:44 PM »
Hello Everyone,


Now here is something a lot of people simply don't understand about this technology. When you look at the voltage intensifier circuit many people assume that they can take this technology to any frequency they so desire, yes kolbacict[/size][/color]? Here's the problem with that. Which of the parts of the VIC will limit how fast one can pulse it, in other words what is the limiting part of the setup? It's the switch, IE, blocking diode. What happens if you choose a switch that is too slow and thus can't keep up with the frequencies you need to be running this technology at? Well, watch this video to learn just what will happen if you choose a switch that is too slow or if you chose a frequency that will over clock your switch: [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXEyCf1P0UU[/size] As you can see the switch is the limiting part of this technology and if you overclock it bad things will happen. So, you don't want to run this technology in the Giga Hertz range do you? For if you do so chances are high that you will overclock the switch as it will not be able to keep up as a result.


Now failure to use the switch, IE, you thought it was just a waste of time and you feel you can make changes to a technology you don't fully understand will result in a capacitor that is switching polarity and heating up the water bath by way of molecular friction as the water molecules keep switching back and forth trying to follow the ever switching polarity of the frequency you are using on the capacitor. Got that Jerry?


This is why I urge folks that don't fully understand this technology to simply copy as best you can what Stanley Meyer did and observe this technology both asking and answering questions so that you can gain an understand of this technology. This part will not be easy as there are many false teachings about what Stanley Meyer did as the people observing the technology with their own two hands simply made a few mistakes. But none the less it is a hill you will have to overcome in order to get this technology up and running correctly.


Remember when you mocked me Jerry when I told everyone over at Ionizationx that I came up with a new theory for the books of science? Now you can see just how important that theory I came up with is towards understanding this technology and being able to predict other things in nature and things that are man made that are breaking the bonds of the water molecules in this fashion. With that theory we now know what to look for.
Here is a example of this theory answering things that science finds are unknown. Now this example is of a horrific plane crash and I truly feel sorry for the loss of life. Remember flight TWA 800 that went down shortly after takeoff? It's the one where they drudged the entire plane out of the ocean looking for explosives but never found and evidence of any explosive materials. Well, it turns out that plane took off in a severe thunderstorm and the pilot, along with most of the scientific community, didn't know that thunderstorms will produce large amounts of hydrogen and oxygen gases when the conditions are right for them to do so. These gases are produced at the bottom of the cloud and rise to the top of the cloud and generally is ignited producing the earth shaking thunder we hear and feel on the ground. The plane intercepted a large pocket of hydrogen and oxygen gas headed for the top of the cloud and it's engines ignited the mixture which blew the plane to kingdom come. This is what this theory I came up with allowed me to figure out about how that plane was blown out of the sky when the mainstream scientist just ended up throwing up their hands telling everyone they couldn't figure out what happened.


It's a sad story as I believe all hands were lost but it goes to show the importance of the theory I came up with as it answers some unknowns we have. In other things scientist are just figuring out about thunderstorms is they are responsible for some of the earthquakes we have as those very large explosions taking place overhead shake the ground which will in turn cause the ground to relive built up tension in the fault lines and perhaps even the tectonic plates. Now I watched a documentary about earthquakes and the scientist are now seeing a pattern where these thunderstorms are actually causing earthquakes. Sorry I can't find the video for you but it just goes to show we humans are learning more and more about our earth and how it behaves all the time.


As always I hope this helps everyone's understanding of this technology just a bit more.
Take care,
Edward



Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #539 on: April 27, 2021, 07:30:25 PM »
Quote
didn't know that thunderstorms will produce large amounts of hydrogen and oxygen gases when the conditions are right for them to do so.
It's true ?It's true ?

 

OneLink