Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer Explained  (Read 447619 times)

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #330 on: October 05, 2019, 04:30:04 AM »
Now I was hoping everyone would see something with the photos I posted on page 21 but with now some 223 people having view this photo I can say it's a must for me to point this out to all of you so that you can see that I am correct and not just have to take my word for it. Allow me to take off the blinders if you would.


I want all of you to look at the "Global Electric Circuit" again and compare it with the "Voltage Intensifier Circuit"(VIC) as you will see that Meyer did in fact mimic a thunderstorm just as I have told all of you he did. The VIC is the Global Electric Circuit, for the WFC is the cloud, the air is the charging chokes and secondary coil, and the blocking diode makes sure the current goes only in one direction. Can all of you see this now? I thought someone would have seen this on their own but I guess not as this technology isn't all that intuitive.


This way you all don't have to just take my word for it as you all should be able to see it clearly now that I have pointed it out to you, YES?


In figure 7-5 Meyer shows the charging chokes are just to be thought of as resistors which is also shown in the Global Electric Circuit above and below the cloud. The secondary coil Meyer has always reference to it as a resistor which is shown as the long resistor at the end of the global electric circuit. Figure 7-7 and 7-8 make it clear that you are actually looking at the Global Electric Circuit. So, it should be clear to all of you know that I did in fact get at the science behind the patents for if I did not I would not be able to show all of this to you so clearly & easily.

I need the support of the people: [/size]https://www.gofundme.com/energytothepeople[/size]

Now a lot of you need to learn how to drown the puppy and you can learn more about what I am talking about in this video of Roger Billings: [/size]https://youtu.be/n1NckxnFWow?t=2766[/size]



« Last Edit: October 05, 2019, 09:24:11 AM by h20power »

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #331 on: October 05, 2019, 12:54:59 PM »
Let me think loud : "gofundme" : 24.Mai.2015 - 5.Oktober.2019 : pleased 25000 $ and reached : 2970 $
                                                                       > 52 months.                                                                        12 donators

What this technology shall change. ? In numeric details per installation,chance/riscs,....... !

          Before = it is / After : it ( will) be  ( Futur II review)


Sources for ( fast) help :

30.000.000.000 $ /2 ( 50% donation) in one female case and other. :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fmobil.stern.de%2Flifestyle%2Fleute%2Fmackenzie-bezos-und-co---sie-spenden-freiwillig-milliarden-8732716.html

Working together with estatal research institutions ( several funds),  Universities,  NGOs. ?

Physics :
Do not forget the kinetic force in your "thunderstorm physics" calculation !
[ during a thunderstorm in the mountains, visiting an airgenerator parc, somebody was thrown ( by u.w.o = unidentified working object  ::) )several meters out from a transformator house, the hill down]


Similar approach :
http://www.rexresearch.com/marks/marks.htm. 
Aerosol generator
By others f. e.  :
Tesla,Plauson,Thomas Townsend Brown,,Baltzar von Platen,AIRHes, ...


The "Scientific World" is thinking in a  G. U. T-'em, from a G. U. P.  ?
https://www.google.com/search?q=kanarev+innoplaza&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m
The use from the Physics- formulas correct. ?
THESE - HYPOTHESE-ANTITHESE-PARENTHESE : demonstration - result- repeat : no/ difference ? AXIOM. ? Rule  ?

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #332 on: October 05, 2019, 04:57:57 PM »
IancaIV,


It's really hard for me to read and follow your thoughts as the post you just made I really don't get it.


All I am asking for it a little bit of help as this technology does have a cost to it and thus far I have gotten enough help to get a few things built. The rest comes from my own funds in building things. Most of you don't know this but to build the VIC transformer correctly cost around $3,500 USD for just one transformer. The WFC has a minimum make value as the machinist aren't going to make just one and to have 8 WFC's made cost me over $13,300 USD.


You ask "What this technology shall change?" and I would think that is obvious as it will turn the tide on climate change. No other technology suits our currently level of technology in industry in the world today like this one does. The Papp motor will cost too much and doesn't work with our current industry whom are already capable of building things at speed. All of the automotive manufactures could make use of this technology in a matter of months once shown how to implement this technology as all they would be doing is switching where they get the hydrogen from. We have to work with the automotive industry as they are already set up to build cars at the scales we need to make a difference towards turning the tide on our climate change problems. With this technology they don't end up with a lot of "Stranded Assets" which is something they would go for as they are already facing having to strand their assets due the rise of the electric cars and a lot of them aren't going to make it.


With this technology one can transform where they get the hydrogen from in planes, ships, cars, trucks, farm equipment, forklifts, heating, wielding, and so much more. And I am only scratching the surface of what this technology is capable of doing for it is as I say, "A whole new era of scientific discovery just waiting to happen," but big things often have small beginnings.


Most of my close friends tell me that I am barking up the wrong tree coming to forums such as these for help and I am beginning to feel perhaps they are correct. Are they?
You ask about cost per installation and I am not able to mass produce this technology so I don't have the numbers for you on that. The way the markets work is the more you buy the lower the per unit cost will be. You ask about the risk and what are the chances this technology will be accepted or not? Right now the world's automotive companies are in a lot of trouble as they are having to make battery electric cars when they really don't want too. And in doing so they have to strand a lot of their assets which some of them are not in a position right now to do meaning they are looking at failing as a company. So, the time is right for them to be shown this technology as I believe they are now willing to accept it being that some of them aren't ready to make the switch to making EV's and are facing having to close their doors as a result.


Tesla Motors has been in business for 11 years and they are only making close to 1.3% of the total cars made in the world. That is no where near fast enough to turn the tide on climate change. We need the entire automotive industries help if we are going to be able to do things at the scales needed to effectively make a difference in solving our climate change problems. Remember every engine converted will actually be cleaning the air as it is operated unlike EV's which are carbon neutral this technology is carbon negative.


You all need to learn how to put your puppies down as I stated this technology has no equal. Never before in the history of mankind has a technology come along that can change the course of humanity like this technology can. This technology which follows the natural design of nature in how it makes use of energy is a win win situation as it's just allowing us to make use of the "Global Electric Circuit." If I can get all of you to see this then perhaps my friends are correct and I am barking up the wrong tree.
Prove them wrong!


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell aka, h2opower/h20power

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #333 on: October 05, 2019, 05:13:56 PM »
"The cost from a VIC ( Voltage Intensifier Circuit)  transformer around $3500 . ..."( clearly : Unikat, mass production. ?)Nominal KW in/output. ?

Possible "conventional" transformer costs :

powerguru.com : flat/plan inverter  transformer  nominal 5 KW, 10000 units production costs : $ 25 US ea.

http://www.powerguru.org/planar-transformers-are-essential-for-truly-efficient-electrichybrid-vehicles/




 I do only questions which I am thinking also a consultor( serving riches,industrial companies, investors) would have to do. !

"gofundme" is not a ( enthusiasts ) free energy forum,did you have had in that time since 24.05.2015 more positive/ negative feedback than here in the last days  ?


Investor-search ( " Klinkenputzen" : door to door)
This is what my father did, for me and clearly himself   !


His knowledge about technology :  :-\ about Business Administration : MBA, I. N. S. E. A. D.  ;)


Do your " friends" trust in You and "Your technology effect" :
a.
How much do they/ their companies( ownership or worker)/ hometown have to pay for energy per week/month/year  ?
b.family(mother-/father-line)own schoolfriends( from child/s)/ University( academic ?   friends : Uni funds)/church community/ military service? /town community. :


how much represents their possible savings as partial funds sum. ?


When you do not know the financial generator/converter cost  per useable power unit you can not know how your technology is concurrence-able against many other competitors  !


        EFFICIENCY RULES THE WORLD




 Nature :               win/win    ?  comme ci comme ca ( avec corriger la fortune  !)

                                                  Andromeda-Galaxy : cosmic canibalism  ::)


https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weltderphysik.de%2Fgebiet%2Funiversum%2Fnews%2F2009%2Fkosmischer-kannibalismus-andromeda-frisst-zwerggalaxien%2F

 
Abschiedsgrusz, Nieder-Awarisch : SERVUS
« Last Edit: October 05, 2019, 08:45:31 PM by lancaIV »

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #334 on: October 05, 2019, 10:01:03 PM »
Do my friends trust me? Yes or they wouldn't be helping me with funds to build the things I need from time to time.


Thus far I really haven't reached out to any would be investors as I am looking for the support of the working class the everyday people around the world that are out there marching and protesting about climate change. They say 4 million marched and protested against climate change this past Friday and I am thinking if only I could get them to all give just a little bit to help support a technology that has the power to turn the tide on climate change. Even if they all of them just gave twenty-five cents that would be more than enough for me to accomplish my goals. I am looking for support from the "Crowd" not the few support from the very people that will be effected by climate change the most.


As a crowd collectively we can do just as the rich do if we pool our resources together which is what crowdfunding is all about. I am really not looking for Angel investors as they normally come with strings attached. Most of the investors are looking for a return on their investment and are thus the primary reason why we are all in this mess with the climate. The IMF and World Bank were looking for a return on their investment when they put a stop to this technology back in 1968 as they had invested in oil. The very thinking of profit above all else is the root cause of many things we find wrong with the world right now.


When I posted what I did I did so to show everyone that I do in fact know how this technology actually works. I showed the science behind this technology to everyone and even went back and hand walked a lot of you missed it so that you too could see the connections between the science I posted and Meyer's work.  I'd be willing to bet the many naysayers aren't laughing now as the science I showed is very clear, but the technology was hidden in plain sight. Like Meyer used to say, "One must ask the right questions," and it should be clear to all of you that I did ask the right questions.


Sure I can do this in a way that would be like going door to door but that would not be effective towards turning the tide on Climate Change for unlike Elon and Tesla Motors I don't have $1.6 billion USD to build a factory with many production lines to make this technology at the scales needed to curb the effects of climate change in the limited time we have left to do something about it. I have been reaching out to Greta Thunberg but it seems she has become too popular to listen to the individual now. In fact I have been reaching out to a great many of those on the front lines of the climate change movement and can't seem to break through to any of them. However I do seem to always attract the attention of the world's naysayers whom tell me this technology goes against the laws of physics or something else along those lines when I take the time to actually talk to them I find out most don't even know what those laws of physics even are.


All in all it's kinda frustrating having to go it almost all alone with only my family and friends supporting me when they can afford to do so from time to time. I try and keep hope alive but it's getting hard not to be bitter towards the many naysayers that keep popping up out of the woodwork. I am totally aware that I have solved this technology and what that means for the future of mankind. For all I can do is try and get the people to aid in my efforts to actually do something effective towards turning the tide on climate change.


Shalom everyone,
h2opower

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #335 on: October 06, 2019, 01:46:51 AM »
To my first Investor meeting I came with sufficient documents to clear  "the status quo":
what are the targets and which are the project competitors  !?
No one from the competitors reached the minimum target : a demonstrative functional device  !I reached the target !

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   October 2019



Which are "water to fuel"- technology competitive alternatives  :
thermionic cells,24/365

compressed air chamber,24/365

motor-generator,24/365
static transformer( MED),24/365
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"water as fuel"- concept : manufactoring costs ( without overhead costs= production costs)

10 KW electric generator Helmut Schiller Germany,500 Euros
10 KW Reinhardt-Turbine Germany,300 Euros
water- converter ,200 Euros

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000 ( one thousand) Euros costs for a nominal 10 KW "water to fuel" gen-set


Performance :  ?
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11516
http://www.williamwilsonmusic.com/inventor.html
HYDRAULIC CYLINDER ELECTRONIC TORQUE MULTIPLIER
+ ic- engine/turbine
+ "water to fuel"-converter

Alternatively : compressed air motor         
                          electric motor


VIC or VEC ( Voltage Excitation Circuit) transformer as "Water Injection Circuit" can be cheap  !





             World small green movement by "FFF" :


"Friday for Future" -Demo audience 4 Mio. / World population : > 1000  fold
                                                       quantite negligeable. !


Would the parents from this'" middleclass"  youth workout 1:1 the FFF own claimed" consume behaviour change" demands :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fm.spiegel.de%2Fwissenschaft%2Fmensch%2Ffridays-for-future-das-bedeuten-die-forderungen-fuer-die-verbraucher-a-1261933.html

                           3,2,1 < 1 Mio. " hard core" Nature-saver

                            Demo- Tourism is " en vogue" : like "Attac"
https://www.greenpeace.org/international/explore/energy/
  voluntaries : 47000 = 1,6%   from  members : 3000000 ( 3 millions)


4 millions FFF- symphatizers donate for the next several years 50% from their pocket-money "nature caritative orgs" or work some hours per week as active volunteers.  !  ::) "Zehn kleine FFF-LEIN die wollten ....."
Learning from other : voluntary 1 week/month consume observation (+ diary)
 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pfarrei-rheinzabern.de%2Fglaubensweitergabeeintritt%2Ffastenaktion-2019%2F

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #336 on: October 06, 2019, 02:02:21 AM »
H2Opower
Quote
As a crowd collectively we can do just as the rich do if we pool our resources together which is what crowdfunding is all about. I am really not looking for Angel investors as they normally come with strings attached. Most of the investors are looking for a return on their investment and are thus the primary reason why we are all in this mess with the climate.

Agree 100%, I met many quite charming, slick talking people who wanted to "invest" in this kind of technology over the years. Save the world they said but the moment they thought they had any control they turned into narcissistic abusive psychopaths.

In the end I came to the conclusion that there is no amount of money they could pay me to have to tolerate there narcissistic abusive bs. Life is short and we only have a given amount of time to live our lives and do the things which make us happy and grow as a person.

Regards




h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #337 on: October 06, 2019, 04:16:00 AM »
H2Opower
Agree 100%, I met many quite charming, slick talking people who wanted to "invest" in this kind of technology over the years. Save the world they said but the moment they thought they had any control they turned into narcissistic abusive psychopaths.

In the end I came to the conclusion that there is no amount of money they could pay me to have to tolerate there narcissistic abusive bs. Life is short and we only have a given amount of time to live our lives and do the things which make us happy and grow as a person.

Regards


I hear you Onepower as I have been there and done that already. People tried and trap me into working for them or with them with truly one sided proposals. Some of those proposals were so bad that I wouldn't even be able to afford the technology that I figured out. Truth be told Meyer took this technology with him to his grave as in order to solve it I had to move totally away from practically all of his written work. In the end I know I am following a plan that I made for this technology years ago. I will stick to this plan but will alter it if the situation changes and right now climate change is causing me to modify the plan a little as know I have known what I shared on this forum over the past few days for over seven years.


Right now I am not liking the way IancaIV post as it's seems like garbage data meant to bury the important stuff I posted so that no one sees it. I hope that is not the case but his post are just long without much relevant information in them. I already know there is no technology in the world that even comes close to besting this technology but he seems dead set on proving me wrong and if so he needs to learn how to drown those puppies as they are not viable solutions.


Anyway, I already have a plan that I am following and at this point in my life I don't think there is anyone that can dissuade me from that plan. I am old and as stubborn as they come and moreover I believe in what I am doing.


Regards

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #338 on: October 06, 2019, 10:02:40 AM »
H2Opower
Quote
I hear you Onepower as I have been there and done that already. People tried and trap me into working for them or with them with truly one sided proposals. Some of those proposals were so bad that I wouldn't even be able to afford the technology that I figured out.

It's strange, I finally came to understand what true freedom is when having a conversation with some people talking about billions of dollars and saying... you have nothing of value I need. It was an incredible feeling knowing freedom while everyone else was a slave to their own materialism and greed. I still chuckle when I think about how dumbfounded they must have been on hearing my response. The fact is most of the wealthy people I have known over the years have major issues with failed businesses, corruption, broken marriages, substance abuse and psychological disorders. Then they would presume to drag me into their shit show?, no thanks I think I will pass, lol.

Quote
Anyway, I already have a plan that I am following and at this point in my life I don't think there is anyone that can dissuade me from that plan. I am old and as stubborn as they come and moreover I believe in what I am doing.

Good for you and I'm trying to get back into the swing of things after taking a break. Exploring the nature of the universe and theory/experimentation is the ultimate liberation in my opinion because with some basic materials, a bench and some ingenuity we could create almost anything. It could be the next tpu, wireless power, motor-generators, transmutation, levitation, anti-gravity... we have so many options to explore.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #339 on: October 06, 2019, 11:41:53 AM »
#337:
Mr. Mitchell,the "water injector circuit" technology developed by Stanley Meyer and several others are listed and known and not forgotten.

I know and have experience enough about what onepower is telling .
"Narcism( egomanie: dreaming ( and working) in $$$ ,why millionair if not billionair)  and "say ever and think ever :  " cheese ! " psychopath/ schizophrenia"


About garbage data : I have had several 1/4 cbm boxes full with ( from me studied and compared) written/ copied/ printed pages about thousands different inventors/developper/ scientists/ and their works.

Hydrogen ( Dr. Billings) and Oxygen( v. Ardenne) treatment methods are me not unknown. !

I treat you like I treat me and my parents and my family and all the other : without economical interests ! 


I am  not friend and I am not enemy to each kind of invention and technology,but  : 

                                            EFFICIENCY RULES THE WORLD
       
See such sites like " powerguru" as possibility to come with experienced (3/4 d) project/prototyping  engineers in contact ( worldwide) which helps to
realize ( with/- out NDA) " paper work"  at first to useable idea/products prototypes  !
I let produce here in Portugal a "transformer set" prototype with 5 KW nominal output   which did cost me 150 €  !                            Unikat-costs : 8 Kg device

    http://www.powerguru.org/planar-transformers-are-essential-for-truly-efficient-electrichybrid-vehicles/   

After prototype costs
( patenting ? : new technical claims ? 5000 $ /Euros first WIPO/PCT fix-costs
 + translation 5.- 20.000 €$ ,pages and language dependant)

and testes/ approvement costs for the UAL/TUEV- certification : 25000 US$/€   !
Selling transformer OTC without approvement and certification : crime. !

75000 €/$ minimum start-money for all certification steps  ( + 1/2 year administration process )
The promotor/initiator should organize : 100000 ( one hundred thousand) €/$ for the  fix 75. + journey costs ( propaganda,shows !) + own/team basic needs. !

100000 ( one hundred thousand )€/$ = 100% investment lost potential.  !
  Gain ?  EXPERIENCE ( ERROR/SUCCESS)  !
And when the patent office rejects the claims ?
 PROMISES AND WARRANTIES to bank, investors, worker/s,family ?

You think that the #.... content is useless or "Stanley Meyer"- non related. ?
Argument right and the written text(e) will become by the Admin after recommendation deleted. !
Democracy and not dictation. !
« Last Edit: October 06, 2019, 07:44:54 PM by lancaIV »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #340 on: October 06, 2019, 01:01:50 PM »
Ed...Not sure any serious persons here who are truly trying to change the way things are would wish you failure or not want to help you ?Nor would they ever give up or relent.Anyone who will carry water for this "change" is a friend IMO ,Some do hold themselves as more worthy than others and feel the world is not ready or they can play God with who does or does not benefit..... ::)

would seem such persons playing God  has been Status quo for quite some time. [some still taunt ,  point fingers  or make excuses on an almost daily basis ,[not referencing anybody here]
However
As mentioned there will be an Open source builders thread here exploring these "water fuel possibilities"

very exciting times !!
Ps to LancaIV, is water as fuel efficient enuff ?
is a Papp water engine [Totally sealed] clean enuff ?
good to set goals !!

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #341 on: October 06, 2019, 02:55:02 PM »
Chet, since when is the Papp engine " water" based. ?
Only one from several sources :
http://www.rexresearch.com/papp/1papp.htm

More :
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&q=Josef+papp+engine&oq=Josef+papp+engine&aqs=heirloom-srp..0l1

Have a fine Sunday
p.s.:

week-days and week-end here :

segunda-,terca-,quarta-,quinta-, sexta- : feira,
 sabbado : sabao : washing soap. Samstag/Satur(n or -a ?)day. Waschtag/Washing day

 Domingo : " Tag des Herrn" : Sonntag/Sunday*  Day of the Lord ( Lord : latin " dominus,german:  ( Haus-) Herr


                 God/Gott in latin dominium : ~ gracian ZEUS :Caelum/Ba(a)ldach(in)/Ceu/Heaven/Himmel
         

       was  IOS/ Iove ( Iopiter/Jupiter and Ioventude/Youth/Jugend) is actually as D'IOS and Deus,Dieu to refind


Sabbat- country "Israel":

https://www.google.com/search?q=judbarovski+renewables&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m

"water as fuel" - application ideas, pure or "doted/dotiert/ enriched " with/ by CO2
Beside FT= Fischer-Tropsch also Sabbat ;) ier process known
Hydrogen + Nitrogen : NH3 = ammoniak

To understand mediterran and European = Occidental culture  and language is essay and easy ,  is it not. !?   ;)

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #342 on: October 06, 2019, 07:33:43 PM »
Here is how I see things. No one is talking about what I shared on this forum on my thread. I already know this is very new information concerning Meyer's technology to everyone as not a soul has ever talked about Meyer's technology in such a way that I am aware of. Most have brought to me different technologies that really aren't viable solutions instead of talking about what I just shared in an Open Source setting. This is what I see and can go back a few pages to easily prove what I am saying is true. When I say Meyer took this technology with him in death I meant it as I haven't shared how to actually go about mimicking a thunderstorm as I only shared the raw science behind the technology in an attempt to gainer some support for this technology as I move forwards with it.


Meyer was very good at hiding the technology in plain sight as he purposefully left out the primary equation that governs this technology as well as a few other things. He was so good at hiding things that even those that actually held his technology in their hands missed things and thus copied it wrong which is why they were unable to duplicate his work. The main thing that separates me from them is I actually took the time to make use of the scientific method and where it lead me I followed. Plus I had dreams that really helped me to see the technology cleanly once I figured out what those dreams were trying to teach me as the way our creator thinks is definitely not how we think.


I made these post to document my new scientific theory so that no one comes in latter saying they thought of it first, and to show everyone that I do in fact understand how this technology actually works. Any monetary support I would get from those that choose to help me would speed up my efforts to bring this technology out. This is what looking into the science of climate change has shown me in that the clock is ticking and time waits for no man. This is a very big task that I alone can not accomplish thus I need the help of industry giants as that is the only way I can see to move forwards at the speeds needed to turn the tide on climate change before we reach the tipping point. At first I was like many of you thinking we could just go around the industry giants but when you take a closer look at the numbers we are talking multiple billions of things that need to be converted and that takes time which as I pointed out to all of you we are running out of. The primary thing we need to do is convince the industry giants that make everything to say goodbye to the fossil fuel industries. All ships, jets, road vehicles, farm & warehouse equipment, as well as homes and businesses world wide need to be converted to make use of this technology and I assure you that can't be done in a day.


People need to think as Steve Jobs did and learn to do the hardest of things and that is choosing which projects not to do. This technology fits our current level of industry perfectly and can be put to use much faster than any other technology as most things don't require us to re-make the wheel as industry is already set up to make use of this technology.


Since I posted my https://www.gofundme.com/energytothepeople campaign I haven't received a single donation so perhaps my friends are right I am barking up the wrong tree here. But, I did document my theory and show my level of understanding about this water for fuel technology is like no other in a public place.


Yesterday I spent the Sabbath with my mother & sister and visited my grandmother who wasn't feeling well. I talked to my sister about this technology and reminded her that this technology is going to change the world more than any other technology that has come before it in this point in time. Yes, I am what some would call a "Law Keeper" as I do try and keep the creators laws, statues, and commandments as my people promised they would do when they entered into a blood covenant with the creator many years ago in the wilderness with Moshe.


Shalom everyone,
Edward

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #343 on: October 06, 2019, 07:52:07 PM »
Mr.  Mitchell,open a treat : " Global Electric Circuit" ,
be the only with " Moderator" - function and post-deleting rights
 and you will see what you will get as feedback to your first idea presentation  and project as comment.and help offer !

Do not " lamentate", do it right. !
Have a good Sunday evening and a succesfull week
OCWL

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Stanley Meyer Explained
« Reply #344 on: October 07, 2019, 12:32:40 PM »
 :) YOU pleased. ! YOU get !
2007 a possible ( me at first unknown) investor, after a first 8 hour meeting - anymore drinks and tobacco :P :-\ ??? asked me if I only want to be " Propheta" or to begin to realize the idea/ project  !?
I gave a positive answer. ! ( I see me as Designer not as Prophet)

By the next meeting I received from the possible investor side a several pages contract to hand - several thousand Euros costs behind( the work from one of the mostly reknown national Advocate-Society ) included PROCURA. !
I recused  !  Because they wanted to fix me. ! I like and love life freedom more than money or equivalent richdom. !

So they accepted to work out the idea/ project fixed by my side.  !
"WE WILL CHANGE THE WORLD! " the expression from one of the investors  !
They changed something,but not the World. ! They failed. !

I got my TARGET. !  The Over-Unity  input/output ratio device. !

The Physician Dr.  Imris Pavel, the technician Jorge Ferreira and the freelancer OCWL  :
~ https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FDie_Physiker   

Only metaphorical :  ;)
« Last Edit: October 07, 2019, 10:50:44 PM by lancaIV »