Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Leedskalnin  (Read 62239 times)

Ren

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2007, 05:49:23 AM »
Hi guys another Aussie here too. I was drawn towards this thread out of interest to Leedskalnin, Im glad I bumped into it.

@ Brian. I am currently learning/building a pulsed motor setup along with a few others in this thread here. http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3318.0/topicseen.html

Alot of our design is similar to the Adams motor, borrowing from Bedini and others too. I would be honored if you would visit it sometime, perhaps share your knowledge, maybe even learn something!  Who knows.

I would be interested to read Lee's mag currents if anyone does have a link to them, just looking at some of the pictures of his magneto/generator was quite inspiring considering when it was built.

Anyways good to meet some of the locals here, I'm in Gosford by the way. Cheers

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #16 on: September 23, 2007, 06:18:26 AM »
G'day Ren,

Welcome to the forum

Hans von Lieven

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2007, 06:32:13 AM »
I have been a fan of Edward Leedskelnin for years.  I also have copies of his papers and photos of Coral Castle taken by my parents who live a little north of there.  One thing Ifind very interesting in the reading and photos was that, he had no electricty, at least not from the grid.  People interviewed from the time period said that his castle was illuminated at night.  He devised a "wheel" using magnets and coils from cars and said that once you started it, it would produce electricty until you stopped it.  Many of you have probably seen pictures of this device.  It had a wooden handle on it to get it started.  As for moving the castle using trucks, I read an interview someone did for a book on Ed and they knew, or were related, to the truck driver.  They said that Ed asked him to pull the truck to a certain point and then come back in the morning.  When the driver returned, the truck was loaded with tons of huge coral blocks which Ed said he loaded by himself. This process was repeated until the entire castle was moved down the road about 5 miles or so.

Very facinating topic.  When I read about people like Ed, I just know that he knew, or discovered something that died with him and science does not know about today. How did he have lights if off the grid? He said that when you started the magnets, they would run forever.

Richard Hogland did some interesting tests at the site but I believe the answer lies not in the location, as Richards believes, but in the knowledge Ed had in his head.

Bill

hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #18 on: September 23, 2007, 12:34:25 PM »
Hi guys another Aussie here too. I was drawn towards this thread out of interest to Leedskalnin, Im glad I bumped into it.

@ Brian. I am currently learning/building a pulsed motor setup along with a few others in this thread here. http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3318.0/topicseen.html

Alot of our design is similar to the Adams motor, borrowing from Bedini and others too. I would be honored if you would visit it sometime, perhaps share your knowledge, maybe even learn something!  Who knows.

I would be interested to read Lee's mag currents if anyone does have a link to them, just looking at some of the pictures of his magneto/generator was quite inspiring considering when it was built.

Anyways good to meet some of the locals here, I'm in Gosford by the way. Cheers

Greetings Ren and all you other Adams experimenters.
I'm fairly busy at the moment, but when I get a few spare hours here and there, I will try to assist you with some schematics and information which may help you stop burning your halls and transistors/mosfets etc. Though I am no longer interested in Adams motors per se, I'm sure I have some info based on 10 years of experience which will at least enable you to build some highly efficient motors. I have during that time analysed one Adams motor which was showing a small degree of genuine overunity,(built by a friend of mine, and utilysing mechanical switching), but an in depth investigation into it revealed that it was a potential environmental threat. When I get the time I shall explain further.

Cheers from hoptoad

P.S I will re post this on  tha Adams thread.

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2007, 06:56:53 AM »
I hate to see this thread die out.  There must be many others out there that have some knowledge of Ed and his work. I remembered the name of the book recently written about ed....."Waiting for Agnes".  I don't recall who the autor is but heard a radio interview with him.  It appears to be well researched.  Has anyone read this yet?

Bill

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #20 on: October 07, 2007, 11:37:04 AM »
Hi Bill and All,

Though I have not read/heard of this book here is some info on it: http://www.waitingforagnes.com/
and   http://www.waitingforagnes.com/book.htm

Gyula


gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #21 on: October 07, 2007, 11:42:41 AM »
...

scotty1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
    • leedskalnin.com
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #22 on: October 07, 2007, 01:58:36 PM »
Ed was a scientist.....he wrote about science.
If just a few people realized what he was saying we could all move forward faster.
Ed's booklet MAGNETIC CURRENT is a theory of electromagnetism.
The theory is based on magnetic MONOPOLES.
Ed's theory says that magnetic fields are ALWAYS in motion.
Magnetic fields and collapsing magnetic fields have nothing to do with electrons.
All fields are made by the way the monopoles are poiniting.
We are in the monopoles like fish in water....they are THE SEA OF ENERGY IN WHICH THE EARTH FLOATS...just like Moray said.
Their numbers are limitless.
Closed magnetic circuits contain motion.
Each particle is an individual particle by itself, and both North and South pole particles.
This is what Ed was trying to say.
Scotty
Leedskalnin.com

aiks

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #23 on: October 10, 2007, 03:56:00 PM »
Hey.
I would never expect that this forum would hold a refernce to a person of a latvian nationality, considering we are a small nation. This made my day, thank you!

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2007, 01:05:28 AM »
G'day all,

I feel I have to jump in here and come to Scotty's defence.

I find Erfinder's criticism of Scotty's research unwarranted and unfair.

Ed Leedskalnin has developed a coherent theory of magnetism, which he has a legitimate right to do. Not only does he theorise but he suggests a number of experiments that he has done in order to prove his theory. He invites replication.

This is what Scotty is doing. Scotty has built a number of devices and is developing more in order to establish the validity of Ed's theories.

This is a perfectly legitimate and scientific approach to the subject. It is a worthwhile and laudable pursuit, resulting hopefully in the vindication or invalidation of Ed's ideas. Scotty is an honest researcher who methodically examines Ed's concepts and reports his results.

This is science in its true form. No man should be belittled for it.

Hans von Lieven

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #25 on: October 11, 2007, 01:39:48 AM »
Here is a photo of Ed's generator device which he reportidly used to generate electricity for his lights.  I read that it was built using ignition coils from old Fords.

(http://)

This guy really fascinates me.

Bill

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #26 on: October 11, 2007, 02:59:40 AM »
Alright.

What is Electricity?

Tesla had this to say in his lecture "Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Application to Methods of Artificial
Illumination", delivered before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, at Columbia College, N. Y., May 20, 1891.

Quote
What is electricity, and what is magnetism ( These questions have been asked again and again. The most able intellects have ceaselessly wrestled with the problem; still the question has not as yet been fully answered. But while we cannot even to-day state what
these singular forces are, we have made good headway towards the solution of the problem. We are now confident that electric and magnetic phenomena are attributable to ether, and we are perhaps justified in saying that the effects of static electricity
are effects of ether under strain, and those of dynamic electricity and electro-magnetism effects of ether in motion. But
this still leaves the question, as to what electricity and magnetism are, unanswered.


Later in this same lecture:

Quote
Returning to the subject, and bearing in mind that the existence of two electricities is, to say the least, highly improbable,
we must remember, that we have no evidence of electricity, nor can we hope to get it, unless gross matter is present. Electricity,
therefore, cannot be called "ether" in the broad sense of the term; but nothing would seem to stand in the way of calling electricity
ether associated with matter, or bound ether; or, in other words, that the so-called static charge of the molecule is ether associated
in some way with the molecule. Looking at it in that light, we would be justified in saying, that electricity is concerned in all
molecular actions.


And this later in the same lecture:
Quote
The spinning of the molecules and their ether sets up the ether tensions or electrostatic strains; the equalization of ether tensions sets up ether motions or electric currents, and the orbital movements produce the effects of electro and permanent magnetism. About fifteen years ago, Prof. Rowland demonstrated a most interesting and important fact, namely, that a static charge carried around produces the effects of an electric current. Leaving out of consideration the precise nature of the mechanism, which produces the attraction and repulsion of currents, and conceiving the electrostatically charged molecules in motion, this experimental fact gives us a fair idea of magnetism. We can conceive lines
or tubes of force which physically exist, being formed of rows of directed moving molecules; we can see that these lines must be closed, that they must tend to shorten and expand, etc. It likewise explains in a reasonable way, the most puzzling phenomenon uf all, permanent magnetism, and, in general, has all the beauties of the Ampere theory without possessing the vital defect of the same, namely, the assumption of molecular currents. Without enlarging further upon the subject, I would say, that I look upon all electrostatic, current and magnetic phenomena as being due to electrostatic molecular forces.  



P.S. 

Seen Jon DePew's site? http://www.coralcastlecode.com/id1.html

His "EQUILIBRIUS GRID" is interesting: http://www.coralcastlecode.com/id28.html

esaruoho

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
    • Lackluster / Esa Juhani Ruoho - melodic electronic music
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #27 on: October 15, 2007, 08:42:26 PM »
(3)  Tesla teaches how electricity moves, but not what it is.  Only one has been successful at explaining what electricity is, and his name is never mentioned.  Tesla teaches that there is only one type of electricity! 

Walter Russell?

Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #28 on: October 16, 2007, 06:13:27 PM »
Latvians?  Being a fan (and certified expert) of mikrotik... I can say that alot of good things come out of Latvia. :)

I'd like to post the content of Ed's booklet... and start a serious thread about it.  I don't think I'll do it here for all the greetings... and all the personal arguments taking place here.  :)
But I thought I'd post here to let everyone watching this thread know to look for it.

Should we include aether in the new thread??  Does the current of monopoles that Ed spoke of constitute Aether... or - at least - was he talking about what some call Aether?

There was a recent experiment at a university somewhere that confirmed the existance of Aether.  It was a duplicate of the original experiment that "proved" there was no aether (100 years ago?) - but this time they measured it right.  If anyone has a link to that info... I would like to include it in the first post to preempt all the brainwashed engineers.

Cheers!!

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: Leedskalnin
« Reply #29 on: October 16, 2007, 08:36:55 PM »
G'day Elvis and all,

The original experiment you are talking about is the famous Michelson Morley experiment from 1887

You will find it here  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson-Morley_experiment 

Since then the experiment has been repeated on a number of occasions with increased sophistication and the results still stand.

There have been a number of claims by ether theorists that the experiment is invalid, one such claim is here:

http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/faq/Michelson-Morley.html 

To my knowledge there has been no reputable refutation of the result or the construction of the interferometer ( the instrument used in the experiment ). The doubters are mostly people on the scientific fringe.

Hans von Lieven