The question has always been on my mind that why did Stan use tubes in his WFC.
You see, if there was just the capacitive seperation he wanted, typical flat panels would
have been much simpler to make.

I don't think it was simply for aesthetic reasons either.
What do you think?

Hey Ahura,
In most cases i have seen it is thought he used tubes for harmonic reasons. No-one really knows the reason why he used tubes people speculate and throw around their ideas like they do know but for all we or anyone else knows its because he liked the look of them or it might of been that tubes were cheaper at the time or any number of reasons. until someone actually figures it out and doesn't get shut down by the powers that be before they can release replicatable plans we are all on a level playing field as to why. Personally i think that it was a varible control thing. Its easier to test one tube doing work and then simply replicate more tubes to get more results. as with plates you start to get more reactions happening with the more plates you have. But thats my opinion.

Urgent

I found that using a PWM circuit can also produce the HHO gas. In the PWM circuit, there have integrator circuit. May anyone or who knows can tell me the purpose of integrator in this circuit.

thanks

QUESTION:

How do you subject water to 1 or 2 KV without taking pulling huge current?

Again I think Meyer was using high voltages in the WFC.

Interesting concept. I never considered it this way but still, both tubes can not be at same potential.

HMMM..

Mr Dankie

You are getting there ,Very almost nice ,However Loner is a MONSTER in the  free energy world
A true humanitarian, perhaps he should visit mouserebellion.com  where true humanitarians are getting it done

Chet

Loner

I apologize for seeming to put you in the limelight, or on the spot ,however bud, you are at the top of the class in the O U community.please pay a visit to the http://mouserebellion.com/

Chet

lol... And dankie can provide you with a great portion of his magical wire for just 4 easy payments... PFFT
I am sure that there is out there a lot of people with more knowledge on this topic than others but there are people in this forum (and other forums) that are acting like a teacher in a class with a book with all the answers in their hands. IF YOU HAVE A WORKING MODEL THAT HAS SO MUCH OUTPUT THEN PUT YOUR PLANS UP FOR ALL TO SEE... not everyone wants a perfected model. Just one that has even good gains and repeatable outcomes. I urge everyone, especially since this forums has so many members, to take any advise good/bad from people here with a pinch of salt and on a french fry unless they can give you something substantial like video evidence that explains what you want to do on something they have completed... sick and tired of people claiming others are so close with no postings or anything to do with proving they know what they are talking about... and about the inner tube on a "spring" you would need some sort of brace/guide to make sure that the tubes didn't short circut (unless that is desired). which would cause friction which would (by some of the laws of physics) would waste energy on friction. if that is your idea excellent can't wait to see how you overcome the energy wasted on friction or wear and tear.