The problem is this:
I understood your errors from a physical point of view. The others our friends, most of them, don't understand this!!!

Where do you see errors in my posting ?
What you are saying about power, and measuring it with a resistor, is absolutely correct.

What i said: even when there is a voltage, but no power to measure in the sand, it would be interesting, if this voltage only occurs after putting the sand into the pyramid for several hours. Of course you can measure voltages everywhere with a high-impedance voltmeter, but if you can measure a voltage after 'pyramid treatment' which is significantly higher than the voltage without this treatment, then i would also consider this as remarkable.

@skywatcher
That's correct now! Maybe it was only my misunderstanding asI'm not an English speaker!
Apologizes,
Tigrotto

That's correct now! Maybe it was only my misunderstanding asI'm not an English speaker!
Apologizes,
Tigrotto

Ok. That's a problem for most of us who are not native speakers of English. But your English is much better than my Italian. 

Today i finished building my pyramid frame. Infos about it will follow in the other thread.

If I remove the electrodes and I insert the probes of the voltmeter,DIRECTLY in the wet sand exposed to the pyramid,I got voltage.This phenomenon  resemble piezoelectricty,but I'm not sure,because I havent take measurements with the same sand -not- wetted.In these experiments .If I use sand not exposed to the energy of the pyramid,I get pratically NOTHING,no voltage, in every mentioned cases.
---------
---------
Now I ask to people that have the possibility to repeat the experiment
Regards,
Cyrano

Hi Pegasus,
I am here to keep me from  impatiently fiddling with the probes on my meter . I am doing only controls right now and I do not have a good pyramid yet. I am only doing the part with the salt water in the sand in the glass jar. Here are some results:

If I stick the probes directly into the
dry sand   0.000v
5% salt water  0.005v
graphite pencils as rods shorted 0.00v   
all as expected OK

now, I wetted the sand with the salt water. at first the reading was 0.001 then I noticed that it changed while I was holding the probes. So, I stuck the probes into the damp sand and as I have been watching and waiting for about 45 minutes the voltage has risen continuously and now the voltage reads 0.090v I am not even sure it is slowing down.

I suppose it could be that I am slowly shorting my meter and the battery which the meter uses as a reference is slowly draining. 

but no up and down motion - just steadily going up.

I will continue to report. Maybe I will make a foam pyramid today while I wait.

jeanna

@Jeanna.
Its not clear to me if you have exposed the sand to the center of the pyramid.By the way if you get raising voltage  during the trethment,is is a good sign.I have measured my voltage after removing the pyramid and I have noticed the capacitor discharge effect.Not doing the exposition on my sand it doesn manifest any effect.Completely inert.I think that if we get differnt results,is becuase we dont use the same source of materials as starting base,so we can get a lot of different varations.even with differnt pyramids,different locations,etc.etc..
If you have the possibility,try to put into the wetted sand a sheet of aluminium and one of copper,and measure the output,and compare with a test control outside the pyramid.There was rumors in the past about the strange effects of these two metals subjected to the energy of the pyramid..Maybe is true.   

@All
 I counsil to everyone to finish their pyramids and show the pics to Thomas.There is the possibilty that he will send the new instructions only to builders.If you got the instruction dont post it here or elsewere without his permission,because there is the possibility that Thomas will leave us,and without his help we will are not able to finish our work,even with every details.


Regards,
Cyrano.

See this link;another strange device......

http://totalism.50megs.com/7_text.htm

Pyramid frame completed today.I have used angle-iron throughout-30x30x5mm. TT says that the vital dimensions are those of the inside surface of the plasterboard skin, and I have stuck to that as closely as possible. Hopefully buying gypsum board tomorrow. One thing that keeps coming back to me is TTs words about building a larger pyramid, and about having problems with static electricity. Could staticHope to complete the job by Sunday, work permitting. be an important part of the whole thing? My basic plan is to complete my duplication, and if it does not work , I have a lot of experiments to try. One idea is to "prime" the converter with a charge of high voltage static. Another is to investigate the cavity of the completed pyramid with a simple electroscope[google it] Not long now to copletion, work permitting.

Can anyone tell me the origin of "Skizze 2". Was it drawn by or for TT? The reason i ask, is that it shows the 2 coils covering nearly the whole of the vertical side-pieces of the copper frame. If we now refer back to the photo of the converter shown on page 1 of this topic, [I know this is not the v6] the coil is wound closely[adjacent turns touching.] So again we have conflicting info. Spacing of turns may be important because it effects the inductance of the coil. If the coil is to be close wound, its hight will be about 9x2,5=22.5mm. so there is the question, how high up the copper tube to place the coil. {My guess would be down the bottom where the wet sand meets the dry sand, in other words, the coil would enclose the botton of each graphite rod.] We have had people complaining about people being unable to follow plans, but this is just one example of ambiguous information. The moral is , if is does not work, there is always something else to try. A photo of v6 would have answered many quesyions.