Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: PLEASE PUT WORKING CIRCUITS only HERE (for everybody please give a share)  (Read 71650 times)

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Science has its own requirements and it supersedes technology. Science is the important avenue. Technology is secondary. Give me scientific proof for OU and don't worry how it's gonna be applied. It will without a doubt. Oh, and, as a matter of fact, the power level in the effect I'm showing isn't that low even as is.

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Science has its own requirements and it supersedes technology. Science is the important avenue. Technology is secondary. Give me scientific proof for OU and don't worry how it's gonna be applied. It will without a doubt. Oh, and, as a matter of fact, the power level in the effect I'm showing isn't that low even as is.

I'm sorry but I disagree with you on that. Who cares what science says. If I can run my house off the grid with new technology, why would I care what science has to say about it. If I have to wait for the scientist to come up with something, I'll be waiting a very long time.

You give scientist to much credit. They live in a little bubble. If OU is discovered, it will probably come from some new type of energy conversion. It won't fit in their little formulas so it won't be accepted. They are the most closed minded people of all.

So, what is the gain of your circuit. How many volts in and how many out. I am asking for the actual real numbers not the simulated ones.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
So, you're asking how many volts in and how many volts out and you think by knowing that you would know if it's OU. How pathetic is that. And, you have the nerve to go after people in this forum.

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
So, you're asking how many volts in and how many volts out and you think by knowing that you would know if it's OU. How pathetic is that. And, you have the nerve to go after people in this forum.

Oh yeah, sorry, I meant watts. Even the smartest of us make mistakes once in a while. I'm not "going after" people. Why do you say this? I'm just asking questions?

So, what is the Wattage/Power in to out?


Peculian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Hi all.
Wow guys  :( .
Sorry to interrupt you, but please let`s stay On-Topic discussion !
The thread title says: PLEASE PUT WORKING CIRCUITS only HERE
so please let`s do just that.This is the only way we can go faster to our ultimate goal
achieving free endless energy for everyone.

I for myself am trying some Bedini stuff-like but to the moment not good results.
But, I will keep trying it and why not other people`s stuff if it has some basic proof
of working prototypes.Anyway.

Guylasun ,thank you for your reply.We need people like you in this forum.
You have done a great deal of experimenting as far as I am concerned.
I kept reading posts in this particular forum for years now,so I know some details ;)

Happy researching people!

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Those posts were 3 months ago. Since then Omni hasn't been around. Don't know if he was banned or just left. Either way is fine.

As far as I'm concerned this is a dead thread. You see, the person who started the thread that is called "PLEASE PUT WORKING CIRCUITS only HERE (for everybody pleas give a share)" Has a working circuit and refuses to share it. Nice guy.

z.monkey

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
    • Scientilosopher's Domain
Science, its what's for dinner...

This whole overunity thing is quite repugnant to me.  In an electrical or electromechanical device you are going to have resistive and frictional losses, and the output is going to be somewhat less than the input.  Even if the thing is built with the finest magnets and superconductors the efficiency is going to be less than 100% of the input.  Even the most finely crafted devices are only going to approach 97% efficiency...

The "overunity" effect you are looking for is caused by an external system coupling to an energy converter.  In the case of an alternator, which might have a moderate efficiency of 70% to 80%, ran by a gasoline generator, more like 45% efficiency, we can see there is no "overunity" there.  But if you couple the alternator to the wind using a turbine, then the alternator is the same efficiency, but the energy source is immeasurable, and free.  It costs nothing to spin the alternator with the wind, and the power generated by the alternator is free from fuel cost.  Are we breaking the laws of physics here?  No, the alternator has the same efficiency, but there is no fuel cost.  You could approximate the cost of the wind but attaching a propeller to the gasoline engine, and point it at the wind generator.  This is where it gets confusing.  Is a wind powered alternator overunity?  No.  Is it free energy?  No.  There is a cost associated with building, or buying the alternator and the turbine, and all the associated stuff, but it is cheap, and becomes cheaper the more you use it...

So, a working "overunity" electrical circuit, to put here, nope ain't got it.  I can show you dozens of circuits that simulate "overunity" but they are all coupled to an external energy system.  Moray's Radiant Energy Receiver, Tesla's Cosmic Energy Receiver, Radio Frequency Energy Receivers, and Electrinium are all receiving and downconverting the Sun's electromagnetic fields.  This is the common misconception, that energy can be created from nothingness.  I tell you it can, but it takes a Star to do it.  The electrical contraptions that claim "overunity" are merely riding on the coattails of a Star.  Sol is really the "Star" of the show.  The funny thing is we really don't know the electromechanics of how this works, yet.  There are the astrophysicists that say this, and the quantum physicists that that, and the spiritual people say different things, but the bottom line is that the only true energy source in this star system, is the Star, Sol...

Sol is the closest thing to a God that we can perceive.  The true nature, and physics of a star are still a mystery to us.  Some theories say that the core of a star is a fissure, a crack in heaven, and the energy, the brilliance of the higher planes of existence is shining through to the physical plane.  The star generates an energetic field which sets matter in motion, creates electromagnetic, and gravity phenomena.  Sol creates matter through accretion, animates matter, and makes life possible in an otherwise void space.  Sol is the reason we are here and can bicker about what "overunity" is.  He is also the source of "overunity"...

Someday we will refine a device that can directly downconvert Sol's electromagnetic radiation into electric current with a material analogous to Electrinium.  But, even then, it will still not be overunity.  The power provided to the device will still be more than the power coming out of the device, although it may be more than 99% efficient, and totally clean.  It doesn't need to be overunity, just free and clean, and in sufficient current to supply our needs.

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Those posts were 3 months ago. Since then Omni hasn't been around. Don't know if he was banned or just left. Either way is fine.

As far as I'm concerned this is a dead thread. You see, the person who started the thread that is called "PLEASE PUT WORKING CIRCUITS only HERE (for everybody pleas give a share)" Has a working circuit and refuses to share it. Nice guy.

Soooo what do you expect after insulting me a lot!!!!!  ;D
the problem in every threads are people like you, sorry but that is the thruth.  ;)

and as of now we don't need this thread anymore cause there are already working circuits in the other threads so its not VIP anymore, its now up to you to do it  ;)

so long MR. magnifico  :D

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
To everyone

A real working circuit is just a matter of efficiency.

making a ringing effect inside the two caps prohibiting a discharging action from the source, and as it is ringing then a magnification is being done at the other coil.  ;)

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
@ z.monkey, stars are the source for electromagnetic radiation, this is our visible world, but what about invisible source, non conventional source.
Does the fact you don't see (we cannot mesure with our current apparatus) this source, is indeniable proof they don't exist ?

And about solar and wind: they are not FE but conventional and they are not cheap at all, they have high cost of service and maintenance, and they aren't clean at all (you need some energy manufacturate them especially solar panel with silicium and the pollution to manucfacture them...)
Windmill can not survive without gouvernement subvention and tax exemption...

A good exemple of FE will be trafos (transformer), why when you put a load the secondary induce a CMMF to the primary ? Why they are wasting in this kind ? CEMF is energy also, but energy out phase of input (action --> reaction) so it's possible to have a "reactionless" trafo ? Not with conventional design, but what about Heins effect and Tesla/Gabriel effect ?

For me CEMF can be recycled and not wasting into primary anymore...
Just my 2 cents...

z.monkey

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
    • Scientilosopher's Domain
@ z.monkey, stars are the source for electromagnetic radiation, this is our visible world, but what about invisible source, non conventional source.
You are making an assumption that Sol only emits visible light...
Sol generates the whole spectrum up to cosmic rays.
He is the source of the invisible and "non-conventional"1 radiation as well...

1I don't know what that is...

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Sorry I have made an error about visible or invisible world, when I speak about "Visible world" I speak all EM spectrum of course, and I speak about invisible world, I speak about time, gravity, dark matter, and other stuff like that...

When I mean non convetional, I speak about for exemple time, what is time, time is energy, AC power inductance and caps involve time in their equation, and even energy istelf, if you know inductance formula you see time stuff in the formula, and gravity, according is our current theory gravity is in relation with matter and mass, but what it's true nature of gravity can we make ernergy with it ?

When I speak about "non conventional source" is all about that, for me it's weird.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2011, 03:26:50 PM by SchubertReijiMaigo »

z.monkey

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
    • Scientilosopher's Domain
Man, weird indeed.  This is where everything, science, spirit, reality blends together.  Sol sets up a matrix which creates our reality.  All things are made from this matrix, including what you call invisible.  It stretches beyond what we call the EM spectrum.  Sol's emission frequencies reach up to what we call cosmic rays, so at those extreme frequencies we have extremely small particles, what you might call ether particles, the canvas upon which the universe is painted.  All other things that manifest are made from harmonics of that base frequency of the smallest particles.  They bond together and form larger particles, and their frequency lowers, eventually becoming large enough to be photons, then electrons, then atoms, and molecules, and eventually form dirt.  I am a dirt puppet.  Built from dust that was built from molecules, that was build from atoms, that was built from electrons, that were built from photons, that were built from ether particles.  As the atoms grow the form the whole elemental table, which includes stuff we don't know about yet, like dark matter.  The ultra heavy elements that could only form at the center of a star with exponential gravitational forces.

Time is a function of mass, directly proportional.  A very small mass, like a photon, has a very small time constant, while a very large mass, like the moon, has a large time constant.  Gravity is more like electrostatic attraction, rather than some mystery force, which is also directly proportional to mass.  The photon has a very low gravity, while the moon has a relatively large gravity.  So, probably I would say that both time and gravity are phenomena that describe mass relative to its energy level.

Its too early to be so philosophical.  Needz more coffee...

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Thank you for responce, it's seems in effect it's more metaphysical than physical or science stuff, one thing is sure: the universe have again many secrets that must be discovered !!!

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
The secret is one : why it is so hard to build a working device when I have plenty of ideas ?  ;D
See... - I can see it working in my mind but cannot make one...  how to break that barrier ?