I've been trying to design a motor that emulates the motion of an electron or the motion of the planets in orbit. I think this is one of the keys for over unity.

The way I currently understand this, and my understanding may not be correct, is the angular momentum (orbital momentum) of the electron or planets pull on the spin of the electrons or planets. This pulling creates a torque or force. This torque causes the electrons or planets spin to under go opposition which causes Lenz's law. The electron or planets spin will thus slow down until it is in balance with the orbital momentum. At this moment the electron or planets are in a perpetual state of motion in regards to their spin path and orbital path but they no longer have any torque or force. This causes space-time to be curved and is know to us as gravity.

When you slow down the orbital path or increase the spin, then this will allow you to reach a farther orbit. In a farther orbit your spin will be faster but your orbital path will be slower or longer. As long as you keep slowing down the orbital path or increasing the spin you will overcome gravity. Once you overcome gravity your spin will be fast and be following a straight path. Since you no longer have an orbital path, then you no longer have an opposition force pulling on your spin. At this point you can increase your spin and move faster in a straight path with no opposition force and Lenz's law does not apply.

This means relativity is wrong about faster than light speed travel. We overcome gravity all the time with our motors when we put a load on them that completely stops the motor. We don't obtain the anti-gravity affect because our motors always have a orbital path that is built into it that is always in opposition to the spin path or current and we don't utilize the orbital path. This means the orbital momentum and the spin momentum are in balance with each other with no torque or force. Now create a motor that has a straight path without the orbital design or create an orbital design that puts its orbital momentum into the current or spin of the electrons and we'll have free energy and anti-gravity.

I understand the principal of motors and other stuff, but when it comes to the designs, I am totally lost. I have ideas on how we can create an anti-gravity motor, but my designs will more than likely not be right and probably to the point that it is laughable.

Anyone following me on this and does this spark any ideas on creating an anti-gravity motor?

Hi,

you both guys should really take a look at pequaide's thread  here:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1995.new;topicseen#new

its sunken, but he is very much into exact this.

hope, it helps.
sushimoto

@broli:

It is no coincidence because we have the same understanding of the forces involved. Although our understanding of these forces are coming from a different path, they both are leading us to the same path.

I'll try to do some animation for visualizing but this will take me sometime since I have no abilities in animation or drawing. I will work on trying to draw an illustration in your mind first.

Hopefully someone else will be able to help in explaining this visually.


Edit:  The planets tilting on their axis shows these opposition forces to be present with no net force.

wonderful thing about that type of motor design, orbital design, we have 3 built, you get a linear power curve, a 1 to 1 input output ratio.
patent # 6239524 & 6707190
and yes, this is the key to OU, as I have been saying for 13 months on here.
Cameron

Congratulations on your motors and patent. You have put yourself into the Cabal and elitist category of the powers to be, until you offer full disclosure. Also, the elitists don't care about your patents because they already have this technology.  Thanks for helping suppress the rest of society because of your greed.

Either way, we (the suppressed) will bring this information out, with or without you. Patents don't mean nothing. Change a few things on the original design, then the patent is no longer valid for the modified design. Oh, and you can't patent an idea.

What side are you on?

String theory and parabolic motion around the gate, I understand , our planets circle the sun, why dont they lock up at the magnetic gate?  How do they get past it and keep going? Thats what i wanna know.

We simply want to develop the technology we believe we have stumbled into, prove it, (proof of concept) than allow any and all manufacturers, builders, whomever to make the products.

The above is what I'm talking about not being able to patent an idea. You haven't been able to prove it yet. You are here for us to prove it for you so then you can claim patent infringement after this technology has been distributed. You're previous post said you have built 3 of these motors. Is that not proof of concept? What are you waiting for?

You don't have all the information for this device yet or don't have all the funding to bring it to proof of concept or to the market. As far as I'm concerned your patents are invalid and will always remain invalid, unless you can get this to market before anyone else. I mean you no disrespect. I understand what you're doing. As far as your investors are concerned, let them invest in the companies that will be building these open-sourced motors. There are more than one way to make money where all can benefit and not just a select few.

I'm not upset with you. You and your investors are truly in a pickle. There are advantages and disadvantages to both patenting or to open-sourcing. This has been discussed many times. There is no need in repeating this discussion.

I just hope we're all on the same side regardless of the decision you and your investors decide to make. I believe you have good intentions. The bottom line is I don't really care who brings this to the market. I don't care if it is patented or open-sourced. All I care about is it being released to the public.

May you be blessed.

A simplified view of gravity is nothing more than 2 momentum forces pulling or in opposition to each other. When you throw a ball into the air going 70 mph, the earth's momentum (speed) is faster than the ball and catches up to the ball. After the ball has lost it's momentum (relative to the earth) due to the earth catching up to it, then it starts to fall towards the earth. Now the ball is no longer in opposition with the earth and the 2 objects will accelerate towards each other (relatively speaking). Einstein even said, "if acceleration feels like gravity, then they may be the same" (I didn't look the exact quote up). We have been bamboozled and hoodwinked for long enough.


Edit:  @cameron - Keep up the good work.

 

You have it the chase is on ...

If you defy gravity you achieve overunity ...
Technically it may take a massive amount of energy to defy gravity in which case OU would be possible but in order to create the conditions for OU it will cost energy...
It is not an easy task this overunity ...

Magnetic Flux seems to play a role in gravity and spin seems to play a role.

Simple observation :

Put something on a round surface eg. a ball and spin it ... What happens the object is flung off...

Now if you take a full glass of water and you make a long spin you will notice you can spin it upside down without the water falling out...

Now take that same glass of water and try to spin it without closing your hand you will have to spin it that much faster because not only do you have to keep the water in your cup but you need enough force to keep your cup stuck to your hand...

Its almost as all the rest of the planets act as hands easing the burden of keeping the people in the container we call earth.

Without the earths atmosphere I assume that we would all be flung off the face of  the earth but then again you look at the moon walks... And there is a degree of gravity there as well...

I don't believe that anyone understands gravity they just know it is there but the full working of gravity is without understanding otherwise we would be manipulating it without problem.

The rest is just assumption!

EDIT:
Anyone know what would happen if you took a ball and encased it in clear plastic then pressurized the air inside of the plastic and placed an object on its surface and spun it if the object would fly off just as quickly?

I dunno this is a very profound topic I commend someone for being ballsy enough to start this thing up.