Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.
 Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here: https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3191457 times)

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5031
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8805 on: May 28, 2021, 11:55:02 AM »

I showed as example the 10 meters coil to 10x 1 meter coils cut and the EE calculation and use "problem" .

We would be stupid to do such an act,complicating the voltage and current stream !

But : there are two types of connection and array construction ,a . serial b. parallel  Voltage-amplifying          Amperage-amplifying

V-         diminuation        A-           diminuation

to the third : serial and parallel

An 1,2,.... 10,(and more) parallel coil/-s connection idea

decription in european language

conditioning :

[0004]

If the voltage is stable, the parallel resistance can increase the current without increasing the voltage. Since the electric power is current x voltage, the electric power can also be increased. Is a device that can easily increase power by n times, which saves input power in terms of cost.

https://brilliant.org/wiki/ohms-law-microscopic-interpretation/#:~:text=Microscopically%2C%20Ohm's%20law%20is%20a,J%20%E2%83%97%20%3D%20%CF%83%20E%20%E2%83%97%20.&text=In%20the%20above%20equation%2C%20%CF%83,current%20density%20at%20a%20point.

Ohm related Mho,  1/resistance or 1/Ohm =  SIEMENS  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siemens_(unit)

Amplifying or diminuation of EMF,clearer EMFF to EFF AND MFF  and counter BEFF and BMFF

light(particle)-wave-dualism(flash and thunder) :

Electric Force = V -Field = V/m

Magnetic Force =A -Field = A/m

and reciproke : B- (or negative-/counter-/.....)

classical EE-language design for physical phenomens : for example

https://www.wordsense.eu/motere/

moto I set in motion
I keep moving

motere : moto : MOTOR                  MOTORIK

differing :    https://de.pons.com/%C3%BCbersetzung/latein-deutsch/notare

NOTAR             NOTORIK  ( neuronal para-/sympathikus to solar plexus)

Annalen der Physik-language ,deutsch :  EMK and MMK   Elektro-Motorische-Kraft       Magneto-Motorische-Kraft

to EMKF and MMKF  F=Feld/Field

K=Kraft/Force and KF = Kraft-Feld/Force-Field

counter/Gegen- : GEMK and GMMK

For this all we have the stringent/strength to differ and use formulas !

and for example to know/noto that GEMK is not spoken "Gemk" but "Gegenelektromotorische Kraft"

alike to speak out : LASER the "word"-user should know that it is an abbreviation :  from L.A.S.E.R

Akronym , english       light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation

M.A.S.E.R.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maser microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation

Physician and Engineer and Technician : they should speak and write and work by same principle

1 image or 1000 words

1:1

=      1

We should ,probably, also calculate -by acceleration/amplifying- deceleration/diminuation the GRAVITATIONAL FORCE /FIELD change

electron magneton graviton

counter : LEICHT LEVE LEVITATIONAL

This all seems complicated : But from Tesla-T.T.Brown R&D stage to 2021 :

serial and parallel angstrom- thin layer cell/modul converter in multiple stack as "battery"

billions of nano-coils to nano-LCR circuits (= emitter/receptor/amplifier =receiver) per sqm layer

this in nano-small :   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMfAotrPEkI  2:20

1 circuit/cycle system = 1 particle = 1 dot to 1 quantum dot

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/quantum-dot

Quantum dots (QDs) are semiconductor nanoparticles which exhibit size and composition-dependent optical and electronic (optoelectronic) properties. QDs are ultrasmall, typically falling in the size range between 1.5 and 10.0 nm.

compared 1 human hair : https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/nano-size#:~:text=There%20are%2025%2C400%2C000%20nanometers%20in,approximately%2080%2C000%2D%20100%2C000%20nanometers%20wide

excitons-hunter/trap

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/exciton

this is called solar-cell-array or Photo-Voltaic generator and in combination with

Phono-Voltaic :

Thermionic converter

" noise-to-signal/signal-to-noise or cps or flops"  as velocity denomination

f.l.o.p.s. : Floating_Point_Operations_Per_Second

to differ from        experiment flop  or       life flop

Am I strict in my life,Leely ? Yes,pardon-me for the wrong written conversation word : " ..... reely,Leely ..." ,correct " .... really,Leely ..."!?

EE-Volt to atomic = quantum spectrum eV

« Last Edit: May 28, 2021, 02:36:36 PM by lancaIV »

#### Leely

• Full Member
• Posts: 109
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8806 on: May 28, 2021, 02:38:24 PM »
I'm meant to believe that the amplifier side is built with components from an already published diagram, of which two components (e.g. A and C) have been interchanged or replaced by false components. But I have not been told the particular published diagram.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5031
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8807 on: May 28, 2021, 03:29:09 PM »
I'm meant to believe that the amplifier side is built with components from an already published diagram, of which two components (e.g. A and C) have been interchanged or replaced by false components. But I have not been told the particular published diagram.

Are You referring #8791

Dave45 is the best!   Tito is       Love!

http://realstrannik.ru/forum/77-temy-ot-fantom/135067-tankodrom.html?start=252#259200
Electrons ... electrons ... don't bother.
Take a ferromagnetic bar with two windings, stick magnets on the sides so that the bar enters
saturation.  We feed the emf in the direction in such a way that the current creates a magnetic field opposite to the
field of magnets and core.  In this case, the primary has an inductive resistance, in which it occurs
a voltage drop, or rather voltage radiation to space.  Space responds: its voltage is already
"precipitated, trapped", induced in the secondary, a current arises.  The secondary current will create a magnetic field
codirectional with the field of magnets and core.  This means that there is no inductive resistance for the secondary current.

We send the secondary in its entirety.  Whatever the current in the secondary, for the primary, the inductive resistance as it was,
it will continue to be so.  Magnets and core - medium, voltage primary - space activator (modulator), secondary - drain.
Too simple, and therefore it does not fit in the head.  But for this to work, you need a small shamanic tambourine, you need to hit it once to "enchant" the core.

related " ..... of which two components (e.g. A and C) have been interchanged or replaced by false components ....." ?

Sincere

OCWL

#### Leely

• Full Member
• Posts: 109
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8808 on: May 29, 2021, 08:10:49 AM »
I'm meant to believe again that the device tito built was gotten from a journal, chapter two, the drawing is located at the top of the page.
Moreover, the clues tito gave, made me to find hints which other free energy researchers gave. It made me know that free energy machines are not difficult to build, you needed the right hints from the free energy author to start with.
« Last Edit: May 29, 2021, 07:50:12 PM by Leely »

#### onepower

• Hero Member
• Posts: 978
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8809 on: May 29, 2021, 08:38:12 AM »
Leely
Quote
I'm meant to believe again that the device tito built was gotten from a journal, located at the top of the page, in a particular chapter. And it was clearly written in the first page of the journal that not all drawings in the journal are correct. It seems someone who created the journal wanted people to get some free energy from it because of the way the drawings were presented differently than the way other publishers presented theirs. It seems tito presented to you drawings from other journals, not from that journal, making it difficult for you to locate the loopholes.
And again, tito used clues which are normally in free energy machines to explain the device, which he would have used hints. For example, it's like telling you, you're looking for a car that has a tire, windshield, automatic gear. All cars have tyre, or windshield, some have automatic gear. He should have told you the name of the car, the shape of the car, or even the type of engine it is running. In other words, tito doesn't want you to find the device in what he is saying.

No, the technology was gotten from Tesla, Moray, Figurea, Hendershot, Schauberger and other great minds and it all comes down to a series of basic questions...

What is energy, where is it, why is it?
What is a field, why does it exist, where does it come from?.

If you cannot answer these basic questions then you cannot understand free energy and the odds of attaining it are basically zero.

It works like this my friend, do not judge the person, there language or any other superficial artifacts but only the concept they present. As Tito claimed this is a high voltage phenomena, thus if you cannot or will not put in the effort to understand it then your out of luck. The onus is on you not people like him and if you cannot rise to the occasion then we all understand the consequences of these actions.

Regards
AC

#### Leely

• Full Member
• Posts: 109
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8810 on: May 29, 2021, 11:01:09 AM »
Based on what I have said so far, I have ascertained that tito seems to have used the earth ground and an antenna to amplify.
There is something I want to add here based on my thinking. I once read that morray used a small battery and a buzzerlike component in his device. In other words, he used a battery to start the device. He did not just collect power from antenna and earth ground to start amplifying. He may have used an earth ground and antenna to amplify. Some publications mislead us, while some publications guide us well.

#### MasterPlaster

• Hero Member
• Posts: 530
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8811 on: May 29, 2021, 12:29:53 PM »
I'm meant to believe again that the device tito built was gotten from a journal, chapter two......
Leely, What journal? do you have a link?

#### Leely

• Full Member
• Posts: 109
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8812 on: May 29, 2021, 09:12:41 PM »
Leely, What journal? do you have a link?
Well, that is no more necessary. It's howTesla showed the possibility of extracting electrons from the ground. It has to do with the diagrams of Tesla's ground and antenna.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5031
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8813 on: May 29, 2021, 10:03:45 PM »
Well, that is no more necessary. It's howTesla showed the possibility of extracting electrons from the ground. It has to do with the diagrams of Tesla's ground and antenna.

Tesla ground , ground beside terra also called tellus ( "the earth is a disc,die Erde ist eine Scheibe " )

Telluric currents   or by Tesla "dielectric currents" (radiant energy)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telluric_current

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric

dielectric current

dielectric current[‚dī·ə′lek·trik ′kər·ənt]
(electricity)
The current flowing at any instant through a surface of a dielectric that is located in a changing electric field.

McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E, Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

https://archive.org/details/19470514DerMagnetischeStromUraniavortrag  Prof. Dr. Felix Ehrenhaft

Member Wesley calls it Zenneck wave/TM with Schumann Resonanz amplitude ,the Telluric current spectrum

It sometimes happens, even in science, that one man can be right against the world. ? ? ? was that man.

It is ironic that among the hundreds of thousands of young radio engineers whose commonplaces of theory rest on what ? ? ?  fought for bitterly and alone only a handful realize that the battle ever happened...
It was he who insisted, against the stormy protests of every recognized authority, that what we now call radio was worked by "continuous waves" of the kind discovered by Hertz, sent through the ether by the transmitting station as light waves are sent out by a flame.
Marconi and others insisted, instead, that what was happening was the so-called "whiplash effect"...
It is probably not too much to say that the progress of radio was retarded a decade by this error...
The whiplash theory faded gradually out of men's minds and was replaced by the continuous wave one with all too little credit to the man who had been right...

for                ? ? ?

a.  fill in : Nicola Tesla                          b. fill in : Professor Reginald Fessenden

We could fill in both ,but this we find here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reginald_Fessenden

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5031
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8814 on: May 30, 2021, 02:05:48 AM »
Based on what I have said so far, I have ascertained that tito seems to have used the earth ground and an antenna to amplify.
There is something I want to add here based on my thinking. I once read that morray used a small battery and a buzzerlike component in his device. In other words, he used a battery to start the device. He did not just collect power from antenna and earth ground to start amplifying. He may have used an earth ground and antenna to amplify. Some publications mislead us, while some publications guide us well.

https://www.britannica.com/technology/electric-generator/Permanent-magnet-generators

An induction generator cannot normally provide an independent electrical power source because it does not contain a source of its own magnetic field.
Stand-alone induction generators can, however, operate with the aid of appropriate loading capacitors.

Induction generators are frequently preferred over synchronous generators for small hydroelectric sites because they are not subject to loss of synchronism following transient changes in the power system

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3533
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8815 on: May 31, 2021, 07:49:58 PM »
http://realstrannik.ru/forum/77-temy-ot-fantom/135067-tankodrom.html?start=252#259200
Electrons ... electrons ... don't bother.
Take a ferromagnetic bar with two windings, stick magnets on the sides so that the bar enters
saturation.  We feed the emf in the direction in such a way that the current creates a magnetic field opposite to the
field of magnets and core.  In this case, the primary has an inductive resistance, in which it occurs
a voltage drop, or rather voltage radiation to space.  Space responds: its voltage is already
"precipitated, trapped", induced in the secondary, a current arises.  The secondary current will create a magnetic field
co-directional with the field of magnets and core.  This means that there is no inductive resistance for the secondary current.
__________________________
We send the secondary in its entirety.  Whatever the current in the secondary, for the primary, the inductive resistance as it was,- it will continue to be so.  Magnets and core - medium, voltage primary - space activator (modulator), secondary - drain. Too simple, and therefore it does not fit in the head.  But for this to work, you need a small shamanic tambourine, you need to hit it once to "enchant" the core.
related " ..... of which two components (e.g. A and C) have been interchanged or replaced by false components ....." ?

What are Ferromagnetic materials?
Those substances  known as Ferromagnetic materials  which when placed in the external magnetic field are strongly magnetized in the direction of external magnetic field
Thank you lankaIV
1. Example of Ferromagnetic materials are - iron, cobalt, nickel, gadolinium, dysprosium.
https://www.phybarik.com/2020/06/what-are-ferromagnetic-materials.html
Note: article  written in  "not so good"  English

2. lankaIV's  link  of Russian Realstrannik is  from May 28.
today in May 31 this link doesn't work and  that part of conversation there was deleted .
It only tells how fast Russians  can spot Westerners paying attention  to their  writing.
_______________________________
For me the phrase is absolutely convoluted and some  of readers may assign it to  BS.
The good thing is that nonsense triggers thinkers to act.
In the world of physics phrase:
Space responds: its voltage is already
"precipitated, trapped",
is  likely an opinion of  some average Russian  car mechanic about  quantum mechanics.
- property of "space"  in unknown .
- interaction with that  "space"  is unknown.
- and form of response  of that "space" is unknown
____________________________________________
Here you have forces in ferromagnetic material.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Geometry-and-orientation-of-the-ferromagnetic-bar-on-the-Si-substrate_fig2_224143586
But interesting is that right below  of it you can see statement saying that
primary source  was  likely Russian Volodymyr Zagorodnii

I was able to establish  that  Volodymyr Zagorodnii is legitimate researcher.

Some basic information is here:
https://www.intechopen.com/books/ferromagnetic-resonance-theory-and-applications/ferromagnetic-resonance

Quote
We developed a method to analyze broad-band ferromagnetic resonance (FMR)
data for rectangular ferromagnetic bars of micron and sub-micron thicknesses.
This method allows one to determine the gyro-magnetic ratio,
the saturation magnetization, and the damping constant of the measured structures
The problem  we are facing when dealing with  information is legitimacy.
And you are my friends  in the position of  assigning given information source  to garbage  or  see value in it.

But for thinkers the biggest BS'  may become valuable trigger for thinking.
like one here:
https://www.phybarik.com/2020/06/what-are-ferromagnetic-materials.html
_________________________
What I was thinking about is not  ferrite but ferrofluid in glass capsule and windings around it in presence of the bar magnets from the both ends.?
You can see in your  own eyes the response of it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrofluid

Wesley
« Last Edit: May 31, 2021, 10:18:08 PM by stivep »

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1149
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8816 on: June 01, 2021, 02:34:41 PM »
...

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1149
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8818 on: June 01, 2021, 04:09:40 PM »
Lanca if you got got a comment on parallel RLC current amplification
post it in my thread, not here

https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3533
##### Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8819 on: June 01, 2021, 04:52:00 PM »
nix85,not disturbing Your new topic ,current amplification related,
https://control.com/textbook/ac-electricity/phasors/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_displacement
For fishing in the Moray or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator
Energy and/or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy ampification
negative energy f.e. as positron   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_materials the zT
by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resistivity_and_conductivity
by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity
and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seebeck_coefficient
and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature
all EE ,rotative or non-motive,conceptions are Maxwell/Carnot engines !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics#Fermi.E2.80.93Dirac_distribution

I don't know who you are lankaIV but I'm impressed with your work.
I do really thank you for that.
______________________
You are disorganized , You are taking to much space  for your posts,
and yes you are... you are one of the  beautiful minds,
frustrating me,  unstable, crazy , chaotic but beautiful. -who the  heck you are man?
I spoke to Chet telling him that your contribution to this forum  is in its  net value  absolutely unique in  positive  way.

_________________________________
It is sometime  difficult for me  to  identify   what you trying to  question or support or deny but in  one particular link of yours
I thought that you may try to defend  Ether, as  ever present ocean of energy with its local internal fluctuations  and that would be somehow in line with
Dirac Sea. "of particles"

Let me joke  a little here?
Quantum mechanics prefers:
-empties having some particles
-Dirac Sea where the US dollars as a sea or pile are covering you  totally in the infinite space
where one dollar  or one particle less or more  will never make any difference to you...

in the field of modern  Aesthetics,  emptiness is understood better:
-1 central figure like  President , King, Tzar and nobody alike in near space.( all others are small in background)
-1 distinct speaker in the TV studio .( all others are small in background)
-Empty room  with  one bee making sound is easily spotted.
-modern houses with hanging shelves, elevated cabinets  and empty floor that makes it look optically bigger.
-big car is big for the driver based on his empty space in it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesthetics

So when talking about Dirac Sea  replaced by Quantum Physics it is
Quantum  that wants to know  what is in that empty  space.
And because quantum Physics works perfect  in other areas - classical  physics  degradation to a branch of it
was natural consequence  of  humanity correcting  its  own practical, scientific and aesthetically pleasant  position.

______________________

Quote
Dirac sea theory treats antimatter as a hole where there is the absence of a particle rather than as a real particle. Quantum field theory (QFT),
developed in the 1930s, deals with antimatter in a way that treats antimatter as made of real particles rather than the absence of particles,
and treats a vacuum as being empty of particles rather than full of negative-energy particles like in the Dirac sea theory.
Quantum field theory has displaced the Dirac sea theory as a more popular explanation of these aspects of physics.
Both the Dirac sea theory and quantum field theory are equivalent by means of a Bogoliubov transformation,
so the Dirac sea can be viewed as an alternative formulation of quantum field theory, and is thus consistent with it.[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy
The last link is important as it  explains  also at its lower  portion a lot of  important terms:
Virtual particles
Casimir effect
Dirac sea
Quantum gravity phenomena