Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3510256 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8580 on: June 11, 2020, 02:40:50 PM »
Just few quotes..

"As the positive lines of force manifest results
through conductors, the negative currents and fields can only be
activated through non-conductors."

Contactee George Van Tassel

"The opposite terminal of the condenser being connected to ground,
which may be considered as a vast reservoir of negative electricity"

Tesla

Mark TPU only worked on one side, if flipped not.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8581 on: June 11, 2020, 05:37:48 PM »
Just few quotes..

"As the positive lines of force manifest results
through conductors, the negative currents and fields can only be
activated through non-conductors."

Contactee George Van Tassel

"The opposite terminal of the condenser being connected to ground,
which may be considered as a vast reservoir of negative electricity"

Tesla

Mark TPU only worked on one side, if flipped not.
Havnt done anything with ground since my crystal radio days.   But the quote has me thinking.  Say we have just a plate of copper and then a ground post.  If we connect a cap to the gnd and the plat, will the cap charge?  Being the ground is said to be a vast reservoir of negative,  after a bit the plate may become positive and cap no longer charges. So discharging the cap would reset the plate charge and repeat.  Will try it as I have what I need to try
Mags

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8582 on: June 11, 2020, 05:47:06 PM »
  Maybe place a small flash light incandescent light bulb on the cap, or close by it to draw a small load that can keeps the cap from fully saturating, and stopping any further charges. Or two caps and a small bulb between them, as you were saying.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8583 on: June 12, 2020, 12:28:06 AM »
Was just a thought. Ive sort of neglected the ground for some time because I couldnt envision the full use beyond a crystal set. But, if we look at a crystal set, the coils usually seem of very thin wire, so not really a good carrier of currents we would want from it. I think.  But probably a thing to do would be to have different antennas for diff freq ranges and look for some potentially strong freq that may be useful and use a spectrum analyzer using those ant. Then make an LC for that freq with stuff that could carry higher currents than what we have seen.  Just thinking

Mags 

Raycathode

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8584 on: June 12, 2020, 02:07:24 PM »
Was just a thought. Ive sort of neglected the ground for some time because I couldnt envision the full use beyond a crystal set. But, if we look at a crystal set, the coils usually seem of very thin wire, so not really a good carrier of currents we would want from it. I think.  But probably a thing to do would be to have different antennas for diff freq ranges and look for some potentially strong freq that may be useful and use a spectrum analyzer using those ant. Then make an LC for that freq with stuff that could carry higher currents than what we have seen.  Just thinking

Mags
[/quote]On the EARTH section the cable from your ground cable needs to be tuned to same length as tank coil!
you will then get a powerful amplification. I found that out as a kid when I use to listen to European radio stations as that kid
it would drive a high impedance loud speaker, it was terrific.

Raymondo

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8585 on: June 12, 2020, 03:31:01 PM »
Seeking hertzian waves is a blind alley. You ask if there is this etheric pressure, longitudinal waves from space, how come we don't detect them, what frequency all ask. Do you feel your own weight? Each nucleus of your body is resisting part of the spectrum of these vibrations that we call gravity. But there is much more than gravity. For example there is negative gravity at 1/3 higher frequency and opposite polarity (according to great Edgar Hollingshead, all my respect goes to him), there is vitality, there is magnetism, so much varieties of subtle etheric currents.

More on etheric atoms and currents. http://villesresearch.com/ether.html

There is a whole untapped world of neutral etheric currents, non hertzian apparently longitudinal waves. They seem to be pulsed DC or have a strong pulsed DC component. Frequencies don't have to be high, we know TPU worked around 5KHz and James Schwartz said he uses 5 frequencies based on Schuman resonance, probably harmonics, but he is not to be trusted, he lied about "72-73 elements" in those "neutrino rods" just so people would not understand how simple it was!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsJwRznsf4o

Those plates are bismuth and aluminum if i remember correctly and thin wire coils inbetween.

PS I corresponded with Schwartz, i first asked him really nicely to tell me how to make those rods. You probably guessed, no reply.

Then i wrote again telling him what a thief he is, then his hurt ego responded, but of course he revealed nothing.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8586 on: June 12, 2020, 04:17:00 PM »
I propose that so called cold electricity is part of the spectrum of negative gravity.

Energy from the sun comes mostly as positive neutral, nonpolarized energy, electrons if you will. How can it be both positive and neutral you ask, neutral simply denotes non hertzian waves which would show as circles on oscilloscope instead of sinewaves, but these waves can also be positive and negative, positive ones come from our male sun, and our female earth reflects back the opposite.

Positive manifest

LIGHT
HEAT
WEIGHT

Negative (reflected) manifests

DARK (as substantial as light with it's own 7 "colors" of darkness)
COLD
LEVITATION

..but upon hitting the magnetic field and top layers of the atmosphere these electrons or bubbles or neutral energy merge with similar ones and produce polarized aka hertzian waves we perceive as light and heat, but most of the energy does not get converted and part of the spectrum of that neutral energy we feel as gravity.


Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8587 on: June 13, 2020, 12:29:20 AM »
Tried an AV plug, well a couple with different size caps. Depending on the ant, of different lengths, got up to 9v.  22uf took a bit of time to charge. 1uf was much quicker and a .1uf seemed to charge almost instantly.  So could probably get more with more experimentation. But so far a small solar cell does much better.
Mags

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8588 on: June 13, 2020, 10:07:32 AM »
Kapanadze, Don Smith..

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8589 on: June 13, 2020, 12:54:35 PM »
I mentioned on some other thread how some guy in Eric Dollard's lecture from late 90s i think on youtube asked the audience to ask themselves how no flux cuts transformer secondary, yet voltage is induced.

This model with etheric smoke rings and magnetic field just an axis of the ring would explain that beautifully!

http://freenrg.info/Physics/Scalar_Vector_Pot_And_Rick_Andersen/Rick_Andersen_Ortho.html

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8590 on: June 13, 2020, 01:36:19 PM »
I mentioned on some other thread how some guy in Eric Dollard's lecture from late 90s i think on youtube asked the audience to ask themselves how no flux cuts transformer secondary, yet voltage is induced.

This model with etheric smoke rings and magnetic field just an axis of the ring would explain that beautifully!

http://freenrg.info/Physics/Scalar_Vector_Pot_And_Rick_Andersen/Rick_Andersen_Ortho.html
But happens not also here a " Magnus effect", the formation from a " death - Kalmen/ standing still - zone ?



http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3217763&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en


Furthermore, the flow velocity in the vicinity of the axis is reduced to such an extent that there can be talk of a standstill in the air, which is then also accelerated towards the wrong side. The yield of the wind energy received is correspondingly low.




this eddies or whirls to understand is very important by the effective application as  "sputting process" of solar-/thermovoltaic panels :
https://www.google.com/search?q=solar+panel+sputting&rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT797PT797&oq=solar+panel+sputting&aqs=chrome..69i57.11192j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputter_deposition

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8591 on: June 13, 2020, 02:01:11 PM »
You are not figuring in what it takes in energy to fill the cap to 40v vs 20v.  At 20v there is an amount of energy there which is 20mj for 100uf.  And 100uf at 40v is 80mj.  So are you saying it doesnt take more energy to charge the 20v cap up to 40v than it did to just charge the cap to 20v in the first place? ???
I understand what you are thinking, but it is wrong. Just like in a car audio amplifier, if the rails are +20v and -20v and the rms sine output before clipping is 14.14v, then that divided by 4ohms speaker is rms 3.535amps, then the power sent to the speaker is 49.9849w..  But if the rails are 40v + and - we calculate the same. 28.28v sine just below clipping gives us 7.07amps rms to the speaker which is 199.9396w.   

So you cant think of energy and voltage numbers as linear.  get it? ;)
Mags


https://static.weg.net/medias/downloadcenter/ha0/h5f/WEG-motors-specification-of-electric-motors-50039409-brochure-english-web.pdf


page 7 : torque = force x distance


page 11 : Effective value of voltage and current ( U and I )


 It is the value of the continuous voltage and current which generate an output corresponding to that generated by the alternated current. We can identify the effective value as: U = Umáx / 2 e I = Imáx / 2 .


 For example: If we connect a “resistance” to an AC circuit ( cos ϕ = 1 ) with Umax = 311 V and I max = 14. 14 A. the developed output power will be:


 P = 2.200 Watts = 2.2 kW


Note: usually, when referring to voltage and current, for example, 220 V or 10 A, without mentioning any other factor, we are referring to voltage or current effective values, which are normally applied.


                                                                                                       Peak and average !


                                                                              311 V x (5/7) x 14,4 A (5/7)  to  220 V x 10 A = 2200 VA

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8592 on: June 13, 2020, 08:32:02 PM »

https://static.weg.net/medias/downloadcenter/ha0/h5f/WEG-motors-specification-of-electric-motors-50039409-brochure-english-web.pdf


page 7 : torque = force x distance


page 11 : Effective value of voltage and current ( U and I )


 It is the value of the continuous voltage and current which generate an output corresponding to that generated by the alternated current. We can identify the effective value as: U = Umáx / 2 e I = Imáx / 2 .


 For example: If we connect a “resistance” to an AC circuit ( cos ϕ = 1 ) with Umax = 311 V and I max = 14. 14 A. the developed output power will be:


 P = 2.200 Watts = 2.2 kW


Note: usually, when referring to voltage and current, for example, 220 V or 10 A, without mentioning any other factor, we are referring to voltage or current effective values, which are normally applied.


                                                                                                       Peak and average !


                                                                              311 V x (5/7) x 14,4 A (5/7)  to  220 V x 10 A = 2200 VA
I get what your saying. I just didnt do the rms calc on that example. Either way it shows that energy and voltage level on a load are not a linear relationship.
Mags


lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8594 on: June 22, 2020, 02:33:27 PM »
Tito,I hope you are well !

But I have to remark : actually the use from a battery as electric source is in the 0,15-0,3 USD range ( calculating also included charger  )

This inverter feed back cycle system gives you never electricity under 25 USD-cents/KWh ,only cheaper you get this donated !

Grid-free electricity : yes ! Cheap : No !

I calculate with 75 USD/KWh storage lead battery with 300 charge cycles conventional and 750 charge cycles by pulse algorithm charging !

In the Phillipines the consumer do not pay more than 15 USD-cents/KWh,or do they ?

Nice successfull week wishing and CoVid19 beware

OCWL

p.s. : probably 2025 we get  hybrid batteries in the ≤ 5 USD-cents/KWh electric power  range comercial ,when then lithium ion batteries will be available for 0,1 USD/KWh electric power  and 100 USD/KWh electricity capaci5y  storage !