Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3510268 times)

Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8430 on: November 22, 2019, 04:49:54 AM »
Bob,  it's just a matter of dragging the short wire between the ground (upper half) and the circuit to right - grab the area closest to the circuit and move it so it's straight up thus connecting it to the circuit.   The drawing is a bit misleading in that it looks like the switch arm is already in contact with the circuit but it is not until you point it straight up.   


Interesting how it takes off very quickly to show giga volts and giga amps.   transformer appears to be a 100:1 ratio.   Looks easy enough to build but would it really start achieving high power like that?   It would certainly need some limit control or it would immediately fry everything.    ;)
Thanks e2
That was unbelievable. I thought for a second my computer was going to blow up!! LOL

What do you folks think is happening?
It looks to me like the charge from the ground is feeding back into the circuit, driving it to multiple harmonic levels.

I actually think this is directly related to the Barbosa-Leal apparatus.
Bob



Raycathode

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8431 on: November 22, 2019, 06:51:00 AM »
The circuit that's puzzling you is in complete and don't you think you might be putting too much faith into so-called computer emulation thats programer controlled.

note B is also a switch.


rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8432 on: November 22, 2019, 08:37:33 AM »
The circuit that's puzzling you is in complete and don't you think you might be putting too much faith into so-called computer emulation thats programer controlled.

note B is also a switch.

No way, I have no illusions. Firstly, the parameters of the voltage potential, shared by the simulator, are simply not real for the incarnations (capacitance, cross-section, etc.). If you wait a long time, the circuit is discharged. This suggests that there is a reason for the excitation of such a potential.

http://tinyurl.com/vlvbvk5 
Option with antenna. The software in the antenna does not have high potential. Where does the potential in the chain come from? it’s just a toy for touch. can be assumed. that the error of the algorithm, or the resonant effect.

http://tinyurl.com/yx5kabgn
In this embodiment, the circuit just explodes

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8433 on: November 22, 2019, 02:48:36 PM »
I understood why the simulator was counting cosmic results. The bug is fixed and the scheme works closer to reality. The reason was the transformation rate of 99.99% . I put 0.9 and already the scheme works closer to reality. But it is worth thinking about how you can make such a transformer to get an explosion of energy.

http://tinyurl.com/qqkpfrb


A little bit analyzed scheme, changed parameters and received here is such outcome. The transformation ratio of 0.5

http://tinyurl.com/slurvpk
http://tinyurl.com/qp8gudw

Raycathode

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8434 on: November 22, 2019, 09:59:37 PM »
I understood why the simulator was counting cosmic results. The bug is fixed and the scheme works closer to reality. The reason was the transformation rate of 99.99% . I put 0.9 and already the scheme works closer to reality. But it is worth thinking about how you can make such a transformer to get an explosion of energy.

http://tinyurl.com/qqkpfrb


A little bit analyzed scheme, changed parameters and received here is such outcome. The transformation ratio of 0.5

http://tinyurl.com/slurvpk
http://tinyurl.com/qp8gudw
Pardon my curiosity here but is this based on an aerial placed in the jet stream? err wouldn't you require some sort of metallic coated, possibly an army surplus barrage balloon of sorts for this idea, I'm not sure Tesla was thinking it this way  ;) :D ;D

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/cloud-power-clean-water-and-energy-from-clouds#/

Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8435 on: November 23, 2019, 12:01:58 PM »
I understood why the simulator was counting cosmic results. The bug is fixed and the scheme works closer to reality. The reason was the transformation rate of 99.99% . I put 0.9 and already the scheme works closer to reality. But it is worth thinking about how you can make such a transformer to get an explosion of energy.

http://tinyurl.com/qqkpfrb


A little bit analyzed scheme, changed parameters and received here is such outcome. The transformation ratio of 0.5

http://tinyurl.com/slurvpk
http://tinyurl.com/qp8gudw

That javascript "simulator" is fine when doing small experiments just to see if your idea works at all. For any "real" emulation you need something like LTSpice and proper modules. Even with LTSpice you   to do your experiment on the bench, if you are examining some anomaly. Using simulators is a good way to save on parts.

This one guy uses that javascript simulator to prove overunity and I think he just uses a bug in it. Battery or PSU is not even connected and he measures overunity.

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8436 on: November 25, 2019, 09:35:31 AM »
That javascript "simulator" is fine when doing small experiments just to see if your idea works at all. For any "real" emulation you need something like LTSpice and proper modules. Even with LTSpice you   to do your experiment on the bench, if you are examining some anomaly. Using simulators is a good way to save on parts.

This one guy uses that javascript simulator to prove overunity and I think he just uses a bug in it. Battery or PSU is not even connected and he measures overunity.

you're right, I use the simulator to test the circuits. Give the correct data for the calculation, the simulator will calculate them very close to reality.  The error was found, but not in the operation of the scheme, and the input parameters for the calculation. Efficiency = 0.9999 transmission transformer can not be. The error is fixed and the scheme works and runs logically. But we should not forget that now the question here is what you need capacitors? To bring this circuit into working form, capacitors are required capable of passing current without loss. Well, the capacitor with the antenna, probably a single element in the form of a capacitive dome. The most interesting thing is that this scheme works without a spark gap

You can restart or disconnect the antenna or ground yourself.

Atmospheric electricity has been used before, quite recently. Bloodsuckers shut for us this knowledge. Today, many researchers have come to believe that ancient churches with domes and other structures of this type, generate (or capture) atmospheric electricity. In this scheme, dispose of it in its pure form will not work but in the form of light or heat, it is even possible.
I came to the conclusion that the receiving capacitor and antenna is a single device. At once there were associations with researchers of domes of churches.

Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 564
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8437 on: November 25, 2019, 10:16:56 AM »
That drawing looks like the Markovich device , interesting !
Moray alledgedly had something similar .
Keep playing ....who knows?

densama

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8438 on: November 27, 2019, 05:46:14 AM »
hi .... where is magluvin hiding now ? ;D

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8439 on: November 27, 2019, 01:24:16 PM »
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15323
Can somebody explain me/us what Mr.Dyba means with (P1 - P2)/P1*100  ?

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8440 on: November 27, 2019, 02:36:00 PM »
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15323
Can somebody explain me/us what Mr.Dyba means with (P1 - P2)/P1*100  ?

Effects = (2W-4W)/2W × 100 = -100%  ;D

leonelogb

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8441 on: November 28, 2019, 12:34:48 AM »
Let me put a gift of thanksgiving  ;D  ;D  Tito   8)  :P

TANK TRANSFORMER

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8442 on: November 28, 2019, 07:19:34 AM »
Could you make a 3d drawing of this? Kolbacit will attempt a replication.

He will replicate anything and everything.

Like a soldier.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8443 on: November 28, 2019, 07:45:52 AM »
Intuitively it makes sense


if you keep the polarities right


The field will be larger on the secondary
Happy thanksgiving

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8444 on: November 28, 2019, 07:52:22 AM »
Ok happy thanksgiving but it will not make OU.

I bet you ummmm... My laptop?