Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3509863 times)

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8295 on: December 01, 2018, 05:04:50 PM »
The article about the DNA was posted to the website www.physics.org.  It was posted sometime in late May if I recall correctly.  The article was written by Marlowe Hood.  The study involved over 5 million gene snapshots or "DNA barcodes" taken from more than 100,000 animals.  These DNA barcodes came from the GenBank database which is managed by the US government.  The study was done by Mark Stoeckle of the Rockefeller University in New York and David Thaler of the University of Basel in Switzerland.  The website where this was posted is clearly pro evolution and is still are pushing the myth of evolution even after this study was posted there.

The prophecy about Israel clearly has a place and form.  Just because the exact time was not predicted doesn't mean it was not a true prediction.  It did come true.  No other nation has even been totally wiped out and then come back to reclaim their homeland.  NEVER!  But God's prophets said it would happen and it did.



memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8296 on: December 01, 2018, 05:48:40 PM »
“ Just because the exact time was not predicted “ NO time/date was predicted. Not even within 1,000 years. Therefore it does NOT qualify as a useful prediction.

I can ‘predict’ that ‘a great disaster will destroy part of a continent’; so what?
This is exactly how astrology works; make vague ‘predictions’.

bringdownthezog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8297 on: December 01, 2018, 07:47:03 PM »
Memoryman I need you to shut the fuck up.

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8298 on: December 01, 2018, 07:53:40 PM »
That is heartbreaking; request denied.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8299 on: December 01, 2018, 10:58:47 PM »

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8300 on: December 02, 2018, 12:37:23 PM »
“ Just because the exact time was not predicted “ NO time/date was predicted. Not even within 1,000 years. Therefore it does NOT qualify as a useful prediction.

I can ‘predict’ that ‘a great disaster will destroy part of a continent’; so what?
This is exactly how astrology works; make vague ‘predictions’.

Predicting that a natural occurrence will happen is easy.  Now predict what nation will be reborn next.  You nitpick at a Biblical prediction because it doesn't meet your criteria but I see you totally ignored the actual proven SCIENTIFIC data I presented to you.  Your claim was that people that believed the Bible weren't being SCIENTIFIC.  So explain why the DNA data supports the Bible and not the myth of evolution.



F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8301 on: December 02, 2018, 03:03:48 PM »
"It appears you are unaware of the fact that almost every field of scientific study was originally started by men and women who believed in a creator...
At that time, religious conditioning was everywhere.
It was precisely when people realized that they could understand the laws of nature without going through God, that they were able to free themselves from their religious yoke and to create scientific knowledge. Galileo was one of the pioneers, and obviously the Catholic Church which had understood the danger of losing power over people's minds, fought him.

But in any case, even scientists with a religious mind have the intelligence to leave their faith in the cloakroom when they enter the lab. This is not the case for some believers here who continually mix their religious superstitions with scientific knowledge or experiments.
Religion+science=religion, not science, and religion=nothing operational. If new ideas could emerge from religious dogma, if incantations and prayers could create technology, it would have been known long ago!

densama

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8302 on: December 02, 2018, 03:32:04 PM »
Religion should die naturally for our own good.  ;)
All of religion ... even my religion  ;D
Me .. must come back to Spirituality : personal relationship with the One Aether
its the only way .. we stop ourself crack the planet
the only road IS Luke 9:23

the MAINSTREAM ALWAYS AGAINST The Aether One till end
Matthew 5:10

why u call me nuts ... buddy ?
is my pink English .. so sexy for you  ;D
http://www.fight-4-truth.com/

we should rename this thread : ENERGY AMPLIFICATION PREDICTION

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8303 on: December 02, 2018, 04:02:23 PM »
F6FLT: well said.

"Predicting that a natural occurrence will happen is easy." Even Nostradamus was a better 'predictor' than the bible.
Any vague, open-ended 'prediction' is easy.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8304 on: December 03, 2018, 04:42:24 AM »
I have an idea...

An open ended series bifilar coil can be driven into a high level open ended resonant state, even if only connected to the driver by just one of the open ends, or by magnetic induction.

If we look at the open ended series connected bifi coil say while driven by a magnetic input, we should be content with believing that there is a charge bouncing back and forth within the series connected bifi coil at its resonant freq. compressing electrons at one end of the windings while decompressing electrons at the other end and likewise in the other direction during oscillating function of the bifi coil.   So it got me to thinking, and this will be an upcoming experiment, that with all the compressing and decompressing at the ends of the coil, that at the series connection of the bifi(open ended) that it is at this point that there would be the most current flow, back and forth, during the resonant oscillations.

So maybe if there were a very low resistance primary of a transformer that had a secondary that was heavily loaded, this loading may not disturb the bifi oscillations in the open ended bifi. (http://www.overunityresearch.com/Smileys/Alive/huh.gif) (http://www.overunityresearch.com/Smileys/Alive/wink.gif) (http://www.overunityresearch.com/Smileys/Alive/afro.gif)

As long as the series connection where we placed our load, whether it be a low ohm resistor or a heavily loaded transformer that the primary will take in as much input as it is given without damping the oscillations, then we may have something that could be very good here.

My first tests will be with resistances at the series juncture to see if there is the currents that Im thinking are there, then move on to introducing a transformer as suggested.

What do you think? (http://www.overunityresearch.com/Smileys/Alive/smiley.gif)



Mags

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8305 on: December 03, 2018, 08:08:19 PM »
Mags


Picture please :-)

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8306 on: December 05, 2018, 01:28:27 AM »
Hey Forest
On the left is say a driver coil pulsed at the resonant freq of the bifi. The 2 coils to the right are the bifi coils, open ended and the resistor is in place between the series connection of the bifi coil. The resonant freq will most likely change with whatever we put between the series connection, so the driver would have to be adjusted to compensate.  ;)   will run this test this weekend.
Mags

F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8307 on: December 05, 2018, 02:14:46 PM »
I have to disagree here.  Back when the MEG was first introduced, I talked with Bearden and members of his team as an interested replicator.  I found them quite knowledgeable and willing to discuss the device to a point, but due to patent applications at that time, certain info was not discussed.  Anyway, I proceeded to build a MEG like arrangement which did produce excess energy.
...
The measurement of these waveforms was easily handled by the PM3000 which did indicate a COP>1.
I ran many tests with this MEG variant using various loads, etc, until the secondaries finally broke down and I never felt the need to rebuild it as I had the info I was seeking.
...
Bearden acts like a guru preaching the good word of free energy. There is no surprise to have in front of his behavior, all the gurus are kind and cooperative, question of proselytism to increase their notoriety and the number of their followers.

Your MEG worked, it provided more out energy than in, indisputable measurements showed it, but after it was broken, your confidence in its operation was so high and this invention of free energy was so insignificant, that you moved on to something else... ;D ::) 

Sorry, I'm not a so naive person to the point of attaching the slightest confidence in this story of a past working MEG. We all know that it would be an extraordinary industrial revolution, motivating for everyone. And despite this fact, and that the MEG has been patented for 16 years, no operational product has ever been produced, including from Bearden himself.


partzman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8308 on: December 05, 2018, 04:20:51 PM »
Bearden acts like a guru preaching the good word of free energy. There is no surprise to have in front of his behavior, all the gurus are kind and cooperative, question of proselytism to increase their notoriety and the number of their followers.

Your MEG worked, it provided more out energy than in, indisputable measurements showed it, but after it was broken, your confidence in its operation was so high and this invention of free energy was so insignificant, that you moved on to something else... ;D ::) 

Sorry, I'm not a so naive person to the point of attaching the slightest confidence in this story of a past working MEG. We all know that it would be an extraordinary industrial revolution, motivating for everyone. And despite this fact, and that the MEG has been patented for 16 years, no operational product has ever been produced, including from Bearden himself.

Your lack of understanding comes from the fact that you did not build nor test this exact device nor have you considered it's usefulness.  So, instead of belittling me and my decision, you are certainly capable of giving just one example of how this particular design could be implemented to promote an "extraordinary industrial revolution".  If you can accomplish this, I will gladly rebuild it!

But first, one must analyze and determine the source of gain.  Is it due to parametric inductance change in the secondaries, parametric capacitance and/or resistance change in the MOVs, corona in the secondaries, complex transmission line characteristics of the secondaries, etc, or some combination of the above?  I spent many months trying to come up with the answers, so good luck.

Also, the operation of this device did not resemble Bearden's MEG nor did I ever claim it to, only the physical appearance was similar.

Pm

bringdownthezog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8309 on: December 05, 2018, 04:21:55 PM »
Bearden acts like a guru preaching the good word of free energy. There is no surprise to have in front of his behavior, all the gurus are kind and cooperative, question of proselytism to increase their notoriety and the number of their followers.

Your MEG worked, it provided more out energy than in, indisputable measurements showed it, but after it was broken, your confidence in its operation was so high and this invention of free energy was so insignificant, that you moved on to something else... ;D ::) 

Sorry, I'm not a so naive person to the point of attaching the slightest confidence in this story of a past working MEG. We all know that it would be an extraordinary industrial revolution, motivating for everyone. And despite this fact, and that the MEG has been patented for 16 years, no operational product has ever been produced, including from Bearden himself.

The MEG has been proven plenty of times. Only you have excuses and lack of understanding.