Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3509903 times)

bringdownthezog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8280 on: November 29, 2018, 11:56:15 PM »
Belief is based on evidence.
Faith does not require evidence.
Bearden et al do not supply evidence.

Bearden was about to go intro production with the MEG. But the company that produced the cores was bought out by Hewlett Packard and the facility was moved from LA to Haryana on the other side of the planet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3bVUr5nHaM


citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8281 on: November 30, 2018, 12:30:57 AM »


Over the past 10 years or so I have seen several attempts by people to build a working MEG.  None of them were successful.  And watching YouTube videos about free energy devices is just about as useful as reading comic books about your favorite action hero.  It's entertaining but totally worthless.



F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8282 on: November 30, 2018, 02:59:53 PM »
This puny F6FLT  thinks he knows energy transfer and Tesla!!!!!  The scam of the century!!!
Of course I know. All Tesla's patents concerning electricity are based on conventional electromagnetism, they are perfectly understood today and were quickly understood even in Tesla's time when it was new. His inventiveness was really great, he was a genious of invention, but everyone with an engineering background as Tesla had, understands his work.

He failed in energy transfer because beyond short distances of the order of wavelength, coupling between transmitter and receiver is not sufficient, there are also many losses in surrounding conductors such as earth, and increasing the wavelength is not mechanically possible because it involves also increasing the dimensions of the radiating elements in proportion, to keep the same efficiency. He was a much better engineer than a physicist.

Unlike Tesla, Bearden is as useless in engineering as he is in physics. His "MEG" is of a confusing stupidity, he denies the principles of field superposition in parametric configuration, and therefore, no one has ever been able to produce any MEG that works.

It's funny how many people have made Tesla their god of electricity. Unlike Tesla, who studied at the Austrian Polytechnic in Graz and passed more exams than necessary, they have not done any academic study, they understand almost nothing about electrical engineering, they believe they are facing great mysteries and secrets, and they tempt to explain them with magic thinking, such as prehistoric men who would be shown a smartphone. ::)  These guys are an insult to Tesla's memory.

partzman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8283 on: November 30, 2018, 04:27:10 PM »

Unlike Tesla, Bearden is as useless in engineering as he is in physics. His "MEG" is of a confusing stupidity, he denies the principles of field superposition in parametric configuration, and therefore, no one has ever been able to produce any MEG that works.


I have to disagree here.  Back when the MEG was first introduced, I talked with Bearden and members of his team as an interested replicator.  I found them quite knowledgeable and willing to discuss the device to a point, but due to patent applications at that time, certain info was not discussed.  Anyway, I proceeded to build a MEG like arrangement which did produce excess energy.

My device was based on a pair of AMCC-320 amorphous "C" cores, used MOV's for loads, and had a rather modest PM structure for core bias.  Removal of the PM structure did affect the gain of the device.

The secondaries were wound on the cores in a directional manner in that all layers were wound in the same direction with a single wire returning to the start position of the next layer.  This cuts the voltage stress in half between layers as compared to normal layer winding and was done to minimize breakdown in the secondaries due to the high resonant peak AC voltages.

Simultaneous input and output measurements were taken with a Voltech PM3000 3-phase power analyzer with the MEG device operating at ~30kHz.  Due to the MOV loads, the output voltage and current waveforms were highly non-linear and reactive.  The measurement of these waveforms was easily handled by the PM3000 which did indicate a COP>1.

I ran many tests with this MEG variant using various loads, etc, until the secondaries finally broke down and I never felt the need to rebuild it as I had the info I was seeking.  BTW, it was very difficult and time consuming to wind the secondaries.

Pm 


densama

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8284 on: November 30, 2018, 04:39:14 PM »
Belief is based on evidence. Faith does not require evidence.
Bearden et al do not supply evidence.

if we need an evidence ... why have faith ?
If we loose faith, the SPIKE automatically shut down

most important is following SPIKE of thought and
the SPIKE take unidirectional road straight in ...

oh ... my English ... why i get SPIKE everyday here



 

bringdownthezog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8285 on: November 30, 2018, 05:06:24 PM »
I have to disagree here.  Back when the MEG was first introduced, I talked with Bearden and members of his team as an interested replicator.  I found them quite knowledgeable and willing to discuss the device to a point, but due to patent applications at that time, certain info was not discussed.  Anyway, I proceeded to build a MEG like arrangement which did produce excess energy.

My device was based on a pair of AMCC-320 amorphous "C" cores, used MOV's for loads, and had a rather modest PM structure for core bias.  Removal of the PM structure did affect the gain of the device.

The secondaries were wound on the cores in a directional manner in that all layers were wound in the same direction with a single wire returning to the start position of the next layer.  This cuts the voltage stress in half between layers as compared to normal layer winding and was done to minimize breakdown in the secondaries due to the high resonant peak AC voltages.

Simultaneous input and output measurements were taken with a Voltech PM3000 3-phase power analyzer with the MEG device operating at ~30kHz.  Due to the MOV loads, the output voltage and current waveforms were highly non-linear and reactive.  The measurement of these waveforms was easily handled by the PM3000 which did indicate a COP>1.

I ran many tests with this MEG variant using various loads, etc, until the secondaries finally broke down and I never felt the need to rebuild it as I had the info I was seeking.  BTW, it was very difficult and time consuming to wind the secondaries.

Pm

This was in 1995ish ? My guess. The PM was opposing the flux or aligned with the flux ?

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8286 on: November 30, 2018, 05:06:45 PM »
Without evidence, faith is blind. Maybe YOU enjoy being blind; most don't. Having faith means you accept everything as presented and doing so leaves you open to use by fraudsters, conman, faith healers etc.

partzman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8287 on: November 30, 2018, 05:30:48 PM »
This was in 1995ish ? My guess. The PM was opposing the flux or aligned with the flux ?

Yes, somewhere around that time. 

Regarding the PM flux in the cores, it was both opposing and aiding the primary/secondary flux dependent on the primary drive configurations and timing.  It was also found that the majority of the PM flux did not penetrate deeply into the amorphous cores as one might think but rather remained close to the inner surface the PMs were in contact with.

Pm

bringdownthezog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8288 on: November 30, 2018, 05:32:01 PM »
Thanks Pm.

densama

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8289 on: November 30, 2018, 10:30:49 PM »
uhhhh .... Titus quote: To become different make some difference. lol  ;D

i don't have faith to make difference .... unconsciously
then i ask ... How come it's so?

Matthew 21:22
Mark 11:24

PROF: CLASS DID YOU SEE GOD?
CLASS: NO SIR!
PROF: DID YOU TOUCH IT?
CLASS: NO SIR!
PROF: SEE THERE IS NO GOD!
TEETSLA: PROF DID YOU SEE YOUR BRAIN?
PROF: NO TEETS!
TEETSLA : DID YOU TOUCH IT PROF?
PROF: NO TEETS!!
TEETSLA: SEE CLASSMATE OUR PROFESSOR DOESN'T HAVE A BRAIN  LETS GO HOME!

so simply & tricky ......  little twist from dis-belief to ......... 
hard to explain
https://patents.google.com/patent/US577670A/en
uhhhh  >:(

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8290 on: November 30, 2018, 11:07:09 PM »
Hopi prophecy. I wish it could work for us without tribulation....

densama

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8291 on: November 30, 2018, 11:50:51 PM »
Hopi prophecy. I wish it could work for us without tribulation....

don.t tell  my funny English ... forest gump :D
i get spike here ... every week
never follow me ... am i NUT ? ;)
i follow my intuit .. only

One time tesla says that voltage and current grows at the same time  IN A CERTAIN CONDITION ::)   :o   ???   :-\
Then hows that happen? >:(   :'(   :P
ok!
        Just one core as SM, hubbard deed, you really need three coils but the two are one and the secondary are included in the two and its power is  the product of the two combine coils, we can call them as the driving coils and considered three primaries and from them we can get lots of energy, we can now have many second secondaries.  8) And That is the truth!

https://overunity.com/6763/energy-amplification/1800/

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8292 on: December 01, 2018, 01:36:49 AM »
"Matthew 21:22
Mark 11:24"
Anyone quoting the bible or a similar book does so without a clue of what science is.

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8293 on: December 01, 2018, 03:35:09 PM »
MM,

It appears you are unaware of the fact that almost every field of scientific study was originally started by men and women who believed in a creator.  Their study was started because they wanted to learn more about this amazing world the creator created.  And more and more evidence shows this world was created by design and not by accident.

A recent study done on the DNA of over 100,000 animals showed that they all came into existence at almost the exact same time.  And the study also found that the DNA clearly showed genetic boundaries between the species.  There is no SCIENTIFIC evidence whatsoever that evolution happened.  The DNA also showed that the age of the animal species also was the same age as the human race.  All this study was written up in a SCIENTIFIC journal.  Of course you will not hear about any of this on the main stream media.  And this is only one of the many things recently discovered that support the Bible.

Just the fact that the nation of Israel is back in existence after almost 2000 years is proof that the Bible is true.  The old testament prophets correctly predicted over 2500 years ago that the nation of Israel would be destroyed and the people scattered all over the world.  They also predicted the nation of Israel would become a nation again with the members of the Jewish race once again coming back to the Promised Land.  And all that has happened just as the old testament prophets said it would.

You have told me over and over again I need to have an open mind.  Maybe you should try the same thing and do some research on your own instead of listening to the crap put out by the main stream media.


Respectfully,
Carroll

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8294 on: December 01, 2018, 04:14:57 PM »
"It appears you are unaware of the fact that almost every field of scientific study was originally started by men and women who believed in a creator.  Their study was started because they wanted to learn more about this amazing world the creator created.  And more and more evidence shows this world was created by design and not by accident." Doing science using the scientific method has nothing to do with a baseless belief in a creator. Scientists want to discover the TRUTH about the universe; NOT just claims of imaginary beings.

“All this study was written up in a SCIENTIFIC journal.  Of course you will not hear about any of this on the main stream media.  And this is only one of the many things recently discovered that support the Bible.” Most likely (since you did not provide a source) a pseudo-scientific CREATIONIST magazine.

A prophecy without specifics (time, place, form) is meaningless.

I am actually engaged in real science, including gravity/inertia control.