Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3509151 times)

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7995 on: September 26, 2017, 01:06:26 PM »
Dear Sir,

Since we have at least two current exciting the transformer,

one current is produced from capacitor discharge,  then where did the other current came from?

Thanks and Regards
luc2010


Maybe the other current is from charging the capacitor..  Series charging circuit and parallel discharging circuit.


Dave

luc2010

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7996 on: September 26, 2017, 02:52:16 PM »

Maybe the other current is from charging the capacitor..  Series charging circuit and parallel discharging circuit.


Dave
Hello Dave,

NO,
deos that makes any sens?

Please,
what You think about that?
One more question? Please

its possible to make high frequency using DC motor?

Thanks & Regards
luc2010

luc2010

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7997 on: October 01, 2017, 04:26:04 AM »
Hello Mr Erfinder,

i am trying to replicate tesla ozone patent.

questions? if you dont mind

1) can we use just any ordinary DC motor or it must be a brush motor, in this setup?
2) the switch ( circuit controller)? its not clear how its works?

Thanks and Regards
luc2010

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7998 on: October 03, 2017, 07:19:28 PM »
"There is a most powerful spiritual warfare going on"

Lol AGAINST oil AND national security?.I'm canning myself here

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7999 on: October 03, 2017, 08:44:56 PM »
In every Tesla patents there is a strange comment which is understood only by those skilled in art , who replicated his device. For example in ozone patent he mentioned "other usage" which is what Stanley Meyer re-used to split water.

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8000 on: October 04, 2017, 04:13:56 AM »
IF you are "replicating", then the answer to this first question is obvious.....What type of motor did Tesla demonstrate...


The primary function of "circuit controller (H)" is to discharge the cap....this is not rocket science.....study the patent.




Regards


Would this post that you made back in 2015 have any relevance to the type of motor which you suggest?


Quote
What I do not want especially in configurations which incorporate transformer action, (systems which incorporates a second stage of coils which are positioned quadrature to the motor windings) is a decrease in consumption, on the contrary, in circuits which make use of transformer action, I find an increase in consumption is desired.  In such a system, the motor field excites the second stage of coils, the transformer action augments the generator action already established in the second stage.  There have been a few demonstrations where consumption drop has been sighted as being a good thing, and while I choose not to argue with those who aim for this, it is not something that I practice nor recommend.


Is this how you are relating your coils in your motor which produces the ozone?  A quadrature coil relation?


Thanks,


Dave




forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8001 on: October 04, 2017, 08:43:27 AM »
Good point Dave. That's why I pointed to Aviso. That's exactly what he did to get 3 times voltage during the same pulse period  :P

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8002 on: October 04, 2017, 04:43:57 PM »

Am I reading into your question or are you asking me about "physical geometry"?




Regards


I am curious about the physical geometry and resultant electrical angle.  Similarly to how a three phase motor’s coils are related, neighboring coils are at an electrical angle of 120 degrees.  Tesla’s original motor had windings at an electrical angle of 90 degree apart from on another in comparison to the rotating magnet.  Is this how you are relating coils in your motor, with a 90 degree electrical angle between neighboring coils?


Thanks,


Dave

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8003 on: October 04, 2017, 06:32:04 PM »

That's what I thought.....you were asking about physical geometry....  With this in mind, and considering you asked about my motor and didn't specify which one, I must answer with no.  Now enters the question, how I can justify a discussion about phasing when there's no physical offset.....


You’ve harped about the necessity of three coils many times.  Is this how you are physically relating them, with no physical offset?  Possibly a trifilar coil which has motoring and transformer functions inherent in it’s operation? 


Dave

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8004 on: October 04, 2017, 07:44:42 PM »

You’ve harped about the necessity of three coils many times.  Is this how you are physically relating them, with no physical offset?  Possibly a trifilar coil which has motoring and transformer functions inherent in it’s operation? 


Dave

Well it could be a few ways. A bifi as the primary. Or secondary between 2 primaries like partnered coils. Tito used to say wind 3 coils but never gave and answer to how exactly nor how to use them exactly, as far as i know. I may have missed something along the way as I lost interest in the thread for the most part.

Mags

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8005 on: October 04, 2017, 07:46:02 PM »
Or trifilar and say 1 is the sec and the other 2 are series bifi. And some other configs that would have to be tried.

Mags

luc2010

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8006 on: October 05, 2017, 01:52:16 AM »
Hi,

just to recap:

i think:

dc bruch motor
3 coils
two capacitors?

well, i am not interessed on ozone product!!
but how to build an efficient motor?

thanks and regards
luc2010

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8007 on: October 05, 2017, 02:58:03 PM »
Hi Erfinder,

Would the attached photo be one way to get the proper relationship you are referring to?  The coils are trifilar with with two number 30 gauge wires for the motor drive and one 24 gauge wire for recovery of spikes and magnet passes.  The motor windings are fired 180 degrees apart to match the alternating polarity of the magnets.  Or to explain it more clearly each winding gets fired 45 degrees after the last winding since there are 8 magnets with alternating polarity.

Regards,
Carroll

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8008 on: October 06, 2017, 03:02:34 AM »

ok......does your machine fill the room with the stench of a rich blend of ozone and possibly nitrogen gas?  If not.... ask yourself to what relations I am referring, at this point it should be crystal clear that what you think I mean is not what I mean.




Regards

Hey Er.. 

Would there be coil shorting on the bifilar windings to get them "spun up" so to say as to get the voltages for ozone production?

Mags

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #8009 on: October 06, 2017, 04:17:52 AM »
@Magluvin,

Here's a video of an inductance measurement of a Tesla series bifilar coil that is spirald around a twin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP2xEKH4qdc


At 22 seconds the negative inductance exceeds the setting level and I pressed the power button too lightly in a failed attempt to turn the meter off. This resulted in a series of false readings that followed.