Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3509879 times)

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4620 on: February 26, 2014, 04:39:25 AM »
Dont stop there Googs. Double up and tripple up them repeat posts.

http://www.overunity.com/6763/energy-amplification/msg389687/#msg389687

Sometimes you just have to beat it in to us, ya know.  ;) ::) What do ya got, 10, 50 more pages to make your point? ::) From what Ive read from your posts so far, I think I get your point.  Anything more I should be aware of, or is that it? ???   There are many pages of others saying just as you have, right here in this thread already, in case you havnt read it through. Just letting you know, and I only need to say it once. Right? ;)

You mentioned Romero as being a fraud. Can you prove that statement?  ::) ;)

Mags

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4621 on: February 26, 2014, 04:55:33 AM »
Mags, that is interesting.

I worked on that exact concept of the single turn at the top of a "Tower" coil.  I went a slightly different route and I'll give you my results.  I learned (From reading a paper.) that the tesla tower, being a resonant device, has a tremendous voltage gain.  It is also a non-linear component, as in, the current IS NOT linear.  There is a much ignored possibility there, as I have posted before, that instead of tuning the peak at the top of the coil, tune it for the center.  The top will then be at 0V, which, if done correctly, could allow this component to be used in Both ways.  (Linear and Non-linear.)

A single turn could then pick up a LOT more power than what it takes to setup the standing wave, but that is where I ran into trouble and stopped playing.  (Got bored as well...)  The tuning is very touchy.  I spent a couple days just to be able to "See" the tuning on a scope by using a one wire pickup, but I was shocked to see that my body could de-tune the thing from more than 5 feet away.  As I am not into decoding Smith charts as they relate to this type of tuning, and setting up and walking away was not an option, I had to give up at that point.

The concept is sound, but it proved to be more trouble that I was willing to deal with.

I wish you all the luck.  If you could lock down the tuning for a specific load....   I'd love to see it.

Hey Loner

You always have some good input. ;)   I was thinking that my TC wasnt really tuned. I built it on a wim in a couple hours. Was a good experience with what it was.

But I have some new ideas to expand on that. ;)

Mags

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4622 on: February 26, 2014, 08:17:31 AM »
Loner, thanks. I believe it is all about radio waves.I believe in simple nature thus EMF is radio wave, but not that kind we are taught in school. Remember , there are various waves like in case of light ; you could have white warm light and a sharp polarised laser beam.

DilJalaay

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4623 on: February 26, 2014, 10:05:11 AM »
Hello All,


I got some three terminals caps from scrap.


I fond a strange thing with them, which i want to share with you.


I charged the cap(24-VDC and remove the power supply) via A and B terminals.


Then i check with my Fluke17B voltmeter, voltage across;


A,B= 24VDC.


B,C=2VDC


A,C = 18VDC which stay at 18VDC although i short them and check again it stay again at 18VDC, but found that no current while discharging  AC.


I hope somebody better explain this cap behavior.


Thanks and regards,


D.J






Lakes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4624 on: February 26, 2014, 10:52:54 AM »
Never seen a three terminal cap before.

Guessing that it's two in series?

Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4625 on: February 26, 2014, 12:58:35 PM »
Someone has already staked the finders right over any zpe devices coming in future.  ;D ;D ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB-jWfzkz_E

http://www.dipoleantigravity.blogspot.in/2013/03/finders-right.html

Contact him to buy a part of the rights.  ;D ;D ;D

Best,

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4626 on: February 26, 2014, 01:12:36 PM »
Its like beating your head against a rock  >:(

If you want to draw energy from the ambient you have to study and understand what the ambient consists of and how to pull energy from it.

OXYGEN - NITROGEN

REMOVING ELECTRONS

IONIZATION


 

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4627 on: February 26, 2014, 01:20:04 PM »
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Inorganic_Chemistry/Descriptive_Chemistry/Periodic_Table_of_the_Elements/Periodic_Properties_of_the_Elements

Electrolysis, separating pos (hydrogen) and neg (oxygen)

Ionization, separating a neg electron from a pos nucleus

starting to see the similarity's yet?

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4628 on: February 26, 2014, 01:22:21 PM »
http://randuff.blogspot.com/2011/06/trends-in-periodic-table.html

Look at radium  ;)

where it lies in the periodic table, very easy to pull an electron from - using ionization

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4629 on: February 26, 2014, 01:38:18 PM »
Lets see how can I emphasize this

IONIZATION
 
IONIZATION

IONIZATION
 
SEPARATE - COLLECT

 ;)


Im out
later
dave

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4630 on: February 26, 2014, 03:16:04 PM »
So if the earth were a coil what would happen if the magnetic field were to collapse at the moment the field was charged by the flare.

What would happen if the field were to collapse without a charged field- less energy
Use ionization to charge the field

NoMoreSlave

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4631 on: February 26, 2014, 10:44:01 PM »
Hi Dave,

by creating that ionization in a Vacuum tube or valve through a Capacitor Multi-discharge, we can get the juice from that ether!
that’s T.H Moray secret.

Thank you for sharing you point of view!
Regards,
NMS

totoalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4632 on: February 27, 2014, 12:02:22 AM »
ive read keeping the discharge in a vacuum    like stefan did in Fluoro tube...
A high discharge rate in a plasma ball melts the glass
either a busted neon lamp for the arc ?????  placed in Mag s T coil or Slayer
and put into bifi cores by Tito drawn by Gyula
Another way is the use of relays for spark gap supplied by hv from flyback ????
 8) 
 

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4633 on: February 27, 2014, 01:34:27 AM »
Something more I was thinking about today with the bifi and secondary on a rod core. I remember the reason for the rod core instead of a closed core. The closed core would not help keep the sec field from impacting the primary. But in the Utkin pdf, he shows a secondary wound on the center peg of an Ecore(closed core) and the primary wound around the outside of the core. Thinking about it, this should be better than the rod core, as virtually all of the sec field will be locked in the core, within a power range of course.

So thinking on the Utkin version, when the primary produces field, the core as a whole is magnetized as if it were just say a rod core. But then the sec field would say for example produce a NS on the peg that it is wound on and the outer pegs SN. Dunno how all that mixes yet. But the primary would influence all 3 pegs NS NS NS, and the sec would want to do otherwise.

It all reminds me of that shell transformer where the guy had the sec wound on a toroid core, then he made a iron shell, like a big doughnut, cut like a bagel and the sec/toroid was put inside the shell. Then he wound a primary around the shell in a toroid fashion.  It was on of Teslas transformer patents. 

But the Utkin ecore version seems like an easier go, to get the same result.

Ill see what I can do.

Will have to try both pulsing the bifi primary and just ac in at its resonant freq. ;)

Mags

totoalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4634 on: February 27, 2014, 02:11:56 AM »
they made some progress with tv coax cable in their coil maybe i will try this