Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3510260 times)

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4545 on: February 19, 2014, 02:52:09 AM »
OK EVERYONE GOODBYE NOW :-*


here is your bonus mind blowing: [size=78%]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgXNM9Ra0Uc[/size]

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4546 on: February 19, 2014, 03:48:53 AM »
OK EVERYONE GOODBYE NOW :-*


here is your bonus mind blowing: [size=78%]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgXNM9Ra0Uc[/size]
This is Laseraber's spoof video for APRIL FOOLS DAY  (1st APRIL in the WEST).
That's why he calls it the AFP!!!!!!

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4547 on: February 19, 2014, 04:05:27 AM »

Well, there is actually a secret way to do this and that is the challenge, do it in automatic way. :)


Using Tesla controller??

totoalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4548 on: February 19, 2014, 10:39:51 AM »

Actually you are correct, that's the power of stimulation. ;D  Baluuut  Baluut :P


http://youtu.be/oJPOjE0hSDU  Infinitum Flux Capacitor  190214   yt  bow downloading  and see after 2 hours
 
 

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4549 on: February 19, 2014, 10:42:01 AM »
I'm trying to understand the secret of electricity dual nature as told us Tito. Why books are teaching that current flow from positive to negative , that is insane but has some merit ,right ?  Hmm...Consider a charged capacitor discharging into resistive load. We have one side of capacitor filled with electrons and the other with no electrons, then we turn on the switch and bulb lights for a moment and we end up with capacitor in balance having equal amount of electrons and zero volt difference between plates.
Now I clearly see one action : each electrons is pushing the other wanting to escape the side of capacitor full of electrons, and when they finally can do that due to closed loop they go in more or less speed, creating more or less current, diminishing because as the other side become fed with electrons there opposes more and more the movement...So we see (dimishing in time) PUSH action of electrical potential difference (voltage).
To be continued...

totoalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4550 on: February 19, 2014, 10:42:35 AM »

Well, there is actually a secret way to do this and that is the challenge, do it in automatic way. :)
Minute to win it or Biggest loser challenge ??? ?? >:(
 
 
« Last Edit: February 19, 2014, 06:32:51 PM by totoalas »

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4551 on: February 20, 2014, 02:31:13 AM »
What does ionization and electrolysis have in common.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4552 on: February 20, 2014, 08:26:07 AM »
Ok,I have done simple experiment. Two identical electrolytic capacitors charged to the same voltage. I tried to discharge them in weird way by connecting only one positive terminal of first capacitor to the negative terminal of second one. Nothing changed , both were still charged. Here we proved that the electrons push action is not enough to make electric current...there must be other action involved and I think we can name it as PULL action. If I could find a way to pull electrons from negative terminal on one capacitor whne the other's negative is connected to positive of that one then the push-pull action together should move electrons from negative of the first capacitor discharging it. At least I think so. Because in my simple experiment circuit was not closed electrons on second capacitor stayed in place and there was no potential pull action to discharge them...
What we can do about that ?  Tito , is that what you thought ? Can we understand this pull action ? I hope so, because I know we are very close to completly change this world, and I pray for this change to be positive...

totoalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4553 on: February 20, 2014, 10:22:10 AM »
Try this
Charge 2 parallel 20 v caps via 12v dc source then discharge the caps in series back to source voltage  in an 800 Hz  schumann  way  ;)

totoalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4554 on: February 20, 2014, 03:44:59 PM »
Eric dollard is running his car with the reed switchy vibrator for 20 years...... if its outdated     .... please share   any schematic as simple as that
thanks 8)

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4555 on: February 20, 2014, 05:00:19 PM »
Ok,I have done simple experiment. Two identical electrolytic capacitors charged to the same voltage. I tried to discharge them in weird way by connecting only one positive terminal of first capacitor to the negative terminal of second one. Nothing changed , both were still charged. Here we proved that the electrons push action is not enough to make electric current...there must be other action involved and I think we can name it as PULL action. If I could find a way to pull electrons from negative terminal on one capacitor whne the other's negative is connected to positive of that one then the push-pull action together should move electrons from negative of the first capacitor discharging it. At least I think so. Because in my simple experiment circuit was not closed electrons on second capacitor stayed in place and there was no potential pull action to discharge them...
What we can do about that ?  Tito , is that what you thought ? Can we understand this pull action ? I hope so, because I know we are very close to completly change this world, and I pray for this change to be positive...




Benitez split the positive with a shorted transformer and an interrupter. He found that taking energy from +24 to +12 caused the + 12 side to charge up by the amount taken out of the system.
Benitez joined the l1 and l2 together of the transformer - that's what I mean by shorting the transformer.

DilJalaay

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4556 on: February 20, 2014, 06:29:20 PM »
Why replicate a system that is out of date ? And one that has a lot of missing data to make it work in a useful way ? Also the system is only compressing a current to increase the frequency to gain energy ! The modal does not explain the currant in finite terms and can become very dangerous . The rule of play should be to first ask is it safe ? And no it is not safe when you expectorate the frequency you attract unwanted amounts of radiation alpha particles static fields all of which would make you very ill if you are to close to such a device for a prolonged amount of time . Tritium particles will attack human DNA also humans emit scalar waves and will ground these particles through the body .

Please stop ! Think first and you will see that there are many ways to create the same effect without the dangers that Tesla had no idea that would exist .

Many have fallen to ill health studying these systems and is one reason they will never be a mass market technology ! Where is the Tesla museum  of dodgy technology ? There would have to be a health warning on entrance to it  ! Let me make this clear this is not 1920 and one has to see sense safety first then a complete diagram where all energies are counted and there effects not just power out .

It to me is a heap of junk a toy that has no place in modern energy production and belongs in a museum and should never be switched on to play with .

Try this formula take on coulomb of electrons at 1 volt equal to one watt than apply it  to produce 2 watts this is the first step on the free energy ladder and a safe one a quantifiable one ! Those that live without rules get lost in the woods without the full map to know where they are .

I can give you a million watts of controllable currant starting with only one amp at one volt at 1 HZ now Tesla could not do that because he had no idea what an electron was or where it came from or any idea of the quantum mechanics of alpha particles or the effects on the DNA caused by all of the technology he made . But he was not stupid enough to play with them every hour of every day or debate there design for weeks and months and years . He just new the basics of free energy and applied it to everything !

Try and except the last thing he was making was a death ray ! Now to me that's bonkers ! Are you sure you all want to follow that mind set ? Weapon systems are to be avoided and dodgy systems that do not offer a safe development curve for useful power ! First chose the amount of power you require that decide your budget than your design !

If you continue to explore high powered systems before you explore the bottom end of the scale you will get confused lost in space grow old very fast and then go nuts or just blow your self up !

Now start with the bottom run of the ladder 1 amp at 1 volt at 1 hz than begin to climb the mountain !  Some of us know what they are doing Tesla was not of this mind set he was tinkering and pulling strings you do not have to do that so stop !

I ask only that you all think again and start again but at the bottom not at the top ! 
   


Thank you.
I agree with you.
Instead of capturing the whole sea, we must start from collecting the drops.
First step start from the bottom....hmmm nice start from 1Amp 1v and 1hz sound good.


Where is the Abc's book... from where i start my lesson?


Could you please guide us?


Looking forward,


Regards,
D.J

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4557 on: February 20, 2014, 08:53:47 PM »
Attomix.  Fantastic post .
Let's see your free energy device then!

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4558 on: February 20, 2014, 10:10:48 PM »
ha ha ha ha...better concentrate on simple working Akula schematic  ;D ;D ;D  seriously a.king21

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4559 on: February 20, 2014, 10:24:37 PM »
ha ha ha ha...better concentrate on simple working Akula schematic  ;D ;D ;D  seriously a.king21
Of course I'm on to it.