Tito
How do we make "Current" Multiply?

Chet

hi chet 

That is actually the remaining secret. there are different method how to achieve this but there is always a better and safe way of course.

To make it stable we need pressure, temperature and fusion rate ok 

See the sun its not blowing but it contineuosly give of energy

Tito, wake up! You still have chance to disclose your invention in full details in an Open Source media. I am afraid, your fellow-coutryman (Ismael Aviso) is just  in his way to steal your hopes, it will be too late (for you and for the rest of the world) when he protects his rights to his inventions. There are several threads on this forum covering this. Here is the latest one: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10443.msg276131#new
and link from that thread: http://panacea-bocaf.org/ismaelaviso.htm

OK

He will not give it! promise 

The secret is simple, mark my word.

Now if in case that he gave the 1% secret then thats the time i will reveal everything, and that's a deal. 

That is if he really have it. 

Ps. I don't really care what ever he does or what ever happen.

Coz' if i reveal now then no more excitement
 
It really needs some kind of fore playing first before going into the climax.
Many people here always wants direct to the point! LOL HAhahahha!

Parental guidance needed hahahahaha!
by the way condoms are good tools to suppressed the volcanic attack

Ps. I don't really care what ever he does or what ever happen.

Now, we'll already have it, no matter if you reveal it or not. It's only a matter of time. So, I see no excitement anymore.

Hey Tito,
Gas just jumped 30 cents a gallon by me,
How much longer you think till they take away our boys [children] toys and hand them rifles?

Next Oil war Is allready up and running!

Its Time Teets..................................

Chet

Ok, so it does not matter if we discharge in series or parallel if we have enough voltage ?  Do you mean that someone could find it while building coil with mistake ?
Hmm... Can you answer questions :
1. Does it relate to geometry of single coil (pancake,bifilar,caduceus) ?
or
2. Require extra coil always ?
3. Abstracting from the coil : do you know exactly WHY it works with gain ? Is that hard to understand or simple ? Kapanadze said about ether, do you think it can be simpler expained ?
4. There is only one method and others are just variations or there are a few different sources ?
5. Is that related to cold electricity ?


I'm still wandering in the forest  but finally I see the light and for me it is cold electricity and interaction with ether and geometry. Nothing serious yet (no OU) but I want to find all possible methods  Like capacitors charge by shorting coils - still do not understand it completly, but being here I have to push north side ,right ?   

The shorting coil works like this.  Imagine the coil open, no switch, well, no current either as the magnet passes. But if you short the coil, current flows, flywheel gets going, release the switch and gather while you can.  Its not an ideal flywheel as we might think, but it does have stored energy that will go away if you dont catch it unlike a capacitor.  =]

Mags

Information relevant to the above 2 pics:  "Figures 3-36 and 3-37 both represent practical, workable saturable-core reactors. Circuits similar to
these are actually used to control lighting in auditoriums or electric industrial furnaces. These circuits are
sometimes referred to as magnetic amplifiers, but that is NOT technically correct. A magnetic amplifier
differs from a saturable-core reactor in one important aspect: A magnetic amplifier has a rectifier in
addition to a saturable-core reactor.
Q-42.
If the permeability of the core of a coil increases, what happens to (a) inductance and (b) true
power in the circuit?
Q-43.
What happens to the permeability of an iron core as the current increases from the operating
point to a large value?
Q-44.
If two coils are wound on a single iron core, what will a change in current in one coil cause in
the other coil?
Q-45.
What symbol in figure 3-33 indicates a saturable core connecting two windings?
SIMPLIFIED MAGNETIC AMPLIFIER CIRCUITRY
If the saturable-core reactor works, why do we need to add a rectifier to produce a magnetic
amplifier? To answer this question, recall that in NEETS, Module 2—Introduction to Alternating Current
and Transformers, you were told about hysteresis loss. Hysteresis loss occurs because the a.c. applied to a
coil causes the tiny molecular magnets (or electron-spin directions) to realign as the polarity of the a.c.
changes. This realignment uses up power. The power that is used for realignment is a loss as far as the
rest of the circuit is concerned. Because of this hysteresis loss in the saturable-core reactor, the power
gain is relatively low. A rectifier added to the load circuit will eliminate the hysteresis loss and increase
the gain. This is because the rectifier allows current to flow in only one direction through the load coils."

Here forest
http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/magnetic%20amplifiers.pdf
 Not sure where they got the copy from I even cosidered not mentioning it due to the website name.

So if I reveal the secret will you reveal everything ? 

First I'll admit I have not read this entire thread but only the first couple and last couple pages.  But a lot of things seem to point to this concept.  The magnetic amplifier circuit which is simple but fell out of use when solid state components became popular.

Oh well. this scheme is other way but this is different than mine and you just added some juice in my brain. hmmmm i think its time to scrutinize this one. thanks bro.   

 I admit, i'm learning more 

Well ok, here is what i'm doing currently.
I am redirecting the input and the effect of that input into the source, and so the effect is self recharging. take note this is just one of my latest scruitinizing. 

and i think i can add up what you taught above thanks